Search

Objectives: Despite living-donor liver transplant being a life-saving therapy for patients with hepatitis B virus with or without hepatocellular carcinoma, outcomes for patients with these diseases are worse. Hepatitis B virus recurrence or relapse of hepatocellular carcinoma can result in subsequent graft loss or patient death. In this study, we discuss the postoperative outcomes of patients with hepatitis B virus infection after living-donor liver transplant., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with hepatitis B virus-related end-stage liver disease, comparing results with 1228 control patients who had other pathologies, including hepatitis C virus, combined hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, and neither virus., Results: Survival rates of patients with hepatitis B virus did not differ from the control groups (P > .05). Patients with concurrent hepatitis B virus and hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly older (P < .0001), had critical status (P < .0001), had chronic underlying pathology (P = .001), lower graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (P = .047), needed more intraoperative plasma transfusion, and experienced more rejection episodes than those without hepatocellular carcinoma. Of interest, in 5 patients who had hepatitis B virus recurrence after living-donor liver transplant, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was significantly higher than those who did not have recurrence (P = .015). In addition, 2 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in the form of peritoneal metastasis, with both patients having high preoperative alpha-fetoprotein levels., Conclusions: Our study provides details on long-term outcomes of patients with hepatitis B virus infection who had undergone living-donor liver transplant. Based on our results, we suggest that prolonged antiviral prophylactic therapy in the form of hepatitis B immunoglobulin with either lamivudine or entecavir be considered for patients who associated with risk factors to prevent postoperative recurrence.

Objectives: The outcome of children who had living-donor liver transplant was analyzed according to their status before transplant, and we analyzed the outcome of critically ill patients., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of children who received primary living-donor liver transplant at Kyoto University Hospital. According to the criteria of the United Network for Organ Sharing, we divided patients into 3 groups: Group A patients had been admitted to the intensive care unit before living-donor liver transplant; Group B patients were hospitalized but did not require intensive care unit stay; and Group C patients were living at home and underwent elective transplant., Results: A total 685 patients met inclusion criteria. Children in Group A were younger than Group B and received liver grafts from younger donors than Group B and C. Group A patients had marked impairment in liver and renal function and coagulation profile and needed higher volumes of fresh frozen plasma transfusions. Group A patients had significantly worse outcomes and early patient death than the other group; Group A patient survival was 68.3%, 63.2%, 60.1%, and 56.1% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after living-donor liver transplant (P < .0001). Group A had worse graft survival than other groups (P < .0001), and Group A graft survival was 68.3%, 65.9%, 54.1%, and 49.9% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years. Low gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase was an independent risk factor for patient death in Group A (hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.007) (P < .05). Group A patients had a higher rate of multidrug-resistant hospital-acquired infections., Conclusions: Children who were admitted to the intensive care unit prior to living-donor liver transplant had marked impairment of pretransplant laboratory parameters and worse outcome than other groups.