Search

Highlights: [•] Startle was potentiated during unpleasant pictures and attenuated during pleasant pictures. [•] Threat-of-shock potentiated startle during all picture types. [•] Threat-of-shock did not change affective modulation of startle. [•] High trait anxiety related to less startle potentiation during unpleasant pictures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the present study, the startle reflex was examined with respect to the degree of anger displayed in facial expressions. To this end, 52 participants viewed faces that were morphed to display 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100% anger. As the percentage of anger in faces increased from 0 to 100%, faces were perceived as increasingly angry; however, relative to neutral facial expressions, startle amplitude was only potentiated to maximally angry faces. These data imply a non-linear relationship between the intensity of angry faces and defensive physiological activity. This pattern of startle modulation suggests a categorical distinction between threatening (100% anger) and other facial expressions presented. These results are further discussed in terms of existing data, and how this paradigm might be utilized in psychopathology research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: The present study examined the time-course of automatic and controlled modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) during emotional picture viewing. Methods: Participants (N =32) viewed neutral and unpleasant stimuli for 6000ms; at 3000ms, one of two tones signaled participants to attend either to a more or less arousing portion of the picture. The time-course of the LPP was examined both during the passive viewing and directed attention portions of the trial using the method proposed by Guthrie and Buchwald [Guthrie D, Buchwald JS. Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology 1991;28(2):240–4]. Results: During passive viewing, the LPP became reliably larger following the presentation of unpleasant pictures from 160ms onward; the magnitude of the LPP became reliably smaller beginning 620ms after participants were instructed to attend to the less arousing aspects of unpleasant pictures – and this difference was maintained throughout the duration of the trial. Conclusions: The LPP reflects relatively automatic attention to emotional visual stimuli, but is also sensitive to manipulations of directed attention toward arousing versus neutral aspects of such stimuli. Significance: These results shed further light on the time-course of emotional and cognitive modulation of the LPP, and suggest that the LPP reflects the relatively rapid and dynamic allocation of increased attention to emotional stimuli. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The late positive potential (LPP) is larger for emotional than neutral stimuli, and reflects increased attention to motivationally salient stimuli. Recent studies have shown that the LPP can also be modulated by stimulus meaning and task relevance. The present studies sought to determine whether the magnitude of the LPP can be manipulated by directing attention to more or less arousing aspects within an emotional stimulus. To this end, trials included a passive viewing and directed attention portion. In both Studies 1 and 2, unpleasant compared to neutral images were associated with an increased LPP during passive viewing; additionally, directing attention to non-arousing compared to highly arousing areas of unpleasant images resulted in a decreased LPP. Results are discussed in terms of the utility of using the LPP to understand emotion–cognition interactions, especially with regard to directed visual attention as an emotion regulation strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The late positive potential (LPP) is an event-related potential that is enhanced when viewing arousing (pleasant and unpleasant) pictures compared to neutral pictures. The affective modulation of the LPP is believed to reflect the increased attention to, and perceptual processing of, emotional stimuli. The present study examined whether concurrent task difficulty (performing mathematics) would modulate the LPP while participants viewed emotionally arousing stimuli. Results indicated that the LPP was larger following pleasant and unpleasant stimuli than it was following neutral stimuli; moreover, the magnitude of this increase was not influenced by concurrent task difficulty. This finding suggests that the affective modulation of neural activity during picture viewing is relatively automatic and is insusceptible to competing task demands. Results are further discussed in terms of the LPP's role in motivated attention and implications for research on emotion regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]