Search

Objectives: To analyse and compare the ability of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocytes to differentiate true bacteraemia from contaminated blood cultures in patients seen in the emergency department (ED) for an episode of infectious disease., Methods: Observational, retrospective and descriptive analytical study of all blood cultures with positive growth extracted in an ED in adult patients (≥18 years) during 2016 and 2017. The follow-up was carried out over a 30-day period to calculate the predictive power and the prognostic performance for true bacteraemia., Results: A total of 266 blood cultures with positive growth were included in the study. Out of these, 154 (57.9%) were considered true bacteraemia and 112 (42.1%) were considered to be contaminated blood cultures. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) for PCT to predict true bacteraemia was 0.983 (95% CI: 0.972-0.994; P<0.001) and, considering a cut-off value of≥0.43 ng/ml, PCT achieved 94% sensitivity, 91% specificity, positive predictive value of 94%, and negative predictive value of 92%. The AUC-ROC obtained for CRP was 0.639 (95% CI: 0.572-0.707, P<.001), for leukocytes of 0.693 (95% CI: 0.630-0.756, P<.001) and for immature leukocytes (>10% bands) of 0.614 (95% CI: 0.547-0.682, P<.001). The mean values for PCT were 3.44 (SD 6.30) ng/ml in true bacteraemia vs. 0.16 (SD 0.18) ng/ml in contaminated blood cultures (P<.001)., Conclusions: In blood cultures with positive growth extracted in an ED, PCT achieves the best prognostic performance of true bacteraemia vs. contaminated blood cultures, better than CRP and leukocytes., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.)