Search

Point-of-care laboratory testing (POCT) is associated with a reduced time to testing results and critical decision making within emergency departments. POCT is an essential clinical assessment tool because laboratory data are used to support timely critical decisions regarding acute medical conditions onditions ; however, there is currently limited research to support the use of POCT in the critical care transport environment. Few studies have evaluated the changes in patient care that occur after POCT during critical care transport. This study aims to contribute to the limited data available correlating prehospital POCT and changes in patient care.After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of patients transported by a critical care transport team between October 1, 2013 and September 31, 2015 was completed. During the study period, 11,454 patients were transported, and 632 (5.51%) received POCT testing.Patient care changes were noted in 244 (38.6%) patient tests. The most frequent patient care alterations were ventilator settings (10.9%), electrolyte changes (10.4%), and unit bed upgrades (7.1%). POCT most frequently altered care for patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome (64.7%), sepsis/septic shock (61.8%), diabetic ketoacidosis (54.5%), or pneumonia (49.3%).Patient care alterations occurred in 38.6% of patients undergoing POCT. Patient care was most frequently changed when patients were diagnosed with post-arrest, sepsis/septic shock, diabetic ketoacidosis, and pneumonia.

Objective Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is often required in managing critically ill patients in the prehospital setting. Although etomidate is a commonly used induction agent for RSI, ketamine has gained new interest in prehospital management with reported neutral hemodynamic effects. Limited data exist to support ketamine as an alternative to etomidate, particularly in the prehospital setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hemodynamic changes after the administration of ketamine versus etomidate in prehospital RSI. Methods This retrospective study evaluated adult patients undergoing prehospital RSI over 13 months within a regional emergency transport medicine service. Hypotension was defined as a 20% decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 15 minutes of receiving ketamine or etomidate. Hemodynamic data were collected 15 minutes before and 15 minutes after administration or until additional sedative medications were given. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (Version 21; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY), with P Results One hundred thirteen patients met the inclusion criteria (ketamine, n = 33; etomidate, n = 80), with the primary reasons for intubation being respiratory failure and trauma. There was no difference between the incidence of patients who experienced a 20% decrease in SBP (16% etomidate vs. 18% ketamine, P = .79). There were no significant differences in SBP pre- to postadministration between ketamine and etomidate. Conclusion No hemodynamic differences occurred between patients who received ketamine versus etomidate for prehospital RSI. Neither drug was associated with an increased need for additional sedatives, and neither drug was associated with an increased first-pass intubation success rate. Larger, prospective, powered studies are required to identify patients who may benefit from either ketamine or etomidate.

Our medical center's regional helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) serves southeastern North Carolina. Judicious HEMS use is vital to ensure that the resource is available for critically injured patients and to reduce morbidity and mortality by providing timely access to definitive care. We reviewed HEMS use, clinical outcomes, and overtriage rates. The data included airlifted trauma patients from January 2004 to December 2012. Of 1210 total patients, 733 were flown directly from the scene (FS) and 477 from referring hospitals (FH). The HEMS catchment area was a 100-mile radius of our trauma center. FS patients were younger and sustained more motor vehicle collisions. FH patients were older and sustained more falls. FS patients required more hospital resources including longer ventilator requirements, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay. For all HEMS patients, there was 92.2 per cent blunt injury, 47.5 per cent required Trauma I or II activation, 31 per cent required mechanical ventilation, and 50 per cent required ICU care. 59.5 per cent of HEMS trauma patients were critically injured (defined as requiring either immediate surgical intervention, immediate ICU admission, or immediate death). The overtriage rate was 1.8 per cent. The emergency department mortality rate was 2.3 per cent and the ultimate mortality rate was 7.5 per cent. Most of the airlifted trauma patients were critically injured, and therefore, HEMS transport was appropriate. However, overtriage was low, suggesting high incidence of undertriage. There should be a lower threshold for HEMS use for trauma patients in our region. More research is needed to determine ideal overtriage and undertriage rates.