Search

Introduction: Tactical teams are at high risk of sustaining injuries. Caring for these casualties in the field involves unique requirements beyond what is provided by traditional civilian emergency medical services (EMS) systems. Despite this need, the training objectives and competencies are not uniformly agreed to or taught., Methods: An expert panel was convened that included members from the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as federal, state, and local law-enforcement officers who were recruited through requests to stakeholder agencies and open invitations to individuals involved in Tactical Emergency Medical Services (TEMS) or its oversight. Two face-to-face meetings took place. Using a modified Delphi technique, previously published TEMS competencies were reviewed and updated., Results: The original 17 competency domains were modified and the most significant changes were the addition of Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC), Tactical Familiarization, Legal Aspects of TEMS, and Mass Casualty Triage to the competency domains. Additionally, enabling and terminal learning objectives were developed for each competency domain., Conclusion: This project has developed a minimum set of medical competencies and learning objectives for both tactical medical providers and operators. This work should serve as a platform for ensuring minimum knowledge among providers, which will serve enhance team interoperability and improve the health and safety of tactical teams and the public., (2014.)

Introduction: Paramedics often encounter patients with difficult airways requiring emergent airway management., Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare intubation utilizing the Airtraq with direct laryngoscopy (DL) in the manikin model. We evaluated the number of attempts, the time to successful intubation, and the Airtraq's learning curve., Methods: This was a randomized, crossover study involving paramedics. Each participant was given a standardized lecture and a demonstration of the Airtraq device. After a 5-minute practice session on a Laerdal Airway Management Trainer with the Airtraq and DL, participants managed the following four scenarios on a Laerdal SimMan manikin: 1) normal airway; 2) tongue edema; 3) cervical spine immobilization; and 4) repeated normal airway. Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test., Results: Thirty paramedics participated in this study. For scenario 1, there were no significant differences in either the number of attempts or the time to ventilation between the devices. For scenario 2, the mean time to ventilation was significantly faster, and fewer intubation attempts were observed with the Airtraq when compared with DL. For scenario 3, there were no significant differences in number of attempts and time to ventilation. Scenario 4 demonstrated significantly less time to ventilation and fewer intubation attempts with the Airtraq. A significant decrease in time to ventilation was observed with the Airtraq when comparing scenarios 1 and 4., Conclusions: The Airtraq was shown to be equal to or faster than DL. The Airtraq has a rapid learning curve demonstrated by a significantly decreased time to ventilation between scenarios 1 and 4.