Search

Abstract: Previous electroencephalographic (EEG) evidence has shown event-related desynchronization (ERD) of alpha rhythms before predictable painful stimuli, as a possible neural concomitant of attentional preparatory processes (Babiloni, C., Brancucci, A., Babiloni, F., Capotosto, P., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Chen, A.C., Rossini, P.M., 2003. Anticipatory cortical responses during the expectancy of a predictable painful stimulation. A high-resolution electroencephalography study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18 (6) 1692–700). This study tested the hypothesis that alpha ERD before predictable painful stimuli is reduced as an effect of distraction. A visual warning stimulus preceded a laser painful stimulation, which was strictly followed by visual imperative stimuli. In the Pain (control) condition, no task was required after the imperative stimuli. In the Pain + Movement condition, subjects had to perform a movement of the right index finger. In the Pain + Cognition condition, they had to mentally perform an arithmetical task. EEG data were recorded in 10 subjects from 30 electrodes. Artifact-free recordings were spatially enhanced by surface Laplacian transformation. Alpha ERD was computed at three alpha sub-bands according to subjects'' individual alpha frequency peak (i.e., about 6–8 Hz, 8–10 Hz, 10–12 Hz). Compared to the control condition, the subjects reported a significantly lower stimulus intensity perception and unpleasantness in the Pain + Movement and Pain + Cognition conditions. In addition, there was a cancellation of the alpha 3 ERD (i.e., about 10–12 Hz) in Pain + Cognition condition and even a generation of a statistically significant alpha 3 ERS in Pain + Movement condition. These effects were maximum over fronto-central midline. These results suggest that distraction during the expectancy of pain is related to a reduced neural desynchronization of fronto-central midline alpha rhythms (i.e., reduced cortical activation) towards an overt hyper-synchronization (cortical idling). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This study aimed to evaluate whether painful cutaneous stimuli can affect specifically the excitability of the arm proximal muscle motor area. The motor evoked potentials (MEPs), recorded from the right biceps brachii muscle after either transcranial magnetic or electrical anodal stimulation of the left primary motor (MI) cortex, were conditioned by painful CO2 laser stimuli delivered either on the right hand dorsum or on the lateral surface of the right arm. Painful CO2 laser stimuli delivered on the hand skin reduced significantly the amplitude of MEPs evoked by the transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral MI area, while the MEP amplitude was not significantly modified by CO2 laser pulses delivered on the arm skin. The inhibitory effect followed the arrival of the nociceptive inputs to the cerebral cortex. The amplitude of MEPs evoked by anodal electrical stimulation of the motor cortex was not decreased by conditioning painful stimuli delivered on the hand dorsum. Since the magnetic stimulation led to transynaptic activation of pyramidal neurons, while the anodal stimulation activated directly corticospinal axons, our findings suggest that CO2 laser pulses delivered on the hand are able to inhibit the arm proximal muscle motor area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: It is well known that scalp potentials evoked by nonpainful visual and auditory stimuli are enhanced in amplitude when preceded by pre-stimulus low-amplitude alpha rhythms. This study tested the hypothesis that the same holds for the amplitude of vertex N2–P2 potentials evoked by brief noxious laser stimuli, an issue of interest for clinical perspective. EEG data were recorded in 10 subjects from 30 electrodes during laser noxious stimulation. The artifact-free vertex N2–P2 complex was spatially enhanced by surface Laplacian transformation. Pre-stimulus alpha power was computed at three alpha sub-bands according to subject''s individual alpha frequency peak (i.e. about 6–8Hz for alpha 1, 8–10Hz for alpha 2 and 10–12Hz for alpha 3 sub-band). Individual EEG single trials were divided in two sub-groups. The strong-alpha sub-group (high band power) included halfway of all EEG single trials, namely those having the highest pre-stimulus alpha power. Weak-alpha sub-group (low band power) included the remaining trials. Averaging procedure provided laser evoked potentials for both trial sub-groups. No significant effect was found for alpha 1 and alpha 2 sub-bands. Conversely, compared to strong-alpha 3 sub-group, weak-alpha 3 sub-group showed vertex N2–P2 potentials having significantly higher amplitude (p <0.05). These results extend to the later phases of pain processing systems the notion that generation mechanisms of pre-stimulus alpha rhythms and (laser) evoked potentials are intrinsically related and subjected to fluctuating “noise”. That “noise” could explain the trial-by-trial variability of laser evoked potentials and perception. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Our study aimed at investigating the nociceptive contribution to the somatosensory evoked potentials after electrical intramuscular stimulation (mSEPs) at painful intensity. Scalp mSEPs were recorded in 10 healthy subjects after electrical stimulation of the left brachioradialis muscle at three intensities: non-painful (I2), slightly painful (I4) and moderately painful (I6). For each intensity, mSEPs were recorded in a neutral condition (NC) in which subjects did not have any task, and in an attention condition (AC) in which subjects were asked to count the number of stimuli. In both NC and AC, the N120 and P220 amplitudes were significantly higher at I6 than at I2. While the N120 amplitude did not vary between NC and AC, the P220 amplitude was significantly higher in AC than in NC at all stimulus intensities. Our results suggest that nociceptive inputs contribute to the N120 amplitude increase at painful stimulus intensity, while the P220 amplitude is more sensitive to changes of subjects’ attention level. Therefore, the N120 amplitude increase to moderately painful stimuli, as compared to non-painful stimuli, may represent a marker of the activation of the muscular thin myelinated afferents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]