Search

Background: The subject of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represents a vast and still mainly undiscovered land, but perhaps the most interesting part of BCIs is trying to understand the information exchange and coding in the brain itself. According to some recent reports, the phase characteristics of the signals play an important role in the information transfer and coding. The mechanism of phase shifts, regarding the information processing, is also known as the phase coding of information., Objective: The authors would like to show that electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, measured during the performance of different gripping-force control tasks, carry enough information for the successful prediction of the gripping force, as applied by the subjects, when using a methodology based on the phase demodulation of EEG data. Since the presented methodology is non-invasive it could be used as an alternative approach for the development of BCIs., Materials and Methods: In order to predict the gripping force from the EEG signals we used a methodology that uses subsequent signal processing methods: simplistic filtering methods, for extracting the appropriate brain rhythm; principal component analysis, for achieving the linear independence and detecting the source of the signal; and the phase-demodulation method, for extracting the phase-coded information about the gripping force. A fuzzy inference system is then used to predict the gripping force from the processed EEG data., Results: The proposed methodology has clearly demonstrated that EEG signals carry enough information for a successful prediction of the subject's performance. Moreover, a cross-validation showed that information about the gripping force is encoded in a very similar way between the subjects tested. As for the development of BCIs, considering the computational time to pre-process the data and train the fuzzy model, a real-time online analysis would be possible if the real-time non-causal limitations of the methodology could be overcome., Conclusion: The study has shown that phase coding in the human brain is a possible mechanism for information coding or transfer during visuo-motor tasks, while the phase-coded content about the gripping forces can be successfully extracted using the phase-demodulation approach. Since the methodology has proven to be appropriate for the case of this study it could also be used as an alternative approach for the development of BCIs for similar tasks.

Numerous reports have shown that performing working-memory tasks causes an elevated rhythmic coupling in different areas of the brain; it has been suggested that this indicates information exchange. Since the information exchanged is encoded in brain waves and measurable by electroencephalography (EEG) it is reasonable to assume that it can be extracted with an appropriate method. In our study we made an attempt to extract the information using an artificial neural network (ANN), which can be considered as a stimulus-response model with a state observer. The EEG was recorded from three subjects while they performed a modified Sternberg task that required them to respond to each task with the answer "true" or "false". The study revealed that a stimulus-response model can successfully be identified by observing phase-demodulated theta-band EEG signals 1 s prior to a subject's answer. The results also showed that it was possible to predict the answers from the EEG signals with an average reliability of 75% for all the subjects. From this we concluded that it is possible to observe the system states and thus predict the correct answer using the EEG signals as inputs.

In this paper we investigate the fuzzy identification of brain-code during simple gripping-force control tasks. Since the synchronized oscillatory activity and the phase dynamics between the brain areas are two important mechanisms in the brain's function and information transfer, we decided to examine whether it is possible to extract the encoded information from the EEG signals using the phase-demodulation approach. The EEG was measured during the performance of different visuomotor tasks and the information we were trying to decode was the gripping force as applied by the subjects. The study revealed that it is possible, by using simple beta-rhythm filtering, phase demodulation, principal component analysis and a fuzzy model, to estimate the gripping-force response by using EEG signals as the inputs for the proposed model. The presented study has shown that even though EEG signals represent a superposition of all the active neurons, it is still possible to decode some information about the current activity of the brain centers. Furthermore, the cross-validation showed that the information about the gripping force is encoded in a very similar way for all the examined subjects. Thus, the phase shifts of the EEG signals seem to have a key role during activity and information transfer in the brain, while the phase-demodulation method proved to be a crucial step in the signal processing.

Current experimental methods for the study of reaching in the MRI environment do not exactly mimic actual reaching, due to constrains in movement which are imposed by the MRI machine itself. We tested a haptic robot (HR) as such a tool. Positive results would also be promising for combined use of fMRI and EEG to study reaching. Twenty right-handed subjects performed reaching tasks with their right hand with and without the HR. Reaction time, movement time (MT), accuracy, event-related potentials (ERPs) and event-related desynchronisation/synchronisation (ERD/ERS) were studied. Reaction times and accuracies did not differ significantly between the two tasks, while the MT was significantly longer in HR reaching (959 vs. 447 ms). We identified two positive and two negative ERP peaks across all leads in both tasks. The latencies of the P1 and N2 peaks were significantly longer in HR reaching, while there were no significant differences in the P3 and N4 latencies. ERD/ERS topographies were similar between tasks and similar to other reaching studies. Main difference was in ERS rebound which was observed only in actual reaching. Probable reason was significantly larger MT. We found that reaching with the HR engages similar neural structures as in actual reaching. Although there are some constrains, its use may be superior to other techniques used for reaching studies in the MRI environment, where freedom of movement is limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]