Search

The primary goal of this study was to evaluate physiological spatial excitation patterns for stimulation of adjacent physical electrodes and intermediate virtual channels. Two experiments were conducted that utilized electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) spread-of-excitation (SOE) functions obtained with the traditional forward-masking subtraction method. These two experiments examined spatial excitation patterns for virtual-channel maskers and probes, respectively. In Experiment 1, ECAP SOE patterns were obtained for maskers applied to physical electrodes and virtual channels to determine whether virtual-channel maskers yield SOE patterns similar to those predicted from physical electrodes. In Experiment 2, spatial separation of SOE functions was compared for two adjacent physical probe electrodes and the intermediate virtual channel to determine the extent to which ECAP SOE patterns for virtual-channel probes are spatially separate from those obtained with physical electrodes. Data were obtained for three electrode regions (basal, middle, apical) for 35 ears implanted with Cochlear (N = 16) or Advanced Bionics (N = 19) devices. Results from Experiment 1 showed no significant difference between predicted and measured ECAP amplitudes for Advanced Bionics subjects. Measured ECAP amplitudes for virtual-channel maskers were significantly larger than the predicted amplitudes for Cochlear subjects; however, the difference was <2 μV and thus is likely not clinically significant. Results from Experiment 2 showed that the probe set in the apical region demonstrated the least amount of spatial separation amongst SOE functions, which may be attributed to more uniform nerve survival patterns, closer electrode spacing, and/or the tapered geometry of the cochlea. As expected, adjacent physical probes demonstrated greater spatial separation than for comparisons between each physical probe and the intermediate virtual channel. Finally, the virtual-channel SOE functions were generally weighted toward the basal electrode in the pair., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading, symmetrical, biphasic cur- rent pulses, despite a growing body of evidence that suggests anodic-leading pulses may be more effective at stimulating the auditory system. However, since much of this research on humans has used pseudomonophasic pulses or biphasic pulses with unusually long interphase gaps, the effects of stimulus polarity are unclear for clinically relevant (i.e., symmetric biphasic) stimuli. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of stimulus polarity on basic characteristics of physiological spread-of-excitation (SOE) measures obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in CI recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. Research Design: Using a within-subjects (repeated measures) design, we examined the differences in mean amplitude, peak electrode location, area under the curve, and spatial separation between SOE curves obtained with anodic- and cathodic-leading symmetrical, biphasic pulses. Study Sample: Fifteen CI recipients (ages 13--77) participated in this study. All were users of Cochlear Ltd. devices. Data Collection and Analysis: SOE functions were obtained using the standard forward-masking artifact reduction method. Probe electrodes were 5--18, and they were stimulated at an 8 (of 10) loudness rating (''loud''). Outcome measures (mean amplitude, peak electrode location, curve area, and spatial separation) for each polarity were compared within subjects. Results: Anodic-leading current pulses produced ECAPs with larger average amplitudes, greater curve area, and less spatial separation between SOE patterns compared with that for cathodic-leading pulses. There was no effect of polarity on peak electrode location. Conclusions: These results indicate that for equal current levels, the anodic-leading polarity produces broader excitation patterns compared with cathodic-leading pulses, which reduces the spatial separation between functions. This result is likely due to preferential stimulation of the central axon. Further research is needed to determine whether SOE patterns obtained with anodic-leading pulses better predict pitch discrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined channel interactions using interleaved pulse trains to assess masking and potential facilitative effects in cochlear-implant recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. Psychophysical thresholds were measured for two adjacent mid-array electrodes; one served as the masker and the other as the probe. Two rates representative of those found in present-day strategies were tested: 1700 and 3400 pulses per second per channel. Four masker levels ranging from subthreshold to loud-but-comfortable were tested. It was hypothesized that low-level maskers would produce facilitative effects, shifting to masking effects at high levels, and that faster rates would yield smaller masking effects due to greater stochastic neural firing patterns. Twenty-nine ears with Cochlear or Advanced Bionics devices were tested. High-level maskers produced more masking than low-level maskers, as expected. Facilitation was not observed for sub-threshold or thresholdlevel maskers in most cases. High masker levels yielded reduced probe thresholds for two Advanced Bionics subjects. This was partly eliminated with a longer temporal offset between each masker-probe pulse pair, as was used with Cochlear subjects. These findings support the use of temporal gaps between stimulation of subsequent electrodes to reduce channel interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first objective of this study was to determine whether adaptive pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination tasks with cochlear-implant (CI) recipients produce similar results for perceiving intermediate "virtual-channel" pitch percepts using current steering. Previous studies have not examined both behavioral tasks in the same subjects with current steering. A second objective was to determine whether a physiological metric of spatial separation using the electrically evoked compound action potential spread-of-excitation (ECAP SOE) function could predict performance in the behavioral tasks. The metric was the separation index (∑), defined as the difference in normalized amplitudes between two adjacent ECAP SOE functions, summed across all masker electrodes. Eleven CII or 90K Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) recipients were tested using pairs of electrodes from the basal, middle, and apical portions of the electrode array. The behavioral results, expressed as d', showed no significant differences across tasks. There was also no significant effect of electrode region for either task. ECAP ∑ was not significantly correlated with pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for any of the electrode regions. Therefore, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict perceptual resolution of virtual channels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study compared pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) spatial excitation patterns for adjacent physical electrodes (PEs) and the corresponding dual electrodes (DEs) for newer-generation Cochlear devices (Cochlear Ltd., Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia). The first goal was to determine whether pitch ranking and electrode discrimination yield similar outcomes for PEs and DEs. The second goal was to determine if the amount of spatial separation among ECAP excitation patterns (separation index, Σ) between adjacent PEs and the PE-DE pairs can predict performance on the psychophysical tasks. Using non-adaptive procedures, 13 subjects completed pitch ranking and electrode discrimination for adjacent PEs and the corresponding PE-DE pairs (DE versus each flanking PE) from the basal, middle, and apical electrode regions. Analysis of d' scores indicated that pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination scores were not significantly different, but rather produced similar levels of performance. As expected, accuracy was significantly better for the PE-PE comparison than either PE-DE comparison. Correlations of the psychophysical versus ECAP Σ measures were positive; however, not all test/region correlations were significant across the array. Thus, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict performance on behavioral tasks of pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for adjacent PEs or corresponding DEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) can be used to predict psychophysical electrical-field interaction patterns obtained with simultaneous stimulation of intracochlear electrodes. The second goal was to determine whether ECAP patterns are affected by recording location because differences might influence the relation between ECAP and psychophysical measures. The third goal was to investigate whether symmetrical threshold shifts are produced with phase inversion of the interaction stimulus. Nine adults with Advanced Bionics cochlear implants participated. ECAP and psychophysical thresholds were obtained for basal, middle, and apical probe electrodes in the presence of a subthreshold interaction stimulus delivered simultaneously to each of seven to eight interaction electrodes per probe. The results showed highly significant correlations between ECAP and psychophysical threshold shifts for all nine subjects, which suggests that the ECAP can adequately predict psychophysical electrical-field interaction patterns for subthreshold stimuli. ECAP thresholds were significantly higher for recordings from the basal (versus apical) side of the probe, which suggests that recording location may affect relations between ECAP and psychophysical measures. Interaction stimulus phase inversion generally produced symmetrical threshold shifts for psychophysical measures but not for half of ECAP measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spatial excitation patterns in cochlear implant users can be measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). This study examined whether the relative separation of ECAP excitation patterns for two electrodes was correlated with the ability to discriminate those electrodes on the basis of pitch. Significant correlations were found for nine of the ten subjects. Electrodes with significant relative overlap of ECAP spatial excitation patterns were generally more difficult to distinguish on the basis of pitch. Pitch-ranking ability and overlap of ECAP patterns were both affected by the relative separation between electrodes in each pair. With increased separation between electrodes, pitch ranking improved significantly, and ECAP spatial excitation patterns showed significantly less overlap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary goal of this study was to examine electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction, electrode pitch discrimination ability using a pitch-ranking task, and behavioral threshold levels in individuals implanted with a straight electrode array versus a perimodiolar array. It was hypothesized that perimodiolar arrays should yield lower thresholds, less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), and better electrode pitch-ranking ability. Results from ten adult Nucleus 24 recipients (N=5 straight array, N=5 perimodiolar Contour array) showed no significant difference in threshold between the two electrode designs; however, there was significantly better electrode pitch-ranking ability and less channel interaction as measured with the ECAP for perimodiolar electrodes. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between behavioral threshold and width of the ECAP interaction function for Contour group data. There was no significant correlation between behavioral threshold and electrode pitch-ranking ability. These data suggest that electrode design and/or perimodiolar position may reduce physiologic channel interaction in the cochlea and improve electrode pitch discrimination ability; however, this positive finding did not translate into significantly better speech perception ability for Contour subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary goal of this study was to examine the relation between electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction and the ability to discriminate pitch between electrodes in a psychophysical pitch-ranking task. It was hypothesized that cochlear implant recipients should perform better on an electrode pitch-ranking task when using electrodes with less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). The width of the ECAP channel interaction function was compared with the slope of the pitch-ranking function for 10 adult Nucleus 24 recipients. Results showed no significant correlation between electrode pitch-ranking ability and width of the ECAP channel interaction function for individual subjects or for group data. Additionally, there was no significant correlation between speech perception performance and either pitch-ranking ability or width of the ECAP channel interaction function. These results suggest that the width of the ECAP interaction function may not be an accurate predictor of the ability to discriminate between electrodes on the basis of pitch. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]