Search

Background: Possible mechanisms of left-axis deviation (LAD) in the setting of left bundle branch block (LBBB) include differences in cardiac electrophysiology, structure, or anatomic axis., Objective: The purpose of this study was to clarify the mechanism(s) responsible for LAD in patients with LBBB., Methods: Twenty-nine patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies and LBBB underwent noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi), cardiac computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in order to define ventricular electrical activation, characterize cardiac structure, and determine the cardiac anatomic axis., Results: Sixteen patients had a normal QRS axis (NA) (mean axis 8° ± 23°), whereas 13 patients had LAD (mean axis -48° ± 13°; P <.001). Total activation times were longer in the LAD group (112 ± 25 ms vs 91 ± 14 ms; P = .01) due to delayed activation of the basal anterolateral region (107 ± 10 ms vs 81 ± 17 ms; P <.001). Left ventricular (LV) activation in patients with LAD was from apex to base, in contrast to a circumferential pattern of activation in patients with NA. Apex-to-base delay was longer in the LA group (95 ± 13 ms vs 64 ± 21 ms; P <.001) and correlated with QRS frontal axis (R 2 = 0.67; P <.001). Both groups were comparable with regard to LV end-diastolic volume (295 ± 84 mL vs LAD 310 ± 91 mL; P = .69), LV mass (177 ± 33 g vs LAD 180 ± 37 g; P = .83), and anatomic axis., Conclusion: LAD in LBBB appears to be due to electrophysiological abnormalities rather than structural factors or cardiac anatomic axis., (Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We aimed to assess the novel concept of using the paced PR interval (PRI) on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) to prove trans-isthmus block after cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical atrial flutter (AFl)., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with AFl underwent linear radiofrequency ablation of the inferior CTI (6 o'clock). After AFl termination and/or presumed completion of the CTI line, CTI block was proven by atrial pacing by the ablation catheter medial (5 o'clock) and lateral to the line (7 and 9 o'clock). Corresponding PRIs were measured on the surface ECG. CTI block was assumed, if a sudden increase in the PRI was observed by moving the pacing site from 5 to 7 o'clock, and if the latter was longer than at 9 o'clock. Afterwards, bidirectional CTI block was confirmed by differential pacing. Thirty-one patients (mean age 67 ± 16 years, 81% male) underwent CTI ablation, and 18/31 (58%) were in AFl at the time of ablation (cycle length 249 ± 31 ms). Successful CTI block as defined by the PRI method was achieved in 31/31 (100%), and the mean PRIs during pacing at 5, 7, and 9 o'clock were 203 ± 56 ms, 329 ± 70 ms, and 296 ± 66 ms, respectively. Cavotricuspid isthmus block was confirmed in all patients (100%) by coronary sinus pacing with a reversal of the local activation sequence lateral to the isthmus line., Conclusion: The method of PRI analysis on the surface ECG to guide CTI ablation is easy to apply and highly accurate in confirming CTI block. This simple technique enables the novel concept of CTI ablation and proof of block with a single catheter., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological pacing. The standard technique based on fluoroscopic approach might be challenging and fluoro consuming. Targeting the His guided exclusively by the electrical signals could enable a precise lead implant, thus reducing fluoroscopy time (FT) and X‐ray dose, desirable both for patients and operators. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety both acutely and at 30 days of the electrogram (EGM)‐guided HBP with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Methods and Results: Between October and December 2018, 41 consecutive patients underwent EGM‐guided HBP. Successful HBP was obtained in 39 (95%) patients, (30 males, 78 ± 10 years). Selective HBP (S‐HBP) was achieved in 23 (59%), nonselective HBP (NS‐HBP) in 16 (41%) patients. The final HBP lead position was reached in 31 (79.4%) patients without fluoroscopy, only guided by electrical signals. In eight patients a minimal fluoroscopy (mean, 8 seconds) has been required. The sheath's cutting and the slack of the lead were routinely performed under fluoroscopy. No difference was observed in FT for HBP lead placement in S‐HBP and NS‐HBP (mean, 8.1 ± 25 vs 7.5 ± 20 seconds, P =.8; median value 0 vs 0 seconds). No differences were observed in FT for the entire procedure, total dose area product and total procedural time in S‐HBP and NS‐HBP. Lead dislodgement occurred in one (2.6%) patient 1 day after the procedure. Conclusions: HBP could be performed safely and efficiently using the EGMs, with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was required during sheath removal and atrial lead placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review: This study aims to summarize the literature on the role of electrocardiography (ECG) in (i) patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), (ii) predicting clinical response after CRT system is implanted, and (iii) optimizing CRT programming. Recent findings: Progress has been made in interpreting ECG beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch (LBBB) morphology to select patients for CRT. We now understand a higher chance of response to CRT in patients with atypical right bundle branch block and lower response rates in subgroups with atypical LBBB. QRS area has emerged as a novel marker to quantify baseline electrical dyssynchrony to improve patient selection. After CRT, the resultant QRS narrowing remains the most validated predictor of long-term favorable outcome. There is increasing awareness of prolonged left ventricular pacing latency hindering the desired response to CRT. There is active interest in using ECG beyond minimizing QRS duration to optimize CRT programming for maximal resynchronization. Novel strategies include fusion of paced and/or conducted wavefronts and minimization of paced QRS area. Summary: ECG remains the ubiquitous method for ventricular electrical mapping in context of CRT. The role of ECG in elucidating baseline electrical dyssynchrony to aptly select patients for this treatment continues to evolve, and ECG is increasingly being evaluated as a reliable endpoint for optimal CRT programming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]