Search

Unlimited access to ECGs using an over-the-counter smartwatch constitutes a real revolution for our discipline, and the application is rapidly expanding to include patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). CIEDs require periodic evaluation and adjustment by healthcare professionals. In addition, implanted patients often present with symptoms that may be related to their PMs or ICDs. An ECG smartwatch could reveal information about device functioning, confirm normal device function, or aid in the case of device troubleshooting. In this review, we delve into the available evidence surrounding smartwatches with ECG registration and their integration into the care of patients with implanted pacemakers and ICDs. We explore safety considerations and the benefits and limitations associated with these wearables, drawing on relevant studies and case series from our own experience. By analyzing the current landscape of this emerging technology, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview that facilitates informed decision-making for both healthcare professionals and patients.

Smartwatches that support the recording of a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) are increasingly being used beyond the wrist, by placement on the ankle and on the chest. However, the reliability of frontal and precordial ECGs other than lead I is unknown. This clinical validation study assessed the reliability of an Apple Watch (AW) to obtain conventional frontal and precordial leads as compared to standard 12-lead ECGs in both subjects without known cardiac anomalies and patients with underlying heart disease. In 200 subjects (67% with ECG anomalies), a standard 12-lead ECG was performed, followed by AW recordings of the standard Einthoven leads (leads I, II, and III) and precordial leads V1, V3, and V6. Seven parameters (P, QRS, ST, and T-wave amplitudes, PR, QRS, and QT intervals) were compared through a Bland-Altman analysis, including the bias, absolute offset, and 95% limits of agreement. AW-ECGs recorded on the wrist but also beyond the wrist had similar durations and amplitudes compared to standard 12-lead ECGs. Significantly greater amplitudes were measured by the AW for R-waves in precordial leads V1, V3, and V6 (+0.094 mV, +0.149 mV, +0.129 mV, respectively, all p < 0.001), indicating a positive bias for the AW. AW can be used to record frontal, and precordial ECG leads, paving the way for broader clinical applications.

Correlating symptoms with arrhythmia in neonates and young children is often difficult because of their sporadic and unpredictable nature. We show that it is possible to register an ECG with a smartwatch in neonates and young children and provide illustrative cases of supraventricular tachycardia and complete atrioventricular block identified with this technology., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Within the span of a few years, watches have functionally morphed from objects that tell time to wearable minicomputers that allow real-time recording of electrocardiograms (ECGs). Considerable information can be deduced from these single lead tracings, and it is now not uncommon to see patients in whom diagnostic tracings of clinically relevant but elusive arrhythmias are captured using a smartwatch. Empowering individuals to record their own ECG tracings in scenarios such as palpitations, syncope, and for risk stratification of sudden death intuitively has considerable potential, but its value remains to be robustly demonstrated. The main objective of this review is to describe the information that can be obtained from smartwatch-based single-lead ECG recordings beyond simply differentiating between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. We also review the strengths and limitations of using these devices in clinical settings and offer potential solutions to address the latter., (Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Possible mechanisms of left-axis deviation (LAD) in the setting of left bundle branch block (LBBB) include differences in cardiac electrophysiology, structure, or anatomic axis., Objective: The purpose of this study was to clarify the mechanism(s) responsible for LAD in patients with LBBB., Methods: Twenty-nine patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies and LBBB underwent noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi), cardiac computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in order to define ventricular electrical activation, characterize cardiac structure, and determine the cardiac anatomic axis., Results: Sixteen patients had a normal QRS axis (NA) (mean axis 8° ± 23°), whereas 13 patients had LAD (mean axis -48° ± 13°; P <.001). Total activation times were longer in the LAD group (112 ± 25 ms vs 91 ± 14 ms; P = .01) due to delayed activation of the basal anterolateral region (107 ± 10 ms vs 81 ± 17 ms; P <.001). Left ventricular (LV) activation in patients with LAD was from apex to base, in contrast to a circumferential pattern of activation in patients with NA. Apex-to-base delay was longer in the LA group (95 ± 13 ms vs 64 ± 21 ms; P <.001) and correlated with QRS frontal axis (R 2 = 0.67; P <.001). Both groups were comparable with regard to LV end-diastolic volume (295 ± 84 mL vs LAD 310 ± 91 mL; P = .69), LV mass (177 ± 33 g vs LAD 180 ± 37 g; P = .83), and anatomic axis., Conclusion: LAD in LBBB appears to be due to electrophysiological abnormalities rather than structural factors or cardiac anatomic axis., (Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming recommends burst antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) up to high rates. The number of bursts is not specified, and treatment by ramps or low-energy shocks is not recommended., Objectives: We investigated the efficacy and safety of progressive therapies for VTs between 150 and 200 beats/min. After 3 failed bursts, we compared 3 ramps vs 3 bursts followed by a low-energy shock vs high-energy shock., Methods: Using remote monitoring, we included monomorphic VT episodes treated with ≥1 burst., Results: A total of 1126 VT episodes were included. A single burst was as likely to terminate VT between 150 and 200 beats/min as VT between 200 and 230 beats/min (63% vs 64%; P=.41), but was more likely to accelerate the latter (3.2% vs 0.25%; P<.01). For VT <200 beats/min, the likelihood of ATP success increased progressively (73% with 2 bursts, 78% with 3 bursts). Three additional bursts further increased VT termination to 89%, similar to the success rate with 3 additional ramps (88%; P=.17). Programming 6 bursts is associated with the probability of acceleration requiring shock of 6.6%. A low-energy first shock was less successful than a high-energy shock (66% vs 86%; P<.01) and more likely to accelerate VT (17% vs 0%; P<.01)., Conclusion: Programming up to 6 burst ATP therapies for VTs 150-200 beats/min can avoid implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in most patients. Ramp ATP after failed bursts were similarly effective. Low-energy shocks are less effective and more arrhythmogenic than high-energy shocks., (Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Activation mapping using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) has recently been used to describe the physiology of different cardiac abnormalities. These descriptions differ from prior invasive studies, and both methods have not been thoroughly confronted in a clinical setting., Objective: The goal of the present study was to provide validation of noninvasive activation mapping in a clinical setting through direct confrontation with invasive epicardial contact measures., Methods: Fifty-nine maps were obtained in 55 patients and aligned on a common geometry. Nearest-neighbor interpolation was used to avoid map smoothing. Quantitative comparison was performed by computing between-map correlation coefficients and absolute activation time errors., Results: The mean activation time error was 20.4 ± 8.6 ms, and the between-map correlation was poor (0.03 ± 0.43). The results suggested high interpatient variability (correlation -0.68 to 0.82), wide QRS patterns, and paced rhythms demonstrating significantly better mean correlation (0.68 ± 0.17). Errors were greater in scarred regions (21.9 ± 10.8 ms vs 17.5 ± 6.7 ms; P < .01). Fewer epicardial breakthroughs were imaged using noninvasive mapping (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.3 ± 0.7; P < .01). Primary breakthrough locations were imaged 75.7 ± 38.1 mm apart. Lines of conduction block (jumps of ≥50 ms between contiguous points) due to structural anomalies were recorded in 27 of 59 contact maps and were not visualized at these same sites noninvasively. Instead, artificial lines appeared in 33 of 59 noninvasive maps in regions of reduced bipolar voltage amplitudes (P = .03). An in silico model confirms these artificial constructs., Conclusion: Overall, agreement of ECGi activation mapping and contact mapping is poor and heterogeneous. The between-map correlation is good for wide QRS patterns. Lines of block and epicardial breakthrough sites imaged using ECGi are inaccurate. Further work is required to improve the accuracy of the technique., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While the implantable pacemaker has initially been developed to treat symptomatic bradycardia, we demand of modern devices that they also function properly during exercise. In recent years, device manufacturers have implemented multiple proprietary algorithms which aim to improve pacemaker function by avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing, optimizing atrial refractory periods and diagnosing pacemaker mediated tachycardia. When activated, these algorithms may save the associated EGM into the device memory which enables later analysis by remote monitoring or device interrogation. In addition, the performance of an exercise-test while analyzing the EGM, enables the verification of proper algorithm function, the evaluation of residual symptoms and the optimization of specific parameters that vary as a function of heart rate. In this manuscript, we demonstrate how pacemaker algorithms may induce dropped P-waves during exercise in pacemaker dependent patients and loss of biventricular pacing in CRT patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remains a new technology requiring accurate assessment of the various aspects of its functioning. Isolated cases of delayed sensing of ventricular arrhythmia have been described., Objective: The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess the quality of sensing during induced ventricular fibrillation (VF)., Methods: One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent induction of VF at the end of the S-ICD implantation., Results: VF induction was successful in 133 patients (97%). Mean time to first therapy was 16.2 ± 3.1 seconds, with a substantial range from 12.5 to 27.0 seconds. Four different detection profiles were arbitrarily defined: (1) optimal detection (n = 39 [29%]); (2) undersensing with moderate prolongation of time to therapy (<18 seconds; n = 68 [51%]); (3) undersensing with significant prolongation of the time to therapy (>18 seconds; n = 19 [14%]); and (4) absence of therapy or prolonged time to therapy related to noise oversensing (n = 7 [6%]). In some of the patients in the last group, despite induction of VF the initial counter was never filled, the device did not charge the capacitors, and the shock was not delivered because of a sustained diagnosis of noise (n = 5). A manual shock by the device or an external shock had to be delivered to restore the sinus rhythm., Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a marked sensing delay leading to prolonged time to therapy in a large number of S-ICD patients. A few worrisome cases of noise oversensing inhibiting the therapies were detected. These results support the need for systematic intraoperative defibrillation testing., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In contrast to patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), heart failure patients with narrow QRS and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) display a relatively limited response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare left ventricular (LV) activation patterns in heart failure patients with narrow QRS and NICD to patients with LBBB using high-density electroanatomic activation maps., Methods and Results: Fifty-two heart failure patients (narrow QRS [n=18], LBBB [n=11], NICD [n=23]) underwent 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping with a high density of mapping points (387±349 LV). Adjunctive scar imaging was available in 37 (71%) patients and was analyzed in relation to activation maps. LBBB patients typically demonstrated (1) a single LV breakthrough at the septum (38±15 ms post-QRS onset); (2) prolonged right-to-left transseptal activation with absence of direct LV Purkinje activity; (3) homogeneous propagation within the LV cavity; and (4) latest activation at the basal lateral LV. In comparison, both NICD and narrow QRS patients demonstrated (1) multiple LV breakthroughs along the posterior or anterior fascicles: narrow QRS versus LBBB, 5±2 versus 1±1; P =0.0004; NICD versus LBBB, 4±2 versus 1±1; P =0.001); (2) evidence of early/pre-QRS LV electrograms with Purkinje potentials; (3) rapid propagation in narrow QRS patients and more heterogeneous propagation in NICD patients; and (4) presence of limited areas of late activation associated with LV scar with high interindividual heterogeneity., Conclusions: In contrast to LBBB patients, narrow QRS and NICD patients are characterized by distinct mechanisms of LV activation, which may predict poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Introduction: The incidence of pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT) varies as a function of patient characteristics, device programming and algorithm specificities. We investigated the efficacy of the Boston Scientific algorithm by reviewing PMT episodes in a large device population., Methods: In this multicenter study, we included 328 patients implanted with a Boston Scientific device: 157 non-dependent patients with RYTHMIQ™ activated (RYTHMIQ group), 76 patients with permanent AV-conduction disorder (AV-block group) and 95 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy patients (CRT group). For each patient, we reviewed the last 10 remote monitoring-transmitted EGMs diagnosed as PMT., Results: We analyzed 784 PMT episodes across 118 patients. In the RYTHMIQ group, the diagnosis of PMT was correct in most episodes (80%) of which 69% was directly related to the prolongation of the AV-delay associated with the RYTHMIQ algorithm. The usual triggers for PMT were also observed (PVC 16%, PAC 9%). The remainder of the episodes (20%) in RYTHMIQ patients and most episodes of AV-block (66%) and CRT patients (74%) were incorrectly diagnosed as PMT during sinus tachycardia at the maximal tracking rate. The inappropriate intervention of the algorithm during exercise causes non-conducted P-waves, loss of CRT (sustained in six patients) and may have been pro-arrhythmogenic in one patient (induction of ventricular tachycardia)., Conclusion: Algorithms to minimize ventricular pacing can occasionally have unintended consequences such as PMT. The PMT algorithm in Boston Scientific devices is associated with a high rate of incorrect PMT diagnosis during exercise resulting in inappropriate therapy with non-conducted P-waves, loss of CRT and limited risk of pro-arrhythmic events., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Causes for diverse effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are poorly understood. Because CRT is an electrical therapy, it may be best understood by detailed characterization of electrical substrate and its interaction with pacing. Electrocardiogram (ECG) features affect CRT outcomes. However, the surface ECG reports rudimentary electrical data. In contrast, noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging provides high-resolution single-beat ventricular mapping. Several complex characteristics of electrical substrate, not decipherable from the 12-lead ECG, are linked to CRT effect. CRT response may be improved by candidate selection and left ventricular lead placement directed by more precise electrical evaluation, on an individual patient basis., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Recent studies have demonstrated that left ventricular (LV) pacing site is a critical parameter in optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The present study evaluates the effect of pacing from different LV locations on QRS duration (QRSd) and their relationship to acute hemodynamic response in congestive heart failure patients., Methods and Results: Thirty-five patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block referred for CRT device implantation were studied. Eleven predetermined LV pacing sites were systematically assessed in random order: epicardial: coronary sinus (CS); endocardial: basal and mid-cavity (septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior), apex, and the endocardial site facing the CS pacing site. For each patient QRSd and +dP/dtmax during baseline (AAI) and DDD LV pacing at 2 atrioventricular delays were compared. Response to CRT was significantly better in patients with wider baseline QRSd (≥150 milliseconds). Hemodynamic response was inversely correlated to increase of QRSd during LV pacing (short atrioventricular [AV] delay: r = 0.44, P < 0.001; long AV delay: r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Compared to baseline, LV pacing at the site of shortest QRSd significantly improved +dP/dtmax (+18 ± 25%, P < 0.001) but was not superior to other conventional strategy (lateral wall, CS pacing, and echo-guided) and was inferior to a hemodynamically guided strategy., Conclusions: In our study, we have demonstrated that changes of QRSd during LV pacing correlated with acute hemodynamic response and that LV pacing location was a primary determinant of paced QRSd. Although QRSd did not predict the maximum hemodynamic response, our results confirm the link between electrical activation and hemodynamic response of the LV during CRT., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the working mechanism of cardiac resynchronization therapy by comparing animal experimental, clinical, and computational data on the hemodynamic and electromechanical consequences of left ventricular pacing (LVP) and biventricular pacing (BiVP)., Background: It is unclear why LVP and BiVP have comparative positive effects on hemodynamic function of patients with dyssynchronous heart failure., Methods: Hemodynamic response to LVP and BiVP (% change in maximal rate of left ventricular pressure rise [LVdP/dtmax]) was measured in 6 dogs and 24 patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block followed by computer simulations of local myofiber mechanics during LVP and BiVP in the failing heart with left bundle branch block. Pacing-induced changes of electrical activation were measured in dogs using contact mapping and in patients using a noninvasive multielectrode electrocardiographic mapping technique., Results: LVP and BiVP similarly increased LVdP/dtmax in dogs and in patients, but only BiVP significantly decreased electrical dyssynchrony. In the simulations, LVP and BiVP increased total ventricular myofiber work to the same extent. While the LVP-induced increase was entirely due to enhanced right ventricular (RV) myofiber work, the BiVP-induced increase was due to enhanced myofiber work of both the left ventricle (LV) and RV. Overall, LVdP/dtmax correlated better with total ventricular myofiber work than with LV or RV myofiber work alone., Conclusions: Animal experimental, clinical, and computational data support the similarity of hemodynamic response to LVP and BiVP, despite differences in electrical dyssynchrony. The simulations provide the novel insight that, through ventricular interaction, the RV myocardium importantly contributes to the improvement in LV pump function induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Reproducibility and hemodynamic efficacy of optimization of AV delay (AVD) of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using invasive LV dp/dtmax are unknown., Method and Results: 25 patients underwent AV delay (AVD) optimisation twice, using continuous left ventricular (LV) dp/dtmax, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP). We compared 4 protocols for comparing dp/dtmax between AV delays: We assessed for dp/dtmax, LVSBP and LVPP, test-retest reproducibility of the optimum. Optimization using immediate absolute dp/dtmax had poor reproducibility (SDD of replicate optima=41 ms; R(2)=0.45) as did delayed absolute (SDD 39 ms; R(2)=0.50). Multiple relative had better reproducibility: SDD 23 ms, R(2)=0.76, and (p<0.01 by F test). Compared with AAI pacing, the hemodynamic increment from CRT, with the nominal AV delay was LVSBP 2% and LVdp/dtmax 5%, while CRT with pre-determined optimal AVD gave 6% and 9% respectively., Conclusions: Because of inevitable background fluctuations, optimization by absolute dp/dtmax has poor same-day reproducibility, unsuitable for clinical or research purposes. Reproducibility is improved by comparing to a reference AVD and making multiple consecutive measurements. More than 6 measurements would be required for even more precise optimization--and might be advisable for future study designs. With optimal AVD, instead of nominal, the hemodynamic increment of CRT is approximately doubled., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate whether noninvasive electrocardiographic activation mapping is a useful method for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)., Background: One third of the patients appear not to respond to CRT when they are selected according to QRS duration., Methods: We performed electrocardiographic activation mapping in 33 consecutive CRT candidates (QRS duration ≥120 ms). In 18 patients, the 12-lead electrocardiographic morphology was left bundle branch block (LBBB), and in 15, it was nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance (NICD). Three indexes of electrical dyssynchrony were derived from intrinsic maps: right and left ventricular total activation times and ventricular electrical uncoupling (VEU) (difference between the left ventricular [LV] and right ventricular mean activation times). We assessed the ability of these parameters to predict response, measured using a clinical composite score, after 6 months of CRT., Results: Electrocardiographic maps revealed homogeneous patterns of activation and consistently greater VEU and LV total activation time (LVTAT) in patients with LBBB compared with heterogeneous activation sequences and shorter VEU and LVTAT in NICD patients (VEU: 75 ± 12 ms vs. 40 ± 22 ms; p < 0.001; LVTAT: 115 ± 21 ms vs. 91 ± 34 ms; p = 0.03). LBBB and NICD patients had similar right ventricular total activation times (62 ± 30 ms vs. 58 ± 26 ms; p = 0.7). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve indicated that VEU (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.88) was significantly superior to QRS duration (AUC: 0.73) and LVTAT (AUC: 0.72) for predicting CRT response (p < 0.05). With a 50-ms cutoff value, VEU identified CRT responders with 90% sensitivity and 82% specificity whether LBBB was present or not., Conclusions: Ventricular electrical uncoupling measured by electrocardiographic mapping predicted clinical CRT response better than QRS duration or the presence of LBBB., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 65-year-old man with severe idiopathic cardiomyopathy was referred to our centre with New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV heart failure requiring continuous dobutamine infusion. Implantation of three left ventricle (LV) leads was associated with a significant haemodynamic improvement. After 6 months of tri-LV pacing the patient has improved NYHA class from IV to II and the LV ejection fraction from 15 to 21%.

Background: A QRS >120 ms remains the recommended criterion for the selection of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates. However, the reproducibility of this measurement has not been studied thoroughly., Methods: QRS duration was measured by 3 experienced cardiologists and by automatic measurement on 228 electrocardiograms (ECGs) randomly collected from 188 subjects, including neonates, healthy adults, patients with complete and incomplete bundle branch block, and CRT candidates. All ECGs were recorded at a 25 mm/s sweep speed. Forty recordings were duplicated and 50 ECGs were recorded at both 25 and 50 mm/s., Results: Significant interobserver differences (P < 0.001) were found between each combination of paired observers, with an up to 50-ms absolute variability between cardiologists and low concordance with computerized measurements. Intraobserver absolute variability was also significant (P < 0.01) for the 3 observers. These significant differences persisted (P < 0.01) when focusing our interest on the ECGs in the 100-140 ms range (defined as at least one out of the 4 measures in this range). Considering the 120 ms limit, 22 (27.5%) ECGs were differently classified by at least one of the cardiologists. We observed similar interobserver differences between each combination of paired observers with a 50 mm/s sweep speed., Conclusion: Manual QRS duration measurements were associated with significant inter- and intraobserver variability and low concordance with computerized measurements. The measurement of QRS is, therefore, operator-dependent and a reevaluation of the measurement methods may be essential to develop clinical and investigative standards.

Introduction: Biventricular pacing is associated with various electrocardiographic patterns depending on the position of the left ventricular (LV) lead. We aimed to develop an electrocardiogram-based algorithm to predict the position of the LV lead., Methods: The algorithm was developed in 100 consecutive recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems. QRS axis, morphology, and polarity were analyzed with a view to define the specific electrocardiographic characteristics associated with the various LV lead positions. The algorithm was prospectively validated in 50 consecutive CRT device recipients., Results: The first analysis of the algorithm was the QRS morphology in V(1). A positive R wave in V(1) suggested LV lateral or posterior wall stimulation. A QS pattern was specific of anterior LV leads. In the presence of an R wave in V(1), V(6) was analyzed to distinguish between an inferior and anterior LV lead. Inferior leads were never associated with a positive V(6). To differentiate between lateral and posterior positions, we analyzed the pattern in V(2). Lateral leads were associated with an R morphology in V(1) and a negative V(2). Posterior leads were associated with an R morphology in V(1) and V(2). The algorithm allowed a reliable distinction between an inferior or anterior and a lateral or posterior lead position in 90% of patients. Inferior, anterior, lateral, and posterior positions were reliably distinguished in 80% of patients., Conclusion: This algorithm predicted the position of the LV lead with a high sensitivity and predictive value.