Search

Background: Currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal waiting period before permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with conduction disorders following an inferior myocardial infarction., Hypothesis: We aimed to elucidate the contemporary practice pattern of pacing, especially the timing of pacemaker implantation, for sinoatrial node and atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders following an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2014, we identified patients with a primary diagnosis of inferior STEMI. Primary conduction disorders were classified into: (a) high-degree AV block (HDAVB) consisting of complete AV block or Mobitz-type II second-degree AV block, (b) sinoatrial node dysfunction (SND), and (c) no major conduction disorders., Results: Among 66 961 patients, 2706 patients (4.0%) had HDAVB, which mostly consisted of complete AV block (2594 patients). SND was observed in 393 patients (0.6%). Among the 2706 patients with HDAVB, 267 patients (9.9%) underwent permanent pacemaker. In patients with HDAVB, more than one-third (34.9%) of permanent pacemakers were placed within 72 hours after admission. The median interval from admission to permanent pacemaker implantation was 3 days (interquartile range; 2-5 days) for HDAVB vs 4 days (3-6 days) for SND (P < .001). HDAVB was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, whereas SND was not., Conclusions: In patients who developed HDAVB following an inferior STEMI, only one in 10 patients underwent permanent pacemaker implantation. Despite its highly reversible nature, permanent pacemakers were implanted relatively early., (© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Characteristics of conduction disorders after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been well described. In contrast, limited data are available on the incidence, treatment trends, and prognostic impact of conduction disorders after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we compared the characteristics and outcomes of conduction disorders in patients with a primary diagnosis of STEMI versus NSTEMI between 2010 and 2014. Conduction disorders were classified into‬ high-degree AV block (HDAVB), consisting of complete AV block or Mobitz type II second-degree AV block, and sinoatrial node dysfunction (SND). We identified 135,468 STEMI patients and 281,928 NSTEMI patients. In contrast to the STEMI cohort where HDAVB was more common than SND (2.4% vs 0.5%), SND was observed more often in the NSTEMI cohort, presenting in 2,417 patients (0.9%), followed by HDAVB in 1,745 patients (0.6%). In patients who developed HDAVB, NSTEMI patients were more likely to undergo permanent pacemaker implantation than STEMI patients (30.0% vs 11.6%; p < 0.001). The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation for SND was comparable between STEMI and NSTEMI patients (33.9% vs 30.5%; p = 0.10). In the NSTEMI cohort, patients who developed HDAVB had higher in-hospital mortality than those without any major conduction disorders (16.6% vs 3.8%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, SND was more common than HDAVB in the NSTEMI cohort, in contrast to the predominance of HDAVB observed in the STEMI cohort. About one-third of patients who developed HDAVB after NSTEMI underwent pacemaker implantation, suggesting lower rates of spontaneous resolution of HDAVB, when compared with STEMI patients., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Low QRS voltage was reported to predict adverse outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the pre-thrombolytic era. However, the association between low voltage and angiographic findings has not been fully addressed., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Low QRS voltage was defined as either peak to peak QRS complex voltage <1.0mV in all precordial leads or <0.5mV in all limb leads., Results: Among 190 patients, 37 patients (19%) had low voltage. Patients with low voltage had a higher rate of multi-vessel disease (MVD) (76% vs. 52%, p=0.01). Patients with low voltage were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during admission (11% vs. 2%, p=0.028). Low voltage was an independent predictor for MVD (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.12 to 6.03; p=0.032)., Conclusion: Low QRS voltage was associated with MVD and in-hospital CABG in anterior STEMI., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Positive T wave in lead aVR has been shown to predict an adverse in-hospital outcome in patients with anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the prognostic value of positive T wave in lead aVR on a long-term outcome has not been fully explored., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 190 consecutive patients with first anterior wall STEMI who underwent an emergent coronary angiogram. Patients were divided into those with positive T wave > 0 mV and those with negative T wave ≦ 0 mV in lead aVR. Baseline and angiographic characteristics, and in-hospital revascularization procedures were recorded. In addition, in-hospital and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were recorded., Results: Among 190 patients, 37 patients (19%) had positive T wave and 153 patients (81%) had negative T wave in lead aVR. Patients with positive T wave had higher rate of left main disease defined as stenosis ≥50% (11% vs. 2%, p = .028) than those with negative T wave. Patients with positive T wave had higher rate of 1-year MACE (38% vs. 13%, p < .001) driven by higher all-cause mortality (27% vs. 5%, p < .001). Positive T wave was an independent predictor for 1-year MACE (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.04-7.15; p = .04)., Conclusion: Positive T wave in lead aVR was an independent predictor for 1-year MACE in patients with first anterior wall STEMI., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) transportation is associated with shorter door-to-balloon (DTB) time in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In addition to EMS transportation, prehospital notification of STEMI by EMS to receiving hospital might be able to further shorten DTB time. We evaluated the impact of STEMI notification on DTB time as well as infarct size., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with anterior wall STEMI who underwent emergent coronary angiography. We excluded patients who presented with cardiac arrest and those who were transferred from non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals. Mode of transportation were categorized into the 3 groups: (1) EMS transport with STEMI notification, (2) EMS transport without STEMI notification, and (3) self-transport. Baseline characteristics, laboratory data, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and DTB time were compared among the 3 groups., Results: A total of 148 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 148 patients, 56 patients arrived by EMS transport with STEMI notification, 56 patients arrived by EMS transport without STEMI notification, and 36 patients arrived by self-transport. Patients who arrived by EMS transport with STEMI notification had the shortest DTB time among the 3 groups. Patients who arrived by EMS transport with STEMI notification had smaller infarct size, as indicated by lower peak creatine kinase value and higher LVEF, compared with those who arrived by EMS transport without STEMI notification., Conclusion: Emergency medical services transport with STEMI notification was associated with shorter DTB time and smaller infarct size in patients with anterior wall STEMI., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can lead to subendocardial ischemia by altering the coronary blood flow and its transmural myocardial distribution in the setting of increased oxygen demand. We hypothesized that electrocardiographic LVH predicts nonsignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We performed a retrospective analysis of 406 consecutive patients with NSTEMI who underwent coronary angiography. The LVH was diagnosed using Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell voltage criteria. Nonsignificant CAD was defined as stenosis less than 50% in the left main and 70% in any other coronary arteries. Of the 406 patients, 100 (25%) patients had electrocardiographic LVH and 99 (24%) patients had nonsignificant CAD. Patients with electrocardiographic LVH had a higher prevalence of nonsignificant CAD (32% vs 22%, P = .04) and a lower rate of in-hospital revascularization (45% vs 69%, P < .001) than those without LVH. On multivariate analysis, electrocardiographic LVH was an independent predictor of nonsignificant CAD (odds ratio 1.94; 95% confidence interval 1.12-3.35; P = .02). In conclusion, electrocardiographic LVH is an independent predictor of nonsignificant CAD and associated with a lower rate of in-hospital revascularization in patients with NSTEMI., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Background: ST-segment elevation in lead aVR predicts left main and/or three-vessel disease (LM/3VD) in patients with acute coronary syndromes. ST-segment elevation in lead aVR is generally reciprocal to and accompanied by ST-segment depression in precordial leads. Previous studies have assessed the independent predictive value of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR for LM/3VD in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and have reported conflicting results., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 379 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Electrocardiograms on presentation were reviewed especially for ST-segment elevation ≥0.05 mV in lead aVR and ST-segment depression ≥0.05 mV in more than two contiguous leads in any other leads., Results: Among 379 patients, 97 (26%) patients had ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and 88 (23%) patients had LM/3VD. Patients with ST-segment elevation in lead aVR had a higher rate of LM/3VD (39% vs. 18%; P < 0.001) and in-hospital revascularization (73% vs. 60%; P = 0.02) driven by a higher rate of in-hospital coronary artery bypass grafting (19% vs. 7%; P < 0.001) than those without ST-segment elevation in lead aVR. On multivariate analysis, ST-segment elevation in lead aVR (odds ratio [OR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.77; P = 0.02) and ST-segment depression in leads V1 -V4 (OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.46-6.15; P = 0.003) were independent predictors of LM/3VD., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ST-segment elevation in lead aVR is an independent predictor of LM/3VD in patients with NSTEMI., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: The prognostic value of ST-segment elevation in lead V1 (STE in V1) in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been elucidated., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 190 consecutive first anterior STEMI patients. STE in V1 ≥0.1mV was recorded. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization., Results: Among 190 patients, 42 patients did not have STE in V1. The patient without STE in V1 had a higher peak creatine kinase value and a higher incidence of 1-year MACE (36% vs. 13%, p<0.001), driven by a higher mortality (24% vs. 5%, p<0.001). The absence of STE in V1 was an independent predictor for 1-year MACE (odds ratio 3.16; 95% confidence interval 1.28-7.83; p=0.01)., Conclusion: The absence of STE in V1 was an independent predictor for worse long-term outcomes in patients with first anterior STEMI., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Patients with acute coronary syndrome due to left main and/or three-vessel disease (LM/3VD) are at the highest risk of short- and long-term adverse cardiovascular events. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to predict the severity of coronary artery disease in various clinical settings, but its independent predictive value for LM/3VD has not been investigated in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We aimed to evaluate the independent predictive value of NLR for LM/3VD in NSTEMI patients.Methods/materials: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography. NLR was calculated as the ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte based on the laboratory data on admission. The primary outcome was the presence of LM/3VD.Results: In all, 396 patients were included in the final analysis. Median NLR in the entire study population was 3.43 (interquartile range, 2.12-5.51). By receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value of NLR in predicting LM/3VD was 2.80 (area under the curve 0.60, sensitivity 73%, specificity 43%). Of the 396 patients, 244 patients (62%) had NLR ≥2.8. Patients with NLR ≥2.8 were older and had a higher prevalence of LM/3VD (30 % vs. 18%, p=0.005). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, NLR ≥2.8 was an independent predictor of LM/3VD after adjusting for other clinical variables including ST depression and ST elevation in lead aVR (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.21, p=0.03).Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that NLR ≥2.8 is an independent predictor of LM/3VD in patients with NSTEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]