1. Statistical evaluation of using the new generation of wind turbines in South Africa
- Author
-
Alibek Issakhov, Ahmad Haghani, Mehdi Jahangiri, Esther T. Akinlabi, Sam M. Sichilalu, Hamed Saghaei, Seyyed Shahabaddin Hosseini Dehshiri, Ahmad Sedaghat, Shahariar Chowdhury, Ali Mostafaeipour, Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri, and Kuaanan Techato
- Subjects
Meteorology ,020209 energy ,02 engineering and technology ,Weighting ,Turbine ,Wind speed ,South Africa ,020401 chemical engineering ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Capital cost ,0204 chemical engineering ,Cost of electricity by source ,Wind power ,HOMER ,LCOE ,business.industry ,General Energy ,East london ,Environmental science ,Electricity ,Ranking ,lcsh:Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering ,business ,Wind turbine ,lcsh:TK1-9971 - Abstract
In the view of the latest status and the potential of developing wind energy in South Africa, the present study aims to perform technical–economic–environmental analysis on a wind turbine system with HOMER software using the 20-years average data of the wind speed obtained from NASA’s database, for providing the electricity to residential buildings. The results showed that the Port Elizabeth station, had the lowest levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) with the value of -0.363 $/kWh when using the EOLO wind turbine, and the Bloemfontein station had the highest LCOE with the value of 1.601 $/kWh when using the Turby wind turbine. The results from the step-wise assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) weighting method demonstrated the wind penetration, total production, and capital cost as the most important sub-indices with the weights of 0.106, 0.095, and 0.091, respectively. Using the additive ratio assessment (ARAS), weighted sum method (WSM), and weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) techniques, the cities under study were ranked, and the cities of East London and Bloemfontein were identified as the most suitable and the most unsuitable stations for the use of household-scale wind turbines, respectively.
- Published
- 2020