Search

Background: Electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. We compared a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy with a conventional strategy in patients with AF > 2 days' duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over a 6-month follow-up., Methods: The ACUTE study was a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial, with 1222 patients. Six-month follow-up was available in 1034 patients (85%), 525 in the TEE group and 509 in the conventional group. The primary composite end points were cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral embolism at 6 months, which was a prespecified time point. Secondary end points were hemorrhage, mortality, and sinus rhythm., Results: At 6 months, there was no difference in composite embolic events between the TEE group and the conventional group (10 [2%] vs 4 [0.8%]; risk ratio (RR) 2.47, 95% CI 0.78-7.88; P = .11). However, the hemorrhagic rate was significantly lower in the TEE group (23 [4.4%] vs 38 [7.5%]; RR 0.58, 96% CI 0.35-0.97; P = .04). There was no difference between the 2 treatment groups in all-cause mortality (21 [4%] vs 14 [2.8%]; RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.76-2.92; P = .25) and in the occurrence of normal sinus rhythm between the 2 groups (305 [62.2%] vs 280 [58.1%]; P = .51). Sinus rhythm at 6 months was more common in the TEE-guided group, in those patients who had direct current cardioversion (238 [62.5%] vs 151 [53.9%]; P = .03)., Conclusion: The TEE-guided strategy may be considered a clinically effective alternative to a conventional anticoagulation strategy for patients with AF of > 2 days' duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over a 6-month period.

Background: The ACUTE Trial studied a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy compared with a conventional strategy for management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing direct current cardioversion. The primary aim was to determine if patient functional capacity, measured by the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), would differ between treatment strategies., Methods: The DASI was self-administered at study enrollment and at 8-week follow-up in 1074 (88%) of 1222 total patients. Clinical outcomes associated with enrollment DASI scores and change in follow-up DASI scores were reviewed., Results: There was no difference between the TEE-guided (n = 544) and conventional treatment (n = 530) groups for mean baseline and 8-week DASI scores, adjusting for baseline; however, patients who improved their DASI score were more likely to be in the TEE-guided group (P = .03). Pooled group data showed that the higher the enrollment DASI score, the more it tended to be positively related to maintenance of sinus rhythm (P = .06) at 8 weeks. The lower the enrollment DASI score, the more it was predictive of death (P = .03) and bleeding (P = .01) within 8 weeks. Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) at enrollment showed greater improvement in DASI scores at 8 weeks compared with patients without CHF (DASI Delta 45.9% vs 31.6%, P < .001)., Conclusions: There was no difference in DASI scores between treatment groups. However, TEE-guided treatment was a predictor of improved DASI at follow-up, and subgroup analysis showed that patients with CHF did show improvement in functional capacity with cardioversion.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the relative cost of a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy versus conventional strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) >2 days duration undergoing electrical cardioversion over an eight-week period., Background: The Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) trial found no difference in embolic rates between the two approaches. However, the TEE-guided strategy had a shorter time to cardioversion and a lower rate of composite bleeding. While similar clinical efficacy was concluded, the relative cost of these two strategies has not been explored., Methods: Two economic approaches were employed in the ACUTE trial. The first approach was based on hospital charge data from complete hospital Universal Billing Code of 1992 forms, a detailed hospital charge questionnaire, or imputation. Regression analysis was used to investigate the added cost of adverse events. The second economic approach involved the development of an independent analytic model simulating treatment and actual ACUTE outcome costs as a validation of clinically derived data. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the analytic model to investigate the potential range in cost differences between the strategies., Results: A total of 833 of the 1,222 patients were enrolled from 53 U.S. sites; TEE-guided (n = 420) and conventional (n = 413). At eight-week follow-up, total mean costs did not significantly differ between the two groups, respectively (6,508 dollars vs. 6,239 dollars; difference of 269 dollars; p = 0.50). Cumulative costs were 24% higher in the conventional group, primarily due to increased incidence of bleeding and hospital costs associated with bleeding. A separate analytic model showed that treatment costs were higher for the TEE-guided strategy, but outcome costs were higher for the conventional strategy. Sensitivity analysis of the analytic model illustrated that varying the incidence and cost of major bleeding and the cost of TEE had the greatest impact on cost differences between the two groups., Conclusions: In patients with AF >2 days duration undergoing electrical cardioversion, the TEE-guided group showed little difference in patient costs compared with the conventional group. The TEE strategy had higher initial treatment costs but lower outcome-associated costs. Cumulative costs were 24% higher in the conventional group, primarily due to bleeding. The TEE-guided strategy is an economically feasible approach compared with the conventional strategy.

In a multicenter randomized trial, we studied a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided strategy with short-term anticoagulation compared with a conventional strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation >2 days' duration and undergoing cardioversion. Composite major and minor bleeding was a predetermined secondary end point of the study. The objective of the study was to assess the incidence, location, and predictors of bleeding in the 2 treatment groups. A total of 1,222 patients were assigned to a TEE guided or conventional strategy and followed over 8 weeks. We present data on major and minor adjudicated bleeding complications for the 2 study groups during the 8-week study period. Composite major and minor bleeding complications occurred in 51 of 1,222 patients (4.2%) and were significantly lower in the TEE guided group compared with the conventional group (2.9 vs 5.5%, p = 0.025). The TEE group had fewer cancellations of cardioversion as a result of bleeding (0% vs 0.7%, p = 0.003). Major (n = 14) and minor (n = 38) bleeding complications were predominantly gastrointestinal (71.4% and 31.6%, respectively) and were associated with warfarin use. Predictors of bleeding included patient age, conventional group assignment, inpatient status, and functional status. Thus, composite major and minor bleeding complications occurred in 4.2% of the 1,222 patients and were significantly lower in the TEE guided group compared with the conventional group. Treatment variables affecting length of anticoagulant therapy in the conventional arm combined with advancing age and functional status are important concerns in patients who undergo cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Background: The conventional treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation who are to undergo electrical cardioversion is to prescribe warfarin for anticoagulation for three weeks before cardioversion. It has been proposed that if transesophageal echocardiography reveals no atrial thrombus, cardioversion may be performed safely after only a short period of anticoagulant therapy., Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, prospective clinical trial, we enrolled 1222 patients with atrial fibrillation of more than two days' duration and assigned them to either treatment guided by the findings on transesophageal echocardiography or conventional treatment. The composite primary end point was cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral embolism within eight weeks. Secondary end points were functional status, successful restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, hemorrhage, and death., Results: There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the rate of embolic events (five embolic events among 619 patients in the transesophageal-echocardiography group [0.8 percent]) vs. three among 603 patients in the conventional-treatment group [0.5 percent], P=0.50). However, the rate of hemorrhagic events was significantly lower in the transesophageal-echocardiography group (18 events [2.9 percent] vs. 33 events [5.5 percent], P=0.03). Patients in the transesophageal-echocardiography group also had a shorter time to cardioversion (mean [+/-SD], 3.0+/-5.6 vs. 30.6+/-10.6 days, P<0.001) and a greater rate of successful restoration of sinus rhythm (440 patients [71.1 percent] vs. 393 patients [65.2 percent], P=0.03). At eight weeks, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of death or maintenance of sinus rhythm or in functional status., Conclusions: The use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide the management of atrial fibrillation may be considered a clinically effective alternative strategy to conventional therapy for patients in whom elective cardioversion is planned.

Electrical cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently performed to relieve symptoms and improve cardiac performance. Patients undergoing cardioversion are treated conventionally with therapeutic anticoagulation for three weeks before and four weeks after cardioversion to decrease the risk of thromboembolism. A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy has been proposed as an alternative that may lower stroke and bleeding events. Patients without atrial cavity thrombus or atrial appendage thrombus by TEE are cardioverted on achievement of therapeutic anticoagulation, whereas cardioversion is delayed in higher risk patients with thrombus. The aim of this review is to discuss the issues and controversies associated with the management of patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. We provide an overview of the TEE-guided and conventional anticoagulation strategies in light of the recently completed Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) clinical trial. The two management strategies comparably lower the patient's embolic risk when the guidelines are properly followed. The TEE-guided strategy with shorter term anticoagulation may lower the incidence of bleeding complications and safely expedite early cardioversion. The inherent advantages and disadvantages of both strategies are presented. The TEE-guided approach with short-term anticoagulation is considered to be a safe and clinically effective alternative to the conventional approach, and it is advocated in patients in whom earlier cardioversion would be clinically beneficial.

An alternative clinical management strategy and cost analysis model is presented for patients with atrial fibrillation of >2 days' duration who may benefit from immediate cardioversion with self-administered low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as a bridge antithrombotic therapy to warfarin, after a negative transesophageal echo-cardiography (TEE) screening for thrombus. Assuming no difference in stroke or bleeding rates, our cost minimization model shows that the TEE-guided enoxaparin treatment costs are $1353 lower per patient than an intravenous unfractionated heparin approach. Sensitivity analyses for stroke and bleeding reveal that the treatment-cost economic dominance of the TEE-guided enoxaparin approach may be enhanced by an expected improvement in clinical outcome.

Background: Patients with atrial fibrillation >2 days' duration for whom immediate cardioversion is desired or required are commonly hospitalized for 4 or more days of antithrombotic therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin and commencement of oral warfarin. For these early cardioversion patients, self-administered low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin sodium) as "bridge" therapy to warfarin may obviate the need for hospitalization and activated partial thromboplastin time monitoring and thus potentially lower costs and enhance utility., Objective: To compare feasibility and safety of a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided enoxaparin strategy with those of a TEE-guided unfractionated heparin strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation of >2 days' duration undergoing early electrical or chemical cardioversion., Design and Setting: This is a randomized, multicenter clinical trial at 11 hospitals in the United States., Patients and Intervention: Two hundred patients with atrial fibrillation >2 days' duration requiring early chemical or electric cardioversion will be enrolled. TEE-guided intravenous unfractionated heparin bridge therapy will be compared with TEE-guided subcutaneous enoxaparin bridge therapy., Outcome Measures: Feasibility outcomes are time to hospital discharge, patient quality of life/utility, treatment costs, and sinus rhythm. Safety outcomes are ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolization, major and minor bleeding, clinical hemodynamic instability, and cardiac and cardioversion-related death for a 5-week period from enrollment., Clinical Implications: The results of this pilot study will have important clinical and economic implications for the antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing TEE-guided cardioversion.

Transesophageal echocardiography-guided anticoagulation management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion has evolved over the past decade as a viable alternative to conventional anticoagulation management. Its use grew out of a need for a more predictable, dependable, and convenient approach to this difficult management dilemma, which has become increasingly prevalent in practice as an increasing number of patients present to clinics and hospitals with atrial fibrillation. In addition to its use in risk stratification of patients scheduled to undergo cardioversion, this management strategy allows for early cardioversion, which enables a minimal delay in proceeding from the diagnosis to the institution of therapy (electrical cardioversion). This review explores the evolution of the transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy, the advantages and disadvantages of its use, and possible modifications to the strategy that would allow for a more convenient, practical, and more widely acceptable approach in the near future.

Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE)-guided cardioversion of patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) of >2 days' duration is used as an alternative to conventional therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate practice patterns employed for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF who underwent cardioversion, and to determine the relative use of conventional and TEE-guided management strategies. We forwarded regionally stratified survey questionnaires to 947 clinical practices within the United States. The 10-question questionnaire queried demographic and clinical practice volumes and practices for managing patients with AF who underwent cardioversion. In addition, we used historical data to determine longitudinal use patterns of the TEE-guided approach for a large institution over 7 years. The 197 completed and returned surveys yielded a return rate of 20.8%. The TEE-guided approach was employed in approximately 12% of total cardioversions, but 75% of practices indicated that they employed transesophageal echocardiography only occasionally. The TEE-guided approach was associated with community size (r = 0.19; p<0.008), type of practice (r = 0.26; p = 0.001), total use of transesophageal echocardiography (r = 0.48; p<0.001), and volume of cardioversions (r = 0.28; p<0.001). Importantly, there was little consensus on the most appropriate clinical indications for TEE-guided cardioversions, and the proportions of TEE-guided cardioversion to total number of electrical cardioversions remained stable over 7 years. Practice volume and physician training may be the most important variables in the adoption of the TEE approach.

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether left atrial appendage stunning occurs in patients with atrial flutter and to compare left atrial appendage function in the pericardioversion period with that in patients with atrial fibrillation., Background: Left atrial appendage stunning has recently been proposed as a key mechanistic phenomenon in the etiology of postcardioversion thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation. Atrial flutter is thought to be associated with a negligible risk of thromboembolic events; therefore, anticoagulation is commonly withheld before and after cardioversion in these patients., Methods: Sixty-three patients with atrial flutter (n = 19) or atrial fibrillation (n = 44) underwent transesophageal echocardiography immediately before and after electrical cardioversion. In addition to assessing the presence of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast, we measured left atrial appendage emptying velocity and calculated shear rates by pulsed wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography., Results: Patients with atrial flutter exhibited greater left atrial appendage flow velocities before cardioversion than those with atrial fibrillation (42 +/- 19 vs. 28 +/- 15 cm/s [mean +/- SD], p < 0.001). Left atrial appendage shear rates were also higher in patients with atrial flutter (103 +/- 82 vs. 59 +/- 37 s-1, p < 0.001). After cardioversion, left atrial appendage flow velocities decreased compared with precardioversion values in patients with atrial fibrillation (28 +/- 15 before to 15 +/- 14 cm/s after cardioversion, p < 0.001) and atrial flutter (42 +/- 19 to 27 +/- 18 cm/s, respectively, p < 0.001). Shear rates decreased from 59 +/- 37 before cardioversion to 30 +/- 31 s-1 after cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001), and from 103 +/- 82 s to 65 +/- 52 s-1, respectively (p < 0.001), in atrial flutter. This decrease in flow velocity from before to after cardioversion occurred in 36 (82%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation and 14 (74%) of 19 with atrial flutter. The impaired left atrial appendage function after cardioversion was less pronounced in the group with atrial flutter (27 +/- 18 cm/s for atrial flutter vs. 15 +/- 14 cm/s for atrial fibrillation, p < 0.001). New or increased spontaneous echo contrast occurred in 22 (50%) of 44 patients with atrial fibrillation versus 4 (21%) of 19 with atrial flutter (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Left atrial appendage stunning also occurs in patients with atrial flutter, although to a lesser degree than in those with atrial fibrillation. These data suggest that patients with atrial flutter are at risk for thromboembolic events after cardioversion, although this risk is most likely lower than that in patients with atrial fibrillation because of better preserved left atrial appendage function.

Background: Electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for embolic stroke. Screening for atrial thrombi with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before cardioversion should, in many patients, safely permit cardioversion to be done earlier than would be possible with prolonged conventional, anticoagulation therapy., Objective: To compare the feasibility and safety of TEE-guided early cardioversion with those of conventional management of cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation., Design: Randomized, multicenter clinical trial., Setting: 10 hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Australia., Patients: 126 patients who had atrial fibrillation lasting longer than 2 days and were having electrical cardioversion., Intervention: Conventional therapy or early, TEE-guided cardioversion with short-term anticoagulation therapy., Outcome Measures: Feasibility outcome variables were frequency of cardioversion and times to cardioversion and sinus rhythm. Safety outcomes were ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolization, bleeding, and detected episodes of clinical hemodynamic instability occurring as long as 4 weeks after cardioversion., Results: 62 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEE-guided cardioversion; TEE was done in 56 (90%) of these patients. Atrial thrombi were detected in 7 patients (13%) and led to the postponement of cardioversion. Cardioversion was successful in 38 of 45 patients (84%) who had early cardioversion. No embolization occurred with this strategy. Of the 64 patients receiving conventional therapy, 37 (58%) had cardioversion, which was successful in 28 patients (76%). One patient had a peripheral embolic event. The time to cardioversion was shorter in the TEE group (0.6 weeks [95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9 weeks] compared with 4.8 weeks [CI, 3.8 to 5.7 weeks]; P < 0.01). The incidence of clinical hemodynamic instability and bleeding complications tended to be greater in the conventional therapy group., Conclusions: These results suggest that TEE-guided cardioversion with short-term anticoagulation therapy is feasible and safe. The use of TEE may allow cardioversion to be done earlier, may decrease the risk for embolism associated with cardioversion, and may be associated with less clinical instability than conventional therapy. A large, multicenter study to confirm these findings is currently under way.

In patients with atrial fibrillation, electrical cardioversion is often performed to relieve symptoms, to improve left ventricular function, and to decrease thromboembolic risks. However, cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias is associated with an increased embolic risk, with an event rate of up to 5.6%. The American College of Chest Physicians recommend 3 weeks of systemic anticoagulation before elective cardioversion and 4 weeks of systemic anticoagulation afterwards. Expulsion of preexisting left atrial (LA) thrombi with resumption of sinus rhythm has traditionally been considered the mechanism for this increased embolic risk associated with cardioversion. The advent of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has allowed accurate detection of LA thrombus. Moreover, recent studies using TEE have identified a state of atrial "stunning" immediately after cardioversion, which is considered a thrombogenic milieu in which new thrombus formation and increased or de novo appearance of LA spontaneous echocardiographic contrast have been observed. Furthermore, embolic events have been reported after cardioversion despite exclusion of preexisting LA thrombus by TEE. These studies strongly suggest an alternative mechanism for embolism after cardioversion, ie, atrial stunning with worsened atrial appendage function and enhanced thrombogenesis. Recent studies have shown the safety of a TEE-guided anticoagulation approach in which exclusion of preexisting LA thrombus by TEE enables early cardioversion without the need for the standard 3 weeks of systemic anticoagulation. The importance of maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation has been further emphasized. Although preliminary observational studies of TEE-guided cardioversion are encouraging, there has been no prospective, randomized trial comparing the two strategies of anticoagulation management. The Assessement of Cardioversion Utilizing Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) pilot study randomized 126 patients from 10 sites and showed the feasibility and safety of the larger scale study. A larger multicenter, prospective randomized trial is now underway and is expected to randomize a total of 3,000 patients. The results of the ACUTE study will definitively establish the safest and the most cost-effective way to manage anticoagulation for elective cardioversion.

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been used recently to detect atrial thrombi before cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. It has been assumed that embolic events after cardioversion result from embolism of preexisting atrial thrombi that are accurately detected by TEE. This study examined the clinical and echocardiographic findings in patients with embolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation despite exclusion of atrial thrombi by TEE., Methods and Results: Clinical and echocardiographic data in 17 patients with embolic events after TEE-guided electrical (n = 16) or pharmacological (n = 1) cardioversion were analyzed. All 17 patients had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including four patients with lone atrial fibrillation. TEE before cardioversion showed left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in five patients and did not show atrial thrombus in any patient. Cardioversion resulted in return to sinus rhythm without immediate complication in all patients. Thirteen patients had cerebral embolic events and four patients had peripheral embolism occurring 2 hours to 7 days after cardioversion. None of the patients were therapeutically anticoagulated at the time of embolism. New or increased left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was detected in four of the five patients undergoing repeat TEE after cardioversion including one patient with a new left atrial appendage thrombus., Conclusions: Embolism may occur after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in inadequately anticoagulated patients despite apparent exclusion of preexisting atrial thrombus by TEE. These findings suggest de novo atrial thrombosis after cardioversion or imperfect sensitivity of TEE for atrial thrombi and suggest that screening by TEE does not obviate the requirement for anticoagulant therapy at the time of and after cardioversion. A randomized clinical trial is needed to compare conventional anticoagulant management with a TEE-guided strategy including anticoagulation after cardioversion.

The management of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion remains controversial, largely because of inadequate studies demonstrating risk or benefit, a relatively inconvenient anticoagulation management strategy and the increasing use of transesophageal echocardiography. Recent investigations into the potential mechanisms involved in the development of thrombus and systemic embolism in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation may provide insight into underlying predisposing factors, with subsequent modification of management strategies. Conventional wisdom suggests that preexisting thrombus is responsible for thromboembolic events after cardioversion. However, development of a thrombogenic milieu after cardioversion, particularly in the left atrial appendage, may also be an important predisposing factor. To protect against both potential mechanisms of embolization, these data support therapeutic anticoagulation for all patients with atrial fibrillation of > 2 days in duration from the time of, as well as after cardioversion for a total of 4 weeks, undergoing cardioversion, even in the absence of thrombus on echocardiography. Therefore, the role of transesophageal echocardiography in this setting should be to enable early cardioversion if atrial thrombus is excluded and to identify high risk patients with atrial thrombi so as to postpone cardioversion and avoid the risk of embolization. Ultimately, however, a controlled, randomized and prospective clinical trial will be required to compare conventional management with a transesophageal echocardiography-guided strategy.

Objectives: This study assessed the function of the left atrial appendage in the pericardioversion period to gain insights into mechanisms involved in thromboembolism after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation., Background: Systemic embolization associated with electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is thought to originate from the left atrium or left atrial appendage, or both. However, the mechanism involved is poorly understood., Methods: We studied left atrial appendage function with transesophageal echocardiography in 20 patients with atrial fibrillation before and after successful electrical cardioversion. We measured left atrial appendage emptying and filling velocities by pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography, characterized Doppler emptying patterns, measured atrial appendage areas and assessed the presence or absence of spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus., Results: Organized left atrial appendage function returned in 16 (80%) of 20 patients immediately after cardioversion. Atrial appendage emptying velocities before cardioversion were greater in patients without (0.39 +/- 0.02 m/s) than in those with (0.25 +/- 0.12 m/s) spontaneous echo contrast (p = 0.045). Furthermore, emptying velocities before cardioversion were significantly greater than late diastolic emptying velocities after cardioversion (0.31 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.12 m/s, p = 0.0001), as well as in both the group with (0.25 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.13 +/- 0.13 m/s, p = 0.001) and the group without (0.39 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.12 m/s, p = 0.01) spontaneous echo contrast. In addition, left atrial and atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast developed in 4 of 20 patients and increased in intensity in 3 of 20 patients in the immediate postcardioversion period., Conclusions: Organized left atrial appendage function returns in most patients immediately after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. However, its function is impaired compared with that before cardioversion. Furthermore, spontaneous echo contrast increased in 7 (35%) of 20 patients after cardioversion. These observations suggest that stunned left atrial appendage function after cardioversion may predispose the chamber to thrombus formation, which may play a role in the mechanism involved in the occurrence of embolization after cardioversion.