Search

Background: Animal source foods are rich in multiple nutrients. Regular egg consumption may improve infant growth in low- and middle-income countries., Objectives: To assess the impact of daily egg consumption on linear growth among 6-12-mo olds in rural Bangladesh., Methods: We conducted a 2 × 4 factorial cluster-randomized controlled trial allocating clusters (n = 566) to treatment for enteric pathogens or placebo and a daily egg, protein supplement, isocaloric supplement, or control. All arms received nutrition education. Here, we compare the effect of the egg intervention versus control on linear growth, a prespecified aim of the trial. Infants were enrolled at 3 mo. We measured length and weight at 6 and 12 mo and visited households weekly to distribute eggs and monitor compliance. We used linear regression models to compare 12-mo mean length, weight, and z-scores for length-for-age (LAZ), weight-for-length, and weight-for-age (WAZ), and log-binomial or robust Poisson regression to compare prevalence of stunting, wasting, and underweight between arms. We used generalized estimating equations to account for clustering and adjusted models for baseline measures of outcomes., Results: We enrolled 3051 infants (n = 283 clusters) across arms, with complete 6 and 12 mo anthropometry data from 1228 infants (n = 142 clusters) in the egg arm and 1109 infants (n = 141 clusters) in the control. At baseline, 18.5%, 6.0%, and 16.4% were stunted, wasted, and underweight, respectively. The intervention did not have a statistically significant effect on mean LAZ (β: 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01, 0.10) or stunting prevalence (β: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.13) at 12 mo. Mean weight (β: 0.07 kg, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.11) and WAZ (β: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.11) were significantly higher in the egg compared with control arms., Conclusions: Provision of a daily egg for 6 mo to infants in rural Bangladesh improved ponderal but not linear growth., Trial Registration Number: NCT03683667, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03683667., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Nutrition. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context‐specific research is needed on the relationship between household animal production and nutrition outcomes to inform programmes intervening in small‐scale animal production. We examined associations between household animal/fishpond ownership and animal source food (ASF) consumption among 6‐ to 12‐month‐old infants enroled in the control arm of a cluster‐randomised controlled trial in rural Bangladesh. We measured ASF consumption using a 7‐day food frequency questionnaire at 6, 9 and 12 months and assessed household animal/fishpond ownership at 12 months. We developed negative binomial regression models with random intercepts for infant and cluster, controlling for infant age and sex, maternal age, socioeconomic status and season. Models were stratified by a dichotomised maternal decision‐making score. Compared with infants in households without each animal type, those with 4–10 and ≥11 poultry consumed eggs 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 1.6) and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.0) times more, respectively; 2–3 and ≥4 dairy‐producing animals consumed dairy 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.7) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 3.1) times more, respectively; and ≥12 meat‐producing animals consumed meat 1.4 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.8) times more. It was unclear whether there was an association between fishpond ownership and fish consumption. Our results did not suggest that maternal decision‐making power was a modifier in the relationship between animal/fishpond ownership and ASF consumption. In this South Asian context, strategies intervening in household animal production may increase infant consumption of eggs, dairy and meat, but not necessarily fish. Research is needed on the role of market access and other dimensions of women's empowerment. Key messages: Household ownership of poultry and dairy‐ and meat‐producing animals was associated with higher infant intakes of eggs, dairy and meat, respectively. There was not a clear association between household fishpond ownership and infant fish consumption.While we found no significant differences in these relationships by maternal decision‐making power, future research in this setting should consider the relative importance of other dimensions of women's empowerment or other contextual factors, such as market access.In Bangladesh and similar rural South Asian settings, programmes aiming to impact infant and child diet through agricultural interventions must assess the factors constraining both production and consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]