Search

There are many, various and interconnected causes of poverty, and we can’t use a magic formula to eradicate it. But, we can consider education as a reducing risk element of high poverty, which may prevent the occurrence of another generation, much poorer. In the underdeveloped countries and developing countries, people instinctively know that education is a good thing for their children, and in developed countries, we have a lot to learn and to relearn about the importance of education. People who live in poverty are aware of the fact that sending their children to school will give them opportunities that they didn’t have. Even if education is not sufficient, due to the multidimensional nature of poverty, is it possible to consider it vital in the reduction of social exclusion?

Innovation is an essential element to generate sustained economic growth. But, we cannot speak of innovation without a high level of education or a high standard of living. As you well know Global Innovation Index (GII) provides a means of evaluating the innovation of performance evaluation and refining policy innovation policies for optimum growth of the economy. But this social and economic future development depends on the intellectual and human resources progress of the company. That is, the education of future requirements of the company. This implies a change in the techniques and methods used in education by understanding this social phenomenon as being capable of creating versatile individuals, responsible, capable of reasoning and learning innovative forward -looking. Moreover, the GII is a guide which aims at the development of innovation policy to verify that performance on the one hand due to the ability of an economy to innovate, and I refer here in particular to human capital and research, and on the other hand, the performance of innovation, that is, an economy with regard to the results-based-generated the two pillars of exit (knowledge and technology outputs and creative outputs). In this context, in the work of analyzing, comparing these indices we note that among them there is a close correlation which involves finding the combination of policies to ensure the sustainability of public finance on the one hand, and economic growth and employment on the other.

For nearly 20 years we have been trying to improve Romanian education, but without results. Most changes were made in a superficial way and this has led to weak outcomes. This study aims to make a parallel between the Romanian educational system and those from Europe, emphasizing on the most successful, such as the ones from Sweden or Finland. The conducted research shows the complaints of young people against the current system and the European education improvements that are attractive to our country. The main purpose is to create the ideal profile of an educational system shaped by young Romanians who have experienced the system deficiencies in our country. The paper uses conjoint analysis in order to achieve this goal.