Search

Background Availability of a safe smallpox vaccine may be necessary under certain circumstances. Use of the old life virus vaccine was associated with serious adverse events, particularly in the setting of atopic eczema (AE) and immunodeficiency. Modified virus Ankara ( MVA)- BN, a highly attenuated strain of vaccinia virus, was developed for vaccination with improved safety profile. Methods A phase 1 study was conducted in 60 subjects without history of smallpox vaccination to gain experience with smallpox vaccination using this strain in healthy and atopic subjects. Healthy subjects, subjects with a history of AE, subjects with mild active AE and subjects with mild allergic rhinitis without AE were equally allocated into four groups. MVA- BN was injected s.c. in a dose of 108 TCID50 twice in a 4-week interval. Results No serious or unexpected adverse reactions were reported. All subjects experienced mild to moderate pain and redness at the injection site. Dermatologic examinations did not reveal any unfavourable reactions to the study medication, particularly no sign or exacerbation of eczema for as long as 196 days. All subjects seroconverted after two vaccinations and no significant difference in antibody titres between the four different groups was observed. Conclusions A good safety profile of the MVA- BN vaccine was shown. The absence of adverse events in subjects with atopic disorders appears promising for the development of a safe smallpox vaccine for patients with AE or other atopic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Management of AD must consider the symptomatic variability of the disease. Methods EADV eczema task force developed its guideline for atopic dermatitis diagnosis and treatment based on literature review and repeated consenting group discussions. Results and Discussion Basic therapy relies on hydrating topical treatment and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti-inflammatory treatment based on topical glucocorticosteroids and topical calcineurin antagonists is used for exacerbation management and more recently for proactive therapy in selected cases. Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, but the topical calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus and pimecrolimus are preferred in certain locations. Systemic anti-inflammatory treatment is an option for severe refractory cases. Microbial colonization and superinfection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial/antiseptic treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1) can relieve pruritus, but do not have sufficient effect on eczema. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation preferably of UVA1 wavelength or UVB 311 nm. Dietary recommendations should be specific and given only in diagnosed individual food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Stress-induced exacerbations may make psychosomatic counselling recommendable. ‘Eczema school’ educational programmes have been proven to be helpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A number of scientific reports have been published on patch tests with protein allergens performed on patients with atopic eczema (AE). Evaluation of eczematous skin lesions with an atopy patch test (APT) can be used as a diagnostic tool in characterizing patients with aeroallergen- and food-triggered AE. Indications for testing with APT, choice of allergens (aeroallergens and foods), test materials and technique, including present knowledge on sensitivity and specificity, are reviewed on the basis of available literature. This position paper also points out the need for future research on the clinical use of the APT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The atopy patch test (APT) is an in vivo model to study the induction of eczema by inhalant allergens in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. Mepolizumab is a monoclonal antibody to interleukin-5, which reduces peripheral blood eosinophils. Previously, we reported that mepolizumab treatment did not result in clinical improvement in AD. The current study investigates the effect of mepolizumab therapy on the APT in the same patients. Methods: Mepolizumab treatment was given at days 0 and 7 in a double-blind placebo-controlled design. The APT was applied at days –2, 0, 14 and 28. Clinical evaluation of each APT was conducted 48 h after application at days 0, 2, 16 and 30. Skin biopsies were taken at days 0, 2 and 16 for eosinophil counts. Results: The mepolizumab-treated group showed no significant reduction in macroscopic outcome of the APT. Tissue eosinophils were reduced in the mepolizumab-treated group at day 16 compared with placebo; however, this was not significant. Conclusion: Mepolizumab therapy cannot prevent the eczematous reaction induced by the APT. Furthermore, the influx of tissue eosinophil numbers in the APT is not significantly inhibited after mepolizumab treatment compared with placebo, despite a significant reduction in peripheral blood eosinophils. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic eczema (AE) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent intense pruritus and a typical age-related distribution of skin lesions. Several new aspects with regard to the pathogenetic background as well as strategies for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of AE have emerged. There are ongoing studies on genetic susceptibility loci, as well as environmental and nutritional factors associated with an increase or a decrease of AE lesions. The atopy patch test is now available for identification of allergens in aeroallergen-triggered AE. New topical therapies, such as the calcineurin inhibitors, have broadened the therapeutic armamentarium substantially. In order to increase knowledge and coping strategies, patient education programs have been launched. Learning objective Upon completing this paper, the reader should be aware of new developments in AE, especially on nomenclature, prevention strategies, diagnostic tests, as well as therapeutic options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The atopy patch test (APT) was proposed to evaluate IgE-mediated sensitizations in patients with atopic eczema (AE).The prevalence and agreement with clinical history and specific IgE (sIgE) of positive APT reactions was investigated in six European countries using a standardized method.A total of 314 patients with AE in remission were tested in 12 study centers on clinically uninvolved, non-abraded back skin with 200 index of reactivity (IR)/g of house dust miteDermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat dander, grass, and birch pollen allergen extracts with defined major allergen contents in petrolatum. Extracts of egg white, celery and wheat flour with defined protein content were also patch tested. APT values were evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h according to the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) guidelines. In addition, skin-prick test (SPT) and sIgE and a detailed history on allergen-induced eczema flares were obtained.Previous eczema flares, after contact with specific allergens, were reported in 1% (celery) to 34% (D. pteronyssinus) of patients. The frequency of clear-cut positive APT reactions ranged from 39% withD. pteronyssinusto 9% with celery. All ETFAD intensities occured after 48 and 72 h. Positive SPT (16–57%) and elevated sIgE (19–59%) results were more frequent. Clear-cut positive APT with all SPT and sIgE testing negative was seen in 7% of the patients, whereas a positive APT without SPT or sIgE for the respective allergen was seen in 17% of the patients. APT, SPT and sIgE results showed significant agreement with history for grass pollen and egg white (two-sided Pr > |Z| ≤ 0.01). In addition, SPT and sIgE showed significant agreement with history for the other aeroallergens. With regard to clinical history, the APT had a higher specificity (64–91% depending on the allergen) than SPT (50–85%) or sIgE (52–85%). Positive APT were associated with longer duration of eczema flares and showed regional differences. In 10 non-atopic controls, no positive APT reaction was seen.Aeroallergens and food allergens are able to elicit eczematous skin reactions after epicutaneous application. As no gold standard for aeroallergen provocation in AE exists, the relevance of aeroallergens for AE flares may be evaluated by APT in addition to SPT and sIgE. The data may contribute to the international standardization of the APT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aeroallergens and food allergens are relevant eliciting factors of atopic eczema. This article focuses on the methods used for diagnosis in patients with suspected allergy to airborne or dietary allergens and who are suffering from atopic eczema. In addition to classical tests of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity (intracutaneous or in vitro testing), the role of provocation procedures is described. For aeroallergens, the atopy patch test yields the most specific results with regard to clinical history as compared with classical methods. For food allergens and pseudoallergic reactions to additives, this holds true for the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. The methods and their limitations are discussed from a practical point of view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dr. Seneschal has been an investigator, speaker, or consultant for Novartis, Abbvie, Sanofi, LeoPharma and Eli Lilly. Dr. De Raeve is a consultant, member of scientific advisory boards and/ or received personal fees and non-financial support from LEO Pharma, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi-Genzyme and Bioderma. Dr. Vestergaard has been investigator, speaker, or consultant for Novartis, Abbvie, Sanofi, LeoPharma and Eli Lilly. [Extracted from the article]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease. The diagnosis is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Disease activity and burden are best measured with a composite score, assessing both objective and subjective symptoms, such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD). AD management must take into account clinical and pathogenic variabilities, the patient's age and also target flare prevention. Basic therapy includes hydrating and barrier‐stabilizing topical treatment universally applied, as well as avoiding specific and unspecific provocation factors. Visible skin lesions are treated with anti‐inflammatory topical agents such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus), which are preferred in sensitive locations. Topical tacrolimus and some mid‐potency corticosteroids are proven agents for proactive therapy, which is defined as the long‐term intermittent anti‐inflammatory therapy of frequently relapsing skin areas. Systemic anti‐inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatment is a rapidly changing field requiring monitoring. Oral corticosteroids have a largely unfavourable benefit–risk ratio. The IL‐4R‐blocker dupilumab is a safe, effective and licensed, but expensive, treatment option with potential ocular side‐effects. Other biologicals targeting key pathways in the atopic immune response, as well as different Janus kinase inhibitors, are among emerging treatment options. Dysbalanced microbial colonization and infection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1R‐blockers) only have limited effects on AD‐related itch and eczema lesions. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably narrowband UVB or UVA1. Coal tar may be useful for atopic hand and foot eczema. Dietary recommendations should be patient‐specific, and elimination diets should only be advised in case of proven food allergy. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Psychosomatic counselling is recommended to address stress‐induced exacerbations. Efficacy‐proven 'Eczema school' educational programmes and therapeutic patient education are recommended for both children and adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Editor Atopic dermatitis (AD), a common inflammatory skin condition characterized by chronic or relapsing episodes of eczema, itch and sleep disturbance,1 is associated with psychiatric, infectious and allergic comorbidities. Dr. Hijnen has been investigator, speaker or consultant for Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Incyte, LeoPharma, MedImmune/Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi and ThermoFisher. Dr. Ring has been an advisor or speaker for AbbVie, Allergika, Sanofi-Genzyme, Pfizer, Bencard, LEO Pharma and Mylan. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Eczema herpeticum (EH) is a disseminated viral infection of eczematous skin disease with the herpes simplex virus. Knowledge on clinical characteristics, risk factors and recurrent disease is limited. Our aim was to better define clinical characteristics and risk factors for EH and especially for recurrent EH. Methods: A retrospective analysis of EH cases assessed the history, clinical signs, prior treatment and laboratory results using a predefined questionnaire. Results: A total of 224 EH cases from eight European centres were included. Extrinsic AD was identified as risk factor for EH, and only one patient suffered from intrinsic AD. Early onset of AD was identified as risk factor for recurrent EH. Pretreatment with topical steroids, systemic steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors or plain emollients reflected standard therapy. Many patients showed AD lesions without EH, but skin without AD lesions was never affected by herpetic lesions. Conclusion: Patients with clinically active, extrinsic AD are at risk of EH. Recurrent EH is associated with confounders of severe atopic distortion and requires active AD lesions for clinical manifestation. Recurrent eczema herpeticum mainly affects patients with early onset of AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the challenges in and actions to be taken to cure allergy caused by diseases such as asthma, eczema and anaphylaxis. It discusses the needs of public, which are not met like inadequate control of complex allergic diseases, lack of treatments and strategies to prevent it. It further discusses how environment plays vital role in the induction of allergic diseases as they have environmental factors like quality of air, nutrition, climate, and ultra violet radiations.

To cite this article: Pfab F, Huss-Marp J, Gatti A, Fuqin J, Athanasiadis GI, Irnich D, Raap U, Schober W, Behrendt H, Ring J, Darsow U. Influence of acupuncture on type I hypersensitivity itch and the wheal and flare response in adults with atopic eczema – a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Allergy 2010; 65: 903–910. Background: Itch is a major symptom of allergic skin disease. Acupuncture has been shown to exhibit a significant effect on histamine-induced itch in healthy volunteers. We investigated the effect of acupuncture on type I hypersensitivity itch and skin reaction in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Methods: An allergen stimulus (house dust mite or grass pollen skin prick) was applied to 30 patients with atopic eczema before (direct effect) and after (preventive effect) two experimental approaches or control observation: acupuncture at points Quchi and Xuehai [verum acupuncture (VA), dominant side], ‘placebo-point’ acupuncture (PA, dominant side), no acupuncture (NA). Itch intensity was recorded on a visual analogue scale. After 10 min, wheal and flare size and skin perfusion (via LASER-Doppler) were measured at the stimulus site, and the validated Eppendorf Itch Questionnaire (EIQ) was answered. Results: Mean itch intensity was significantly lower in VA (35.7 ± 6.4) compared to NA (45.9 ± 7.8) and PA (40.4 ± 5.8) regarding the direct effect; and significantly lower in VA (34.3 ± 7.1) and PA (37.8 ± 5.6) compared to NA (44.6 ± 6.2) regarding the preventive effect. In the preventive approach, mean wheal and flare size were significantly smaller in VA (0.38 ± 0.12 cm2/8.1 ± 2.0 cm2) compared to PA (0.54 ± 0.13 cm2/13.5 ± 2.8 cm2) and NA (0.73 ± 0.28 cm2/15.1 ± 4.1 cm2), and mean perfusion in VA (72.4 ± 10.7) compared to NA (84.1 ± 10.7). Mean EIQ ratings were significantly lower in VA compared to NA and PA in the treatment approach; and significantly lower in VA and PA compared to NA in the preventive approach. Conclusions: Acupuncture at the correct points showed a significant reduction in type I hypersensitivity itch in patients with atopic eczema. With time the preventive point-specific effect diminished with regard to subjective itch sensation, whereas it increased in suppressing skin-prick reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:  Itch is the major symptom of many allergic diseases; yet it is still difficult to measure objectively. The aim of this study was to use an evaluated itch stimulus model in lesional (LS) and nonlesional (NLS) atopic eczema (AE) skin and to characterize cerebral responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods:  Thermal modulation was performed on a histamine stimulus in randomized order on LS or NLS in rapid alternating order from 32°C (warm) to 25°C (cold). Subjective itch ratings were recorded. Additionally, fMRI measurements were used to analyze the cerebral processing ( n = 13). Healthy skin (HS) of age-matched volunteers served as control ( n = 9). Results:  Mean VAS itch intensity was significantly ( P < 0.0001) higher during the relative cold [55.2 ± 8.3% (LS); 48.6 ± 8.2% (NLS)] compared to the relative warm blocks [36.0 ± 7.3% (LS); 33.7 ± 7.6% (NLS)]. Compared to HS, the itch response was delayed in LS and NLS. Itch intensity was perceived highest in LS, followed by NLS and HS. For NLS, fMRI revealed at the beginning of the itch provocation a cerebral deactivation pattern in itch processing structures (thalamus, prefrontal, cingulate, insular, somatosensory and motor cortex). During the course of stimulation, the cerebral deactivation was reduced with time and instead an activation of the basal ganglia occurred. In contrast LS showed an activation instead of deactivation pattern already at the beginning of the stimulation in the above mentioned structures. Conclusions:  Moderate short-term temperature modulation led to a reproducible, significant enhancement of histamine-induced itch with the strongest effect in LS. The differences in itch perception and itch kinetics between healthy volunteers and NLS in patients point towards an ongoing central inhibitory activity patients with AE, especially at the beginning of the itch provocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Epidemiological studies indicate environmental pollutants to be involved in the increase in the prevalence of allergic diseases. In human exposure studies, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been shown to cause exacerbations of allergic asthma whereas, no data concerning atopic eczema (AE) are available. Objective We investigated the effect of airborne VOCs on the skin of patients with AE and controls in the presence or absence of house dust mite allergen, Der p 1. Methods In a double-blind crossover study, 12 adults with AE and 12 matched healthy volunteers were exposed on their forearms to Der p 1 and subsequently to a mixture of 22 VOCs (M22, 5 mg/m3) in a total body exposure chamber for 4 h. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin blood flow were measured in all subjects before, during and after exposure. Additionally, an atopy patch test (APT) with Der p 1 was applied to the skin after exposure. Results A significant increase in transepidermal water loss was observed 48 h after exposure to VOCs as compared with exposure with filtered air in all individuals (mean difference: +34%; 95% Confidence Interval: 7–69%). Prior Der p 1 exposure resulted in a significant rise of dermal blood flow after 48 h in patients with AE but not in controls. Six out of seven patients showed enhanced atopy patch test (APT) reactions to HDM allergen after previous exposure to VOCs. Conclusion Our results show that exposure to VOCs – at concentrations commonly found in indoor environments – can damage the epidermal barrier and enhance the adverse effect of Der p 1 on sensitized subjects with AE. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the increase in prevalence and exacerbation of AE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors (TCIs) used for the treatment of atopic eczema modify the immune regulatory function of the skin and may have the potential to enhance immunosuppressive ultraviolet (UV) effects. Current recommendations on UV protection in eczema patients treated with PCIs are inconsistent and have given rise to uncertainty and anxiety in patients. Therefore, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) developed a position statement which reviews critically the available data with regard to the problem, especially analysing and commenting the limitations of rodent models for the human situation. There is no conclusive evidence from rodent trials to indicate that long-term application of TCIs is photococarcinogenic. There is a need for further studies to investigate the validity of mouse models as well as long-term cohort studies in patients using TCIs. Available data suggest that long-term application of TCIs is safe, that there is no evidence of increased skin cancer risk and that it is ethical to treat patients with TCIs when indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 35-year-old Caucasian male cook with history of chronic eczema that affects his hands and distal forearms. Clinical report shows that the patient had experienced generalized pruritus and dyspnoea which could not be traced on his family background. Thus, the patient was advised to avoid chicory and prescribed an emergency medication kit to avoid contact anaphylaxis and protein contact dermatitis.