Search

Background: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increased in post-cardiac surgery patients, however the mechanisms underlying BNP release are still unclear. In the current study, we aimed to assess the relationship between postoperative BNP levels and left ventricular filling pressures in post-cardiac surgery patients., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 134 consecutive patients referred to our Center 8 +/- 5 days after cardiac surgery. BNP was sampled at hospital admission and related to the following echocardiographic parameters: left ventricular (LV) diastolic volume (DV), LV systolic volume (SV), LV ejection fraction (EF), LV mass, relative wall thickness (RWT), indexed left atrial volume (iLAV), mitral inflow E/A ratio, mitral E wave deceleration time (DT), ratio of the transmitral E wave to the Doppler tissue early mitral annulus velocity (E/E')., Results: A total of 124 patients had both BNP and echocardiographic data. The BNP values were significantly elevated (mean 353 +/- 356 pg/ml), with normal value in only 17 patients (13.7%). Mean LVEF was 59 +/- 10% (LVEF >or=50% in 108 pts). There was no relationship between BNP and LVEF (p = 0.11), LVDV (p = 0.88), LVSV (p = 0.50), E/A (p = 0.77), DT (p = 0.33) or RWT (p = 0.50). In contrast, BNP was directly related to E/E' (p < 0.001), LV mass (p = 0.006) and iLAV (p = 0.026). At multivariable regression analysis, age and E/E' were the only independent predictors of BNP levels., Conclusion: In post-cardiac surgery patients with overall preserved LV systolic function, the significant increase in BNP levels is related to E/E', an echocardiographic parameter of elevated LV filling pressures which indicates left atrial pressure as a major determinant in BNP release in this clinical setting.

Objective: To assess the potential value and cost-effectiveness of a hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) device in an outpatient cardiology clinic., Methods: 222 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. When standard echocardiography (SE) was specifically indicated on the basis of clinical history, electrocardiogram and physical examination, the same cardiologist (level-2 or level-3 trained) immediately performed an HCU examination. The cardiologist then reassessed the clinical situation to confirm or cancel the SE request according to the information provided by HCU. The SE examination was performed by a sonographer and examined in a blinded fashion by a cardiologist expert in echocardiography. Findings from the two examinations were compared., Results: HCU was performed in 108/222 patients, and a definite diagnosis was established in 34 of them (31%), making SE examination potentially avoidable. In the 74 patients with inconclusive HCU results and for whom SE was still indicated, the decision was mainly dictated by the lack of spectral Doppler modality in the HCU system. The overall agreement between HCU and SE for diagnosis of normal/abnormal echocardiograms was 73% (kappa = 0.4). On the basis of the potentially avoided SE examinations and the obviated need for a second cardiac consultation, a total cost saving of euro2142 per 100 patients referred for echocardiography was estimated., Conclusions: The use of a simple HCU device in the outpatient cardiology clinic allowed reliable diagnosis in one third of the patients referred for echocardiography, which translates into cost and time saving benefits.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the potential value of hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) devices in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with pleural effusion (PE) after cardiac surgery., Methods: Seventy consecutive patients were evaluated at bedside early after cardiac surgery, in the upright sitting position, using an HCU device on hospital admission and every 3 days until hospital discharge. The posterior chest wall was scanned along the paravertebral, scapular, and posterior axillary lines. For each hemithorax, an effusion index was derived as the sum of the intercostal spaces between the lower and upper limits of the PE along the lines of scanning, divided by 3. A standard chest radiograph was performed in all patients on hospital admission and at hospital discharge, and was qualitatively scored (0, absent; 1, small; 2, large PE). The findings of the HCU device and radiograph were compared using kappa statistics and the Kruskal-Wallis test., Results: A chest ultrasound was feasible in all patients (mean [+/- SD] time, 5 +/- 2 min). Compared with the chest ultrasound, a physical examination showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 77%. On hospital admission, the HCU device detected a PE in 72 of 140 hemithoraxes. Agreement with the finding of the radiograph was 76% (kappa = 0.52). In 15 hemithoraxes, the HCU device revealed a PE that had not been diagnosed using the radiograph. Conversely, in 18 hemithoraxes a PE that had been diagnosed with a radiograph was not confirmed by the HCU device. The correlation between ultrasound and radiographic scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001). At hospital discharge, a PE was present in 31 of 140 hemithoraxes according to the findings of the HCU device, and in 38 of 140 hemithoraxes according to the findings of the radiograph (agreement, 78%; kappa = 0.44)., Conclusions: In patients early after cardiac surgery, HCU devices allow rapid PE detection and improve the clinical diagnosis. Compared to a radiograph, this method offers the unique advantage of the bedside evaluation of patients without the need for radiation exposure.

The implementation of a digital echocardiography laboratory exists today using the DICOM (Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine) standard to acquire, store and transfer echocardiographic digital images. The components of a laboratory include: 1) digital echocardiography machines with DICOM output, 2) a switched high-speed local area network, 3) a DICOM server with abundant local storage, and 4) a software to manage image and measurement information. The aim of this article was to describe the critical components of a digital echocardiography laboratory, discuss strategies for implementation, and describe some of the pitfalls that we encountered in our own implementation of the digital third level echocardiography laboratory.

Exercise electrocardiography (ECG) is of limited usefulness in hypertensive patients, whereas pharmacologic stress echocardiography can provide diagnostic and prognostic information. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of clinical data, exercise ECG, and pharmacologic stress echocardiography in hypertensive patients with chest pain and to identify the best strategy for their risk stratification. Three hundred sixty-seven hypertensive patients (189 men, age 61 +/- 9 years) with chest pain of unknown origin underwent exercise ECG and pharmacologic stress echocardiography (237 with dipyridamole and 130 with dobutamine) and were followed up for 31 +/- 24 months. Positive exercise ECG (ST-segment shift of > or =1 mm at 80 ms after the J point) and stress echocardiography (new wall motion abnormalities) were found in 130 (35%) and 86 (23%) patients, respectively. During follow-up, there were 13 deaths and 16 myocardial infarctions. Additionally, 43 patients underwent coronary revascularization and were censored accordingly. Of 12 clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables analyzed, a positive result of stress echocardiography was the only multivariate predictor of either death (hazard ratio [HR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 14.5, p = 0.007) or hard events (death, myocardial infarction) (HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.8 to 9.3, p = 0.0009). Using an interactive stepwise procedure, stress echocardiography provided additional prognostic information to clinical evaluation and exercise ECG. However, the negative predictive value of the 2 tests was similarly (p = NS) high in assessing 4-year event-free survival. In conclusion, a negative exercise electrocardiographic test identifies low-risk hypertensive patients with chest pain and should be the first-line approach for risk stratification. In contrast, positive exercise ECG is unable to distinguish between patients with different levels of risk. In this case, stress echocardiography provides strong and incremental prognostic power over clinical and exercise electrocardiographic data.

The feasibility of two-dimensional echocardiographic visualization of the coronary artery was re-evaluated in adults in the light of technological advances and development of new imaging planes. Athletes are a good model for this type of study. The aim of our study was to visualize in athletes the coronary arteries, particularly the left main artery, and to see if a correlation exists between left-ventricular mass and coronary diameter. Twenty-one endurance athletes, aged between 17 and 30 years, and 21 control subjects, matched for age, sex and body surface area, were examined. All the subjects were examined with mono- and two-dimensional echocardiography, with annular array (3.5 and 5 MHz), with parasternal and apical projections modified in order to visualize the left main coronary artery. Wall thickness, left ventricular internal dimension and left ventricular mass were calculated. Interventricular septum thickness was 10.8 +/- 1.5 mm for athletes (A) versus 8.2 +/- 0.9 mm for controls (C); p less than 0.01. Posterior wall thickness was 10.4 +/- 1.5 mm (A) versus 8.2 +/- 0.6 mm (C); p less than 0.01. The left ventricular diastolic diameter was 54.6 +/- 5.1 mm (A) versus 49.5 +/- 3.4 mm (C); p less than 0.01. The mean left ventricular mass was 278.2 +/- 85.2 g (A) versus 165.6 +/- 35.4 g (C); p less than 0.01. The mean diameter of the left main coronary artery was 4.9 +/- 0.8 mm (A) versus 3.1 +/- 0.4 mm (C); p less than 0.01.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)