Search

Strong tsunami excitation from slow rupture of shallow subduction zone faults is recognized as a key concern for tsunami hazard assessment. Three months after the 22 July 2020 magnitude 7.8 thrust earthquake struck the plate boundary below the Shumagin Islands, Alaska, a magnitude 7.6 aftershock ruptured with complex intraplate faulting. Despite the smaller size and predominantly strike-slip faulting mechanism inferred from seismic waves for the aftershock, it generated much larger tsunami waves than the mainshock. Here we show through detailed analysis of seismic, geodetic, and tsunami observations of the aftershock that the event implicated unprecedented source complexity, involving weakly tsunamigenic fast rupture of two intraplate faults located below and most likely above the plate boundary, along with induced strongly tsunamigenic slow thrust slip on a third fault near the shelf break likely striking nearly perpendicular to the trench. The thrust slip took over 5 min, giving no clear expression in seismic or geodetic observations while producing the sizeable far-field tsunami. The 19 Oct 2020 MW 7.6 Shumagin earthquake involved unprecedented source complexity with two fast ruptures straddling the megathrust and strong tsunami excitation from a long-duration upper plate thrust rupture undetected by seismic and geodetic data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A great earthquake struck the Semidi segment of the plate boundary along the Alaska Peninsula on 29 July 2021, re‐rupturing part of the 1938 rupture zone. The 2021 MW 8.2 Chignik earthquake occurred just northeast of the 22 July 2020 MW 7.8 Simeonof earthquake, with little slip overlap. Analysis of teleseismic P and SH waves, regional Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) displacements, and near‐field and far‐field tsunami observations provides a good resolution of the 2021 rupture process. During ∼60‐s long faulting, the slip was nonuniformly distributed along the megathrust over depths from 32 to 40 km, with up to ∼12.9‐m slip in an ∼170‐km‐long patch. The 40–45 km down‐dip limit of slip is well constrained by GNSS observations along the Alaska Peninsula. Tsunami observations preclude significant slip from extending to depths <25 km, confining all coseismic slip to beneath the shallow continental shelf. Most aftershocks locate seaward of the large‐slip zones, with a concentration of activity up‐dip of the deeper southwestern slip zone. Some localized aftershock patches locate beneath the continental slope. The surface‐wave magnitude MS of 8.1 for the 2021 earthquake is smaller than MS = 8.3–8.4 for the 1938 event. Seismic and tsunami data indicate that slip in 1938 was concentrated in the eastern region of its aftershock zone, extending beyond the Semidi Islands, where the 2021 event did not rupture. Plain Language Summary: The Pacific plate underthrusts the North American plate along the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone producing great earthquakes along most of the plate boundary. The region, that ruptured in 1938, hosted another great earthquake with magnitude 8.2 on 29 July 2021 offshore of Chignik, adjacent to a magnitude 7.8 event in 2020 beneath the Shumagin Islands. Using seismic wave recordings, Global Navigation Satellite System static displacements, and tsunami wave recordings at regional and distant locations, we determine the space‐time evolution of slip during the 2021 rupture process. The rupture extended northeastward ∼170 km, ending just short of the Semidi Islands. The slip is concentrated on the megathrust, from 32‐km to 40‐km deep. Shallow slip at depths <25 km is precluded by the tsunami observations, confining all rupture to beneath the shallow continental shelf. Most aftershocks are up‐dip of the large‐slip regions with a concentration in the shallow region of the southwestern rupture zone. Comparisons of observations and rupture models with the 1938 event indicate distinct slip distributions and seismic energy release, with the 1938 event being somewhat larger and extending further northeast than the 2021 rupture. This provides strong evidence that the 2021 event is not a simple repeat failure of the 1938 rupture. Key Points: The slip distribution of the 2021 Chignik MW 8.2 earthquake is constrained by joint analysis of seismic, geodetic, and tsunami recordingsDuring the ∼60‐s long rupture, patchy slip of up to 12.9 m occurred at depths of 32–40 km on the megathrust below the continental shelfThe 2021 slip pattern differs from the 1938 MW 8.2 rupture, with larger slip in the west and no slip in the easternmost 1938 rupture zone [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A major (MW 7.9) intraplate earthquake ruptured the Pacific plate seaward of the Alaska subduction zone near Kodiak Island on 23 January 2018. The aftershock seismicity is diffuse, with both NNW‐ and ENE‐trending distributions, while long‐period point source moment tensors have near‐horizontal compressional and tensional principal strain axes and significant non‐double‐couple components. Backprojections from three large‐aperture networks indicate sources of short‐period radiation not aligned with the best double‐couple fault planes. A suite of finite‐fault rupture models with one to four faults was considered, and a four‐fault model, dominated by right‐lateral slip on an SSE trending, westward‐dipping fault, is compatible with most seismic, GPS, and tsunami data. However, the precise geometry, timing, and slip distribution of the complex set of faults is not well resolved. The sequence appears to be the result of intraplate stresses influenced by slab pull, the 1964 Alaska earthquake, and collision of the Yakutat terrane in northeastern Alaska. Plain Language Summary: On 23 January 2018 a very large earthquake, with magnitude 7.8, ruptured in the Pacific plate southwest of the Alaskan subduction zone. There are multiple indications of complex faulting for this event: The point source moment tensor is not consistent with a single fault rupture; the aftershock distribution is diffuse, with nearly orthogonal trends in seismicity; the aftershock mechanisms are diverse; backprojections of short‐period seismic waves show complex patterns of high‐frequency energy release not on a single plane; and teleseismic waveforms are complex. Inversions of the teleseismic signals for a variety of models with from one to four different faults being allowed provide slip models that are used to predict regional GPS observations from Alaska along with deepwater tsunami recordings from seafloor pressure sensors at Deep‐ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART) stations. The primary rupture occurred on a fault trending SSE, dipping to the west, and several nearly perpendicular faults appear to have ruptured as well, but the limited spatial extent of the rupture makes it difficult to resolve the details of the faulting. Key Points: Several faults ruptured the Pacific plate seaward of Kodiak Island; most slip was on a southward‐trending right‐lateral strike‐slip faultTeleseismic body waves, aftershock distribution, regional GPS offsets, and tsunami observations are used to constrain the complex faultingThe principal stress directions are influenced by slab pull, the 1964 Alaska earthquake deformation, and collision of the Yakutat terrane [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The up-dip extent of slip during large megathrust earthquakes is important for both tsunami excitation and subsequent tsunami earthquake potential, but it is unclear whether frictional properties and/or fault structure determine the up-dip limit. A finite-fault slip model for the 2021 M W 8.2 Chignik, Alaska Peninsula earthquake obtained by joint inversion of seismic-geodetic data with model spatial extent constraints from the tsunami waves provides unusually good constraints on the up-dip edge of coseismic slip. Rupture initiated ∼35 km deep and propagated unilaterally northeastward with large-slip (up to 8.4 m) distributed over a depth range of 26 to 42 km beneath the continental shelf. Aftershocks concentrate up-dip of the coseismic slip around a strong megathrust reflector with high Coulomb stress change. The ∼25 km deep up-dip edge of slip strongly correlates with a change in plate interface reflectivity apparent in reflection profiles, indicating that a structural and frictional transition provided a barrier to shallower rupture. • Joint analysis of extensive observations to resolve the slip extent of the 2021 Chignik earthquake. • High-resolution slip is determined by iteration of the finite-fault inversion and tsunami predictions. • The 2021 earthquake ruptured a deeper portion of the Semidi segment with no shallow slip. • Complex physical state of the subduction zone controlled the up-dip limits of the rupture. • The 2021 rupture prompts us to reevaluate the rupture zone of the 1938 earthquake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]