Search

Understanding how young learners come to construct viable mathematical arguments about general claims is a critical objective in early algebra research. The qualitative study reported here characterizes empirically developed progressions in Grades K–1 students' thinking about parity arguments for sums of evens and odds, as well as underlying concepts of pair and parity of a number. Data are drawn from classroom lessons of a Grades K–1 early algebra instructional sequence, as well as task-based interviews conducted at four timepoints during the implementation of the sequence. While most students at the beginning of the study (Grade K) did not know the concepts of even or odd and could not make any viable arguments regarding parity, by the end of Grade 1 students were largely constructing representation-based arguments to justify number parity and claims about sums of evens and odds. Results of this study align with other research that shows young learners can develop viable arguments to justify mathematical generalizations. Results also provide preliminary evidence that the instructional sequence used here can foster students' practice of argumentation from the start of formal schooling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research focuses on ways in which balance scales mediate students' relational understandings of the equal sign. Participants included 21 Kindergarten–Grade 2 students who took part in an early algebra classroom intervention focused in part on developing a relational understanding of the equal sign through the use of balance scales. Students participated in pre-, mid- and post-intervention interviews in which they were asked to evaluate true-false equations and solve open number sentences. Students often worked with balance scales while solving these tasks. Interview analyses revealed several categories of affordances of these tools for supporting students' productive thinking about equations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research focuses on the retention of students' algebraic understandings 1 year following a 3-year early algebra intervention. Participants included 1,455 Grade 6 students who had taken part in a cluster randomized trial in Grades 3-5. The results show that, as was the case at the end of Grades 3,4, and 5, treatment students significantly outperformed control students at the end of Grade 6 on a written assessment of algebraic understanding. However, treatment students experienced a significant decline and control students a significant increase in performance relative to their respective performance at the end of Grade 5. An item-by-item analysis performed within condition revealed the areas in which students in the two groups experienced a change in performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Didactica Mathematicae is the property of Polskie Towarzystwo Matematyczne and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A cluster randomized trial design was used to examine the effectiveness of a Grades 3 to 5 early algebra intervention with a diverse student population. Forty-six schools in three school districts participated. Students in treatment schools were taught the intervention by classroom teachers during regular mathematics instruction. Students in control schools received only regular mathematics instruction. Using a three-level longitudinal piecewise hierarchical linear model, the study explored the impact of the intervention in terms of both performance (correctness) and strategy use in students' responses to written algebra assessments. Results show that during Grade 3, treatment students, including those in at-risk settings, improved at a significantly faster rate than control students on both outcome measures and maintained their advantage throughout the intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Kindergarten and first-grade students can develop a relational view of the equal sign. • An early algebra intervention can help students accept equations of various forms. • Students can at times hold dual interpretations of the equal sign. • Students should be exposed to multiple forms of equations early and often in their school experiences. This research shares progressions in thinking about equations and the equal sign observed in ten students who took part in an early algebra classroom intervention across Kindergarten and first grade. We report on data from task-based interviews conducted prior to the intervention and at the conclusion of each school year that elicited students' interpretations of the equal sign and equations of various forms. We found at the beginning of the intervention that most students viewed the equal sign as an operational symbol and did not accept many equations forms as valid. By the end of first grade, almost all students described the symbol as indicating the equivalence of two amounts and were much more successful interpreting and working with equations in a variety of forms. The progressions we observed align with those of other researchers and provide evidence that very young students can learn to reason flexibly about equations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]