Search

Abstract Objective Videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing is an objective swallowing function evaluation method used in dysphagia rehabilitation. However, it is anatomically difficult to detect the entry of foreign substances through the posterior tracheal wall using a conventional endoscope (CE). In this study, we developed an endoscope that can observe the posterior tracheal wall and investigated its reliability and validity in healthy adults. Methods Twenty healthy adults were included. The trachea was observed from inside the larynx using a CE and a portable, flexible two‐step angulation endoscope (two‐AE) with a two‐step curved shaft tip. The visibility of the anterior and posterior walls was recorded. The time from the endoscope tip entering the larynx to the posterior tracheal wall was measured. Additionally, discomfort events were assessed after the examination. McNemar's test and a paired t‐test were used for statistical analysis. Kappa coefficients and concordance rates were calculated. Results The anterior tracheal wall was observed using both endoscopes. The posterior tracheal wall was significantly observed in 18 participants with the two‐AE (p

Objective: Videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing is an objective swallowing function evaluation method used in dysphagia rehabilitation. However, it is anatomically difficult to detect the entry of foreign substances through the posterior tracheal wall using a conventional endoscope (CE). In this study, we developed an endoscope that can observe the posterior tracheal wall and investigated its reliability and validity in healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy adults were included. The trachea was observed from inside the larynx using a CE and a portable, flexible two‐step angulation endoscope (two‐AE) with a two‐step curved shaft tip. The visibility of the anterior and posterior walls was recorded. The time from the endoscope tip entering the larynx to the posterior tracheal wall was measured. Additionally, discomfort events were assessed after the examination. McNemar's test and a paired t‐test were used for statistical analysis. Kappa coefficients and concordance rates were calculated. Results: The anterior tracheal wall was observed using both endoscopes. The posterior tracheal wall was significantly observed in 18 participants with the two‐AE (p <.001), compared to only three of 20 participants with the CE. The time to observation of the posterior tracheal wall for examiners 1 and 2 was 13.3 ± 6.5 and 12.0 ± 6.7 s, respectively, with no difference between groups (p =.400). The kappa coefficients of examiners 1 and 2 and between the examiners were 0.444, 0.643, and 0.643, respectively, with concordance rates of 90%, 95%, and 95%, respectively. Conclusion: Regardless of the examiner's years of experience, we observed that the two‐AE could observe the posterior tracheal wall. Level of Evidence: Step 5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graves' disease is a recurrent syndrome often accompanied by depression. I report a rare case in which dysphagia and bulbar myopathy indicated a relapse of Graves' disease, accompanied by recurrent depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study focused on the Kuchikara Taberu Balance Chart (KTBC) as a tool for swallowing function evaluation. To clarify the relationship between videoendoscopic (VE) examination of swallowing function and the KTBC, we compared median KTBC scores with and without laryngeal penetration identified by VE. Sixty-five patients with a mean age of 84.3 ± 7.9 years were examined at the Towada City Hospital. The patients were classified into groups based on laryngeal penetration, including 28 patients with and 37 patients without penetration. We found no significant differences in patient backgrounds. The median KTBC score (interquartile range) was 36.5 (31–44.5) in the group with laryngeal penetration and 42 (35–48.5) in the group without penetration, but the scores were not significantly different (level of statistical significance at α = 0.0036 determined by the Bonferroni correction method) when compared with the Mann–Whitney U test (36.5 vs. 42, z = -2.33, p = 0.020). The median respiratory condition (3 vs. 4, z = − 3.23; p < 0.0036), oral preparatory and propulsive phases (3 vs. 4, z = − 2.96; p < 0.0036), and position and endurance (1 vs. 3, z = − 3.25; p < 0.0036) scores were significantly lower in the group with laryngeal penetration. This study revealed a correlation between laryngeal penetration confirmed by VE and KTBC scores. Consequently, respiratory condition, oral preparatory and propulsive phases, and position and endurance may be useful as tools for the assessment of swallowing. In particular, we recommend adding respiratory status to dysphagia screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to classify sequential swallowing types using videoendoscopy (VE) avoiding radiation exposure and compare the results using videofluoroscopy (VF). Design: Twenty-one healthy adults simultaneously underwent VF and VE during sequential straw drinking. Each discrete swallow was classified into an L-segmental type (laryngeal vestibule opens after swallow) or L-continuous type (laryngeal vestibule closure continues after swallow) using VF and a V-segmental type (velopharynx opens after swallow) or V-continuous type (velopharynx closure continues after swallow) using VE. Test-retest reproducibility and interrater and intrarater reliability were evaluated in ten healthy adults. Results: Of 128 swallows, 94 were L-segmental and 34 were L-continuous types as per VF, whereas 95 were V-segmental and 33 were V-continuous types as per VE. The leading edge of the bolus at swallow onset was significantly deeper in L-continuous types (P = 0 001 ) . Laryngeal vestibule closure on VF images corresponded to velopharyngeal closure on VE images for 127 of 128 swallows (k = 0.9 8 , P < 0.001 ) . All subjects showed the same types of swallows in the first and the second studies. Both interrater and intrarater reliability were high. Conclusion: VE showed high reproducibility and reliability in the classification of sequential swallowing types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When eating food containing both liquid and solid phases (two-phase food), the liquid component frequently enters the hypopharynx before swallowing, which may increase the risk of aspiration. We therefore tested whether preswallow bolus transport and swallow initiation would change as the viscosity of two-phase food was increased. Fiberoptic endoscopy was recorded while 18 adult subjects ate 5 g of steamed rice with 3 ml of blue-dye water. Liquid viscosity was set at four levels by adding a thickening agent (0, 1, 2, and 4 wt%, respectively). We measured the timing of the leading edge of the food reaching the base of the epiglottis, as well as the location of the leading edge at swallow initiation. As viscosity increased, the leading edge of the food reached the epiglottis significantly later during chewing and was higher in the pharynx at swallow onset. The time after the leading edge reached the epiglottis did not vary among the viscosities of the two-phase food. This study found that the initial viscosity of two-phase food significantly altered oropharyngeal bolus flow and the timing of swallow initiation. Accordingly, increased two-phase food viscosity may delay food entry into the pharynx and be of use in dysphagic diets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the present study was to examine what dysphagic signs identified by videoendoscopy (VE) could predict the incidence of pneumonia and body weight loss in elderly patients living in nursing homes. This study was performed at six nursing care facilities in Japan from March 2007 to February 2009. The 148 subjects (85·1 ± 8·0 years, male/female: 43/105) were evaluated for their feeding and swallowing movements by clinical and VE examinations during the consumption of a regular meal. The VE examination items included the existence/absence of pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration of food and saliva. The patients were followed-up for 3 months with individualized feeding therapy based on the results of the clinical/VE examination at baseline, and the incidence of pneumonia was examined as the primary outcome. In patients without pneumonia, the body weight change was also measured as a secondary outcome. The risk factors for pneumonia and body weight loss (of 3% or more) were identified among the clinical/VE examination items by a Cox proportional hazard analysis. Even with elaborative feeding therapy, 12 (8·1%) of the 148 patients developed pneumonia during the 3 months follow-up period. The existence of signs of 'silent aspiration of saliva' or 'aspiration of saliva' detected by VE examination was a significant risk factor for both pneumonia and a body weight loss of 3% or more. This study shows that 'aspiration of saliva' detected by VE is a significant risk factor for both pneumonia and body weight loss in elderly patients living in nursing homes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The patient was a 78-year-old man with a chief complaint of dysphagia. Extrinsic displacement of the posterior hypopharyngeal wall was observed on upper endoscopy. The patient was diagnosed with ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL) of the cervical spine according to lateral cervical spine radiographic findings. The OALL caused dysphagia. In swallowing endoscopic assessments of patients with dysphagia, OALL of the cervical spine should be differentiated from other possible diagnoses by using radiography when extrinsic displacement of the posterior oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal wall is observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new, physical examination-based videoendoscopic method of evaluation can enhance considerably the understanding and efficiency of clinicians working with patients with swallowing difficulties. Using the fiberoptic nasolaryngoscope, evaluation of structure and function of palate, pharynx, and larynx, along with sensation of the laryngopharynx, is carried out. Next, patients' swallowing capabilities are assessed as they ingest various food consistencies. This method, formerly called videoendoscopic evaluation of dysphagia (VEED), but perhaps more appropriately termed videoendoscopic swallowing study (VESS) has particular value for patients who cannot undergo the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS)-for example, because they are bedfast-or those whose swallowing function is changing so rapidly (after a stroke or surgery) as to call for frequent reassessments. This technique is often useful during the initial consultation with new patients complaining of dysphagia, as a 'stand alone' method of diagnosis and management. Less frequently, VESS findings, along with patient history, will indicate when VFSS should also be obtained. VESS will orient the examiner to the nature and severity of the problem even in this latter circumstance. In follow-up circumstances, VESS is generally more useful than the VFSS. Case presentations are utilized to illustrate the usefulness of VESS as compared to VFSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]