Search

Background: Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for acute myocardial infarction. However, real-world data on its prevalence and lipid management trends for Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction are limited. This study aimed to determine the 10-year temporal trends in dyslipidemia prevalence and lipid management in this patient population., Methods and Findings: The study used a merged database of two nationwide observational cohorts (2011-2020) that included 26,751 participants. The primary endpoints were the achievement rates of the (1) absolute low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <70 mg/dL (<1.8 mmol/L), (2) relative LDL-C target reduction of >50% from the baseline, (3) absolute or relative LDL-C target (American target), and (4) both absolute and relative LDL-C targets (European target). The dyslipidemia prevalence increased from 11.1% to 17.1%, whereas the statin prescription rate increased from 92.9% to 97.0% from 2011 to 2020. The rate of high-intensity statin use increased from 12.80% in 2012 to 69.30% in 2020. The rate of ezetimibe use increased from 4.50% in 2016 to 22.50% in 2020. The high-intensity statin and ezetimibe prescription rates (0.20% to 9.30% from 2016 to 2020) increased gradually. The absolute and relative LDL-C target achievement rates increased from 41.4% and 20.8% in 2012 to 62.5% and 39.5% in 2019, respectively. The American (45.7% in 2012 to 68.6% in 2019) and European (16.5% in 2012 to 33.8% in 2019) target achievement rates also increased., Conclusions: The adoption of lipid management guidelines in clinical practice has improved. However, continued efforts are needed to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Oh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is accelerated in people with diabetes. Dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation play a role via a variety of mechanisms operative in the artery wall. In addition, some unique features predispose people with type 1 diabetes to accelerated atherosclerosis. Various organizations have created guidelines that provide advice regarding screening, risk assessment, and roadmaps for treatment to prevent ASCVD in diabetes. Management of dyslipidemia, especially with statins, has proven to be of immense benefit in the prevention of clinical CVD. However, since many patients fail to attain the low levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) recommended in these guidelines, supplemental therapy, such as the addition of ezetimibe, bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibitors, is often required to reach LDL goals. As a result, the upfront use of combination therapies, particularly a statin plus ezetimibe, is a rational initial approach. The addition to statins of drugs that specifically lower triglyceride levels has not proven beneficial, although the addition of icosapent-ethyl has been shown to be of value, likely by mechanisms independent of triglyceride lowering. Newer treatments in development, including apoC-III and ANGPTL3 inhibitors, seem promising in further reducing apoB-containing lipoproteins., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in Germany. Cardiovascular risk can be mitigated with long-term lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) that reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Although effective, risk mitigation is hindered by poor persistence and adherence., Objective: To investigate real-world persistence and adherence to LLTs through 36 months post-initiation., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with dyslipidemia who were newly prescribed LLTs between July and December 2017, using anonymized prescription data from the Insight Health™ Patient Insight Tool, and followed up until March 2021. Persistence and adherence to the therapies were stratified by age and sex. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to measure adherence., Results: Patients with dyslipidemia and newly prescribed statins (n = 865,732), ezetimibe (n = 34,490), or anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (anti-PCSK9 mAbs; n = 1940) were included. Persistence to LLTs declined gradually across all treatment subgroups and was lower in women than men. Adherence, calculated as the mean PDC at the end of the analysis period (July 2017‒March 2021) was 0.84, 0.92, and 0.93 for statins, ezetimibe, and anti-PCSK9 mAbs, respectively. Among patients who discontinued treatment, mean treatment duration was 265, 255, and 387 days for statins, ezetimibe, and anti-PCSK9 mAbs, respectively. Only ~ 10% of patients persisted between 201 and 300 days. By Day 300, 71% of patients on statins had discontinued treatment. At 36 months, overall persistence rates were lowest with statins (20.6%), followed by ezetimibe (22.3%) and anti-PCSK9 mAbs (50.9%)., Conclusions: High non-persistence rates were observed across all LLT regimens analyzed, with the lowest persistence rates observed with statins., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

This study aimed to investigate the impact of the latest guidelines on the real-world clinical practice of initial lipid-lowering therapy, especially on the use of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in China. All adult patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction in our hospital between August 31, 2018, and August 31, 2020, were divided into the following 2 groups: those patients treated before the latest guideline release, and those patients treated after the release. A propensity score-matched method was used, and logistic regression was used to assess the association with intensive statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor usage together with treatment results between the 2 groups. A total of 325 patients were enrolled in this study, including 141 patients who were admitted before the release of the latest guideline and 184 patients who were admitted after the release. After a median follow-up time of 8.20 months, the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 1.87 ± 0.59 mmol/L (1.87 ± 0.55 in the before group vs 1.88 ± 0.62 in the after group, P = .829). After propensity score matching, the initial usage of intensive statin therapy was decreased after guideline release without statistical significance (17.00% vs 28.00%, P = .090), whereas the usage of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors was increased (19.00% vs 8.00%, P = .039; and 10.00% vs 3.00%, P = .085, respectively). In logistic regression models, the release of the guideline was associated with a statistically significantly increased use of ezetimibe (odds ratio [OR]: 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 3.02; P = .005), a marginally decreased use of intensive statins (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.03; P = .069) and a marginally increased use of PCSK9 inhibitors (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.76; P = .068). In this single-center, real-world data analysis, after the release of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines, an increasing number of patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction were initially receiving ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of the blood pressure (BP) control and cholesterol-lowering effects and safety of combination therapy with telmisartan, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin and ezetimibe double therapy or telmisartan single therapy in dyslipidemia patients with hypertension. After a wash-out/therapeutic lifestyle change period of ≥4 weeks, a total of 100 eligible patients were randomized and received one of three treatments for 8 weeks: (1) telmisartan 80 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (TRE), (2) rosuvastatin 20 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (RE), or (3) telmisartan 80 mg (T). The primary endpoint was the efficacy evaluation of TRE by comparing changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and mean percentage change in low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment. The least square (LS) mean (SE) changes in msSBP at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -23.02 (3.04) versus -7.18 (3.09) mmHg in the TRE and RE groups, respectively (p < .0001), and -25.80 (2.74) versus -14.92 (2.65) mmHg in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p = .0005). The percentage changes in the mean (SD) LDL-C at 8 weeks compared with baseline were -54.97% (3.49%) versus -0.17% (3.23%) in the TRE and T groups, respectively (p < .0001). No serious adverse events occurred, and no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overall AEs and adverse drug reactions occurred among the three groups. TRE therapy significantly decreased msSBP and LDL-C compared to RE or T therapy with comparable safety and tolerability profiles., (© 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Patients with CKD are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Clinical studies suggest statins reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Lipid lowering therapy with statin with or without ezetemibe is recommended for most of the patients in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min and also in those who have an increased urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (≥3 mg/mmol) for at least 3 months. Evidence suggests that it should not be started for hemodialysis patients without evidence of ASCVD. Patients who were already taking statins or statin/ezetimibe combination at the time of dialysis should consider continuing these medications, especially if they have ASCVD. Fibrates should not be used in conjunction with statins in patients with CKD, and ezetimibe monotherapy is also not recommended. The role of PCSK9 inhibitors is evolving suggests that it is effective in lowering LDL cholesterol without affecting the renal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Despite numerous improvements in the management of acute coronary syndrome(ACS), it is a major cause of mortality in India. Lipids play a critical role in pathogenesis of ACS and reduction of lipid parameters plays a pivotal role in secondary prevention. High total cholesterol and high low-density lipoprotein(LDL) are the major lipid abnormalities globally as well as in Indians. Among all the lipid parameters, LDL is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapies across the globe. High-dose statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid are recommended therapies for LDL reduction in ACS patients. Statins have pleiotropic effects on the modulation of thrombogenesis, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial protection. Multiple randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that the use of high-dose statin has significant benefits in ACS. LDL reduction goal is < 55 mg/dl or at least 50 % reduction from the baseline regardless of age or gender. Non-fasting LDL should be measured soon after the ACS as it varies minimally with food intake. The first line of therapy after ACS is to advise lifestyle modifications, combination therapy including high-dose statin with ezetimibe, and evaluation after 4-6 weeks of the index event. If the goal is not achieved then PCSK 9 inhibitors or Bempedoic acid should be used in combination with statins and ezetimibe to reduce recurrent ischaemic events. Despite the proven effect of these lipid-lowering therapies, undertreatment is still a big hurdle across the globe. Prohibitive costs, adverse effects, medication non-adherence, variation in health practice in different countries, and clinical inertia to prescribe this medication by physicians are the main reasons for the undertreatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite contemporary practice guidelines, a substantial number of post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients fail to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds. Our study aimed to investigate this guideline recommendations-to-practice care gap. Specifically, we aimed to identify opportunities where additional lipid-lowering therapies are indicated and explore reasons for the non-prescription of guideline-recommended therapies., Methods: ACS patients with LDL-C ≥1.81 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) despite maximally tolerated statin ± ezetimibe therapy (including those intolerant of ≥2 statins) were enrolled 1-12 months post-event from 27 Canadian and US sites from September 2018 to October 2020 and followed up for three visits during the 12 months post-event. We determined the proportion of patients who did not achieve Canadian/US guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds, the number of patients who would have been eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapies, and reasons behind lack of escalation in lipid-lowering therapies when indicated. Individual patient and aggregate practice feedback, including guideline-recommended intensification suggestions, were provided to each physician., Results: Of the 248 patients enrolled in the pilot study (median age 64 [57, 73] years, 31.5% female and STEMI 27.4%), 75.4% were on high-intensity statins on the first visit. A total of 18.5% of those who attended all 3 visits had an LDL-C measured only at the first visit which was above the threshold. After 1 year of follow-up, 51.9% of patients achieved LDL-C thresholds at either visit 2 or 3. In the context of feedback reminding physicians about guideline-directed LDL-C-modifying therapy in their individual participating patients, we observed an increase in the use of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy at 3-12 months. This was associated with a significant lowering of the mean LDL-C (from 2.93 mmol/L [baseline] to 2.09 mmol/L [3-6 months] to 1.87 mmol/L [6-12 months]) and a significantly greater proportion of patients (from 0% [baseline] to 38.6% [3-6 months] to 53.4% [6-12 months]) achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds. The most prevalent reasons behind the non-intensification of LDL-C-lowering therapy with ezetimibe and/or PCSK9i were LDL-C levels being close to target, the pre-existing use of other lipid-lowering therapies, patient refusal, and cost., Conclusion: Although most patients post-ACS were on high-intensity statin therapy, almost 50% failed to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds by 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, additional lipid-lowering therapies in this high-risk group were underprescribed, and this might be linked to several factors including potential gaps in physician knowledge, treatment inertia, patient refusal, and cost., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Studies have shown the combination treatment effectiveness of using rosuvastatin and ezetimibe in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Our study aim to evaluate the effectiveness of dyslipidemia treatment with the combination of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe 10mg in patients with chronic coronary artery disease compared with 20 mg rosuvastatin., Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of dyslipidemia treatment with the target of LDL-c < 1.4 mmol/L between combination therapy with rosuvastatin 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg in patients with chronic coronary artery disease compared with monotherapy increasing the dose of rosuvastatin 20 mg in Vietnam., Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial, single-blind, parallel-group with a 1:1 randomized ratio in 103 outpatients with chronic coronary syndromes treated with rosuvastatin 10mg daily. Group A received the combination therapy with rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily, and group B received rosuvastatin 20 mg daily. The primary outcome was to assess the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein - cholesterol (LDL-c) control between rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg versus rosuvastatin 20 mg after 4 weeks and 8 weeks., Results: After 8 weeks of intervention, the proportion of archived treatment target patients with LDL-c < 1.4 mmol/L in groups A and B was 69.2% and 44.2%, respectively (Risk ratio (RR) = 1.57, p < 0.01), 50% LDL reduction was 27.9% and 55.8%, respectively (RR = 2.00, p < 0.01), and archived both targets were 51.9% and 25.6% (RR = 2.03, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Group A's LDL-c reduction effect and target achievement proportion (Rosuvastatin 10mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg) were significantly higher than Group B's (Rosuvastatin 20 mg). Both medication therapies were safe in patients, and the increased dose of monotherapy showed more side effects than the combination therapy., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Aim: To assess the implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies among more than 30 000 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a German and Austrian registry from 2020 to 2022., Materials and Methods: Registry data from 2020 and 2021 of 32 170 adult patients (8314 patients with T1D and 23 856 with T2D) were stratified according to the 2019 ESC/EAS risk categories, and guideline-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goal attainment was analysed., Results: In patients with T1D (median age 38.35 [20.51-57.13] years), overall statin use was 19.3%, ezetimibe use was 2.2% and the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors or fibrates was less than 1%. In patients with T2D (median age 68.76 [58.86-78.39] years), 45.7% received statins, 3.4% received ezetimibe, and fibrates and PCSK9 inhibitors were used by 1% and 0.1%, respectively. Among patients with T1D, 6.16% reached their risk-based recommended LDL-C goal of less than 55 mg/dL (very high risk), 10.97% of less than 70 mg/dL (high risk), and 69.50% of less than 100 mg/dL (moderate risk), respectively. In patients with T2D, 11.81% reached their risk-based goal of LDL-C less than 55 mg/dL, 16.25% of less than 70 mg/dL, and 51.33% of less than 100 mg/dL. Non-HDL-C goals were reached more often, with 15.3%, 25.52% and 91.61% in patients with T1D and 18.56%, 17.96% and 82.30% in patients with T2D for very high, high and moderate risk, respectively., Conclusion: Approximately 2 years after publication of the guidelines, LDL-C and non-HDL-C goal attainment was rarely achieved in patients with T1D and T2D with a high or very high cardiovascular risk., (© 2023 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose of Review: It is clear from epidemiological studies that patients at high and very-high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) risk do not reach lipid guideline-recommended targets. Thus, fixed-dose combinations of statins/ezetimibe, bempedoic acid/ezetimibe and statins/fibrates may represent a further armamentarium in the field of lipid-lowering approaches in these individuals., Recent Findings: The combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe is not inferior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. Drug discontinuation or dose reduction is inferior with fixed-dose combination. The fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe is superior to bempedoic acid in monotherapy in lowering LDL-C and in reducing high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. The combination fenofibrate with atorvastatin is superior to monotherapies in lowering triglycerides. Lipid-lowering fixed-dose combinations may guarantee a higher therapy adherence, representing a better approach to control plasma lipids and thus ameliorate ASCVD burden. Additional studies will define the advantages on cardiovascular outcomes in high and very high-risk patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction and Objective: The cardiovascular prevention strategy by autonomous communities can be variable since the competences in health are transferred. The objective of the study was to determine the degree of dyslipidaemia control and the lipid-lowering pharmacological therapy used in patients at high/very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) by autonomous communities., Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study based on a consensus methodology. Information on the clinical practice of 145 health areas belonging to 17 Spanish autonomous communities was collected through face-to-face meetings and questionnaires administered to the 435 participating physicians. Furthermore, aggregate non-identifiable data were compiled from 10 consecutive dyslipidaemic patients that each participant had recently visited., Results: Of the 4010 patients collected, 649 (16%) had high and 2458 (61%) very high CVR. The distribution of the 3107 high/very high CVR patients was balanced across regions, but there were inter-regional differences (P<.0001) in the achievement of target LDL-C <70 and <55mg/dL, respectively. High-intensity statins in monotherapy or in combination with ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitors were used in 44, 21 and 4% of high CVR patients, while in those at very high CVR it rose to 38, 45 and 6%, respectively. The use of these lipid-lowering therapies at national level was significantly different between regions (P=.0079)., Conclusions: Even though the distribution of patients at high/very high CVR was similar between autonomous communities, inter-territorial differences were identified in the degree of achievement of LDL cholesterol therapeutic goal and use of lipid-lowering therapy., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to understand the impact of physicians' perception about LDL-cholesterol (LDLc) control on the management of patients with dyslipidemia in Spain., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional and multicenter study, in which 435 healthcare professionals participated in face-to-face meetings, collecting qualitative and quantitative information related to hypercholesterolemia management. Additionally, aggregated anonymized data of the last 10 patients with hypercholesterolemia attended by each physician were collected., Results: A total of 4,010 patients (8%, 13%, 16% and 61% with low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular [CV] risk) were included. Physicians' perception was that 62% of their patients attained LDLc goals (66%, 63%, 61% and 56%, for low, moderate, high and very high CV risk, respectively). However, when looking into the data only 31% (vs 62% p<0.01) of patients attained the LDLc goals (47%, 36%, 22% and 25%, respectively). Overall, 33% of patients were taking high intensity statins, 32% statin/ezetimibe, 21% low/moderate intensity statins and 4% PCSK9 inhibitors. These numbers were 38%, 45%, 8% and 6% for very high risk patients and 44%, 21%, 21% and 4% for high CV risk patients. In 32% of patients, a change in lipid lowering therapy was performed after the visit, mainly combining statins/ezetimibe (55%)., Conclusions: In Spain, most patients with dyslipidemia do not achieve the recommended LDLc goals because of an insufficient intensification of lipid lowering therapy. On the one hand, this is in part due to physicians misperception on preventive LDLc control and the need for repeated advice to patient, and, on the other, to the lack of patient adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Juan Cosin-Sales: has received conference fees from Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi and Sanofi; has participated in advisory services for Almirall, Amgen, MSD and Sanofi; and has received research grants from Amgen, Ferrer, MSD and Sanofi. Raquel Campuzano: has received conference fees from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Mylan, MSD, Organon, Sanofi, Servier and Novartis; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Organon, Servier and Novartis. José Luis Díaz: has received fees for presentations, advisory services or scientific collaborations from Amgen, Bayer, Boëringher, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Rovi, Rubió, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier. Carlos Escobar: has received fees for conferences/advisory services from: Almirall, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, MSD, Novartis, Organon, Rovi, Sanofi, Servier and Viatris. María Rosa Fernández: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and Rovi; has participated in advisory services for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin. Juan José Gómez-Doblas: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Organon and MSD; has participated in advisory services for Amgen, Sanofi and Amarin; and has received collaborations to scientific or research projects from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer and Daiichi-Sankyo. José María Mostaza: has participated in advisory services and/or conferences, or has carried out projects for Pfizer, Amarin, Ferrer, Sanofi, Amgen, Alter, Servier, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo. Juan Pedro-Botet: has received fees for conferences from Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, MSD, Sanofi and Viatris; and has participated in advisory services for Amarin, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esteve, Ferrer, Sanofi and Viatris. Núria Plana: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo Mylan and Alexion. Pedro Valdivielso: has received fees for conferences from Amgen, Sanofi, Ferrer, Amarin, Akcea, Sobi, MSD, Novartis and Daiichi-Sankyo; has participated in advisory services for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Sanofi, Akcea and Amarin; and has received research grants from Ferrer and Akcea., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim    To evaluate the frequency and structure of lipid-lowering therapy and of achieving the goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) who were monitored at the outpatient stage. Material and methods    A retrospective snapshot analysis was performed by continuous sampling method for 136 medical records of outpatient patients (71 men, 65 women) aged 42 to 91 years [median, 68 years; 25th and 75th percentiles (59; 78)].Results    134 (98,53 %) patients took statins; 8 (5.88 %) patients took a combination of statin and ezetimibe; 2 (1.47 %) patients took proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 enzyme inhibitors (PCSK9): 2 (1.47 %) patients took evolocumab and 1 (0.74%) of 2 PCSK9-treated patients took a combination of PCSK9 inhibitor and statin. Atorvastatin at a dose of 20 (20; 40) mg as recommended at the hospital was the most frequently prescribed statin. 5 (3.68%) patients achieved the goal LDL-C of ≤1.4 mmol/l.Conclusion    Statins prevail in the structure of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with very high CVR. The frequency of combination therapy (statin/ezetimibe, 5.88%; PCSK9 inhibitor/statin, 0.74%) and PCSK9 inhibitors was noted to be low. Only 3.68% of patients achieved the goal LDL-C during the lipid-lowering treatment.

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for stroke, following hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, and is an important risk factor for the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease, including stroke. Recent guidelines recommend considering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies, such as statins (preferably), ezetimibe, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors to prevent the occurrence or recurrence of stroke, adhering to the "lower is better" approach. In this review, we examined the evidence supporting lipid-lowering medications like statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors for secondary stroke prevention and dyslipidemia management in different stroke subtypes. Stroke guidelines advocate for administering the maximum tolerable dose of statins as the primary treatment and as soon as possible despite the potential for new-onset diabetes mellitus and possible muscle and liver toxicity due to their demonstrated benefits in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and mortality reduction. When statin use is insufficient for LDL lowering, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors are recommended as complementary therapies. It is essential to establish lipid-lowering therapy goals based on the stroke subtype and the presence of comorbidities.

The use of lipid-modifying agents (LMAs) other than statins has rarely been reported in real clinical settings. We aimed to compare the initiation and subsequent use of LMA classes for prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Using the national claims database, this retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged ≥55 years who initiated to use statins, ezetimibe, or fibrates between Fiscal Years (FYs) 2014 and 2017 as the first pharmacotherapy for dyslipidemia in Japan. A permissible gap for defining persistence was set as the median days of supply of a class to an individual. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for rates. Cohorts for primary prevention without/with risk and secondary prevention comprised 1307438, 908378, and 503059 initiators for statins; 44116, 34206, and 11373 for ezetimibe; and 124511, 96380, and 27751 for fibrates. The persistence rates declined shortly after the therapy initiation regardless of the classes, which was approximately 50% at 1 year for any class for primary prevention without risk. A notable sex difference in terms of persistence rates was observed only for statins of secondary prevention. The restarting rates were similar between prevention settings: approximately 50-60% for statins and 30-40% for ezetimibe and fibrates 1 year after first discontinuation. For ezetimibe and fibrates, approximately 10% of initiators were added or switched to statins within 1 year of initiation. Collectively, any class tended to be discontinued early and some restarted; however, there were some unique classes. The findings are useful for improvement of dyslipidemia therapy.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a known risk factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Per the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guidelines, high-risk ASCVD patients with CKD and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels  ≥ $\ge $  70 mg/dL should take a high-intensity statin with ezetimibe and/or a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i)., Objective/methods: We examined the changes in use of lipid lowering therapies (LLT) over two years in 3304 patients with ASCVD and CKD in the Getting to an imprOved Understanding of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management (GOULD) observational cohort study., Results: Of those with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , 21.6% (171/791) had intensification of LLT while 10.4% (82/791) had de-escalation of LLT. Notably, 61.6% (487/791) had no change in LLT regimen over 2 years. Statin use was 83.2% (785/944) at baseline and 80.1% (634/791) at 2 years. Statin/ezetimibe use increased from 2.9% (27/944) to 4.9% (39/791). Statin discontinuation at 2 years was greater with lower eGFR levels across all cohorts., Conclusion: Despite the recommendations of multiscociety guidelines, statin use, while high, is not ubiquitous and rates of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe use remain low in patients with CKD. There remains a significant opportunity to optimize LLT and achieve atheroprotective cholesterol levels in the CKD population., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC.)

Dyslipidemia, specifically elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and increases the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Statins, a class of drugs that exert their effects by inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase, a key enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol, have been the mainstay of therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and lipids reduction. Statins are associated with side effects, most commonly myopathy and myalgias, despite their proven efficacy. This review explores non-statin lipid-lowering therapies and examines recent advances and emerging research. Over the previous decades, several lipid-lowering therapies, both as monotherapy and adjuncts to statin therapy and lipid-targeting gene therapy, have emerged, thus redefining how we treat dyslipidemia. These drugs include Bile acids sequestrants, Fibrates, Nicotinic acid, Ezetimibe, Bempedoic acid, Volanesoren, Evinacumab, and the PCSK 9 Inhibitors Evolocumab and Alirocumab. Emerging gene-based therapy includes Small interfering RNAs, Antisense oligonucleotides, Adeno-associated virus vectors, CRISPR/Cas9 based therapeutics, and Non-coding RNA therapy. Of all these therapies, Bempedoic acid works most like statins by working through a similar pathway to decrease cholesterol levels. However, it is not associated with myopathy. Overall, although statins continue to be the gold standard, non-statin therapies are set to play an increasingly important role in managing dyslipidemia., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stroke is the second most common cause of mortality worldwide and the third most common cause of disability. Arterial hypertension is the most prevalent risk factor for stroke. A precise management of arterial hypertension prevents the first episode of stroke and the recurrence. Blood pressure must be decreased carefully and not very vigorously in the acute phase of the stroke. Recommended blood pressure goals in chronic tratment are at least 140 / 90 mm Hg and lower if tolerated. ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in combination with calcium channel blockers or indapamide are favorable antihypertensive drugs. Dyslipidemia is also a strong risk factor for ischaemic stroke and has no relatioship to the other etiologies of stroke. The cardiovascular risk in patients after a stroke is very high. An intensive hypolipidemic treatment by statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9i to LDL-cholesterol goals &lt; 1,4 mmol/l and a 50% decrease was proved to decrease the incidence of recurrent stroke.

Background: Despite treatment with statins, dyslipidaemia patients with elevated cholesterol- and triglyceride-levels remain at high residual risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). New lipid-lowering drugs must prevent the occurrence of MACE and exhibit cost-effectiveness for their successful adoption to clinical practice., Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of icosapent ethyl, fenofibrate, ezetimibe, evolocumab, and alirocumab in combination with statins compared to statin monotherapy for cardiovascular prevention from the perspective of UK's National Health Service., Methods: A Markov model simulated the progression of cardiovascular disease and MACE, including myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, and coronary revascularisation, in dyslipidaemia patients. The model was populated with cardiovascular outcome trial data for each drug. Cost and utility data were extracted from peer-reviewed literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is reported per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained in 2021 Great Britain Pounds (£)., Results: For primary cardiovascular prevention, icosapent ethyl increased QALYs by 0.79 and costs by £15,421 compared to statin monotherapy (ICER = £19,485/QALY). Fenofibrate yielded 0.62 additional QALYs at cost-savings of - £6127 (ICER = - £9932/QALY). For secondary prevention, the omega-3 fatty acid icosapent ethyl extended QALYs by 0.98 at costs of £12,981 compared to statin monotherapy (ICER = £13,285/QALY). Fenofibrate added 0.85 QALYs whilst saving - £637 (ICER = - £7472/QALY). Ezetimibe increased QALYs by 0.60 at cost reductions of - £2529 (ICER = - £4231/QALY). PCSK9 inhibitors provided QALYs of 0.53 and 0.86 at costs of £45,279 and £46,375 for evolocumab (ICER = £85,193/QALY) and alirocumab (ICER = £54,211/QALY), respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £25,000/QALY, there is a probability of 100% for icosapent ethyl (98% in primary prevention) and 0% for PCSK9 inhibitors to be cost effective in secondary prevention., Conclusions: Icosapent ethyl is cost effective for primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention at an annual price of £2064 in the UK. For PCSK9 inhibitors, price discounts or prescription restrictions are necessary to achieve cost effectiveness., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death around the world with various efforts being made to reduce risk in patients through preventive measures. One major method for prevention has been managing cholesterol, particularly low-density lipoprotein to decrease atherosclerotic plaque burden, potentially decreasing future cardiac complications. Statins have been the gold standard therapy for hypercholesterolemia treatment due to their ease of dosing, limited drug interactions, and favorable safety profile. Unfortunately, statin therapy alone is not always effective enough to adequately control a patient's elevated lipid levels and combination therapy may be warranted. Ezetimibe is commonly added to regimens to help augment cholesterol lowering by inhibiting the absorption of cholesterol. The recent approval of a combination tablet of high-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe has introduced a potentially more beneficial option for cholesterol management in addition to the only available combination of moderate intensity simvastatin and ezetimibe. We aimed to identify potential beneficial effects of ezetimibe by comparing its use in combination with high-intensity rosuvastatin compared to a statin therapy alone or in combination with moderate intensity simvastatin through a literature review. The current evidence indicated that combination therapy outperformed statin monotherapy in reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and patients were more likely to achieve their target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal level. This suggests rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination holds a potential place in therapy for patients requiring a more aggressive reduction in cholesterol to help prevent atherosclerotic disease., Competing Interests: Dr Qing Ma reports grants from Gilead Science CO-US-380-5529, outside the submitted work. The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2022 Chilbert et al.)

Purpose of Review: Despite the elevation of lipid values during pregnancy is mostly physiological, evidence suggest that it may be associated with adverse events. This article reviews the characteristics of lipid disorders and the possible management with dyslipidemia in pregnant women., Recent Findings: Among many available groups of lipid-lowering drugs, only bile acid sequestrants are approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia during pregnancy. Ezetimibe and fenofibrate might be considered if benefits outweigh the potential risk. Statins are still contraindicated due to the results mainly from animal studies and series of human cases. However, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed that their use may not be detrimental, and in some selected cases may be beneficial. Especially, in some groups of pregnant patients with very high cardiovascular risk-those already after an event, or with established cardiovascular disease, with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; in such cases the final decision should weight the potential risk of discontinuation of therapy. Finally, we need to wait for the data with new drugs, including PCSK9 inhibitors and especially inclisiran, which (still hypothetically) might be a very interesting option as it may be used just before the pregnancy and immediately after with the duration of about 9 months between injections. The decisions on lipid-lowering therapy in pregnant patients should be individualized. Despite design and ethical difficulties with such studies, further investigations on dyslipidemia treatment during pregnancy are highly awaited., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Despite the availability of effective lipid-lowering drugs, only few high-risk patients attain their LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) guideline-recommended risk-based goal because of underprescription of combination therapy. We present an 18-month experience with variation of prescription protocols after publication of the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias., Methods: Overall, 621 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin, Italy, between January 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled. Lipid-lowering therapy recommended at discharge was registered to evaluate how many patients received statin monotherapy, statin plus ezetimibe combination or triple therapy with high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i). At 6-month follow-up, the reduction in LDL-C, adverse events, compliance and cardiovascular recurrences was analyzed., Results: Of 621 patients enrolled, 7 died during hospitalization. During the entire study period, 33% of patients received statin monotherapy, 50% were discharged on statin-ezetimibe combination, and PCSK9i (evolocumab) was prescribed to 17% of patients. Between April 2020 and June 2021, when new recommendations were introduced into clinical practice, 20% of patients received evolocumab, 56% combination therapy and only 24% were discharged on statin monotherapy. At the beginning of observation, evolocumab was prescribed to 3% of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome, while at the end of the study period 27% of patients were discharged on PCSK9i, with an increase of the prescription rate by 759%; in the same period, prescription of statin monotherapy decreased by 75%. At 6-month follow-up, LDL-C reduction was 77% in patients treated with PCSK9i vs 48% in patients taking statin-ezetimibe combination therapy (p<0.001). All patients on evolocumab reached the guideline-directed goals and a low rate of adverse events was reported, mainly represented by local injection site reactions. Six patients experienced acute coronary syndrome recurrence; only one of them was treated with evolocumab., Conclusion: Prescription of intensive lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome, eventually with introduction of PCSK9i during hospitalization or at discharge, leads to attainment of guideline-recommended goals for all patients, with a low incidence of adverse events and optimal compliance.

Purpose of Review: Lipid registry-based research is a valuable tool for assessing current lipid management in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Results of several registries are useful for improving clinical practice highlight gaps between guidelines and their implementation and potential impact on population health. We summarize recent clinical studies based on lipid registries., Recent Findings: Current guidelines for lipid management recommend high-intensity statins and concomitant therapies such as ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors for high-risk patients. However, recent observational studies show that the majority of patients received inadequate lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and the low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment rates are still unsatisfactory., Summary: There is a clear gap between lipid guidelines and lipid management in clinical practice. Clinical studies based on registry databases represent real-world conditions, as opposed to clinical trials. Contemporary registry data reveal that only half of the patients received high-intensity statins, and less than half achieve the LDL-C <70 mg/dL in secondary prevention. In addition, the major reasons for insufficient therapy have been shown to be not only side effects of LLT, but poor adherence by patients to medication regimens and low use of combination therapies by physicians. The real-world evidence from lipid registries clarifies gaps, areas for focus for implementation, to improve CVD prevention., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The 2021 guidelines primary panel selected clinically relevant questions and produced updated recommendations, on the basis of important new findings that have emerged since the 2016 guidelines. In patients with clinical atherosclerosis, abdominal aortic aneurysm, most patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and those with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 5 mmol/L, statin therapy continues to be recommended. We have introduced the concept of lipid/lipoprotein treatment thresholds for intensifying lipid-lowering therapy with nonstatin agents, and have identified the secondary prevention patients who have been shown to derive the largest benefit from intensification of therapy with these agents. For all other patients, we emphasize risk assessment linked to lipid/lipoprotein evaluation to optimize clinical decision-making. Lipoprotein(a) measurement is now recommended once in a patient's lifetime, as part of initial lipid screening to assess cardiovascular risk. For any patient with triglycerides ˃ 1.5 mmol/L, either non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or apolipoprotein B are the preferred lipid parameter for screening, rather than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We provide updated recommendations regarding the role of coronary artery calcium scoring as a clinical decision tool to aid the decision to initiate statin therapy. There are new recommendations on the preventative care of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Health behaviour modification, including regular exercise and a heart-healthy diet, remain the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention. These guidelines are intended to provide a platform for meaningful conversation and shared-decision making between patient and care provider, so that individual decisions can be made for risk screening, assessment, and treatment., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This cross-sectional study aimed to identify actionable factors to improve LDL-cholesterol target achievement and overcome underuse of lipid-lowering treatments in high- or very-high-cardiovascular risk patients., Methods: We evaluated healthcare records of 934,332 subjects from North-Italy, including subjects with available lipid profile and being on statin treatments up to December 2018. A 6-month-period defined adherence with proportion-of-days-covered ≥ 80%. Treatment was classified as high-intensity-statin (HIS) + ezetimibe, HIS-alone, non-HIS (NHIS) + ezetimibe or NHIS alone., Results: We included 27,374 subjects without and 10,459 with diabetes. Among these, 30% and 36% were on secondary prevention, respectively. Adherence was high (78-100%) and increased with treatment intensity and in secondary prevention. Treatment intensity increased in secondary prevention, but only 42% were on HIS. 2019-guidelines LDL-cholesterol targets were achieved in few patients and more often among those with diabetes (7.4% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Patients in secondary prevention had mean LDL-cholesterol levels aligned slightly above 70 mg/dl (range between 68 and 73 mg/dl and between 73 and 85 mg/dl in patients with and without diabetes, respectively). Moreover, the differences in mean LDL-cholesterol levels observed across patients using treatments with well-stablished different LDL-lowering effect were null or much smaller than expected (HIS vs. NHIS from - 3 to - 11%, p < 0.001, HIS + ezetimibe vs. HIS-from - 4 to + 5% n.s.). These findings, given the observational design of the study, might suggest that a "treat to absolute LDL-cholesterol levels" approach (e.g., targeting LDLc of 70 mg/dl) was mainly used by physicians rather than an approach to also achieve the recommended 50% reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels. Our analyses suggested that female sex, younger age, higher HDL-c, and elevated triglycerides are those factors delaying prescription of statin treatments, both in patients with and without diabetes and in those on secondary prevention., Conclusions: Among patients on statin treatment and high adherence, only a small proportion of patients achieved LDL-cholesterol targets. Late initiation of high-intensity treatments, particularly among those with misperceived low-risk (e.g., female subjects or those with high HDL-cholesterol), appears as pivotal factors needing to be modified to improve CVD prevention., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction : Statins are powerful lipid-lowering agents which reduce cardiovascular (CV)-related morbidity and mortality. However, a large proportion of patients cannot attain the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, despite receiving maximally tolerated doses of high-intensity statins. Also, adherence to treatment may be reduced due to statin-induced myopathy or other side effects. For these reasons, guidelines recommend adding the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe. Areas covered : Authors discuss the main pharmacological characteristics of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects, as well as the clinical effects of the fixed dose combination of these drugs when used to treat dyslipidemia. Expert opinion : The rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination is safe and effective in patients with hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia with or without diabetes and with or without cardiovascular disease. This drug combination enabled higher proportions of patients to achieve recommended LDL-C goals than rosuvastatin monotherapy or the simvastatin/ezetimibe combination, without additional adverse events. Despite the lack of additional CV outcomes data and comparisons with atorvastatin/ezetimibe, rosuvastatin/ezetimibe appears as a potent and generally well-tolerated drug combination eligible for the management of hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia in adults. Recently, the 40 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe fixed combination was approved and is also evaluated.

Despite widespread evidence of the effectiveness of lipid modification for the reduction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, lipid modification goals are commonly underachieved in the United Kingdom (UK). In order to understand current UK lipid management guidance and the corresponding attainment of recommended lipid lowering goals relating to treatment with statins and ezetimibe, a literature review was conducted using PubMed focusing on publications between January 2017 and February 2020 in order to capture the most up-to-date literature. Identified publications were reviewed against key clinical guidelines for lipid management in relation to CVD risk from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, CG181), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN, 149) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Cholesterol lowering goals are central to current lipid lowering therapy guidance, although specific goals vary depending on the guideline and patients' individual risk profile. Current guidance by NICE and SIGN specifies that treatment should achieve a greater than 40% reduction in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) at 3 months of treatment, while the ESC/EAS place emphasis on the lowering of low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and total cholesterol. Yet, despite widespread availability of guidance and consistent messaging that lipid lowering goals should be ambitious, current evidence suggests a significant proportion of UK patients have sub-optimal reductions in cholesterol/non-HDL-C/LDL-C. The reasons for this are reported to be multifactorial, including a lack of compliance with guidelines, particularly regarding high-intensity statin prescribing, patient adherence, statin intolerance and statin reluctance as well as wider genetic factors. A number of possible strategies to improve current lipid management and attainment of lipid-lowering goals were identified, including improving the patient-healthcare professional partnership, conducting audits of local prescribing versus guidance, implementing plans for the refinement of current services and considering alternative options such as cost-effective single pill combinations for improving adherence., Competing Interests: The development of this manuscript was initiated and funded by Daiichi Sankyo UK, who were involved in the design of the literature review and the review and approval of the manuscript. TR has received funding to attend conferences from Sanofi-Genzyme and for research projects (investigator-led and multicentre trials) from Alexion Pharma UK Ltd, AmGen Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Dalcor Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Takeda Ltd. He has no direct stock holdings in any pharmaceutical company or any patents.AP has received funding to attend conferences from Sanofi.SHQ is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo UK Ltd. The parent company Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH are marketing authorisation holders of bempedoic acid and the bempedoic acid/ezetimibe combination in the UK, European Economic Area and Switzerland., (© 2021 Reynolds et al.)

Despite dyslipidaemia management guidelines, many patients do not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets due to insufficiently intensive regimens or lack of adherence to their medication. This was a retrospective cohort study on the Pharmacoepidemiologic General Research eXtension (PGRx)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registry. Patients included were ≥ 18 years old who suffered an ACS between 2013 and 2016, and treated with lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) at hospital discharge or within 92 days. Patients were followed up to 12 months' post index ACS, a new cardiovascular event, loss to follow-up or death. Treatment intensity (high, moderate and low intensity statins ± ezetimibe) and adherence (proportion of days covered > 80%) are described. A total of 2,695 patients were included; mean age [SD] was 63.1 [12.8] years, and 77% were men. High, moderate and low intensity statins were started in 56% (1,520), 36% (971), and 3% (86) of patients, respectively. A further 2% (46) were on statin/ezetimibe combination, 2% (42) on other LLT and 1% (30) on ezetimibe alone. At follow-up, around 70% of patients were adherent to LLT, with those on moderate intensity treatments showing better adherence (76%) than those on low (63%) or high (67%) intensity treatments. Despite guideline recommendations, many patients following an ACS are not treated with high intensity statins, and adherence remains far from optimal. Effort should be made to increase the proportion of patients treated with high intensity statins following an ACS and to further improve treatment adherence., Competing Interests: EB declares having received honoraria from Amgen, MSD, Sanofi and Regeneron, Unilever, Danone, Aegerion, Chiesi, Rottapharm-MEDA, Servier, lonis-pharmaceuticals, AKCEA, Mylan and GENFIT. FS-V, GD and PN are full-time employees at Amgen and own Amgen stock options. AK and GG are full-time employees of Certara, Evidence & Access (previously - Analytica Laser), that received consulting fees from Amgen to conduct the study. EB received consulting fees from Amgen., (© 2020 Bruckert et al. Published by IMR Press.)

Background and Aims: Rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe are beneficial for the management of dyslipidemia. We investigated whether rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe improves hepatic steatosis in patients with dyslipidemia., Methods: Between January and August 2018, 114 patients with dyslipidemia treated for 6 months with rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. The degree of hepatic steatosis was assessed using the hepatic steatosis index (HSI). Hepatic steatosis improvement and presence of fatty liver were defined as a ≥5% reduction in HSI score and HSI ≥36, respectively., Results: The mean age of the study population (50 males and 64 females) was 57.4 years. At baseline, the mean BMI total cholesterol level, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, triglyceride level, and HSI were 25.1 kg/m, 207.4 mg/dL, 126.1 mg/dL, 52.9 mg/dL, 146.4 mg/dL, and 36.1, respectively. During the 6-month treatment, hepatic steatosis burden was constant (mean HSI = 36.3 and 36.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively). On multivariate analyses, ultrasonographic fatty liver and HSI ≥36 were selected as independent predictors of hepatic steatosis improvement. However, when 53 (46.5%) patients with fatty liver (HSI ≥ 36) were selected, hepatic steatosis burden was significantly improved (mean HSI = 40.8, 39.3, and 39.7 at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively)., Conclusions: The use of rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe for the management of dyslipidemia did not improve hepatic steatosis burden in all patients with dyslipidemia, but it improved hepatic steatosis burden in the subgroup with fatty liver.

Background: Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9-I) have been reported to cause a moderate increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in human studies. We thus evaluated the effect of two approved PCSK9-I on the concentration and lipid composition of HDL particle subclasses., Subjects and Methods: 95 patients (62.8 ± 10.3 years old, 58% men), with or without statin and/or ezetimibe treatment and eligible for PCSK9-I therapy, received either evolocumab (140 mg) or alirocumab (75 or 150 mg). Their HDL particle profiles were measured by NMR spectroscopy at baseline and after 4 weeks of PCSK9-I treatment., Results: PCSK9-I treatment increased the level of HDL-C by 7%. The level of medium-sized HDL particles (M-HDL-P) increased (+8%) while the level of XL-HDL-P decreased (-19%). The lipid core composition was altered in the smaller S- and M-HDL-P, with a reduction in triglycerides (TG) and an enrichment in cholesterol esters (CE), whereas the for the larger XL- and L-HDL-P the relative CE content decreased and the TG content increased. Ezetimibe therapy differentially impacted the HDL particle distribution, independently of statin use, with an increase in S-HDL-P in patients not receiving ezetimibe., Conclusions: As S- and M-HDL-P levels are inversely related to cardiovascular risk, PCSK9-I treatment may result in a more atheroprotective HDL particle profile, particularly in patients not concomitantly treated with ezetimibe., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Changes in serum levels of angiopoietin-like protein-8 (ANGPTL8) and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored high-density lipoprotein binding protein 1 (GPIHBP1) in patients with dyslipidemia after ezetimibe therapy remain to be elucidated. Thirty-eight patients who initially received ezetimibe and were followed for 16 weeks were enrolled. Various parameters were investigated before and after 16 weeks of ezetimibe treatment in all patients. In addition, the patients were also divided into metabolic syndrome (MetS) (n = 22) and Non-MetS (n = 16) groups, and various parameters were compared between these groups. ANGPTL8 was significantly positively correlated with triglyceride (TG) and negatively correlated with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) before treatment in all patients and in the MetS group. After treatment, TC and LDL-C were significantly decreased in all patients, and in both the MetS and Non-MetS groups, whereas there were no changes in TG or HDL-C. Serum levels of remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) significantly decreased in all patients and in the MetS group. The ANGPTL8 level before treatment was significantly positively associated with TG and negatively correlated with HDL-C in all patients and in the MetS group. ANGPTL8 and GPIHBP1were significantly decreased after treatment in all patients. GPIHBP1 was also significantly decreased after treatment in both groups. In conclusion, this is the first report to support the possibility of a new effect of ezetimibe therapy. Ezetimibe significantly decreased the serum level of LDL-C, but not TG or HDL-C, while reducing ANGPTL8 and GPIHBP1 in all patients with dyslipidemia. In addition, ezetimibe significantly decreased RLP-C levels in the MetS group., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest S.M. has received lecture honoraria and grant from MSD, Co. Ltd. and Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. and belong to Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Therapeutics supported by MSD, Co. Ltd. S.M.’s spouse is an employee of Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To estimate the proportion of patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) who would be eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapy according to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, and to simulate the effects of expanded lipid-lowering therapy on attainment of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target as recommended by the guidelines., Methods and Results: Using the nationwide SWEDEHEART register, we included 25 466 patients who had attended a follow-up visit 6-10 weeks after an MI event, 2013-17. While most patients (86.6%) were receiving high-intensity statins, 82.9% of the patients would be eligible for expanded lipid-lowering therapy, as they had not attained the target of an LDL-C level of <1.4 mmol and a ≥50% LDL-C level reduction. When maximized use of high-intensity statins followed by add-on therapy with ezetimibe was simulated using a Monte Carlo model, the LDL-C target was reached in 19.9% using high-intensity statin monotherapy and in another 28.5% with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, while 50.7% would still be eligible for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. When use of alirocumab or evolocumab was simulated in those who were eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors, around 90% of all patients attained the LDL-C target., Conclusion: Our study suggests that, even with maximized use of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe, around half of patients with MI would be eligible for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Considering the current cost of PCSK9 inhibitors, the financial implications of the new guidelines may be substantial., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

The efficacy and safety of statin and ezetimibe combination therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. To assess the effect of statin and ezetimibe combination therapy on controlling lipid profiles and reducing cardiovascular events in patients with CKD, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We selected randomized controlled trials comparing this combination therapy with statin monotherapy or placebo in patients with CKD from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases published before September 1, 2018 on the Internet. Eight articles on seven studies, with a total of 14,016 patients with CKD, were selected from 412 full-text articles. Statin and ezetimibe combination therapy had beneficial effects on serum total cholesterol (weighted mean difference (WMD) -20.31 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI), -26.87 to -13.75 mg/dL, P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD -17.22 mg/dL, 95% CI, -18.93 to -15.51 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and triglycerides (WMD -15.08 mg/dL, 95% CI, -23.41 to -6.75 mg/dL, P < 0.001) compared with statin monotherapy. Statin and ezetimibe combination therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97, P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse events was low, with no significant difference between statin and ezetimibe combination therapy and statin monotherapy. In conclusion, the statin and ezetimibe combination therapy significantly improved serum lipid profiles and reduced risks of all-cause deaths and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with the control group in patients with CKD., (© 2020 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Statin therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Understanding the mechanisms of action of these drugs provides an opportunity to define new therapeutic goals for pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic lesions. The present review indicates the existence of previously unknown therapeutic targets for statins, such as Krüppel-like Factor 2 (KLF-2), Cystathionine γ lyase (CSE) and the microRNA regulating eNOS activity and synthesis; nuclear PXR receptor and EB transcription factor regulating Inflammasome NLRP3 activity; the Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1), which inhibits the WNT signalling pathway; the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR-γ) in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which regulates the cell cycle, and the ERK5-Nrf2 pathway, which reduces the level of harmful advanced glycation end-products (AGE) in VSMCs during diabetic vasculopathy. Importantly, our review includes a number of promising discoveries, specifically those related to the effects of miR-221, miR-222 and miR-27b on the structure, synthesis and activity of eNOS, such as microRNA-based therapies, which offer promise in future targeted therapies. In contrast to numerous experiments confirming the pleiotropic effect of statins, there is still insufficient evidence on the pleiotropic effect of ezetimibe, which goes beyond its basic inhibitory effect on intestinal cholesterol absorption. However, recent studies indicate that this effect is limited to inhibiting macrophage migration, decreasing VCAM-1 expression and reducing the levels of reactive oxygen species. Defining new therapeutic goals for pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic lesions and ensuring effective treatment of dyslipidemia and its associated cardiovascular complications requires a thorough understanding of both the mechanisms of action of these drugs and of atherosclerosis itself., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dyslipidaemia is a major modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. At the time the study was conducted, guidelines recommended a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of less than 1.8 mmol/l and a reduction of at least 50% if the baseline LDL-C was between 1.8 and 3.5 mmol/l in patients with either very high cardiovascular risk or established atherosclerosis. In South Africa, there is a paucity of data on attainment of LDL-C goal in patients with very high cardiovascular risk who are on maximum tolerated statin with or without ezetimibe., Objective: The aim was to assess the percentage of very high cardiovascular risk South African patients with dyslipidaemia not reaching an LDL-C goal of less than 1.8 mmol/l, despite maximum tolerated statin with or without ezetimibe., Methods: This was a multi-centre, observational, cross-sectional study conducted at 15 private healthcare sector sites and one public sector site. Adults (> 18 years) with very high cardiovascular risk of familial hypercholesterolaemia receiving stable, maximum-tolerated statin therapy for at least four weeks prior to their latest lipid profile were enrolled into the study, and electronic case report forms were completed after written informed consent was provided. LDL-C goal attainment was modelled, first assuming an increase in the statin dose to the registered maximum, followed by the addition of ezetimibe or a PCSK9-inhibitor., Results: In total, 507 patients were screened, of whom 492 were eligible for study participation. One patient was excluded from the analysis because of a missing LDL-C value. Most participants were male (male 329, 67%; female 162, 33%). Most patients were either obese (223, 46.0%) or overweight (176, 36.3%). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were frequent co-morbidities and were found in 381 (77.6%) and 316 (64.4%) patients, respectively. Eighty (16.3%) patients reported current smoking. Only 68 (13.8%) patients were taking ezetimibe in addition to a statin. Reasons for not using ezetimibe included no requirement for ezetimibe in the opinion of the treating physician (229, 48.7%), cost (149, 31.7%), Physician's choice (39, 8.3%), or other (53, 11.3%). Only 161 (32.8%) of the patients attained their goal LDL-C level. In our modelling analysis, increasing the statin dose to the registered maximum and adding ezetimibe brought an additional 34.5% of patients to goal, while adding a PCSK9-inhibitor, irrespective of any other changes to lipid-lowering therapy brought over 90% of not-at-goal patients to goal., Conclusions: Most study participants were not at LDL-C goal despite maximum-tolerated statin, highlighting the need for treatment intensification in this high-risk population. Although intensifying treatment by adding a PCSK9-inhibitor brought more patients to goal, the initial addition of ezetimibe would be more reasonable, given the cost of PCSK9-inhibitors.

Background: Previous meta-analyses have shown that statins may cause incident diabetes. This article reviews randomized controlled trials using proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) or ezetimibe on the risk of new-onset diabetes., Methods: Eight trials involving PCSK9i and 3 trials of ezetimibe were selected for review. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov were thoroughly searched for relevant trials. Inclusion criteria included at least 100 patients per treatment arm, follow-up of at least 52 weeks, and at least double-blinded study design. Exclusion criteria included patients with previously diagnosed diabetes, nonrandomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, and crossover trials. The primary outcome was the number of incident diabetes cases. A random effects model was used. Heterogeneity in effect sizes was measured with I 2 parameter and the Q statistic was used to test for excessive between-study heterogeneity., Results: A total of 52 214 participants for the PCSK9i and a total of 20 084 for the ezetimibe meta-analyses were included. Participants randomized to PCSK9i did not differ from the control patients in diabetes incidence (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99, P = .87, 95% CI = 0.92-1.07). Participants randomized to ezetimibe did not differ from the control patients in diabetes incidence (RR = 1.05, P = .37, 95% CI = 0.95-1.15)., Discussion: The use of PCSK9i and ezetimibe does not appear to impact the risk of incident diabetes mellitus when added to guideline-directed medical therapy.

Background: The effects of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels on clinical outcomes in chronic-phase acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing aggressive lipid-lowering therapy remain unclear. We examined the effects of hs-CRP levels on the prognosis of ACS patients who underwent aggressive lipid-lowering therapy and determined treatment targets for hs-CRP value., Methods: This post-hoc sub-analysis of a prospective randomized control trial (HIJ-PROPER) included 1734 ACS patients with dyslipidemia, who were divided into hs-CRP quartiles after 3 months of treatment. Primary endpoints were combined all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina, and ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. Secondary endpoint was all-cause death., Results: The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Overall, 1415 patients were evaluated retrospectively. No significant among-group differences were noted in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels over time (p = 0.44). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that the incidence of the primary and secondary endpoints was significantly higher in the highest hs-CRP group than in the other groups [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-2.00, p < 0.01; HR = 5.30, 95% CI = 2.47-11.32, p < 0.01, respectively]. The cut-off hs-CRP level to predict all-cause death was 0.74 mg/L (receiver operating characteristic curve: sensitivity: 68%, specificity: 62%). Multivariate analyses revealed that hs-CRP ≥0.74 mg/L　at 3 months was correlated with an increased risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR = 3.68, 95% CI = 2.22-6.10, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Elevated hs-CRP levels independently predicted a worse prognosis, regardless of LDL-C levels, suggesting that interventions against elevated inflammatory responses plus intensive lipid-lowering therapy and coronary revascularization are encouraging options for secondary prevention in ACS patients., Trial Registration: This trial is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number UMIN000002742. Trial name: Proper level of lipid lowering with pitavastatin and ezetimibe in acute coronary syndrome (HIJ-PROPER) URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr-view.cgi?recptno=R000003334., (Copyright © 2019 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : Although statin therapy is a powerful lipid-lowering strategy, only one-fifth of statin users currently reach their lipid goals. In addition, statin treatment alone has relatively low efficacy in reducing other lipid fractions than low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). In such cases, most guidelines recommend adding the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe. Areas covered : This paper summarizes the main pharmacological characteristics of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (mechanism of action, metabolism), their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects, with particular attention to the clinical effects of the combined drugs in hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia patients (such as the ones affected by diabetes mellitus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)). Expert opinion : The additive effect of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe helps to reach lipid goals in a large number of high-risk patients, while avoiding some safety issues related to high dosages of intensive statin therapy. Patients with diabetes receive additional benefits from ezetimibe as they seem to absorb cholesterol more effectively than non-diabetic ones, because of increased NPC1L1 gene expression. Ezetimibe augments rosuvastatin triglyceride-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects, as well. Taking into account its excellent safety profile and lack of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, the rosuvastatin/ezetimibe association is a valuable alternative to statin dose uptitration.

Benefits and safety on statins have been well-established over 20 years of research. Despite this, the vast majority of patients are not adequately treated and do not achieve the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target levels. This is mainly due to poor adherence, which is associated with dangerous and sometimes fatal outcomes. To increase adherence and prevent worse outcomes, a combination therapy with lower dosage of statins and new lipid-lowering drugs may be used. However, the implementation of new lipid-lowering drugs in European countries is still at the beginning. For these reasons, the aim of this position paper is to give an up-to-date indication from the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy in order to discuss the barriers towards statins adherence and new lipid-lowering drugs implementation in Europe., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction : Lipid disorders are frequent after kidney transplantation (KT) and KT recipients are considered at high- or very-high cardiovascular risk. Among many concurring factors, a major role is played by immunosuppressants. Areas covered : General measures to manage lipid disorders first include physical activity and diet counseling. Modulating the doses of immunosuppressants also improves dyslipidemia. When lipid-lowering drugs are necessary to control elevated plasma cholesterol and/or triglycerides, statins are the cornerstone for managing hypercholesterolemia. However, side-effects (e.g. myopathy, new-onset diabetes, and kidney graft dysfunction) may occur. In these cases, ezetimibe (which does not affect kidney function) alone or on top of statins for the severe cases, is suggested by the most recent Guidelines. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type9 inhibitors are promising but expensive and their use in KT is still limited. Expert opinion : In KT recipients, statins should be used cautiously. Rather than using high-dose statin in difficult patients, an association with ezetimibe is suggested. While fibrates, niacin, and resins do not play a relevant role due to their erratic efficacy and common side-effects, new lipid-lowering drugs are emerging but their safety and efficacy in KT patients still need to be assessed.

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy is uncertain. We performed meta-analysis of 29 randomized controlled trials using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL through April 2019. Therapies were grouped as more intensive LDL-C lowering therapy (statins, ezetimibe + statin or PCSK9 inhibitors) and less intensive LDL-C lowering therapy (less potent active control or placebo). Random effects meta-regressions and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate association of BMI with cardiovascular endpoints. In 265,766 patients, for every 1 kg/m 2 increase in BMI, more intensive therapy compared with less intensive therapy was associated with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 for cardiovascular mortality (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.13); HR of 1.03 for all-cause mortality (0.99 to 1.06) HR of 1.06 for myocardial infarction (1.02 to 1.09), HR of 1.08 (1.03 to 1.12) for revascularization and HR of 1.04 for MACE (1.01 to 1.07). Meta-analysis showed that patients with BMI <25 kg/m 2 had the highest risk reduction in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes compared with patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 (p-interaction ≤0.05). In conclusion, patients with normal BMI treated with intensive LDL-C lowering regimens may derive a larger clinical benefit compared with patients with larger BMI. The results could be due to the higher mortality rate of obese patients that may artificially lower the efficacy of therapy, or due to a true therapeutic limitation in these patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of intensively lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level on the deferred lesion prognosis after revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve (FFR)., Background: Lowering LDL-C is associated with lower cardiovascular event rate, but its benefit on the deferred lesion prognosis has not been well evaluated., Methods: This retrospective, single-center, observational study analyzed 192 deferred lesions with FFR value >0.80 in 192 patients with stable coronary artery disease. According to the first follow-up LDL-C level, they were assigned to the LOW group (<70 mg/dL) or the HIGH group (≥70 mg/dL). Deferred lesion failure (DLF) was defined as the composite of deferred lesion revascularization and deferred vessel myocardial infarction., Results: Of all participants, 61 and 131 patients were assigned to the LOW and the HIGH group, respectively. During the median follow-up of 2.8 years, DLF occurred in 1 and 14 patients in the LOW group and the HIGH group (1.6% and 10.7%, log-rank p = .043), respectively. The incidence of any unplanned revascularization was also significantly lower in the LOW group than in the HIGH group (3.3% vs. 14.5%, log-rank p = .032)., Conclusions: The incidence of DLF was significantly lower in the patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL than in those with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL at the first follow-up after FFR-based deferral of revascularization., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Arterial stiffness (AS) is considered an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Among lipid lowering drugs, statins have a beneficial effect on AS, independent of their hypolipidaemic effect. Based on 3 meta-analyses and other studies, this effect is compound- and doserelated. Potent statins at high doses are more effective than less powerful statins. Ezetimibe (± statin) also seems to decrease AS in patients with dyslipidaemia. Fibrates have no effect on AS. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have data that beneficially affect all AS risk factors, suggesting a beneficial effect on artery compliance. However, there is no direct measurement of their effect on AS indices. In patients with dyslipidaemia, prescribing high dose statins (± ezetimibe) will not only decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels but also improve AS (in addition to other effects). This effect on AS may contribute to the observed reduction in vascular events., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: Guidelines for managing patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) recommend statin therapy initially. Target levels/goals for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) were initially included, subsequently de-emphasized in 2013, and then re-introduced as thresholds, leading to confusion in clinical practice. We designed a multicenter, observational registry of patients with ASCVD, to describe and track LDL-C treatment patterns in the United States over time., Methods: Patients with ASCVD receiving any pharmacologic lipid-lowering therapy were eligible for enrollment in one of three cohorts: 1) currently receiving a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i), or not receiving PCSK9i with 2) LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL, or 3) LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL. Patients undergo a 1-year retrospective chart review, followed by chart reviews and phone interviews every 6 months for 2 years., Results: A total of 5006 patients were enrolled at 119 centers. Mean age was 68 years, 40% of patients were female, 86% were white, 80% had coronary artery disease, and 33% had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Among those not on a PCSK9i, high-intensity statins and ezetimibe were utilized in only 44% and 9%, respectively. Among women vs men, only 36.6% vs 48.2% received high-intensity statins (P < .001). Among patients on a PCSK9i, only one-third were receiving a statin, suggesting statin intolerance is a driver of PCSK9i use at present., Conclusion: Our data on current practice in the US continue to illustrate that high-intensity statins and ezetimibe are underutilized in at-risk patients outside of clinical trials, particularly women. This study will track temporal changes in treatment patterns and identify opportunities for improvement in lipid management in patients with ASCVD., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Although ezetimibe has potential value as an add-on therapy to statins, it is not established whether the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy is more effective than double-dose statin monotherapy. We conducted a crossover design study. Twenty-one coronary artery disease (CAD) patients whose lipid profiles had not achieved Japanese guideline recommendations (JAS 2017), despite receiving low-dose statin therapy, were divided into two groups. Group A received ezetimibe 10 mg in addition to the baseline dose of statin for the first 3 months and was then switched to monotherapy with a double dose of statin for the next 3 months. Group B first received a double dose of statin for 3 months and was then switched to ezetimibe 10 mg in addition to a baseline dose of statin for the next 3 months. Compared with the baseline, double-dose statin therapy reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (from 118 ± 22 to 104 ± 15 mg/dL, P < 0.05) and malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL) (from 142 ± 35 to 126 ± 24 U/L, P < 0.05) but did not lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (3.02 ± 0.47 and 2.98 ± 0.41 log [ng/ml]). The addition of ezetimibe to a baseline dose of statin further reduced LDL-cholesterol (to 89 ± 15, P < 0.0001) and MDA-LDL (to 114 ± 22 U/L, P < 0.001) and reduced hsCRP (to 2.78 ± 0.38 log (ng/ml), P < 0.05). The changes in the levels of MDA-LDL (R = 0.548, P = 0.010) and hsCRP (R = 0.473, P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with the change in the LDL-cholesterol level after the addition of ezetimibe. Add-on ezetimibe treatment appears superior to double-dose statin therapy in CAD patients with poorly controlled dyslipidemia in terms of reductions in LDL-cholesterol level, lipid peroxidation, and inflammation.