Search

Intersecting orthogonal strike‐slip faults with opposite senses of slip pose the question of what allows rupture to propagate through the junction and through both faults versus confining rupture to a single fault. I conduct dynamic rupture simulations on simplified orthogonal strike‐slip fault systems, to determine which conditions produce rupture on both component faults. In models with uniform initial tractions on both faults, slip on the first fault must reduce normal stress on the second fault for it to rupture. If the first fault ends at the cross fault, a stopping phase causes the cross fault to rupture. In models where I resolve a uniform regional stress field on the faults, only a narrow range of stress orientations allow multifault ruptures. These results will be helpful for evaluating hazard near orthogonal strike‐slip faults. Plain Language Summary: There are many examples around the world where two strike‐slip earthquake faults cross each other at nearly 90° angles. This is not remarkable when only one of the faults in a pair causes an earthquake, but it becomes notable when two or more crossing faults move at the same time. This raises the question of what causes the second fault to get involved, or not. To address this question, I use computer simulations of the physics of the earthquake process to test dozens of different fault configurations and earthquake starting points. I find that the location where the earthquake starts on the first fault controls whether the second fault is made stronger versus weaker, and therefore whether both faults can move together in one earthquake. These results can help us understand earthquake hazard around crossing faults. Key Points: Nucleation location effectively controls whether multifault rupture occurs on orthogonal strike‐slip fault systemsA stopping phase from rupture reaching the end of one fault is often required to initiate rupture on the cross faultOnly a narrow range of regional stress orientations allows both cross‐faults to rupture [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One crucial yet unanswered question about the 2011 M W 9.1 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and tsunami is what generated the largest tsunami (up to 40 m) along the Sanriku coast north of 39°N without large slip near the trench. A minimalist dynamic rupture model with wedge plasticity is presented to address this issue. The model incorporates the important variation of sediment thickness along the Japan Trench into the Japan Integrated Velocity Structure Model (JIVSM). By revising a heterogeneous stress drop model, the dynamic rupture model with a standard rate-and-state friction law can explain the GPS, tsunami, and differential bathymetry data (within data uncertainties) with minimum tuning. The rupture is driven by a large patch of stress drop up to ∼10 MPa near the hypocenter with significantly smaller stress drop (< 3 MPa) in the upper ∼10 km. The largest shallow slip reaches 75.67 m close to the trench north of hypocenter, which is caused by the large fault width, free surface, shallowly dipping fault geometry, and northwardly increasing sediment thickness, dominated by elastic off-fault response. North of large shallow slip zone, however, inelastic deformation of thick wedge sediments significantly controls the rupture propagation along trench, giving rise to slow rupture velocity (∼850 m/s), diminishing shallow slip, and efficient seafloor uplift. The short-wavelength inelastic uplift produces impulsive tsunami consistent with the observations off the Sanriku coast in terms of timing, amplitude, and pulse width. Wedge plasticity and variation of sediment thickness along the Japan Trench thus provides a self-consistent interpretation to the along-strike variation of near-trench slip and anomalous tsunami generation in the northern Japan Trench in this earthquake. • A minimalist dynamic rupture model reveals a more complete picture of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki rupture process. • Inelastic deformation of thick sediments can explain the large tsunamigenesis north of 39°N with diminishing shallow slip. • A slow rupture velocity ∼ 850 m/s in the northern Japan Trench explains the timing of the impulsive tsunami. • Sediment thickness variation along the Japan Trench plays an important role in the near-trench slip and tsunamigenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]