Search

ABSTRACT Objective Methods Results Conclusion To evaluate long‐term infection rates in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab.This was a post hoc analysis of an ongoing open‐label extension (OLE) study of dupilumab. Pediatric patients aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate‐to‐severe AD who had previously taken part in the LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL phase 2 and 3 clinical trials received weight‐based subcutaneous dupilumab every 2 or 4 weeks. Exposure‐adjusted infection rates after a median dupilumab exposure of 52 weeks are compared with data from the earlier randomized, placebo‐controlled, 16‐week LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL phase 3 trial.Infection rates were overall lower in the OLE study compared with the dupilumab and placebo groups in the earlier 16‐week trial, including total infections (101.0 patients/100 patient‐years [PY]), nonherpetic skin infections (22.7 patients/100PY), herpetic infections (7.3 patients/100PY), and nonskin infections (92.9 patients/100PY). The frequency of severe and serious infections was low (3.1 patients/100PY), compared with 17.1 placebo‐treated patients/100PY and 0 dupilumab‐treated patients in the earlier 16‐week trial, and no infections leading to treatment discontinuation were observed. Systemic anti‐infective medication use (58.9 patients/100PY) was lower in the OLE study compared with both the dupilumab and placebo groups in the 16‐week trial.Overall, reduced infection rates are observed in infants and young children with moderate‐to‐severe AD treated with dupilumab long‐term, supporting the known safety profile of dupilumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), particularly infants and young children, are at greater risk of developing skin infections. In this study, we assessed infection rates in AD patients aged 6 months to 5 years treated with dupilumab. Methods: In LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial, children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo, with concomitant low-potency topical corticosteroids, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Exposure-adjusted infection rates were used to compare treatment groups. Results: The analysis included 162 patients, of whom 83 received dupilumab and 79 received placebo. Total infection rates were not significantly different between the dupilumab and placebo groups (rate ratio [RR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.48–1.19; p = 0.223). Non-herpetic adjudicated skin infections and bacterial infections were significantly less frequent with dupilumab versus placebo (non-herpetic skin infections: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21–0.99; p = 0.047; bacterial infections: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.67; p = 0.019), and the number of patients using systemic anti-infective medication was significantly lower in the dupilumab group (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30–0.89; p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in the number of herpetic infections between the dupilumab and placebo groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.31–4.35; p = 0.817). The number of patients with two or more infection events was significantly higher in the placebo group (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.68; p = 0.004), and no severe or serious infections (including eczema herpeticum) were observed among patients receiving dupilumab. Conclusions: These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in infants and children younger than 6 years with AD does not increase overall risk of infections and is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial and non-herpetic skin infections compared with placebo, resulting in a reduced need for anti-infective medication. Trial Registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT03346434 on November 17, 2017. Infographic: Plain Language Summary: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic disease of the skin, are at greater risk of developing skin infections, particularly infants and young children. Several medications for AD may weaken the patient's immune system, further increasing the risk of infections. Dupilumab is a recently developed drug for AD that should not interfere with the patient's immune defenses against bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. In this study, we evaluated the effect of dupilumab on infections in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients received 200 or 300 mg of dupilumab (depending on the child's weight) or placebo, together with ointments containing mild steroids, every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. At the end of treatment, total infections were not significantly different between patients receiving dupilumab and placebo. Furthermore, patients receiving dupilumab experienced significantly less bacterial and non-herpetic skin infections and used significantly less anti-infective medication compared with patients receiving placebo. Herpetic infections were also not significantly different between dupilumab- and placebo-treated patients. Finally, significantly more patients in the placebo group experienced two or more infections. This study demonstrates that dupilumab does not increase the risk of infections in infants and young children with AD and can decrease the use of anti-infective medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The summarized guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for the management of AD with phototherapy and systemic therapies. A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. The workgroup developed 11 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics, oral Janus Kinase inhibitors, and other immunomodulatory medications. The evidence supported strong recommendations for the use of dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib and conditional recommendations in favor of using phototherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate, and against the use of systemic corticosteroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For people with atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapies, treatment with phototherapy and systemic therapies can be considered. Multiple biologic therapies and Janus kinase (JAK)inhibitors have been approved since 2014 to treat AD. These guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for management of AD with phototherapy and systemic therapies. To provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of phototherapy and systemic therapies for AD in adults. A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. The workgroup developed 11 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with phototherapy and systemic agents, including biologics, oral JAK inhibitors, and other immunomodulatory medications. Most randomized controlled trials of phototherapy and systemic therapies for AD are of short duration with subsequent extension studies, limiting comparative long-term efficacy and safety conclusions. We make strong recommendations for the use of dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib. We make conditional recommendations in favor of using phototherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate, and against the use of systemic corticosteroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background While previous studies into continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) demonstrated sustained efficacy, further study into long-term safety and efficacy data regarding dupilumab in children is needed. Objectives To evaluate the impact of treatment with dupilumab and low-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) for up to 2 years on efficacy and safety measures in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods Children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD, who had participated in prior dupilumab pediatric AD studies were enrolled in a phase 3 open label extension (OLE) study. Patients received subcutaneous dupilumab every 4 weeks; 200 mg for children weighing 5 to <15 kg, 300mg for 15 to <30 kg. Topical AD treatments were allowed. Efficacy outcomes assessed include the proportion of patients who achieved 75% improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) score and the proportion of patients who achieved an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 as observed from OLE baseline to 2 years. Safety was also evaluated. Results A total of 180 patients were included in the 6 month to 5 years cohort; mean (±SD) age at OLE baseline was 3.9 (1.3) years with mean (SD) duration of AD of 3.5 (1.3) years. At OLE baseline, 29.4% of patients achieved EASI-75, improving to 85.1% at 52 weeks and 92.1% at 104 weeks. Similarly, 12.8% of patients achieved IGA 0/1 at OLE baseline, improving to 36.0% at Week 52 and 40.6% at Week 104. Total treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 87.8% of patients (intensity: mild 24.4%, moderate 52.2%, severe 11.1%). TEAEs assessed as related to dupilumab by the study investigators were reported in 18.3% of patients; the most prevalent were conjunctivitis (2.8%), allergic conjunctivitis (1.7%), nasopharyngitis (1.7%) and urticaria (1.7%). Serious TEAEs assessed as related to dupilumab by the study investigators were observed in 0.6% of patients. Conclusions Treatment with dupilumab for up to 2 years in young children with moderate-to-severe AD demonstrated efficacy outcomes, with sustained improvement in clinical signs reported in a large proportion of patients. Results are consistent with the known safety profile for dupilumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background Children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are at increased risk of lower bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. Peak bone mass achieved during prepubescence is a major determinant of lifetime risk of fractures and osteoporosis. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) promotes bone mineralization and contributes to density and linear growth in children. Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) negatively impact growth and bone health. Objectives To describe the impact of dupilumab treatment on BALP in children aged 6–11 years with moderate-to-severe AD and prior history of SCS use. Methods BALP levels in sera from participants receiving dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) or placebo in LIBERTY AD PEDS (NCT03345914) and dupilumab 300 mg q4w in LIBERTY AD PED-OLE (NCT02612454) were analyzed at baseline and at 8, 12, 16 (PEDS), and 52 weeks (PED-OLE). Serum BALP levels (mcg/L) were stratified by prior use (with SCS; n = 42) or with no prior use of SCS (without SCS; n = 203), as captured in PEDS patient history at baseline. Results Regardless of prior SCS use, dupilumab treatment led to significant increase in BALP levels in children with moderate-to-severe AD at Week 16 compared with the placebo group (with SCS: 300 mg q4w [n = 25] vs placebo [n = 17], mean change [standard deviation] in BALP levels of 15.1 mcg/L [16.5] vs −5.5 mcg/L [16.0], P = 0.0099; without SCS: 300 mg q4w [n = 97] vs placebo [n = 106], 11.8 mcg/L [18.8] vs 2.2 mcg/L [16.3], P = 0.0074). By Week 52, BALP levels further increased vs baseline regardless of prior SCS use and were comparable with reference intervals (with SCS: 24.5 mcg/L [16.8], P = 0.0044; without SCS: 13.4 mcg/L [19.4], P = 0.0002). Patients in the placebo group who switched to dupilumab in PED-OLE had improved to levels similar to those of patients continuing treatment by Week 52 (with SCS: 23.3 mcg/L [19.3], P = 0.0067 [vs baseline]; without SCS: 18.4 mcg/L [20.4], P < 0.0001 [vs baseline]). Conclusions Dupilumab treatment increased BALP levels in children aged 6-11 years with moderate-to-severe AD irrespective of prior history of SCS use. These results add to the body of evidence that moderate-to-severe AD can negatively impact BALP levels, and that this effect may be improved with dupilumab in this age group, regardless of history of SCS use. The increase in BALP levels suggests that dupilumab may help improve bone mineralization in children with moderate-to-severe AD when treated during prepubescence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Previous studies of dupilumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents, and severe atopic dermatitis in children aged 6 to < 12 years demonstrate no clinically important changes in laboratory parameters. The objective of this study was to assess laboratory outcomes in children aged 6 months to < 6 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab. Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of dupilumab, 161 children aged 6 months to < 6 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis were enrolled from 31 sites in Europe and North America and randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous placebo or dupilumab (5 kg to < 15 kg: 200 mg; 15 kg to < 30 kg: 300 mg) every 4 weeks plus topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks. Hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis assessments were analyzed on blood and urine samples collected at screening and weeks 4 and 16; descriptive statistics are provided. Results: No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters were observed. While two cases of eosinophilia and one case each of neutropenia and leukocytosis were reported as treatment-emergent adverse events in the dupilumab plus topical corticosteroids group, these events were not associated with clinical symptoms and did not lead to treatment discontinuation or study withdrawal. Conclusions: These results suggest that routine laboratory monitoring of children aged 6 months to < 6 years treated with dupilumab plus topical corticosteroids is not required. Limitations of this study include short study duration, and exclusion of patients with abnormalities in laboratory test results at screening. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03346434, part B Plain Language Summary: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that often causes itchy rashes. To reduce persistent AD signs and symptoms, patients may need to take medications that require laboratory monitoring. This can add to treatment burden, especially among infants and children. Dupilumab is a drug that specifically targets key molecules that underlie AD and has been tested in several clinical trials, now in patients 6 months and older. Studies in adults, adolescents, and children as young as 6 years of age with moderate-to-severe AD have shown that dupilumab can be used without the need for regular laboratory tests. In this study, the authors analyzed blood and urine samples collected during a clinical trial of dupilumab in 161 infants and children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Routine laboratory tests revealed no clinically meaningful changes in patients' blood and urine following treatment with dupilumab. In general, the laboratory results in these patients were similar to those in adults, adolescents, and children aged 6–11 years treated with dupilumab. Taken together, these findings suggest that dupilumab can be used for the continuous treatment of moderate-to-severe AD without the need for routine laboratory monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: Patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have increased risk of cutaneous and extracutaneous infections. Dupilumab has previously been associated with reduced risk of serious/severe infections and non‐herpetic skin infections in adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD. This analysis assessed infection rates with dupilumab versus placebo in pediatric patients with moderate‐to‐severe and severe AD participating in clinical trials. Methods: This is a pooled analysis from two 16‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 clinical trials of dupilumab: monotherapy in adolescents aged 12–17 years with moderate‐to‐severe AD (LIBERTY AD ADOL, NCT03054428) and with concomitant topical corticosteroids in children aged 6–11 years with severe AD (LIBERTY AD PEDS, NCT03345914). Data were pooled according to treatment received: placebo/approved dupilumab doses/other studied dupilumab doses/all dupilumab doses. Exposure‐adjusted rates (patients with ≥1 event per 100 patient‐years [nP/100 PY]) were used to compare treatment groups. Results: Overall, 612 patients were included: 205 received placebo and 407 received dupilumab (261 received approved dupilumab doses and 146 received other studied dupilumab doses). Overall infection rates were numerically lower with dupilumab versus placebo (nP/100 PY: placebo, 227; approved dupilumab, 173; other dupilumab, 206; all dupilumab, 184). Total skin infections were numerically less frequent in all dupilumab‐treated groups versus placebo (nP/100 PY: placebo, 67; approved dupilumab, 30; other dupilumab, 46; all dupilumab, 36). Conclusions: These data suggest that dupilumab treatment in children and adolescents with AD does not increase infection risk overall and is associated with lower rates of skin infections compared with placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Psoriasiform eruptions after initiation of dupilumab have been previously described in adults. This report details the risk of developing or unmasking psoriasiform eruptions after initiation of dupilumab in children. Methods: Records of patients ≤18 years of age with atopic dermatitis who developed psoriasiform dermatitis during treatment with dupilumab were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Six children, 4–18 years of age, on dupilumab for severe atopic dermatitis developed new‐onset psoriasiform dermatitis at a median duration of 8 months (range, 6‐12 months) after dupilumab initiation. Typical locations of psoriasis were involved (face, scalp, trunk, and extensor extremities). The majority showed clearance or near clearance with the use of medium‐strength to potent topical corticosteroid ointments and 83% continued use of the dupilumab. A 7th patient had psoriasis, in addition to severe atopic dermatitis, and the psoriasis was unmasked by its failure to respond to dupilumab. Conclusion: Although unusual, psoriasiform lesions can appear during effective treatment with dupilumab for atopic dermatitis, potentially reflecting a shift toward cutaneous IL‐23/TH17 pathway activation with dupilumab‐induced suppression of type 2 immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dupilumab demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in two randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, phase III trials in adolescents (12–17 years; LIBERTY AD ADOL) and children (6–11 years; LIBERTY AD PEDS) with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated for 16 weeks. Here, we present the pharmacokinetic profiles and exposure‐response (E‐R) relationships of dupilumab that guided the posology in these populations. A total of 251 adolescent patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD were randomized to subcutaneous dupilumab monotherapy every 2 weeks (q2w; 200 mg q2w, baseline weight < 60 kg; 300 mg q2w, ≥ 60 kg), dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; non‐weight tiered), or placebo; 367 children with severe AD were randomized to dupilumab q2w (100 mg q2w, baseline weight < 30 kg; 200 mg q2w, ≥ 30 kg), dupilumab 300 mg q4w, or placebo. Children received concomitant topical corticosteroids in addition to dupilumab, and loading doses were administered at the start of therapy. Mean dupilumab trough concentrations at week 16 for weight subcategories in each dosing regimen were compared with adult exposures for the approved dupilumab 300 mg q2w regimen. Positive E‐R relationships were demonstrated between dupilumab trough concentrations and AD outcome measures across patient populations and regimens; no relationship was observed with treatment‐emergent conjunctivitis. Based on these analyses, a weight‐tiered posology was proposed for adolescents (200/300 mg q2w in patients 30–< 60 kg/≥ 60 kg) and children (300 mg q4w in patients 15–< 30 kg, 200 mg q2w in patients 30–< 60 kg) with moderate‐to‐severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies of dupilumab in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) showed no clinically meaningful adverse changes in laboratory parameters. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess laboratory outcomes in children aged 6–11 years with severe AD in a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of dupilumab. Methods: Children aged 6–11 years with severe AD were randomized 1:1:1 to 16 weeks of dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks, 100 or 200 mg every 2 weeks, or matching placebo, all with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS). Blood samples were collected at baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16; urine samples were collected at baseline and Weeks 4 and 16. Results: Of 367 patients enrolled in the study, 362 were included in the safety analysis, 351 completed study treatment, and 4 withdrew due to treatment-emergent adverse events not related to laboratory abnormalities. Both dupilumab + TCS groups showed overall trends toward increases in mean blood levels of eosinophils and alkaline phosphatase, and decreases in mean blood levels of platelets, neutrophils, and lactate dehydrogenase levels, without corresponding mean changes in the placebo + TCS group. None of these changes were associated with symptoms or clinically meaningful adverse outcomes, and none led to treatment modification. No clinically significant changes or trends were observed for other measured laboratory parameters. Conclusion: There were no clinically meaningful adverse changes in routine laboratory parameters attributable to treatment with dupilumab + TCS. Changes in platelet counts and lactate dehydrogenase levels likely reflect reduced inflammation. These results confirm similar findings in adults and adolescents, and suggest that there is no need for routine laboratory monitoring of children aged 6–11 years treated with dupilumab + TCS for severe AD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345914. 4bTSAzFaRmrELnrwsHf1S6 Does treatment with dupilumab require routine laboratory monitoring in 6- to 11-year-old children with severe atopic dermatitis? (MP4 180482 kb) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laboratory testing is typically required for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with systemic immunosuppressants. A previous analysis of laboratory outcomes in randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD found no clinically important changes in hematologic, serum chemistry, and urinalysis parameters, supporting the use of dupilumab without routine laboratory monitoring. Objective: The aim was to assess laboratory results in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Adolescents aged ≥ 12 to < 18 years with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 1:1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab 200/300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) (200 mg for patients < 60 kg at baseline; 300 mg for patients ≥ 60 kg at baseline); dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w); or placebo for 16 weeks. Laboratory evaluations included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis parameters. Results: Of 251 patients enrolled in the study, 250 received treatment and were included in the analysis. 4.7%, 2.4%, and 4.8% of patients receiving placebo, dupilumab 200/300 mg q2w, and dupilumab 300 mg q4w, respectively, had laboratory abnormalities reported as treatment-emergent adverse events, none of which prompted discontinuation of study treatment or study withdrawal. Mean eosinophil counts were elevated at baseline in all treatment groups. Patients in both dupilumab regimens, but not the placebo group, showed mild transient increases in mean eosinophil counts above baseline that returned to near-baseline values by week 16. Mean levels of lactate dehydrogenase trended towards the upper limit of normal at baseline and decreased with treatment; greater decreases were seen in dupilumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients. There were no meaningful changes in other laboratory parameters, and none of the laboratory abnormalities were clinically significant. Conclusion: No clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters were seen in adolescents, similar to that observed in adults. The findings of this study indicate no routine laboratory monitoring is required in this population prior to or during dupilumab treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03054428. 6vz_jLtTkCJ6tzGx5HdiGv Video abstract: Effect of Dupilumab on Laboratory Parameters in Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial (MP4 175137 KB) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Conjunctivitis is a known comorbidity of atopic dermatitis. Dupilumab clinical trials for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults showed a higher conjunctivitis incidence for dupilumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients, whereas trials for uncontrolled asthma reported lower rates for both dupilumab and placebo. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis or uncontrolled asthma. Methods: We evaluated the incidence of conjunctivitis in adolescents (aged 12 to < 18 years) in three phase III trials. Ocular events were diagnosed and treated based on patient-reported symptoms and an external eye examination by study investigators, in most cases without an ophthalmologic referral. In LIBERTY AD ADOL (16-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial), adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis were randomized to subcutaneous placebo, dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks, or dupilumab every 2 weeks (200 mg, patients < 60 kg at baseline; 300 mg, ≥ 60 kg at baseline). In LIBERTY AD PED-OLE (open-label extension), pediatric patients from previous dupilumab atopic dermatitis trials received dupilumab 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg weekly (up to 300 mg) or 300 mg every 4 weeks. In LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial), patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma were randomized to 52 weeks of add-on therapy with dupilumab 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks or matched-volume placebo. Results: In ADOL, more dupilumab-treated (17/165; 10.3%) than placebo-treated patients (4/85; 4.7%) reported one or more conjunctivitis event. All events were mild to moderate in severity; 12 (7.3%) dupilumab-treated and 4 (4.7%) placebo-treated patients received treatment. Most patients with conjunctivitis (dupilumab, 12/17; placebo, 4/4) recovered/resolved during the treatment period. The risk of conjunctivitis showed no relationship with dupilumab serum concentration. In PED-OLE, 12/275 adolescents (4.4%) reported one or more conjunctivitis event. Most conjunctivitis events were mild to moderate. Ten patients received treatment for conjunctivitis. Ten patients recovered/resolved during the study. In QUEST, similar low proportions of dupilumab-treated (2/68, 2.9%) and placebo-treated (1/39, 2.6%) adolescents reported one or more conjunctivitis event. All events were mild to moderate. One dupilumab-treated patient received treatment for conjunctivitis. All cases recovered/resolved during the study. No patients in these trials discontinued study treatment temporarily or permanently because of conjunctivitis. In ADOL, one case of unspecified viral keratitis (specific viral etiology not known) in the dupilumab 300-mg every 4 weeks group and one case of allergic blepharitis in the placebo group were reported; both events resolved during the treatment period, and neither led to treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Dupilumab-treated adolescents in atopic dermatitis trials had a higher incidence of conjunctivitis than placebo-treated patients, whereas overall rates of conjunctivitis among adolescents in the asthma trial were lower than in atopic dermatitis trials and were similar for dupilumab- and placebo-treated patients. Most events were mild to moderate, most recovered/resolved, and none prompted study withdrawal. These results are similar to those reported in adult trials and support a drug–disease interaction. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03054428, NCT02612454, NCT02414854. FSZJ5YMfe98kiNB8ymgqFL Conjunctivitis in Dupilumab Clinical Trials for Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis or Asthma (MP4 18453 kb) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have limited treatment options.Objective: We report the efficacy and safety of dupilumab + topical corticosteroids (TCS) in children aged 6-11 years with severe AD inadequately controlled with topical therapies.Methods: In this double-blind, 16-week, phase 3 trial (NCT03345914), 367 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 300 mg dupilumab every 4 weeks (300 mg q4w), a weight-based regimen of dupilumab every 2 weeks (100 mg q2w, baseline weight <30 kg; 200 mg q2w, baseline weight ≥30 kg), or placebo; with concomitant medium-potency TCS.Results: Both the q4w and q2w dupilumab + TCS regimens resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in signs, symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) versus placebo + TCS in all prespecified endpoints. For q4w, q2w, and placebo, 32.8%, 29.5%, and 11.4% of patients, respectively, achieved Investigator's Global Assessment scores of 0 or 1; 69.7%, 67.2%, and 26.8% achieved ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores; and 50.8%, 58.3%, and 12.3% achieved ≥4-point reduction in worst itch score. Response to therapy was weight-dependent: optimal dupilumab doses for efficacy and safety were 300 mg q4w in children <30 kg and 200 mg q2w in children ≥30 kg. Conjunctivitis and injection-site reactions were more common with dupilumab + TCS than with placebo + TCS.Limitations: Short-term 16-week treatment period; severe AD only.Conclusion: Dupilumab + TCS is efficacious and well tolerated in children with severe AD, significantly improving signs, symptoms, and QOL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory condition with substantial burden and limited treatment options for adolescents with moderate-to-severe disease. Significantly more patients treated with dupilumab vs. placebo achieved Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 at week 16. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of dupilumab treatment vs. placebo on the achievement of clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms and quality of life. Methods: R668-AD-1526 LIBERTY AD ADOL was a randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, phase III clinical trial. Two hundred and fifty-one adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis received dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; n = 84), dupilumab 200 or 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w; n = 82), or placebo (n = 85). A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed on 214 patients with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16. Measures of atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms, and quality of life were assessed. Clinically meaningful improvement in one or more of three domains of signs, symptoms, and quality of life was defined as an improvement of ≥ 50% in Eczema Area and Severity Index, ≥ 3 points in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, or ≥ 6 points in the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index from baseline. Results: Of patients receiving dupilumab q2w, 80.5% [66/82] experienced clinically meaningful improvements in atopic dermatitis signs, symptoms, or quality of life at week 16 (vs. placebo, 20/85 [23.5%], difference 57.0% [95% confidence interval 44.5–69.4]; q4w vs. placebo, 53/84 [63.1%], difference 39.6% [95% confidence interval 25.9–53.3]; both p < 0.0001). Results were similar in adolescents with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16 (q2w, 46/62 [74.2%] vs. placebo, 18/83 [21.7%], difference 52.5% [95% confidence interval 38.5–66.6]; q4w, 38/69 [55.1%] vs. placebo, difference 33.4% [95% confidence interval 18.7–48.1]; both p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Dupilumab provided clinically meaningful improvements in signs, symptoms, and quality of life in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis among patients with Investigator's Global Assessment > 1 at week 16. Treatment responses should be interpreted in the context of such clinically relevant patient-reported outcome measures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03054428. Adolescents with atopic dermatitis: does dupilumab improve their signs, symptoms, and quality of life? (MP4 212916 kb) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease requiring long-term management. However, availability of long-term AD treatments with an acceptable risk-benefit profile is limited in pediatric patients. This ongoing phase 3 open-label extension (OLE; NCT02612454) enrolled patients aged 6 months to 17 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were treated with dupilumab (weight-based dosing): 200 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; 5–14 kg), 300 mg q4w (15–29 kg) and 200 mg q2w (30–59 kg). Here we report safety data (cutoff date July 31, 2021) for 180 patients aged 6 months to 5 years who enrolled in the OLE. Of the 180 patients reported, 122 (67.8%) completed up to 16 weeks of the study, 30 (16.7%) up to Week 52 and 15 (8.3%) up to Week 156. A total of 167 (92.8%) patients were continuing treatment at the time of data cutoff. At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 3.9 (1.3) years. One hundred and nine (60.6%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the most common were nasopharyngitis (12.8%), upper respiratory tract infection (11.7%) and pyrexia (11.7%). One (0.6%) patient had a treatment-related severe TEAE (urticaria) that led to study drug discontinuation. Two (1.1%) patients had serious TEAEs (anaphylactic reaction and pneumonia mycoplasmal) of severe and moderate intensity, respectively. Both serious TEAEs were unrelated to treatment. Long-term safety of dupilumab in this pediatric population was generally consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile in adults and older pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information of the importance of use of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in pediatric treatment including its access, dosing challenges,, and implications for managing severe atopic dermatitis. Topics discussed include approval of dupilumab for AD by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA;) concern related to adverse effects such as renal toxicity, hypertension for cyclosporine, and hepatic toxicity for methotrexate; and information of the benefits of the dupilumab.

Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk for low bone mineral density (BMD), which is associated with an increased prevalence of osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fracture risk.1,2 Factors such as restricted nutrition, vitamin D deficiency, poor sleep and corticosteroid use contribute to lower bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) levels, a marker of bone mineralization, seen in children with moderate-to-severe AD compared with healthy children.³ A major determinant for the lifetime risk of fractures and osteoporosis is the magnitude of peak bone mass achieved during prepubescent years. Low BALP and BMD in children with moderate-to-severe AD could contribute to a higher prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis. The objective of this analysis is to report the impact of dupilumab treatment on markers of bone formation in children aged ≥ 6 to <12 years with moderate-to-severe AD. The analysis was performed retrospectively on sera from participants in LIBERTY AD PEDS (NCT03345914) and LIBERTY AD PED-OLE (NCT02612454). In LIBERTY AD PEDS, a double-blind, 16-week, phase 3 trial, children aged 6 to <12 years were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to 300 mg dupilumab every 4 weeks (300 mg q4w), a weight-based regimen of dupilumab every 2 weeks (100 mg q2w for patients with baseline weight <30 kg, and 200 mg q2w for those with baseline weight ≥30 kg), or placebo; with concomitant medium-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS). After the initial 16-week trial, children aged 6 to <12 years were enrolled in the open-label extension study LIBERTY AD PED-OLE. Patients received dupilumab 300 mg q4w, which could be titrated up in case of inadequate clinical response at week 16 (200 mg q2w for patients with baseline weight <60 kg, and 300 mg q2w for those with baseline weight ≥60 kg); with concomitant medium-potency TCS. Bone biomarkers including BALP, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type 1 collagen, osteocalcin, and insulin-like growth factor 1 were analysed at baseline, 8, 12, 16 and BALP only at 52 weeks. Dupilumab treatment led to a rapid and significant increase in geometric mean (standard error) levels of BALP in children with moderate-to-severe AD at 16 weeks compared with patients in the placebo group (77.7(1.02) μgL−1 vs. 65.0(1.04) μgL−1; P<0.0001). As well as a rapid and significant increase in BALP levels in children from the placebo group once they joined the OLE trial. BALP levels increased over 52 weeks in all treated children, reaching a level of 78–84 μgL−1 which constitutes a significant improvement compared with baseline, and is comparable to healthy reference intervals. An increasing trend from baseline to 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment was observed for other biomarkers, however, there was a limited number of data points due to insufficient volumes of serum available for analysis. These placebo-controlled results show, for the first time, a rapid and significant increase in BALP, and a possible trend in other biomarkers, in children with AD during treatment with dupilumab. These results suggest increased bone mineralization during the treatment period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many systemic therapies used for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) have immunosuppressive properties and necessitate laboratory screening and monitoring, adding to the treatment burden. Previous dupilumab studies in adults, adolescents and children aged 6–11 years with moderate-to-severe AD showed no clinically meaningful adverse changes in laboratory parameters. Here we evaluate hematology and chemistry laboratory safety data for dupilumab-treated children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Patients aged 6 months to 5 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD were enrolled in LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (NCT03346434 part B), a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 study. 162 patients were randomized to either dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; N=83; baseline weight ≥5 <15 kg: 200 mg; ≥15 to <30 kg: 300 mg) or placebo (N=79) for 16 weeks. From Day –14, all patients initiated standardized treatment with low-potency topical corticosteroids. Laboratory data was collected at baseline, weeks 4 and 16. At baseline, mean (SD) counts of hematology parameters were similar in both treatment groups: haemoglobin (dupilumab: 129.4 gL−1 [12]; placebo: 127.2 gL−1 [11.4]), lymphocyte (dupilumab: 4.6×109 L−1 [1.8]; placebo: 4.5×109 L−1 [1.7]), basophil (dupilumab: 0.07×109 L−1 [0.03]; placebo: 0.07×109 L−1 [0.04]), platelet (dupilumab: 397.7×109 L−1 [103.2]; placebo: 385.6 × 109 L−1 [112.9]) and eosinophils (dupilumab: 1.1×109 L−1 [0.7]; placebo: 1.1×109 L−1 [0.7]). Mean (SD) haemoglobin count in the dupilumab (128.4×gL−1 [11]) and placebo groups (128.2×gL−1 [11.2]), lymphocyte count in the dupilumab (4.20×109 L−1 [2.06]) and placebo groups (4.29×109 L−1 [1.52]) and basophil count in the dupilumab (0.07×109 L−1 [0.04]) and placebo groups (0.06×109 L−1 [0.03]) remained with the normal reference range for this population at week 16. The mean change (SD) in platelet count at week 16 was −16.3×109 L−1 (78.5) in the dupilumab group and +17.4×109 L−1 (106.6) in the placebo group. In the dupilumab treatment group, the mean eosinophil count increased at week 4 (mean change from baseline [SD]; +0.48×109 L−1 [1.8]) and trended downward by week 16 (+0.31×109 L−1 [1.4]) while minimal changes were noted in the placebo group at week 4 (0.1×109 L−1 [0.7]) and week 16 (−0.2×109 L−1 [0.7]). The values for creatine kinase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, blood urea nitrogen, albumin and protein at week 16 remained within the normal reference range in all treatment groups. Two patients in the dupilumab 200/300 mg q4w arm of this study reported treatment-emergent adverse events of severe and moderate eosinophilia. Neither event was associated with clinical symptoms nor led to the discontinuation of the study treatment. No clinically meaningful changes in hematology and chemistry parameters in children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD were seen with 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment. These data demonstrate that, as with adults, adolescents and older children, routine laboratory monitoring is unnecessary in this younger population. Dupilumab was generally well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Continuous use of several traditional systemic atopic dermati - tis (AD) treatments in pediatric patients is not recommended due to safety concerns and lack of long-term efficacy data. Children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD who had participated in the 16-week, double-blind, phase 3 LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL trial (NCT03346434, part B; parent study) were enrolled in an open-label extension (OLE) study (NCT02612454). Patients received subcutaneous dup - ilumab every 4 weeks (200 mg for children weighing 5 to <15 kg; 300 mg for 15 to <30 kg). Topical AD treatments were allowed. Relative to the parent study baseline, mean percentage changes (± standard error) in Eczema Area and Severity Index score were −41.6 (±4.6) and −54.0 (±3.2) at OLE baseline, −74.5 (±3.7) and −81.7 (±1.8) at week 16, and −85.6 (±3.5) and −86.4 (±2.2) at week 52 in the 200 and 300 mg dupilumab groups, respectively. The number of patients (%) achieving an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 increased from OLE baseline (6/61 [9.8%] and 15/116 [12.9%]) to week 16 (22/58 [37.9%] and 35/115 [30.4%]), and at week 52 (16/34 [47.1%] and 18/54 [33.3%]) in the 200 and 300 mg dupilumab groups, respectively. The overall safety of dupilumab treatment administered for up to 1 year was consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. Dupilumab treatment for 1 year provides sustained improvement in signs of AD in patients aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are limited approved systemic treatment options for children with atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab is now approved in the United States for patients 6 months and older with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical prescription therapies. European Medicines Agency is evaluating the use of dupilumab in children aged 6 months through 5 years with severe AD only. To report the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the subgroup of children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD (IGA score=4) at baseline in the LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL trial (NCT03346434 part B). Patients aged 6 months to 5 years with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe AD were enrolled in LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (part B), a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Patients were randomized to either dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks (200 mg if baseline weight 5 to <15 kg, 300 mg if 15 to <30 kg) or placebo for 16 weeks. All patients initiated standardized treatment with low-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) from day –14. This analysis reports efficacy and quality-of-life endpoints including a 75% reduction from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI, for children aged 4 to <6 years), and Infant’s Dermatitis Quality Of Life (IDQOL, for children <4 years) in children with severe AD. Of the total trial population of 162 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, 125 patients with severe AD at baseline were randomized: 63 to the dupilumab+TCS treatment group and 62 to the placebo+TCS treatment group. Baseline demographics were similar. Mean (SD) baseline disease characteristics were also similar between the dupilumab and placebo groups: EASI (38.8 [13.7] vs. 35.4 [12]), body surface area (63.1% [21] vs. 58.9% [21.4]), weekly average PP-NRS (7.6 [1.4] vs. 7.6 [1.6]), CDLQI (17.5 [5.5] vs. 17.8 [6.4]) and IDQOL (18.4 [5.1] vs. 17.4 [5.4]). Dupilumab treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase in the proportion of patients achieving EASI-75 compared with placebo treatment by week 4 (27% vs. 4.8%; P=0.0009). By week 16, this improvement was further increased compared with the placebo group (46% vs. 7%; P<0.0001). At week 16, dupilumab-treated patients had a significantly greater percent reduction from baseline in PP-NRS compared with the placebo group (LS mean (SE)–41.8 [5.4] vs. 0.5 [5.4]; P<0.0001). Dupilumab also resulted in significant improvement in quality-of-life outcomes compared with placebo (LS mean [SE]) change from baseline to week 16 in CDLQI (−9.1 [1.1] vs. −2.6 [1.2]; P<0.0001); IDQOL (−9.1 [1.3] vs. −0.6 [1.1]; P<0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 42 (66.7%) patients in the dupilumab group and 45 (73.8%) patients in the placebo group. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate and deemed unrelated to the study drug by the investigator. The most common TEAE was atopic dermatitis in both the dupilumab group (10 [15.9%]) and placebo group (16 [26.2%]). Additionally, TEAEs in the conjunctivitis cluster were reported by 4 (6.4%) patients in the dupilumab group and none in the placebo group. In the placebo group, 3 (4.9%) serious adverse events were reported. No dupilumab-related adverse events were serious or led to treatment discontinuation. Dupilumab significantly improved AD signs, symptoms, and quality of life in children aged 6 months to 5 years with severe AD. The safety profile was consistent with that previously seen in adults, adolescents, and children aged>6 years of age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]