Search

Background: Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a significant challenge. Current options include repeat stenting or drug-coated balloons. However, there is a paucity of data regarding vascular healing after these strategies. We, aimed to compare optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based vessel healing after treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) or everolimus-eluting stents (EES)., Methods: An OCT substudy (baseline and 6-9 months) of patients from RIBS IV and RIBS V, two prospective multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials comparing PCB vs. EES in patients with ISR was performed., Results: Sixty-four patients were included (30 PCB and 34 EES). There were no differences in the baseline or angiographic characteristics between groups. Both groups had the same proportion of drug-eluting and bare-metal stent (BMS) ISR. Baseline OCT analysis did not show differences in the qualitative characteristics of the ISR nor the restenotic tissue burden. Follow-up OCT showed a larger mean lumen area in the EES group (6.03 ± 1.5 vs. 5.24 ± 1.3 mm 2 ; P  = 0.043) but no difference in angiographic restenosis ( P  = 0.66). Percentage tissue coverage was higher with PCB vs. EES (26 ± 13 vs. 19 ± 11%; P  = 0.031). EES-treated ISR more frequently had uncovered struts at follow-up [21 (72%) vs. 12 (44%); P  = 0.034]. Tissue covering struts more frequently had a high backscatter structure after PCB [21 (78%) vs. 16 (55%); P  = 0.07]., Conclusions: Compared with EES, ISR treated with PCB demonstrated more strut coverage with mainly high backscattering tissue. Larger OCT-defined neointimal proliferation in PCB-treated ISR did not translate into higher angiographic restenosis rates., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of circulating progenitor cells (CPC) in vascular repair following everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation is largely unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between temporal variation in CPC levels following EES implantation and the degree of peri-procedural vascular damage, and stent healing, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT).Methods and Results: CPC populations (CD133+/KDR+/CD45low) included patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing stent implantation, and were evaluated using a flow cytometry technique both at baseline and at 1 week. OCT evaluation was performed immediately post-implantation to quantify the stent-related injury and at a 9-month follow up to assess the mid-term vascular response. Twenty patients (mean age 66±9 years; 80% male) with EES-treated stenoses (n=24) were included in this study. Vascular injury score was associated with the 1-week increase of CD133+/KDR+/CD45low (β 0.28 [95% CI 0.15; 0.41]; P<0.001) and with maximum neointimal thickness at a 9-month follow up (β 0.008 [95% CI 0.0004; 0.002]; P=0.04). Inverse relationships between numbers of uncoated and apposed struts for the 9-month and the 1-week delta values of CD133+/KDR+/CD45low (β -12.53 [95% CI -22.17; -2.90]; P=0.011), were also found., Conclusions: The extent of vessel wall injury influences early changes in the levels of CPC and had an effect on mid-term vascular healing after EES implantation. Early CPC mobilisation was associated with mid-term strut coverage.

Aim: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes., Methods and Results: We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.96; Pnon-inferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs. 11.1%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99; P = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups., Conclusion: In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03321032., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Compare the degree of acute vascular injury caused by a polymer-free, thin-strut drug-eluting stent (DES) to that caused by a bioresorbable polymer, thick-strut DES using optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods and Results: Fifty patients requiring nonurgent PCI were randomized to receive either a thin or a thick-strut DES. OCT was performed before and after stent implantation. OCT-based injury score (IS) after implantation was numerically higher within thick-strut stents 0.32 vs. 0.23, but the difference was NS (P = 0.61). Edge dissections were present in 36% of the patients without differences between groups. Tissue prolapse (TP) area was larger with thin-strut stents (2.26 vs. 1.83 mm2, P = 0.04). Stent expansion and symmetry index were similar between the two platforms (85% vs. 94%, P = 0.08; and 0.82 vs. 0.80, P = 0.25). No differences were observed in total malapposition area (1.85 mm2 in thin-strut stents vs. 1.47 mm2, P = 0.48). Regarding the influence of plaque-type, IS tended to be higher (non-significant) with thick strut DES in fibrocalcific plaques. Stent malapposition area was smaller in fibrous plaques, especially with thin strut stents (P = 0.03)., Conclusion: There was no difference in the extent of OCT-based vessel injury associated with thin and thick-strut DES platforms. TP was larger with the thin strut DES, potentially reflecting a deeper stent embedment in the vessel wall., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The BioFreedom drug-coated stent with a stainless steel platform (BF-SS) has been demonstrated to be efficacious in patients at high bleeding risk and receiv-ing only one-month dual antiplatelet therapy., Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the new BioFreedom Ultra drug-coated stent with a thin-strut cobalt-chromium platform (BF-CoCr) compared to the BF-SS in an all-comers population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography at nine-month follow-up. Clinical evaluation was performed at one year., Results: A total of 200 patients were randomised (1:1) to either the BF-CoCr or the BF-SS stent at eight centres in Spain and Denmark. Baseline clinical and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Mean age was 66 years and 23% were female. The mean number of stents implanted per patient was 1.5. At nine-month follow-up, mean in-stent LLL was 0.34±0.49 mm in the BF-CoCr group versus 0.29±0.37 mm in the BF-SS group, p=0.005 for non-inferiority. At one year, target lesion failure was similar between the groups (7.3% in BF-CoCr vs 9.3% in the BF-SS group; p=0.60)., Conclusions: The BF-CoCr was non-inferior to the BF-SS in terms of in-stent LLL at nine months. Larger studies powered for clinical endpoints are warranted to compare the efficacy of this new platform with currently available DES.

Introduction and Objectives: Neoatherosclerosis is one of the causes of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Our objective was to evaluate the influence of neoatherosclerosis on prognosis and treatment response in patients with ISR., Methods: This is a pooled analysis of the optical coherence tomography (OCT)-substudies of 2 multicenter, randomized clinical trials, RIBS IV and V, comparing treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent in patients with ISR. OCT evaluation was performed at baseline and at 6 to 9 months. Neoatherosclerosis was defined in baseline OCT as neointima with calcified or lipid content. We evaluated the angiographic and OCT results at 6 to 9 months and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years of follow-up in patients with and without neoatherosclerosis treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimus-eluting stents., Results: Sixty-four patients underwent OCT at the time of the index procedure. Neoatherosclerosis was documented in 23 (36%) lesions. Angiographic follow-up at 6 to 9 months showed no differences in restenosis [5 (24%) vs 6 (15%) P=.49], minimum lumen diameter (1.79±0.7 vs 1.94±0.6mm; P=.41) or late loss (0.33±0.7 vs 0.15±0.5; P=.34) in patients with and without neoatherosclerosis, respectively. Follow-up OCT confirmed the absence of differences in quantitative parameters and the characteristics of tissue coverage between the 2 groups. At 3 years of follow-up, the major adverse cardiovascular events rate was 3 (13%) vs 5 (12%) in the neoatherosclerosis and nonneoatherosclerosis groups (HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.22-3.93; P=.93)., Conclusions: In this limited study population, OCT-defined neoatherosclerosis did not seem to influence acute and long-term outcomes in patients randomized to paclitaxel-coated balloon or everolimus-eluting stents for ISR., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: While thinner struts are associated with improved clinical outcomes in bare-metal stents (BMS), reducing strut thickness may affect drug delivery from drug-eluting stents (DES) and there are limited data comparing otherwise similar thin and thick strut DES. We assessed 2-year outcomes of patients treated with a thin strut (84-88um) cobalt-chromium, biodegradable polymer, Biolimus A9-eluting stent (CoCr-BP-BES) and compared these to patients treated with a stainless steel, biodegradable polymer, Biolimus A9-eluting stent (SS-BP-BES)., Methods: In total, 1257 patients were studied: 400 patients from 12 centres receiving ≥1 CoCr-BP-BES in the prospective Biomatrix Alpha registry underwent prespecified comparison with 857 patients who received ≥1 Biomatrix Flex SS-BP-BES in the LEADERS study (historical control). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE)-cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR). Propensity analysis was used to adjust for differences in baseline variables and a landmark analysis at day-3 to account for differences in periprocedural MI definitions., Results: MACE at 2 years occurred in 6.65% CoCr-BP-BES versus 13.23% SS-BP-BES groups (unadjusted HR 0.48 [0.31-0.73]; P =0.0005). Following propensity analysis, 2-year adjusted MACE rates were 7.4% versus 13.3% (HR 0.53 [0.35-0.79]; P =0.004). Definite or probable stent thrombosis, adjudicated using identical criteria in both studies, occurred less frequently with CoCr-BP-BES (1.12% vs. 3.22%; adjusted HR 0.32 [0.11-0.9]; P =0.034). In day-3 landmark analysis, the difference in 2-year MACE was no longer significant but there was a lower patient-orientated composite endpoint (11.7% vs. 18.4%; HR 0.6 [0.43-0.83]; P =0.006) and a trend to lower target vessel failure (5.8% vs. 9.1%; HR 0.63 [0.4-1.00]; P =0.078)., Conclusion: At 2-year follow-up, propensity-adjusted analysis showed the thin strut (84-88um) Biomatrix Alpha CoCr-BP-BES was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with the thicker strut (114-120um) Biomatrix Flex SS-BP-BES., Competing Interests: IM has received a speaker honorarium from Biosensors. SC, SSS, and KGO are employed by Biosensors. No other authors have any conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Ian B. A. Menown et al.)

Background: Although previous observational studies have documented late luminal enlargement and expansive remodeling following implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS), no comparison with metallic stents has been conducted in a randomized fashion., Objectives: This study sought to compare vessel remodeling patterns after either Absorb BVS or Xience metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) and determine the independent predictors of remodeling., Methods: In the ABSORB II randomized trial, 383 lesions (n = 359) were investigated by intravenous ultrasound both post-procedure and at 3-year follow-up. According to vessel and lumen area changes over 3 years, we categorized 9 patterns of vessel remodeling that were beyond the reproducibility of lumen and vessel area measurements., Results: The relative change in mean vessel area was significantly greater with the BVS compared to the DES (6.7 ± 12.6% vs. 2.9 ± 11.5%; p = 0.003); the relative change in mean lumen area was significantly different between the 2 arms (1.4 ± 19.1% vs. -1.9 ± 10.5%, respectively; p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis indicated that use of the BVS, female sex, balloon-artery ratio >1.25, expansion index ≥0.8, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, and higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were independent predictors of expansive remodeling. Furthermore, in the BVS arm, necrotic core pre-procedure was an independent determinant of expansive remodeling., Conclusions: Expansive vessel wall remodeling was more frequent and intense with the BVS than the metallic DES and could be determined by patient baseline characteristics and periprocedural factors. The clinical effect of the observed lumen and vessel remodeling must be investigated in further large clinical studies to optimize the clinical outcome of patients and lesions treated by bioresorbable scaffolds. (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT01425281)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The study sought to investigate the relationship between post-procedural asymmetry, expansion, and eccentricity indices of metallic everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) and their respective impact on clinical events at 1-year follow-up., Background: Mechanical properties of a fully BVS are inherently different from those of permanent metallic stent., Methods: The ABSORB II (A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions) trial compared the BVS and metallic EES in the treatment of a de novo coronary artery stenosis. Protocol-mandated intravascular ultrasound imaging was performed pre- and post-procedure in 470 patients (162 metallic EES and 308 BVS). Asymmetry index (AI) was calculated per lesion as: (1 - minimum scaffold/stent diameter/maximum scaffold/stent diameter). Expansion index and optimal scaffold/stent expansion followed the definition of the MUSIC (Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries) study. Eccentricity index (EI) was calculated as the ratio of minimum and maximum scaffold/stent diameter per cross section. The incidence of device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) was collected., Results: Post-procedure, the metallic EES group was more symmetric and concentric than the BVS group. Only 8.0% of the BVS arm and 20.0% of the metallic EES arm achieved optimal scaffold/stent expansion (p < 0.001). At 1 year, there was no difference in the DoCE between both devices (BVS 5.2% vs. EES 3.1%; p = 0.29). Post-procedural devices asymmetry and eccentricity were related to higher event rates while there was no relevance to the expansion status. Subsequent multivariate analysis identified that post-procedural AI >0.30 is an independent predictor of DoCE (hazard ratio: 3.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 10.92; p = 0.037)., Conclusions: BVS implantation is more frequently associated with post-procedural asymmetric and eccentric morphology compared to metallic EES. Post-procedural devices asymmetry were independently associated with DoCE following percutaneous coronary intervention. However, this approach should be viewed as hypothesis generating due to low event rates. (ABSORB II Randomized Controlled Trial [ABSORB II]; NCT01425281)., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major challenge., Objectives: This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients presenting with DES-ISR., Methods: The study design of this multicenter randomized clinical trial assumed superiority of EES for the primary endpoint, in-segment minimal lumen diameter at the 6- to 9-month angiographic follow-up., Results: A total of 309 patients with DES-ISR from 23 Spanish university hospitals were randomly allocated to DEB (n = 154) or EES (n = 155). At late angiography (median 247 days; 90% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.03 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.80 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.01) (absolute mean difference: 0.23 mm; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.38) [corrected], net lumen gain (1.28 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.01 ± 0.7 mm; p < 0.01), and lower percent diameter stenosis (23 ± 22% vs. 30 ± 22%; p < 0.01) and binary restenosis rate (11% vs. 19%; p = 0.06), compared with patients in the DEB arm. Consistent results were observed in the in-lesion analysis. At the 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), the main clinical outcome measure (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) was significantly reduced in the EES arm (10% vs. 18%; p = 0.04; hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.98), mainly driven by a lower need for target vessel revascularization (8% vs. 16%; p = 0.035)., Conclusions: In patients with DES-ISR, EES provided superior long-term clinical and angiographic results compared with DEB. (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent [RIBS IV]; NCT01239940)., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: This study will compare the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Methods and Results: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing DEB and EES in patients with DES-ISR. The study is an investigator-driven initiative generated within the RIBS study programme. A total of 310 patients with DES-ISR will be included and randomised (1:1) to DEB or EES. Angiographic follow-up has been scheduled at six to nine months. Quantitative coronary analyses will be performed in a centralised core lab by blinded personnel. The primary endpoint of the study is minimal lumen diameter at angiographic follow-up. Other secondary angiographic endpoints include % diameter stenosis, late loss, net gain and binary restenosis rate. An independent clinical events committee will adjudicate clinical events after reviewing source documents. The main clinical outcome measure is a combined endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation at one year. Individual components of the combined clinical endpoint and rates of target lesion revascularisation and stent thrombosis will also be compared., Conclusions: This randomised clinical trial will determine the relative efficacy of EES versus DEB in patients presenting with DES-ISR. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01239940).

Background: Mechanisms of lumen gain during reinterventions in patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) remain unsettled., Methods: We sought to assess the mechanisms of acute lumen gain after balloon angioplasty (BA) and repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with DES-ISR. Following a prospective protocol 29 consecutive patients with DES-ISR were sequentially treated with BA and new DES implantation under a multimodality intracoronary imaging assessment including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Imaging studies were systematically obtained, at baseline, after BA, and after DES. Results of interventions were compared using volumetric and morphometric (ISR pattern and injury score) analyses., Results: IVUS and OCT demonstrated that acute lumen gain after BA and DES equally results from a reduction in intra-stent neointimal volume and further DES expansion. As compared with BA, repeat DES implantation not only increased final lumen (baseline 39.6±18.5mm(3), post-BA 58.6±26.6mm(3), post-DES 84.2±30.8mm(3), all p<0.001) but also provided a smoother lumen (injury score 1.57±0.86 vs 0.22±0.26, p<0.001). At the 9th month of angiographic follow-up (86% patients) in-stent late loss was 0.44±0.5mm and 4 patients (16%) developed ISR. The ISR pattern on OCT was not associated with the injury score after interventions or late angiographic findings. Likewise, the injury score did not predict late angiographic outcome., Conclusions: In patients with DES ISR, lumen gain equally results from a reduction in intra-stent neointimal volume and further DES expansion. As compared with BA, repeat DES implantation provides a larger and smoother coronary lumen., (Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.)

Objectives: This study sought to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) with that of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Background: Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge., Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the minimal lumen diameter at 9 months' follow-up., Results: A total of 189 patients with BMS-ISR from 25 Spanish sites were included (95 were allocated to DEB and 94 to EES). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. At late angiography (median 249 days; 92% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.36 ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001; absolute mean difference: 0.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16 to 0.53) and a lower percent of diameter stenosis (13 ± 17% vs. 25 ± 20%, p < 0.001). However, late loss (0.04 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.14) and binary restenosis rate (4.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.22) were very low and similar in both groups. Clinical follow-up (median 365 days) was obtained in all (100%) patients. Occurrences of the combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization; 6% vs. 8%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.18, p = 0.6) and the need for target vessel revascularization (2% vs. 6%; HR: 0.32: 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.59, p = 0.17) were similar in the 2 groups., Conclusions: In patients with BMS-ISR, both DEB and EES provided excellent clinical results with a very low rate of clinical and angiographic recurrences. However, compared with DEB, EES provide superior late angiographic findings. (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs. Everolimus-eluting Stent [RIBS V]; NCT01239953)., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus-Eluting Stent) trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) as compared to bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in diabetic patients. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the five-year clinical follow-up of the patients included in this trial., Methods and Results: One hundred and sixty patients (222 lesions) were included: 80 patients were randomised to SES and 80 patients to BMS. Patients were eligible for the study if they were identified as non-insulin-dependent diabetics (NIDDM) or insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDM), with significant native coronary stenoses in ≥1 vessel. There was a sub-randomisation according to diabetes status. Clinical follow-up was extended up to five years. Five-year clinical follow-up was obtained in 96.2%. Overall, MACE at five years was significantly lower in the SES group as compared with the BMS arm, mainly due to a significant reduction in TLR. There were no significant differences in cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). This was also observed in both prespecified subgroups IDDM and NIDDM. In the SES group, the incidence density of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 0.53 per 100 person-years, whereas in the BMS group it was 0.8 per 100 person-years. Independent predictors of MACE were: SES implantation (p<0.001), multivessel stent implantation (p=0.04), and creatinine levels (p=0.001)., Conclusions: Five-year follow-up of the DIABETES trial suggests the effect of SES in reducing TLR is similar in both IDDM and NIDDM. No major safety concerns in terms of ST, MI or mortality were observed.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of patient and lesion complexity on outcomes with newer-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES)., Background: Clinical and angiographic outcomes of newer-generation stents have not been described among complex patients., Methods: Patients enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) were stratified into "complex" and "simple.", Results: Of 2,292 patients, 1,520 (66.3%) were complex and treated with ZES (n = 764) or EES (n = 756). Event rates were higher among complex patients, and results did not differ between ZES and EES, regardless of complexity. At 1 year, target lesion failure was 8.9% in ZES- and 9.7% in EES-treated complex patients (p = 0.66) and 6.8% in ZES- and 5.7% in EES-treated simple patients (p = 0.55). Rates of cardiac death (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.24), target-vessel myocardial infarction (4.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.90), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (4.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.80) were similar for both stent types among complex patients. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 20 (1.3%) complex patients with no difference between ZES (1.7%) and EES (0.9%, p = 0.26). Angiographic follow-up showed similar results for ZES and EES in terms of in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (22.2 ± 15.4% vs. 21.4 ± 15.8%, p = 0.67) and in-segment binary restenosis (6.6% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.82) in the complex group., Conclusions: In this all-comers randomized trial, major adverse cardiovascular events were more frequent among complex than simple patients. The newer-generation ZES and EES proved to be safe and effective, regardless of complexity, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes for both stent types through 1 year. (RESOLUTE-III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study assessed the ability of the SYNTAX score (SXscore) to stratify risk in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using zotarolimus-eluting or everolimus-eluting stents., Background: The SXscore can identify patients treated with PCI who are at highest risk of adverse events., Methods: The SXscore was calculated prospectively in 2,033 of the 2,292 patients enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers study (RESOLUTE III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Clinical outcomes in terms of a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization; the individual components of POCE; target lesion failure (TLF) (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization); and stent thrombosis were subsequently stratified according to SXscore tertiles: SXscore(LOW) ≤ 9 (n = 698), 9 17 (n = 659)., Results: At 12-month follow-up, rates of POCE, MI, repeat revascularization, TLF, and the composite of death/MI were all significantly higher in patients in the highest SXscore tercile. Rates of stent thrombosis were all highest in the SXscore(HIGH) tertile (p > 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, the SXscore was identified as an independent predictor of POCE, MI, repeat revascularization, and TLF (p < 0.05 for all). At 12-month follow-up, the SXscore, ACEF score, and Clinical SXscore had C-statistics of 0.57, 0.78, and 0.67, respectively, for mortality and of 0.62, 0.56, 0.63, respectively, for POCE. No significant between-stent differences were observed for TLF or POCE in any of the SXscore tertiles., Conclusions: The SYNTAX score is able to stratify risk amongst an all-comers population treated with PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES); however, improvements can be made with the inclusion of clinical variables. (RESOLUTE III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084)., (Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies have shown that among patients undergoing multivessel revascularization, coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), as compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) either by means of balloon angioplasty or with the use of bare-metal stents, results in greater relief from angina and improved quality of life. The effect of PCI with the use of drug-eluting stents on these outcomes is unknown., Methods: In a large, randomized trial, we assigned 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease to undergo either CABG (897 patients) or PCI with paclitaxel-eluting stents (903 patients). Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, and 12 months with the use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The primary end point was the score on the angina-frequency subscale of the SAQ (on which scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status)., Results: The scores on each of the SAQ and SF-36 subscales were significantly higher at 6 and 12 months than at baseline in both groups. The score on the angina-frequency subscale of the SAQ increased to a greater extent with CABG than with PCI at both 6 and 12 months (P=0.04 and P=0.03, respectively), but the between-group differences were small (mean treatment effect of 1.7 points at both time points). The proportion of patients who were free from angina was similar in the two groups at 1 month and 6 months and was higher in the CABG group than in the PCI group at 12 months (76.3% vs. 71.6%, P=0.05). Scores on all the other SAQ and SF-36 subscales were either higher in the PCI group (mainly at 1 month) or were similar in the two groups throughout the follow-up period., Conclusions: Among patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, there was greater relief from angina after CABG than after PCI at 6 and 12 months, although the extent of the benefit was small. (Funded by Boston Scientific; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114972.).

Aims: Because of the reduction in the rate events related with in-stent restenosis, most events after drug-eluting stent implantation occur shortly after coronary stenting. Cobalt-chromium alloys allow to reduce strut thickness and improve flexibility and deliverability of coronary stent platforms, and thus could be associated with lower short-term events after stenting. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that drug-eluting coronary stents with a cobalt-chromium platform reduce the incidence of periprocedural (30-day) myocardial infarction in comparison with stainless steel drug-eluting coronary stents., Methods and Results: A meta-analysis from nine randomised trials comparing cobalt-chromium and stainless steel drug-eluting coronary stents that overall included 11,313 patients was performed. The incidence of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and cardiac death at 30 days was compared between both types of stents. At 30 days, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction was significantly lower in patients allocated to cobalt-chromium drug-eluting stents (2.3% vs. 3.9%, respectively; p=0.006; odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.91), due to a significant reduction in the rate of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.88). The incidence of stent thrombosis was similar between both groups of patients, (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p=0.76; odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.63-1.89)., Conclusions: Drug-eluting coronary stents that use cobalt-chromium stent platforms have a better safety profile at 30 days in comparison with stainless steel drug-eluting stents, due to a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction.

Background: New-generation coronary stents that release zotarolimus or everolimus have been shown to reduce the risk of restenosis. However, it is unclear whether there are differences in efficacy and safety between the two types of stents on the basis of prospectively adjudicated end points endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration., Methods: In this multicenter, noninferiority trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 2292 patients to undergo treatment with coronary stents releasing either zotarolimus or everolimus. Twenty percent of patients were randomly selected for repeat angiography at 13 months. The primary end point was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction (not clearly attributable to a nontarget vessel), or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization within 12 months. The secondary angiographic end point was the extent of in-stent stenosis at 13 months., Results: At least one off-label criterion for stent placement was present in 66% of patients. The zotarolimus-eluting stent was noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent with respect to the primary end point, which occurred in 8.2% and 8.3% of patients, respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of death from cardiac causes, any myocardial infarction, or revascularization. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.3% in the zotarolimus-stent group and 1.5% in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.17). The zotarolimus-eluting stent was also noninferior regarding the degree (+/-SD) of in-stent stenosis (21.65+/-14.42% for zotarolimus vs. 19.76+/-14.64% for everolimus, P=0.04 for noninferiority). In-stent late lumen loss was 0.27+/-0.43 mm in the zotarolimus-stent group versus 0.19+/-0.40 mm in the everolimus-stent group (P=0.08). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of adverse events., Conclusions: At 13 months, the new-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent was found to be noninferior to the everolimus-eluting stent in a population of patients who had minimal exclusion criteria. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00617084.), (2010 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Chronic total coronary occlusions constitute a sub-group of lesions at very high risk of restenosis after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. The sirolimus-eluting coronary stent is the only drugeluting stent that has demonstrated to reduce angiographic restenosis and the need for new revascularisation procedures in comparison with bare-metal stents in randomised clinical trials focusing on these lesions. Everolimus-eluting stents have shown to offer optimal angiographic and clinical outcomes in comparison with bare-metal stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents, but no randomised trials have tested the device in chronic total occlusions. The CIBELES (non-acute Coronary occlusIon treated By EveroLimus- Eluting Stent) will randomise 208 patients with chronic total coronary occlusions in 13 centres from Portugal and Spain to receive everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting coronary stents. The primary endpoint will be angiographic in-stent late loss.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent (DES) and bare-metal stent (BMS) use in chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization., Background: The long-term effectiveness and safety of DES use in CTO recanalization are unclear, and performance of randomized clinical trials in the field is complex., Methods: Major electronic information sources were explored for articles comparing outcomes with DES and BMS use among patients with CTO. Assessed clinical outcomes were death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis; angiographic outcomes were stent restenosis and stent reocclusion., Results: Fourteen comparative studies were identified (a total of 4,394 patients). When compared with BMS, DES significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiac events (relative risk [RR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34 to 0.60, p < 0.001) and TVR (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.58, p < 0.001) without increasing death (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.16, p = 0.88) or myocardial infarction (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.46, p = 0.80). This benefit was sustained at >/=3 years of follow-up. Lower RRs for restenosis (RR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.41, p < 0.001) and stent reocclusion (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.49, p < 0.001) were also observed in the DES group. A strong trend toward a higher rate of stent thrombosis was documented in DES-treated patients (RR: 2.79, 95% CI: 0.98 to 7.97, p = 0.06)., Conclusions: DES use in CTO recanalization is associated with significantly fewer major adverse cardiac events and fewer occurrences of target vessel revascularization, restenosis, and stent reocclusion than with BMS. Although a statistical trend toward a higher risk of stent thrombosis was observed, the use of DES in this context seems to be safe, with an overall benefit sustained in the long term., (Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Assessment of health related quality-of-life (HRQL) has become increasingly important as not only the clinician's view of the technical success, but also the patient's perception is being measured. We evaluated the HRQL following sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (SES) (CYPHER(R); Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ, USA) implantation in patients with multivessel disease, comparing the outcomes with the historical surgical and bare metal stent (BMS) arms of the ARTS-I study., Methods and Results: The HRQL outcomes were compared to the outcome of the historical cohorts of the randomised ARTS-I trial using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. HRQL was evaluated at baseline, at one month and at 6, 12 and 36 months after revascularisation using the SF-36 in patients treated with SES (n=585), BMS (n=483) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n=492). The HRQL compliance rates varied from 100% at baseline to 92% at 36 months. Both stenting and CABG resulted in significant improvement of HRQL and anginal status. There was a trend towards better HRQL after CABG than BMS beyond six months. Already from the first month up to three years, SES patients had, on average, 10% significantly better HRQL than BMS patients on the HRQL subscales physical functioning, role physical functioning, role emotional functioning and mental health (p<0.01) and a trend towards better HRQL in the other subscales. Up to 12 months, the HRQL was better after SES than CABG and was identical thereafter. At all time points, angina was more prevalent in the BMS group than in both the SES and CABG groups, in which the incidence of angina was similar. At three years, 10% of the SES patients suffered from angina, 13% of the CABG patients and 20% of the BMS patients., Conclusions: Both stenting and CABG resulted in a significant improvement in HRQL and angina. Along with a substantial reduction of restenosis, HRQL after SES was significantly improved as compared with BMS, and was similar to CABG.

Objectives: This study sought to assess clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings in patients developing coronary aneurysms (CANs) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Background: The long-term safety of DES remains unsettled., Methods: This study analyzed 1,197 consecutive patients with late angiographic evaluation after DES implantation. In 15 patients (1.25%, 95% confidence interval: 0.58 to 1.93), CANs developed at follow-up. Analyses included quantitative angiography and volumetric IVUS., Results: DES developing CANs were more frequently implanted during acute myocardial infarction and were longer than those without this outcome. The elapsed time from DES implantation to CAN diagnosis was 313 +/- 194 days. Angiographically, maximal CAN diameter measured 5.1 +/- 1.2 mm. On IVUS, CAN external elastic lamina area was 32 +/- 13.1 mm(2) and incomplete apposition area was 12.1 +/- 8.6 mm(2). Two patients presented with acute myocardial infarction secondary to DES thrombosis. Four additional patients presented with unstable angina and underwent CAN aggressive dilation (3 were also treated for concomitant in-stent restenosis). Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended in the remaining 9 patients who were asymptomatic at CAN diagnosis, but 1 of them eventually died of cardiogenic shock after a CAN-related myocardial infarction. After a mean follow-up of 399 +/- 347 days, the 1-year event-free survival was 49 +/- 14% and was related to CAN size on IVUS. In 2 patients, CANs disappeared at repeated late angiography and IVUS showed abluminal CAN thrombosis., Conclusions: After DES implantation, CANs are rare and may be detected in asymptomatic patients. However, CANs are frequently associated with adverse clinical events as a result of DES restenosis and DES thrombosis. Further studies are required to determine the implications of this distinct new entity.

Aims: The aim of the current study was to compare the short and mid-term outcome between males and females treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and drug-eluting stent implantation in the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study I and II (ARTS I and II)., Methods and Results: The patients included in ARTS I were randomised to PCI with bare metal stents or to CABG. The patients enrolled in ARTS II were treated with Cypher stent implantation. All patients were scheduled for clinical follow-up at one, six and twelve months, and after three and five years. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) included death, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarction (MI), repeat target vessel PCI (RPCI) and CABG. At one and three-year follow-up in ARTS II, both the female and male patients had an incidence of MACCE similar to ARTS I-CABG. When comparing the female and male population of ARTS II, there were no differences between the two genders in terms of in-hospital outcome. At one year and three years there were no gender specific differences in the incidence of MACCE., Conclusions: Female and male patients in ARTS II had significantly lower MACCE rates compared with ARTS I-PCI, but similar to that of ARTS I-CABG. In ARTS II, MACCE free survival was similar for the two genders at three years follow-up.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the 3-year outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients who had multivessel coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus., Background: The optimal method of revascularization in diabetic patients remains in dispute., Methods: The ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial is a single-arm study (n = 607) that included 159 diabetic patients treated with SES whose 3-year clinical outcome was compared with that of the historical diabetic and nondiabetic arms of the randomized ARTS-I trial (n = 1,205, including 96 diabetic patients in the CABG arm and 112 in the PCI arm)., Results: At 3 years, among nondiabetic patients, the incidence of the primary composite of death, CVA, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]), was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.64) and similar to ARTS-I CABG. The ARTS-II patients were at significantly lower risk for death, CVA, and MI as compared with both the ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.91) and ARTS-I CABG patients (adjusted OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.92). Among diabetic patients, the incidence of MACCE in ARTS-II was similar to that of both PCI and CABG in ARTS-I. Conversely, the incidence of death, CVA, and MI was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.65) and was similar to that of ARTS-I CABG., Conclusions: At 3 years, PCI using SES for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease seems to be safer and more efficacious than PCI using bare-metal stents, irrespective of the diabetic status of the patient. Hence, PCI using SES appears to be a valuable alternative to CABG for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Objectives: We sought to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Background: Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge. The long-term outcome of patients with ISR treated with SES remains unknown., Methods: The RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study was a randomized trial conducted in 150 patients with ISR (76 SES, 74 balloon angioplasty [BA]). The long-term (>1 year) clinical outcome and pre-specified subgroup analyses were pre-defined secondary study end points., Results: At 1 year, the event-free survival (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was better in the SES group (88% vs. 69%, p < 0.005). Additional long-term (>3 years) clinical follow-up was obtained in 97% of patients (median 3.3 years). After the first year, 3 patients died (1 SES, 2 BA), 5 suffered myocardial infarction (4 SES, 1 BA), and 7 required TVR (4 SES, 3 BA). At last follow-up, definitive/probable/possible stent thrombosis was similar in both groups (2/2/1 SES vs. 1/0/3 BA, p = NS). At 4 years, the event-free survival was 76% in the SES arm and 65% in the BA arm (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, SES implantation was an independent predictor of event-free survival. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measure., Conclusions: In patients with ISR, SES implantation remains effective and safe at very long-term clinical follow-up.

Objectives: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of the eluted everolimus by assessing systemic drug release and distribution of everolimus-eluting stents., Background: Drugs eluted by a coronary stent might cause adverse events such as tumors, infections, or noncardiac death. The systemic exposure of the drugs is unknown because there are only limited data about pharmacokinetics of drug-eluting stents in humans., Methods: Venous blood samples in a subset of 39 patients were drawn just before implantation of the first stent (baseline, 0-minute time point) and at 10 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 168, and 720 hours (30 days) after completion of implantation of the last stent. Whole blood concentrations of everolimus were determined using a sensitive validated high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry method., Results: The total dose of everolimus received by the patients ranged from 53 to 588 microg. The last time point up to which whole blood concentrations could be quantified ranged per patient from 4 to 720 hours after implantation of the last stent. Across all dose levels, individual T(max) values ranged from 0.13 and 2.17 hours; individual C(max) ranged from 0.14 to 2.79 ng/mL., Conclusion: This study confirms the limited exposure to the systemic circulation of the eluted drug with the use of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Therefore, a systemic cause of adverse events is unlikely.

In the ABSORB trial, the feasibility of using a fully bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting stent (BVS; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) in patients with ischemia and a single de novo coronary lesion was investigated. Some important concerns about the efficacy of this device were raised by this study. The in-stent late loss with the BVS (0.44 mm) was comparable to that seen with some drug-eluting stents currently on the market, and the late lumen loss was primarily due to reduction in stent area. Technical improvements aimed at definitively preventing late vessel recoil and negative remodeling, as well as clarification of the behavior of these devices with longer follow-up, are needed before fully bioabsorbable drug-eluting stents can be considered a therapeutic option for patients with coronary artery disease.

Background: Wall shear stress (WSS) has been associated with neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) almost abolish NIH. Conversely, diabetes mellitus amplifies NIH response. The association between WSS and arterial wall response following DES and BMS implantation in diabetic patients remains to be evaluated., Methods: The study involved 20 diabetic patients randomized to BMS (n = 9) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 11) implantation in native coronary arteries. A computational fluid dynamic model applied 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and two-plane angiographic to measure WSS (Pa). IVUS assessments were performed post-procedure and at 9-months follow-up. The target segment encompassed the stent plus 5 mm distal and proximal edges. A total of 93 subsegments were evaluated: in-stent segments divided in three subsegments (proximal, mid and distal; n = 60) and proximal and distal edges (n = 33)., Results: Stent length was similar between BMS (17.4 +/- 7.3 mm) and SES (19.8 +/- 6.8 mm) groups. NIH was observed in all BMS subsegments (n = 27) versus one subsegment in the SES group (n = 33). WSS ranged from 0.52 to 4.20 Pa in the BMS and from 0.42 to 3.06 Pa in the SES group. There was no correlation between WSS and NIH in either stent group. In addition, there were no correlation between the change of external elastic membrane (EEM) or plaque growth at the edges and WSS., Conclusion: WSS was not associated with NIH after implantation of SES or BMS in diabetic patients. Plaque growth or the change of EEM at the edges were not associated with WSS either.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of overlapping bare-metal stent (BMS) and three different formulations of drug-eluting stent (DES) on intimal hyperplasia (IH) response of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM)., Methods: Forty-nine DM patients treated with overlapping BMS (19 lesions), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES 12 lesions), paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES 8 lesions) or tacrolimus-eluting stent (TES 10 lesions) were studied. Baseline and 9-month follow-up volumetric intravascular vascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis were performed in the entire stented segment and in the overlapped (OL) and non-overlapped (non-OL) subsegments. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 1-year follow-up., Results: Post-procedure (PO-) QCA measurements were similar in all stent groups, and between OL and non-OL subsegments in each individual type of stents. Percent IH was lower in SES and PES vs. BMS (p < 0.05). Percent IH was significantly greater in OL subsegment compared with non-OL subsegment in BMS (p < 0.05), but not in all type of DES groups. SES showed significantly less %IH compared with PES and TES in OL and non-OL subsegments. Vessel area at the OL remained unchanged from PO to FU in all type of DES and BMS groups. There were no aneurysm formation and no stent thrombosis up to 1-year follow-up., Conclusions: Overlapping BMS is associated with enhanced IH response in diabetic patients, whereas overlapping DES, particularly SES and PES, appear effective to inhibit IH without detectable late vascular adverse effects.

Aims: Sirolimus stent implantation has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in diabetics; however, the long-term outcomes in this high-risk population remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) when compared with the bare metal stent (BMS) in patients included in the DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial., Methods and Results: The prospective multicentre DIABETES trial randomized 160 diabetic patients with one or more significant coronary stenoses in one, two, or three vessels to either SES or BMS implantation. One-year dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) was routinely prescribed. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at 1, 9, 12, and 13 months and 2 years. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between groups. At 2 years, the rate of target lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the SES group compared with the BMS group (7.7 vs. 35.0%, P < 0.001). However, the total revascularization rate at 2 years increased in both groups due to progression of atherosclerosis in coronary segments remote from the target lesion (rate of atherosclerosis progression: 7.7% in SES group vs. 10% in BMS group; P = 0.7). During dual antiplatelet treatment (1 year), there was no stent thrombosis in the SES group, whereas two patients presented it in the BMS group. However, after clopidogrel withdrawal, three patients allocated to the SES group presented stent thromboses vs. none in the BMS group., Conclusion: SES implantation in diabetic patients remains effective at 2-year follow-up. However, clinical efficacy appeared to be reduced by the occurrence of stent thrombosis between 1 and 2 years.

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly reduced the incidence of restenosis. Although the results obtained with these novel antiproliferative devices are encouraging, recent reports have shown that DES are not completely immune from restenosis. Therefore, the broad use of DES has inevitably led to a major issue: treatment of DES failure. Intracoronary brachytherapy (IBT) represents an important advancement for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and has led to important pathophysiological insight on the restenotic process. To date, IBT, when properly used, still represents the gold standard for treatment of ISR. However, experience with IBT is for treatment of ISR occurring with bare metal stents (BMS). Whether IBT may be used with the same safety and efficacy profile as an adjunctive treatment for ISR following DES implantation is still unknown. In this article, we report the outcome of a series of patients with DES failure treated with IBT. IBT for treatment of DES failure was shown to be both safe and efficient and, therefore, until ISR exists, IBT still remains an important player in this growing and even more challenging setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]