Search

Psoriasis affects approximately 0.3% of the Japanese population. Recently, various effective systemic drugs have become available, and the continuation of a given treatment has become critical because of the chronic nature of psoriasis. Factors affecting drug survival (the time until treatment discontinuation) in psoriasis treatment include efficacy, safety, ease of use, and patient preference. In the present study, the authors retrospectively surveyed a multifacility patient registry to determine the real‐world evidence of the survival rate of systemic interventions for psoriasis treatment. Patients with psoriasis who visited 20 facilities in the Western Japan area between January 2019 and May 2020 and gave written consent were registered as study participants, and their medical history of systemic interventions for psoriasis (starting from 2010) was retrospectively collected and analyzed. The drugs investigated were adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, cyclosporine, and apremilast. When drugs were discontinued, the reasons were also recorded. A total of 1003 patients with psoriasis including 268 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were enrolled. In biologics, more recently released drugs such as interleukin 17 inhibitors showed a numerically higher survival rate in the overall (post‐2010) analysis. However, in the subset of patients who began treatment after 2017, the difference in the survival rate among the drugs was smaller. The reasons for discontinuing drugs varied, but a loss of efficacy against dermatological or joint symptoms were relatively frequently seen with some biologics and cyclosporine. The stratification of drug survival rates based on patient characteristics such as bio‐naive or experienced, normal weight or obese, and with or without PsA, revealed that bio‐experienced, obese, and PsA groups had poorer survival rates for most drugs. No notable safety issues were identified in this study. Overall, the present study revealed that the biologics show differences in their tendency to develop a loss of efficacy, and the factors that negatively impact the survival rate of biologics include the previous use of biologics, obesity, and PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of interleukin (IL)‐17 inhibitors (IL‐17i) by analyzing 66 patients with psoriasis treated with secukinumab (n = 25), ixekizumab (n = 17) and brodalumab (n = 24) at Kurume University Hospital between December 2014 and June 2019. The mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores at baseline were 12.9, 13.4 and 9.9 in the secukinumab, ixekizumab and brodalumab groups (SECg, IXEg and BROg), respectively. At the 6‐month evaluation, the mean PASI scores were 1.7, 1.1 and 0.5 in SECg, IXEg and BROg, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving PASI of 3.0 or less was significantly lower in SECg. Drug survivals showed no significant difference among the groups. Although one patient in IXEg died due to an unknown cause, no serious IL‐17i‐associated adverse event was observed. This study showed high efficacy and relatively low risk of the treatment with IL‐17i. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Real-world data differ from clinical trial data. Although some real-world data regarding apremilast use for psoriasis treatment has been reported in Western countries, no such data has been reported in Asian countries. Objective: To study the efficacy, including Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and drug survival, and safety of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriasis. Methods: Data on all the patients treated with apremilast in Kurume University Hospital between May 2017 and June 2018 were retrieved, with June 30 2018, as the data lock date. Efficacy was analyzed by PASI50, PASI75, and PASI90; drug survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis; and drug safety by the proportion of adverse events (AEs). Results: Fourteen of 42 (33.3%) patients achieved PASI75/90; 16 (32%) patients had discontinued apremilast by the data lock date. Drug survival at week 28 was 70%. No serious AEs were reported; the most prevalent one was loose stools/diarrhea (60%), followed by nausea (38%). The most common reason for apremilast discontinuation was primary/secondary failure. Conclusions: Apremilast is safe and effective in Japanese patients with psoriasis. Higher occurrence of loose stools/diarrhea was noted in our cohort than that reported in Western real-world studies on apremilast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In Japan, more than five years have passed since emergence of the first three biologics, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, became available in daily practice; however, no data for drug survival was reported from Japan. Objective: To study the long-term drug survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab used for Japanese psoriatic patients. Methods: We retrieved data on all patients treated with biological agents and calculated the long-term drug survival for infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab using our psoriasis registry (Kurume Psoriasis Registry: KURUPR) consisted of 343 patients by the end of March 2017. We analyzed 103 treatment courses of 83 patients with all types of psoriasis, as well as 79 treatment courses of 62 patients with psoriasis vulgaris using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Drug survival was higher for ustekinumab than infliximab and adalimumab in both settings, although there were no statistical differences. Conclusions: Previous studies of long-term drug survival in patients with psoriasis vulgaris showed significantly higher drug survival for ustekinumab than infliximab, and adalimumab. Our data showed similar tendency. Besides randomized clinical trials, drug survival data is useful because it reflects real-world management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]