Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the waiting times for surgical assessment, neuropsychological testing and epilepsy surgery between people with epilepsy who live in cities with available neurologists vs not., Methods: We reviewed all cases referred for epilepsy surgery between 2007 and 2017 at the Saskatchewan Epilepsy Program Royal University Hospital (SEP) (n = 98; Saskatchewan, Canada). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare wait times from first diagnosis of epilepsy to epilepsy surgery between patients who live in cities with neurologists (mainly urban areas) vs cities without neurologists (mainly rural areas)., Results: The mean age of patients who enrolled in SEP was 37.8 ± 12.8 years. The median wait time from date of epilepsy diagnosis to referral was 9.5 years in Saskatoon and Regina (cities with available neurologists) and 14 years in other areas of Saskatchewan (small cities and rural areas with no available neurologists) (p = 0.03). The median wait time from date of epilepsy diagnosis to first consult with the epileptologist was 10 years in Saskatoon and Regina and 15.5 years in other areas of Saskatchewan (p = 0.03). The median wait time from date of first diagnosis to epilepsy surgery was 13.2 years in Saskatoon and Regina and 18.2 years in other areas of Saskatchewan (p = 0.05)., Conclusion: A notable difference was observed in surgical wait times between patients who live in cities with available neurologists compared with people living in rural areas and cities with no neurologists. This suggests that delayed surgical treatment for epilepsy is related with the availability of neurologists., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2020 British Epilepsy Association. All rights reserved.)

In recent years clinical and epidemiological research on cysticercosis has gained significant interest in some countries, especially in Latin American countries and some countries in Asia and Africa. For many years it has been proposed that the higher prevalence of epilepsy seen in some regions such as Latin-America could be explained by parasitic infections, particularly neurocysticercosis (NCC). In this review we discussed selected epidemiological topics of the association of NCC and epilepsy, such as global distribution around the world, identification of NCC in developed countries, drug resistant epilepsy and NCC. Finally this review presents a critical review of biases of the published literature in NCC. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Neurocysticercosis and Epilepsy"., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been widely recognized as an alternative for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy, although modification of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during VNS treatment could explain the improvement in patients., Methods: We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of VNS in 30 adult patients with epilepsy treated with >6 months of follow-up. The criteria for implantation were the following: (1) not a candidate for resective epilepsy surgery, (2) drug-resistant epilepsy, (3) impairment of quality of life, (4) no other option of treatment, and (5) patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who fail to be controlled with appropriate AEDs. We assessed sociodemographics, seizure etiology, seizure classification, and AEDs used during treatment with VNS. We assessed adverse effects and efficacy. Responder rate was defined as >50% seizure improvement from baseline., Results: Thirty patients (females, 18; males, 12; age, 35.1±13.3 years) were included. After 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up, the response rates were: 13/30 (43%), 13/27 (48%), 9/22 (41%), and 8/16 (50%), respectively; none was seizure free. Fifty-seven percent, 33%, 59%, and 81% of patients had changes of medication type or dose at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. In the majority of patients, the change of medication consisted of an increase in the dose of AEDs., Conclusions: Our study shows that VNS is an effective therapy, although significant changes in medications were done along with the therapy; therefore, the real effect of VNS could be controversial.