Search

Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the clinical utility, safety, and tolerability in epilepsy patients of ultra long-term monitoring with a novel subcutaneous electroencephalographic (EEG) device (sqEEG)., Methods: Five patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy were implanted (one patient bilaterally) with sqEEG. In phase 1, we assessed sqEEG sensitivity for seizure recording by recording seizures simultaneously with scalp EEG in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). sqEEG was scored either visually (v-sqEEG) or by using a semiautomatic algorithm (EpiSight; E-sqEEG). In phase 2, the patients were monitored as outpatients for 3-6 months. sqEEG data were analyzed monthly, evaluating concordance of data obtained by v-sqEEG, E-sqEEG, and patients' diaries. v-sqEEG data were used to guide treatment adjustments. sqEEG-related side effects were assessed throughout the study., Results: In phase 1, v-sqEEG detected all seizures recorded in the EMU in all patients, whereas E-sqEEG was as effective in three patients. In the other two patients, E-sqEEG detected only a proportion or none of the seizures, respectively. Sensitivity of E-sqEEG depended on the ictal EEG features. In phase 2, a 100% concordance between E-sqEEG and v-sqEEG in seizure detection was observed for the same three patients as in phase 1. In the other two patients (one implanted bilaterally), effectiveness of E-sqEEG in detecting seizure as compared to v-sqEEG ranged from 0% to 83%. v-sqEEG showed that all patients reported in their diaries fewer seizures than they actually suffered. In four of five patients, v-sqEEG showed that the treatment adjustments had been ineffective or associated with a seizure increment. The only side effect was an infection at the implantation site in one patient., Significance: The sqEEG system could collect reliable information on seizure activity, thus providing clinically relevant information. Sensitivity of EpiSight in detecting seizures varied across patients, depending on the ictal EEG features. sqEEG ultra long-term monitoring was feasible and well tolerated., (© 2024 The Author(s). Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) over time, and to determine which patient groups derive the most benefit., Methods: Long-term outcomes are reported in 436 epilepsy patients from a VNS quality registry (52.8% adults, 47.2% children), with a median follow-up of 75 months. Patients were stratified according to evolution of response into constant responders, fluctuating responders, and nonresponders. The effect was evaluated at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify predictors of response., Results: The cumulative probability of ≥50% seizure reduction was 60%; however, 15% of patients showed a fluctuating course. Of those becoming responders, 89.5% (230/257) did so within 2 years. A steady increase in effect was observed among constant responders, with 48.7% (19/39) of those becoming seizure-free and 29.3% (39/133) with ≥75% seizure reduction achieving these effects within 2-5 years. Some effect (25%-<50%) at 6 months was a positive predictor of becoming a responder (odds ratio [OR] = 10.18, p < .0001) and having ≥75% reduction at 2 years (OR = 3.34, p = .03). Patients without intellectual disability had ORs of 3.34 and 3.11 of having ≥75% reduction at 2 and 5 years, respectively, and an OR of 6.22 of being seizure-free at last observation. Patients with unchanged antiseizure medication over the observation period showed better responder rates at 2 (63.0% vs. 43.1%, p = .002) and 5 years (63.4% vs. 46.3%, p = .031) than patients whose antiseizure medication was modified. Responder rates were higher for posttraumatic (70.6%, p = .048) and poststroke epilepsies (75.0%, p = .05) than other etiologies (46.5%)., Significance: Our data indicate that the effect of VNS increases over time and that there are important clinical decision points at 6 and 24 months for evaluating and adjusting the treatment. There should be better selection of candidates, as certain patient groups and epilepsy etiologies respond more favorably., (© 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Background: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) is a new non-invasive technique developed as treatment option for drug resistant epilepsy. A few studies have been carried out showing that the efficacy and tolerability of ta-VNS is comparable with traditional implanted VNS but the feasibility of the therapy has been poorly described. This study aimed to explore potential clinical benefits of ta-VNS and to evaluate adaptation, compliance, as well as the usability of the device from a service design perspective., Methods: A prospective, multicenter, clinical, investigator-initiated trial was conducted using the NEMOS® ta-VNS device. After eight weeks baseline, all subjects started ta-VNS with individually adjusted currents for four hours per day for six-months (first endpoint) followed by optional 12 months follow-up (second endpoint). The primary outcome was six months retention rate of ta-VNS therapy. Secondary outcomes included the user retention rate at 12 months follow-up, compliance, changes in scores of psychometric measures. For the study of feasibility, a service design questionnaire on medical devices used in the home was developed., Results: In total 37 subjects had been included in the study after 45 months where the study was prematurely terminated due to recruitment problems and due to a high drop-out rate. Twenty-two subjects (59 %) completed the first six months of the study and in total six subjects (16 %) completed the following 12 months follow-up. The reasons for discontinuation were a mixture of medical and practical issues of which the majority were related to a combination of both. Those, who managed to continue to use ta-VNS throughout the study, gave generally higher scores for the device usability and compatibility with lifestyle. The study turned out to be inadequately powered to reach any conclusion in terms of the clinical benefits of ta-VNS but present an example of difficulties that are encountered in conducting high-quality studies with digital devices., Conclusion: The feasibility of ta-VNS therapy showed to be relatively modest which is most likely due to practical usability issues and lifestyle fits. The results of this study stress the importance of generating data based on patients experiences at an early stage during the development phase and when designing clinical trials on medical devices that depend on patient's active participation and motivation., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)