Search

The perioperative management of dabigatran is challenging, and recommendations based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and thrombin time (TT) are unsatisfactory. Dedicated coagulation tests have limitations at plasma concentrations < 50 ng/ml. Therefore, a more sensitive test, which is available 24/7, is required. It was the aim of this study to investigate the performance of the Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitors® LOW (HTI LOW) kit, a diluted thrombin time, and the STA® - ECA II(ECA-II) kit, a chromogenic variant of the ecarin clotting time, that were developed to measure low dabigatran concentrations, compared to reference dabigatran analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). This study included 33 plasma samples from patients treated with dabigatran etexilate who had plasma concentrations < 200 ng/ml. HTI LOW and ECA-II were performed along with HTI, aPTT (STA®-C. K.Prest® and SynthasIL®) and TT (STA® - Thrombin). All procedures were performed according to recommendations by the manufacturers. Linear (or curvilinear) correlations and Bland-Altman analyses were calculated. For free dabigatran concentrations < 50 ng/ml, the R² of linear correlations were 0.69, 0.84 and 0.61, with HTI, HTI LOW and ECA-II, respectively. The R² for TT, STA®-C. K.Prest® and SynthasIL® were 0.67, 0.42 and 0.15. For HTI, HTI LOW and ECA-II, Bland-Altman analyses revealed mean differences of -6 ng/ml (95 %CI: -25-14 ng/ml), 1 ng/ml (95 %CI: -18-19 ng/ml) and -1 ng/ml (95 %CI: -25-23 ng/ml), demonstrating that tests dedicated to measuring low concentrations are more accurate than HTI. In conclusion, the use of HTI LOW or ECA-II to assess low plasma dabigatran concentrations is supported by our findings.

Several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now widely used in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. Unlike vitamin K antagonists, DOACs exhibit predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. DOACs are to be administered at fixed doses without routine coagulation monitoring. However, in some patient populations or specific clinical circumstances, measurement of drug exposure may be useful, such as in suspected overdose, in patients with a haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during treatment with an anticoagulant, in those with acute renal failure, or in patients who require urgent surgery. This article provides practical guidance on laboratory testing of DOACs in routine practice and summarizes the influence of DOACs on commonly used coagulation assays.

Introduction: Estimation of residual apixaban plasma concentrations may be requested in the management of emergencies. This study aims at assessing the performance of specific anti‐Xa assays calibrated with apixaban on real‐life samples with low apixaban plasma concentrations (<30 ng/mL) and on‐treatment ranges, with and without interference of low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH). Methods: The performance of the STA®‐Liquid Anti‐Xa assay (STA® LAX) and the low and normal procedures of the Biophen®Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors (DiXaI) assay was tested on 134 blood samples, collected from patients on apixaban, wherefrom 74 patients received LMWH after apixaban cessation. The results were compared with the liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) measurements. Results: The Biophen®DiXaI, Biophen®DiXaI LOW, and STA®LAX showed very good correlation with LC‐MS/MS measurements in patients without LMWH administration (Spearman r.95,.99, and.98, respectively). Their limits of quantitation were defined at 48, 24, and 12 ng/mL, respectively. The Bland‐Altman test measured mean bias (SD) at 5.6 (13.1), −2.5 (5.0), and −0.8 (6.1) ng/ml, respectively. The Spearman r of the Biophen®DiXaI decreased to 0.64 in presence of low apixaban concentrations. The Spearman r of the Biophen®DiXaI LOW and STA®LAX decreased to 0.39 and 0.26, respectively, in presence of LMWH. Conclusions: The accuracy of the low methodologies (Biophen®DiXaI LOW and STA®LAX) is slightly improved for low apixaban plasma concentrations, compared with the normal procedure of Biophen®DiXaI. The interference of LMWH on the low methodologies is measurable, however, less important than the previously reported interference of LMWH on rivaroxaban calibrated specific anti‐Xa assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Estimation of residual rivaroxaban plasma concentrations may be requested before invasive procedures and some patients at high thromboembolic risk will have a bridging therapy with heparins when rivaroxaban is interrupted. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the performance of the STA-Liquid Anti-Xa assay (STA LAX) and the low and normal procedures of the Biophen Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors (DiXaI) assay, in patients with and without bridging with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Materials and Methods: Seventy-nine blood samples were collected from 77 patients on rivaroxaban at CTROUGH or before an invasive procedure. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were estimated using Biophen DiXaI, Biophen DiXaI LOW, and STA LAX and compared to liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements. Stratifications were performed according to heparin bridging. Results: The Biophen DiXaI LOW and STA LAX showed better correlation with LC-MS/MS measurements than Biophen DiXaI in patients not bridged with LMWH (R: 0.97, 0.96, and 0.91, respectively). However, the performance of Biophen DiXaI LOW and STA LAX decreased when residual LMWH activity was present (R: 0.18 and 0.19 respectively) demonstrating that these tests are not specific to rivaroxaban. Conclusion: In patients not bridged with LMWH, we suggest to use the Biophen DiXaI LOW and STA LAX for the estimation of rivaroxaban concentrations <50 ng/mL. These results should be confirmed on a larger cohort of patients. Patients bridged with LMWH have inaccurate estimates of low levels of rivaroxaban and the 3 assays studied should not be used to estimate if it is safe to perform a procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]