Search

This study aimed to investigate the effects of oral curcumin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral etoposide in rats. Intravenous (6 mg/kg) or oral (2 mg/kg) etoposide was administered to rats in the absence and the presence of oral curcumin (0.4, 2 or 8 mg/kg). The effects of curcumin on the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 activity was also evaluated. Curcumin inhibited CYP3A4 enzyme activity with a 50% inhibition concentration (IC(50) ) of 2.7 µM. In addition, curcumin (10 µm) significantly enhanced the cellular accumulation of rhodamine-123 in MCF-7/ADR cells overexpressing P-gp. Compared with the control group (given etoposide alone), curcumin (2 or 8 mg/kg) increased significantly the oral bioavailability (AUC and C(max) ) of etoposide. Consequently, the extent of absolute oral bioavailability (F) of etoposide with curcumin was significantly enhanced compared with that in the control group. In contrast, curcumin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of etoposide after intravenous administration. Therefore, the enhanced oral bioavailability of etoposide in the presence of curcumin might be due mainly to inhibition of the P-gp efflux pump in the small intestine and possibly by reduced first-pass metabolism of etoposide in the small intestine by inhibition of CYP3A activity in rats. The combined use of curcumin may be helpful to improve the F of etoposide in chemotherapeutic applications.

Background This study aimed to investigate the effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine in rats. Methods We determined the pharmacokinetic parameters of nifedipine and dehydronifedipine in rats after oral and intravenous administration of nifedipine without and with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. We evaluated the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the activity of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4. Results Atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin inhibited CYP3A4 activities; inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values were 47.0, 5.2, 15.0 and 3.3 μM, respectively. Simvastatin and fluvastatin increased the cellular uptake of rhodamine-123. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC 0–∞ ) and the peak plasma concentration ( C max ) of oral nifedipine were significantly increased by fluvastatin and simvastatin, respectively, compared to control group. The total body clearance (CL/F) of nifedipine after oral administration with fluvastatin and simvastatin were significantly decreased compared to those of control. The metabolite–parent AUC ratio (MR) of nifedipine with fluvastatin and simvastatin were significantly decreased, which suggested that fluvastatin and simvastatin inhibited metabolism of nifedipine, respectively. The AUC 0–∞ of intravenouse nifedipine with fluvastatin and simvastatin was significantly higher than that of the control group. Conclusion The increased bioavailability of nifedipine may be mainly due to inhibition of both P-gp in the small intestine and CYP3A subfamily-mediated metabolism of nifedipine in the small intestine and/or in the liver and to the reduction of the CL/F of nifedipine by fluvastatin and simvastatin.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of pravastatin on the pharmacokinetics of nimodipine in rats. Materials and Methods: The effect of pravastatin on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 activity was evaluated. Nimodipine was administered to rats intravenously (3 mg/kg) and orally (12 mg/kg) with pravastatin (0.3 and 1 mg/kg). Results: Pravastatin inhibited CYP3A4 enzyme activity in a concentration-dependent manner with a 50% inhibition concentration (IC 50 ) of 14 ΅M. Compared with the oral control group, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC 0-∞ ) of nimodipine was increased significantly. Consequently, the absolute bioavailability (AB) of nimodipine with pravastatin (1 mg/kg) was 31.1%, which was significantly enhanced compared with the oral control group. Moreover, the relative bioavailability (RB) of nimodipine was 1.12- to 1.31-fold greater than that of the control group. Conclusions: The enhanced oral bioavailability of nimodipine might be mainly due to inhibition of the CYP3A-mediated metabolism of nimodipine in the small intestine and/or in the liver and due to reduction of the total body clearance rather than both to inhibition of the P-gp efflux transporter in the small intestine and reduction of renal elimination of nimodipine by pravastatin. The increase in the oral bioavailability of nimodipine with pravastatin should be taken into consideration of potential drug interactions between nimodipine and pravastatin.