Search

Nitazoxanide use is limited by gastrointestinal side effects associated with increasing dose. In this drug repurposing study, we investigated the possibility of enhancing the exposure of its active metabolite, tizoxanide, through pharmacokinetic interaction with atazanavir/ritonavir. In this crossover drug–drug interaction study, 18 healthy participants received a single dose of 1000 mg of nitazoxanide alone and in combination with 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir in period 1 and 2 respectively. On both days, blood samples for intensive pharmacokinetic analyses were collected at 0–12 h post-dose. To explore the utility of dried blood spots (DBS) as an alternative to plasma for tizoxanide quantification, 50 µL of blood from some participants was spotted on DBS cards and correlated with plasma concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental analysis and compared between both periods. Co-administration of nitazoxanide with atazanavir/ritonavir resulted in a significant increase in tizoxanide plasma exposure [GMR (90% CI) of AUC0–12h, Cmax and C12h being 1.872 (1.870–1.875), 2.029 (1.99–2.07) and 3.14 (2.268–4.352), respectively]. DBS concentration (%CV) was 46.3% (5.6%) lower than plasma concentrations, and there was strong correlation (R = 0.95, p < 0.001) between DBS-derived plasma concentration and plasma concentrations. Co-administration with atazanavir/ritonavir enhanced tizoxanide exposure with no report of adverse events in healthy volunteers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Amodiaquine (AQ) and pioglitazone (PGZ) are both metabolized by CYP2C8, an enzyme also inhibited by PGZ. These drugs are likely to be administered in instances of comorbidity of malaria with type 2 diabetes. This study, hence, evaluated the possibility of a drug interaction resulting from the concurrent use of both drugs. A 3‐period crossover design in 10 healthy subjects, that assessed the disposition of AQ and PGZ alone and when coadministered, was implemented with the administration of single oral doses of AQ and PGZ. Whole‐blood samples collected between 0 and 24 hours on protein saver cards across the study periods were processed and analyzed for AQ and PGZ contents. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by a noncompartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios for the Cmax, area under the concentration‐time curve for 24 hours (AUC0‐24h), and AUC0‐∞, alongside their corresponding 90%CIs, were compared across the study periods to infer clinically significant changes in disposition. The coadministration of AQ and PGZ resulted in decreases of about 38% and 54% in the Cmax and AUC0‐24h of AQ, respectively. For PGZ, the Cmax increased by about 50%, and AUC0‐24 rose by 48%. The 90%CIs of geometric mean ratios for the Cmax, AUC0‐24h, and AUC0‐∞ were all outside the expected bioequivalence interval of 80% to 125% for both drugs, implying significant interactions. These findings suggest that a bidirectional interaction between AQ and PGZ, with likely implications for the therapy and toxicity of both drugs, may occur in the event of their coadministration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]