Search

Background and Objective: Although there are several treatments for narcolepsy type 2 and idiopathic hypersomnia, studies that assess amphetamines, symptoms beyond sleepiness, and comparative effectiveness are needed. We performed a randomized, fully blinded, noninferiority trial of modafinil versus amphetamine–dextroamphetamine in these disorders. Methods: Forty-four adults were randomized to modafinil or amphetamine–dextroamphetamine, individually titrated to a maximum of modafinil 200 mg twice daily or amphetamine–dextroamphetamine 20 mg twice daily, for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was change in Epworth from baseline to week 12, with a noninferiority threshold of 2 points. Secondary outcomes were (1) patient global impression of change measures of disease severity, sleepiness, sleep inertia, and cognition; (2) change from baseline in Hypersomnia Severity Index; and (3) change from baseline in Sleep Inertia Questionnaire. Adverse events were compared between groups. Results: Epworth improved 5.0 [± standard deviation (SD) 2.7] points with modafinil and 4.4 (± SD 4.7) with amphetamine–dextroamphetamine; noninferiority of amphetamine–dextroamphetamine was not demonstrated (P = 0.11). Noninferiority of amphetamine-dextroamphetamine was demonstrated for change scores of severity, sleepiness, sleep inertia, Hypersomnia Severity Index, and Sleep Inertia Questionnaire. Dropouts due to adverse events were 31.8% for modafinil (including two severe events) and 9.1% for amphetamine–dextroamphetamine, P = 0.13. Anxiety was more common with modafinil and appetite suppression with amphetamine-dextroamphetamine. Conclusion: Noninferiority of amphetamine–dextroamphetamine to modafinil was not demonstrated for the primary outcome. However, amphetamine–dextroamphetamine was noninferior on multiple secondary measures of disease severity and symptomatology. These data may inform shared decision-making regarding treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia and narcolepsy type 2. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Registration (NCT03772314) 12/10/18.. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin can enhance central nervous system excitability, possibly by antagonism of GABA-A receptors. Enhancement of GABA signaling has recently been demonstrated in a significant proportion of patients with central nervous system hypersomnias, so we sought to determine whether clarithromycin might provide symptomatic benefit in these patients. We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with clarithromycin for hypersomnia, in whom cerebrospinal fluid enhanced GABA-A receptor activity in vitro in excess of controls, excluding those with hypocretin deficiency or definite cataplexy. Subjective reports of benefit and objective measures of psychomotor vigilance were collected to assess clarithromycin’s effects. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared in responders and non-responders. In total, 53 patients (38 women, mean age 35.2 (SD 12.8 years)) were prescribed clarithromycin. Of these, 34 (64%) reported improvement in daytime sleepiness, while 10 (19%) did not tolerate its side effects, and nine (17%) found it tolerable but without symptomatic benefit. In those who reported subjective benefit, objective corroboration of improved vigilance was evident on the psychomotor vigilance task. Twenty patients (38%) elected to continue clarithromycin therapy. Clarithromycin responders were significantly younger than non-responders. Clarithromycin may be useful in the treatment of hypersomnia associated with enhancement of GABA-A receptor function. Further evaluation of this novel therapy is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

We describe multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) results in 27 adult patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD). Pathological sleepiness (i.e. mean sleep latency ≤5 min) was common (40 of 134 nap opportunities), and sleep-onset REM periods were also observed (13 of 134 nap opportunities). These findings bore little relationship to disease specific variables (e.g. level of disability, medication use), or sleep architecture measures (e.g. total sleep time, sleep stage percentage’s). Our findings speak against a simple association of excessive sleepiness and the quality and quantity of prior night’s sleep, but rather, argue for primary impairments of waking arousal and REM-sleep expression in a sizeable subpopulation of PD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We successfully treated a 46-year-old narcoleptic woman suffering from atypical depression with bupropion hydrochloride. Diagnostic evaluation revealed a Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score of 24, a short nocturnal REM-sleep latency, subjective and objective sleepiness (mean sleep latency (MSL) = 1.8 minutes), and three sleep onset REM-sleep periods during the five nap multiple sleep latency test. Bupropion (100 mg t.i.d.) Normalized her mood (BDI = 6), sleepiness (MSL = 9.1 minutes), and REM-sleep propensity. Upon discontinuation of bupropion, these parameters reverted to pretreatment levels. This “activating” antidepressant's reversal of the sleepiness and REM-sleep propensity in narcolepsy may be due to blockade of dopamine or norepinephrine reuptake. Clinicians need to be alert to the fact that depression can mask the diagnosis of narcolepsy. Bupropion warrants further investigation as a treatment for narcolepsy in an open-label, double-blind, placebo-controlled paradigm. Depression and Anxiety 7:92–95, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Symptoms of the central disorders of hypersomnolence extend beyond excessive daytime sleepiness to include non‐restorative sleep, fatigue and cognitive dysfunction. They share much in common with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, recently renamed systemic exertion intolerance disease, whose additional features include post‐exertional malaise and orthostatic intolerance. We sought to determine the frequency and correlates of systemic exertion intolerance disease in a hypersomnolent population. One‐hundred and eighty‐seven hypersomnolent patients completed questionnaires regarding sleepiness and fatigue; questionnaires and clinical records were used to assess for systemic exertion intolerance disease. Sleep studies, hypocretin and cataplexy were additionally used to assign diagnoses of hypersomnolence disorders or sleep apnea. Included diagnoses were idiopathic hypersomnia (n = 63), narcolepsy type 2 (n = 25), persistent sleepiness after obstructive sleep apnea treatment (n = 25), short habitual sleep duration (n = 41), and sleepiness with normal sleep study (n = 33). Twenty‐one percent met systemic exertion intolerance disease criteria, and the frequency of systemic exertion intolerance disease was not different across sleep diagnoses (p = .37). Patients with systemic exertion intolerance disease were no different from those without this diagnosis by gender, age, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, depressive symptoms, or sleep study parameters. The whole cohort reported substantial fatigue on questionnaires, but the systemic exertion intolerance disease group exhibited more profound fatigue and was less likely to respond to traditional wake‐promoting agents (88.6% versus 67.7%, p = .01). Systemic exertion intolerance disease appears to be a common co‐morbidity in patients with hypersomnolence, which is not specific to hypersomnolence subtype but may portend a poorer prognosis for treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]