Search

Objective: To investigate the effect of the presence or absence of fetal anomalies and soft markers diagnosed by ultrasound on positive predictive value (PPV) 21, 18 and 13 in pregnancies with a high-risk cfDNA result., Methods: Retrospective study including singleton pregnancies with high-risk NIPT results for common trisomies followed by invasive testing. The cases were grouped by gestational age at the time of invasive testing and by the presence or absence of fetal abnormalities or soft markers. The ultrasound was considered abnormal if at least one major defect or a soft marker was detected., Results: A total of 173 women were included. Median maternal and gestational age was 37.7 years and 14.0 weeks, respectively. CfDNA test result showed high-risk for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 or 13 in 119 and 54 cases, respectively. The "pre-ultrasound" PPV for trisomy 21 and for trisomy 18 or 13 were 98.3% and 68.4%, respectively. In case of a high-risk result for trisomy 21 and no fetal anomalies, the PPV was 86.7% while it was 100% if there were anomalies or markers present. In the case of a high-risk result for trisomy 18 or 13, the PPV was 9.5% if the ultrasound examination was normal and 100% if the ultrasound examination was abnormal., Conclusion: This study suggests that a detailed ultrasound examination performed after a cfDNA result that is high-risk for one of the common autosomal trisomies adds significantly to establishing an individualized risk assessment. This is particularly true in cases with a high-risk result for trisomies 18 or 13., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the performance, cost-effectiveness and additional findings of combined detailed ultrasound and biochemical screening for risks of major fetal trisomies in the first-trimester., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis study, we estimated the risk of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 based on maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, nasal bone, ductus venosus pulsatility index velocity, tricuspid regurgitation, fetal heart rate, free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in singleton pregnant women, and performed non-invasive prenatal testing for women with risks of trisomy 21 between 1:500 and 1:300. Invasive diagnostic testing was performed for women with positive or failed non-invasive prenatal testing result and in the high-risk group of this screening method. The direct costs were compared between this strategy and the non-invasive prenatal testing which alone used as first-line screening for all pregnant women., Results: Among 25,155 singleton pregnant women who underwent screening, 24,361 were available for analysis, of these, 194 cases underwent non-invasive prenatal testing. Among the 24,361 women, 39, 19, and 7 had trisomies 21, 18 and 13, respectively. The use of this strategy could potentially detect approximately 94.87% of trisomy 21 cases, 100% of trisomy 18 cases, and 100% of trisomy 13 cases, with false-positive rates of 2.49%, 0.41%, and 0.49%, respectively. The overall detection rate and overall false-positive rates were 96.92% and 2.52%, respectively. The detection rate was 100% in the advanced age group and 94.12% in the general age group. Additionally, structural abnormalities were detected in 137 fetuses, and 44 fetuses had other chromosomal abnormalities. The total cost of this strategy was $3,730,843.30, and the cost per person tested was $153.15. The total cost of using non-invasive prenatal testing as the first-line strategy would be $6,813,387.04 and the cost per person tested was $279.68., Conclusions: Our strategy is an efficient and cost-effective approach for detecting major trisomies and identifying more fetuses with a potential abnormality. Therefore, this strategy is a valuable screening method and highly feasible in the clinical setting., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (dPCR) presents a promising approach for quantifying DNA and analyzing copy number variants, particularly in non-invasive prenatal testing. This method offers a streamlined and time-efficient procedure in contrast to the widely used next-generation sequencing for non-invasive prenatal testing. Studies have reported encouraging results for dPCR in detecting fetal autosomal aneuploidies. Consequently, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of dPCR in screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13., Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase for relevant articles published up to December 30, 2023. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was utilized for the quality assessment of the included articles. Furthermore, a bivariate random-effect regression model was used to conduct a meta-analysis on the utility of dPCR for trisomy 21 screening., Results: A total of 9 articles were included in this review, with all of them assessing the utility of dPCR in trisomy 21 screening, and 2 and 1 studies conducting additional analysis on the screening abilities of dPCR for trisomy 18 and 13, respectively. A bivariate random-effects model calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing trisomy-21 screening with karyotyping demonstrated dPCR's pooled sensitivity of 98% [95% CI: 94 -100] and specificity of 99% [95% CI: 99 -100]. While conducting a meta-analysis for trisomy 13 and 18 proved impractical, reported values for sensitivity and specificity were favorable., Conclusions: These findings suggest that dPCR holds promise as an effective tool for non-invasive prenatal testing, presenting a less time-consuming and intricate alternative to next-generation sequencing. However, further research is necessary to evaluate dPCR's applicability in clinical settings and to delineate its specific advantages over next-generation sequencing. This study contributes valuable insights into the potential of dPCR for enhancing prenatal screening methodologies., Trial Registration: The protocol of this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 7/3/2024, with a registration code of CRD42024517523., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This is a written summary of the oral debate presented at the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis annual conference in Edinburgh in 2023. The topic under debate is whether noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA should replace other screening strategies for the detection of fetal trisomies 13, 18, 21. There is no disagreement that NIPT is far more sensitive and has better positive predictive values for identifying trisomies 13, 18, and 21 than traditional screening approaches using biochemical markers and measurement of nuchal translucency. The major issue lies in the potential adverse consequences associated with abandoning traditional screening methods. The source of disagreement stems primarily from whether you consider the role of ultrasound in the context of screening to be strictly for nuchal translucency measurement or whether it should be combined with a fetal anatomy scan. The debate featured two experts who presented evidence in favor of each argument., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To analyze the results of prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for women with a high risk for fetal aneuploidies., Methods: A total of 747 cases of prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis due to high risks by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) were selected from January 2015 to March 2022 in the Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School. The amniotic fluid samples were subjected to chromosomal karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis. All cases were followed up by searching the birth information or telephone calls, and the results were recorded. 2 test or F test were used for comparing the difference between the groups., Results: Among the 747 pregnant women with a high risk by NIPT, 387 were true positives, and the overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 51.81%. The PPVs for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) were 80.24% (199/248), 60% (48/80), 14% (7/50) and 38.97% (106/272), respectively. The PPV for T21 was significantly higher than T18 and T13 (χ 2 = 85.216, P < 0.0001). The PPV for other chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs) were 11.11% (5/45) and 40.74% (22/52), respectively. The PPV for increased X chromosomes was significantly higher than X chromosome decreases (64.29% vs. 22.22%, χ 2 = 5.530, P < 0.05). The overall PPV for elder women (≥ 35 years old) was significantly higher than younger women (69.35% vs. 42.39%, χ 2 = 49.440, P < 0.0001). For T21 and T18, the PPV of Z ≥ 10 group was significantly higher than that for 3 ≤ Z < 5 group or 5 ≤ Z < 10 group (P < 0.05). Among 52 cases with a high risk for CNVs, the PPV for the ≤ 5 Mb group was significantly higher than the 5 Mb < CNVs < 10 Mb or > 10 Mb groups (60% vs. 30%60% vs. 23.53%, P < 0.05). Among the 387 true positive cases, 322 had opted for induced labor, 53 had delivered with no abnormal growth and development, and 12 were lost during the follow-up., Conclusion: The PPVs for common chromosomal aneuploidies are related to the age and Z value of the pregnant women, which were higher in the elder group and higher Z value group. In addition, the PPV is associated with high risk types. The PPV for T21 was higher than T18 and T13, and that for 45,X was lower than 47,XXX, 47,XYY or 47,XXY syndrome. NIPT therefore has relatively high PPVs for the identification of chromosomal CNVs.

This review article delves into the rapidly advancing domain of prenatal diagnostics, with a primary focus on the detection and management of chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomy 13 ("Patau syndrome)", "trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome)", and "trisomy 21 (Down syndrome)". The objective of the study is to examine the utilization and effectiveness of novel computational methodologies, such as "machine learning (ML)", "deep learning (DL)", and data analysis, in enhancing the detection rates and accuracy of these prenatal conditions. The contribution of the article lies in its comprehensive examination of advancements in "Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)", prenatal screening, genomics, and medical imaging. It highlights the potential of these techniques for prenatal diagnosis and the contributions of ML and DL to these advancements. It highlights the application of ensemble models and transfer learning to improving model performance, especially with limited datasets. This also delves into optimal feature selection and fusion of high-dimensional features, underscoring the need for future research in these areas. The review finds that ML and DL have substantially improved the detection and management of prenatal conditions, despite limitations such as small sample sizes and issues related to model generalizability. It recognizes the promising results achieved through the use of ensemble models and transfer learning in prenatal diagnostics. The review also notes the increased importance of feature selection and high-dimensional feature fusion in the development and training of predictive models. The findings underline the crucial role of AI and machine learning techniques in early detection and improved therapeutic strategies in prenatal diagnostics, highlighting a pressing need for further research in this area., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess whether the fetal fraction (FF) has an impact on the screen-positive rate (SPR) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for trisomy 21., Methods: Retrospective analysis based on samples analyzed using the Harmony ® Prenatal Test (Roche Inc). Due to the size of the data set, we focused on the SPR, which was stratified according to the maternal age, weight, gestational age, and FF distribution., Results: The study cohort consisted of 364,881 patients, including 2614 with a high-risk-result. Median maternal and gestational ages were 34.6 years and 12.4 weeks. FF was dependent on maternal age, weight, and gestational age. SPR was 0.72% and it was independent of maternal weight but was dependent on maternal age. There was a positive but weak association between the FF and the SPR until the FF reached 20.0% (OR p = 1.021, p < 0.001, Nagelkerkes r2 = 0.001). This group included 357,800 pregnancies or 98.1% of the study population. In the group of pregnancies with a FF > 20%, the association was stronger (OR 1.099, p < 0.001, Nagelkerkes r2 = 0.042)., Conclusion: The SPR in cfDNA screening for trisomy 21 was relatively constant up to a FF of about 20%., (© 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT-Plus) for the detection of aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes., Methods: A total of 7177 pregnant women were enrolled in the study from June 2020 to March 2022 at Xijing Hospital, China. Cases with NIPT-Plus-positive results were further confirmed by chromosomal karyotyping and a chromosomal microarray analysis., Results: A total of 112 positive cases (1.56%) were identified by NIPT-Plus, including 60 chromosome aneuploidies and 52 microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. Ninety-five cases were validated by amniocentesis, and 57 were confirmed with true-positive results, comprising 18 trisomy 21, 4 trisomy 18, 1 trisomy 13, 17 sex chromosome aneuploidies, 1 other aneuploidy, and 16 microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. The positive predictive value of total chromosomal abnormalities was 60% (57/95). For trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, other aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes, the sensitivity was all 100%, the specificity was 100, 99.986, 100, 99.888, 99.958, and 99.636%, and the positive predictive value was 100, 80, 100, 68, 25, and 38.10%, respectively. For all clinical characteristics, the abnormal maternal serum screening group was found to have the highest prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities (1.54%), and the ultrasound abnormality group presented the highest positive predictive value (73.33%)., Conclusions: NIPT-Plus has great potential for the detection of aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes owing to its high sensitivity, safety, and specificity, which greatly reduces unnecessary invasive procedures and the risk of miscarriage and allows informed maternal choice., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Analysis of cell-free DNA from maternal blood provides effective screening for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies. Data on cell-free DNA screening in twin gestations are promising although limited. In previous twin studies, cell-free DNA screening was primarily performed in the second trimester and many studies did not report chorionicity., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the screening performance of cell-free DNA for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in a large, diverse cohort. A secondary aim was to evaluate screening performance for trisomy 18 and trisomy 13., Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies from 17 centers for which cell-free DNA screening was performed from December 2011 to February 2020 by one laboratory using massively parallel sequencing technology. Medical record review was conducted for all newborns and data on the birth outcome, the presence of any congenital abnormalities, phenotypic appearance at birth, and any chromosomal testing that was undertaken in the antenatal or postnatal period were extracted. Cases with a possible fetal chromosomal abnormality with no genetic test results were reviewed by a committee of maternal-fetal medicine geneticists. Cases with a vanishing twin and inadequate follow-up information were excluded. A minimum of 35 confirmed cases of trisomy 21 was required to capture a sensitivity of at least 90% with a prevalence of at least 1.9% with 80% power. Test characteristics were calculated for each outcome., Results: A total of 1764 samples were sent for twin cell-free DNA screening. Of those, 78 cases with a vanishing twin and 239 cases with inadequate follow-up were excluded, leaving a total of 1447 cases for inclusion in the analysis. The median maternal age was 35 years and the median gestational age at cell-free DNA testing was 12.3 weeks. In total, 81% of the twins were dichorionic. The median fetal fraction was 12.4%. Trisomy 21 was detected in 41 of 42 pregnancies, yielding a detection rate of 97.6% (95% confidence interval, 83.8-99.7). There was 1 false negative and no false positive cases. Trisomy 21 was detected in 38 out of 39 dichorionic twin pregnancies, yielding a detection rate of 97.4% (95% confidence interval, 82.6-99.7). Trisomy 18 was detected in 10 of the 10 affected pregnancies. There was 1 false positive case. Trisomy 13 was detected in 4 of the 5 cases, yielding a detection rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 11.1-99.2). There was one false negative and no false positive cases. The nonreportable rate was low at 3.9 %., Conclusion: Cell-free DNA testing is effective in screening for trisomy 21 in twin gestations from the first trimester of pregnancy. Detection of trisomy 21 was high in dichorionic and monochorionic twins, and the nonreportable result rates were low. This study included high numbers of cases of trisomy 18 and 13 when compared with the current literature. Although screening for these conditions in twins seems to be promising, the numbers were too small to make definitive conclusions regarding the screening efficacy for these conditions. It is possible that cell-free DNA testing performance may differ among laboratories and vary with screening methodologies., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose of Review: To review the incidence of congenital heart disease in the trisomies, highlight the history of cardiac surgery in trisomy 21 comparing it to the increase in cardiac surgery in trisomies 13 and 18, discuss ethical issues specific to trisomies 13 and 18, and suggest a pathway of shared decision-making in the management of congenital heart disease in trisomy 13 and 18, specifically congenital heart surgery., Recent Findings: Congenital heart disease is prevalent in the trisomies and the management of these defects, especially surgical intervention, has changed. In the late 20th century, survival after cardiac surgery in trisomy 21 vastly improved, significantly decreasing morbidity and mortality secondary to pulmonary hypertension. Similarly, procedures and surgeries have been performed with increasing frequency in trisomy 13 and 18 patients and concomitantly, survival in this patient population is increasing. Yet across the United States, the willingness to perform cardiac surgery in trisomy 13 and 18 is variable, and there is ethical controversy about the correct action to take. To address this concern, a shared decision-making approach with an informed parent(s) is advised., Summary: As the care and management of congenital heart disease changed in trisomy 21, so too it has with trisomy 13 and 18. Physicians and parents should develop goal-directed treatment plans balancing the risk versus benefit and consider cardiac surgical repair if feasible and beneficial., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the value of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications using cell-free fetal DNA from peripheral blood samples of pregnant women., Methods: A total of 15 237 pregnant women who had undergone NIPT testing at the Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Zaozhuang from February 2015 to December 2021 were enrolled in this study. For those with a high risk by NIPT, amniotic fluid samples were collected for G-banding chromosomal karyotyping analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis to verify the consistency of NIPT with results of prenatal diagnosis. All of the women were followed up by telephone for pregnancy outcomes., Results: Among the 15 237 pregnant women, 266 (1.75%) were detected with a high risk for fetal chromosomal abnormality were detected. Among these, 79 (29.7%) were at a high risk for T21, 26 (9.77%) were at a high risk for T18, 9 (3.38%) were at a high risk for T13, 74 (27.82%) were at a high risk for sex chromosome aneuploidies, 12 (4.51%) were at a high risk for other autosomal aneuploidies, and 66 (24.81%) were at a high risk for chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications. 217 women had accepted invasive prenatal diagnosis and respectively 50, 13, 1, 25, 1 and 18 were confirmed with T21, T18, T13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, autosomal aneuploidies and microdeletions/microduplications, and the positive predictive values were 75.76%, 68.42%, 11.11%, 40.32%, 10% and 35.29%, respectively. For 13 042 women (85.59%), the outcome of pregnancy were successfully followed up. During the follow-up, one false negative case of T21 was discovered. No false positive cases for T13 and T18 were found., Conclusion: NIPT has a sound performance for screening T13, T18 and T21, and is also valuable for screening other autosomal aneuploidies, sex chromosome aneuploidies and chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature on low fetal fraction (LFF) in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening and the risk of fetal chromosomal aberrations., Method: We searched articles published between January 2010 and May 2021 in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2., Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data of 243,700 singleton pregnancies. Compared to normal fetal fraction, LFF was associated with a higher risk of trisomy 13 (OR 5.99 [3.61-9.95], I 2 of heterogeneity = 0%, n = 22 studies), trisomy 18 (OR 4.46 [3.07-6.47], I 2  = 0%, n = 22 studies), monosomy X (OR 5.88 [2.34-14.78], I 2  = 18%, n = 10 studies), and triploidy (OR 36.39 [9.83-134.68], I 2  = 61%, n = 6 studies), but not trisomy 21 (OR 1.25 [0.76-2.03], I 2  = 36%, n = 23 studies). LFF was also associated with a higher risk of various other types of fetal chromosomal aberrations (OR 4.00 [1.78-9.00], I 2  = 2%, n = 11 studies). Meta-analysis of proportions showed that absolute rates of fetal chromosomal aberrations ranged between 1% and 2% in women with LFF. A limitation of this review is the potential risk of ascertainment bias because of differences in outcome assessment between pregnancies with LFF and those with normal fetal fraction. Heterogeneity in population characteristics or applied technologies across included studies may not have been fully addressed., Conclusion: An LFF test result in cfDNA screening is associated with an increased risk of fetal trisomy 13, trisomy 18, monosomy X, and triploidy, but not trisomy 21. Further research is needed to assess the association between LFF and other specific types of fetal chromosomal aberrations., (© 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The screening performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in vanishing twin (VT) pregnancies is relatively unknown. To close this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review of the available literature. Studies describing the test performance of NIPT for trisomy 21, 18, 13, sex chromosomes and additional findings in pregnancies with a VT were retrieved from a literature search with a publication date until October 4, 2022. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The screen positive rate of the pooled data and the pooled positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated using a random effects model. Seven studies, with cohort sizes ranging from 5 to 767, were included. The screen positive rate of the pooled data for trisomy 21 was 35/1592 (2.2%), with a PPV of 20% (confirmation in 7/35 cases [95% CI 9.8%-36%]). For trisomy 18, the screen positive rate was 13/1592 (0.91%) and the pooled PPV 25% [95% CI 1.3%-90%]. The screen positive rate for trisomy 13 was 7/1592 (0.44%) and confirmed in 0/7 cases (pooled PPV 0% [95% CI 0%-100%]). The screen positive rate for additional findings was 23/767 (2.9%), of which none could be confirmed. No discordant negative results were reported. There is insufficient data to fully evaluate NIPT performance in pregnancies with a VT. However, existing studies suggest that NIPT can successfully detect common autosomal aneuploidies in pregnancies affected by a VT but with a higher false positive rate. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of NIPT in VT pregnancies., (© 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

This study evaluated prenatal screening test performance and the prevalence of common aneuploidies at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. We collected data from screening tests which are first-trimester test, quadruple test, and noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) between January 2016 and December 2020. Thirty percent (7,860/25,736) of pregnancies received prenatal screening tests for aneuploidies disorders, and 17.8% underwent prenatal diagnosis tests without screening. The highest percentage of screening tests was first-trimester test (64.5%). The high-risk results were 4% for first-trimester test, 6.6% for quadruple test, and 1.3% for NIPT. The serum screening tests for trisomy 13 and 18 had no true positives; therefore, we could not calculate sensitivity. For the first-trimester test, the sensitivity for trisomy 21 was 71.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 30.3-94.9); specificity for trisomy 13 and 18 was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-99.9); and for trisomy 21 was 96.1% (95% CI 95.6-96.7). For the quadruple test, the specificity for trisomy 18 was 99.6% (95% CI 98.9-99.8), while the sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 were 50% (95% CI 26.7-97.3) and 93.9% (95% CI 92.2-95.3), respectively. NIPT had 100% sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and there were neither false negatives nor false positives. For pregnant women < 35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.67), 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.67), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.54-1.45), respectively. For pregnant women ≥35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.26 (95% CI 0.06-1.03), 2.59 (95% CI 1.67-4.01), and 7.25 (95% CI 5.58-9.41), respectively. For all pregnancies, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13-0.57), 0.97 (95% CI 0.66-1.44), 2.80 (95% CI 2.22-3.52), respectively., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Wongkrajang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the correlation combined fetal fraction and Z-score for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 of NIPT by the semiconductor sequencing platform and further analyze the differences of different sequencing depths., Methods: A cohort of 61,581 pregnancies were recruited for NIPT. Invasive prenatal diagnostic confirmation is recommended in all high-risk NIPT cases. Logistic regression and rank correlation analysis were applied to analyze the relationship between different parameters. ROC curve analysis was adopted to analyze the cutoff values of Z-score and fetal fraction., Results: A total of 278 common trisomy pregnancies were verified in 377 NIPT-positive results. The fitted logistic regression models revealed that Z-scores of NIPT-positive results were significantly associated with PPVs (p < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff value of Z-scores for T21, T18, and T13 was 7.597, 4.944, and 9.135 for NIPT and 9.489, 8.004, and 12.4 for NIPT-plus. If combing fetal fraction as another evaluation factor, the PPV of trisomy 21 gradually improved. We analyzed the correlation between the fetal fraction and the PPV, which revealed that the fetal fraction was significantly correlated with PPV. By analyzing the PPV of different groups divided by the associated criteria obtained from ROC curve, the PPV of high Z-score and high fetal fraction is higher in groups of Z-score > the optimal cutoff value., Conclusion: The results of this study show that the fetal fraction is significantly correlated with the PPV. Combining fetal fraction with Z-score is significantly better than in groups of Z-score-associated criteria; clinicians can give more accurate and efficient prenatal genetic counseling., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: The diagnostic accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA in screening for rare autosomal trisomies is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to determine the predictive value of cell-free DNA in screening for rare autosomal trisomies., Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022., Study Eligibility Criteria: All studies that reported on the diagnostic accuracy of cell-free DNA in the detection of rare autosomal trisomies were included. Case series were included if they contained at least 10 cases with diagnostic test results or postnatal genetic testing., Methods: Study appraisal was completed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects meta-analysis of double-arcsine transformed proportions of confirmed results in the fetus out of the positive tests to obtain a pooled estimate of the positive predictive value., Results: The search identified 7553 studies, of which 1852 were duplicates. After screening 5701 titles and abstracts, 380 studies proceeded to the full-text screen; 206 articles were retrieved for data extraction, of which another 175 articles were excluded. A total of 31 studies, with a total of 1703 women were included for analysis. The pooled positive predictive value of cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of rare autosomal trisomies was 11.46% (95% confidence interval, 7.80-15.65). Statistical heterogeneity was high (I 2 =82%). Sensitivity analysis restricted to 5 studies at low risk of bias demonstrated a pooled positive predictive value of 9.13% (95% confidence interval, 2.49-18.76). There were insufficient data to provide accurate ascertainment of sensitivity and specificity because most studies only offered confirmatory tests to women with high-risk results., Conclusion: The positive predictive value of cell-free DNA in diagnosing rare autosomal trisomies is approximately 11%. Clinicians should provide this information when offering cell-free DNA for screening of conditions outside of common autosomal trisomies., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Twins account for approximately 1 in 30 live births in the United States. However, there are limited clinical experience studies published in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting aneuploidies in twins. This study reports the performance of an SNP-based NIPT in the largest cohort with known outcomes for high-risk aneuploidy results., Method: This is a retrospective analysis of 18,984 results from commercial single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT tests performed in twins between October 2, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Follow-up for all 211 high-risk cases was solicited., Results: Follow-up outcomes were obtained in 105 cases. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for high-risk results were 88.7% (63/71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 79.0%-95.0%) for trisomy 21% and 72.7% (8/11, 95% CI: 39.0%-94.0%) for trisomy 18. The results were stratified into monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ). The PPVs in MZ were 100% for both trisomy 21 (4/4, 95% CI: 40%-100%) and trisomy 18 (1/1, 95% CI: 2.5%-100%). No trisomy 13 cases were detected in the MZ group. The PPVs in DZ were 88.1% (59/67, 95% CI: 77.8%-94.7%), 70.0% (7/10, 95% CI: 34.8%-93.3%), and 66.7% (2/3, 95% CI: 9.4%-99.2%) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13, respectively., Conclusion: The performance of SNP-based NIPT in this large twin cohort was comparable to previously reported twin NIPT studies. SNP-based NIPT allows for zygosity-based PPV assessment., (© 2022 Natera. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To analyze the Z values of true and false positive cases by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in order to improve its accuracy in clinical practice., Methods: Results of 24 384 NIPT tests were reviewed. For cases with high risks for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, the range of Z values in true and false positive cases was analyzed and discussed., Results: A total of 335 high-risk cases were identified by NIPT, among which 256 had elected prenatal diagnosis, 153 (59.77%) were verified as true positives, and 103 (40.23%) were false positives, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9994. For NIPT screening, the positive predictive value (PPV) for trisomy 21 was 100% when Z>13, regardless if the pregnant woman was over 35. When 335 and about 41.6% (5/12) for those<35. For trisomy 18, the PPV was 100% when Z>13, and only 14.3% (1/7) when 3

Background: Prenatal screening for common trisomies via cell-free (cfDNA) is usually implemented by technologies utilizing massively parallel sequencing, stringent environmental controls, complex bioinformatics, and molecular expertise. An alternative and less complex methodology utilizes rolling circle amplification (RCA). Further evaluation of its performance and related requirements are warranted., Methods: At 16 sites, women at 10 to 20 weeks gestation provided informed consent, relevant information, and 2 to 3 blood samples. Samples shipped for testing were processed and stored. Women were enrolled at primary cfDNA screening, or following such screening at referral for diagnostic testing. RCA testing occurred post-enrollment, over 11 months. Diagnostic results and delivery notes determined clinical truth. Detection rates were based on confirmed trisomic pregnancies; false-positive rates were based on unaffected pregnancies from the general population., Results: Detection rate for the common trisomies was 95.9% (117/122, 95% CI, 90.5%-98.5%); overall false-positive rate was 1.00% (22/2,205, 0.65%-1.51%). Test failure rate after repeat testing was 0.04%. When assay standard deviations were below pre-specified levels, the overall false-positive rate was much lower at 0.30% (P < 0.001). Fetal sex calls were correct for 99.7%. One technician analyzed 560 samples over 2 weeks, a rate of 14 000/year., Conclusions: Our assessment of this simplified cfDNA-based system for prenatal screening for common trisomies performed in a prenatal screening laboratory is encouraging. Improved detection, low failure rates and rapid reporting can be achieved by collecting 2 samples. Future priorities should include achieving higher run precision using a single collection tube., Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT03087357., (© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2022.)

A vanishing twin (VT) occurs in up to 30% of early diagnosed twin pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of fetal aneuploidy. Here, we describe our experience in a large VT population of 847 patients that underwent noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common fetal trisomies over a three-year period. All patients underwent an ultrasound examination prior to NIPT. Two comparison populations were included, namely, the singleton ( n = 105,560) and the viable multiple gestation pregnancy samples ( n = 9691) collected over the same period. All NIPT samples in the VT population received a result, of which 14 were high-risk for trisomy 21 (1.6%), nine for trisomy 18 (1.1%), and six for trisomy 13 (0.7%). Diagnostic testing confirmed the presence of trisomy 21 in 6/12 samples, giving a positive predictive value of 50%. One trisomy 18 case and no trisomy 13 cases were confirmed. The time between fetal demise and NIPT sampling did not appear to affect the number of true- or false-positive cases. In conclusion, NIPT is an effective screening method for trisomy 21 in the surviving fetus(es) in VT pregnancies. For trisomies 18 and 13, a positive NIPT should be interpreted carefully and ultrasound monitoring is preferrable over invasive diagnostic testing.

Objective: To investigate the influence of Z -score and different risk factors on positive predictive value (PPV) of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for chromosome aneuploidies. Methods: A total of 81 838 NIPT samples from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. Invasive prenatal diagnosis was applied to verify the diagnosis of NIPT-positive results and the corresponding PPV was calculated. The PPV of the samples with different Z -score were compared. The women were divided into high-risk group and non-high-risk group: high-risk group ( n =39 114) included those with ultrasound soft index abnormalities, advanced maternal age or high risk for maternal serum screening, while non-high-risk group ( n =42 724) included those with intermediate risk for maternal serum screening or no indications. The differences of the PPV between these two groups were compared. Finally, the comprehensive influence of Z -score and different risk factors on PPV were analyzed. Results: A total of 471 high-risk cases were detected by NIPT results, including 362 cases of trisomy 21, 77 cases of trisomy 18 and 32 cases of trisomy 13. For trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, there were 226 cases, 46 cases and 6 cases which were confirmed via invasive prenatal diagnosis respectively. The corresponding PPV were 79.3% (226/285), 82.1% (46/56) and 27.3% (6/22), respectively. PPV of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 were positively correlated with the corresponding Z -score ( r =0.92, 0.62, all P <0.05), while trisomy 13 could not be analyzed due to the small sample size. The PPV of high-risk group was 85.2% (207/243), which was higher than that of the non-high-risk group with PPV of 59.2%(71/120, χ 2 =30.30, P <0.01). When the Z -score was between 3-<4 and 4-<5, the PPV of the high-risk group were 46.2%(12/26)and 62.5%(15/24) respectively, which were higher than those of the non-high-risk group [16.0%(4/25) and 14.3%(3/21), χ 2 =4.10, 8.90, all P <0.05]. With the increase of Z -score, there was no significant difference in PPV between the two groups (all P >0.05). Conclusions: The PPV of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 are positively correlated with Z -score. The PPV of high-risk group is higher than that of non-high-risk group. The combination of Z -score and other risk factors may provide more accurate genetic counseling for those with NIPT positive results.

A total of 15,267 pregnancies were tested by NIPT in this study. Grey zone (z score: 2.58 ∼ 4 and -4∼-2.58) was set for screening out aneuploidy 21, 18 and 13. Cases with z score located in the grey zone were retested starting from DNA extraction. The chi-squared test and/or the Fisher's exact test were used to compare variables. One hundred and eight screening-positive samples in the first run of NIPT were common trisomies 21 ( N  = 83), trisomies18 ( N  = 13) or trisomies 13 ( N  = 12), with PPVs of 87.18%, 76.92%, and 30% respectively. For the cases in the grey zone, most of them (67.15%, 184/274) were reported with Z score of Chromosome 21 in the grey zone and 176 were reclassified as negative by the second run of NIPT; while 3 cases reclassified as trisomy 21 and 1 case reclassified as trisomy 13 were finally confirmed by karyotyping analysis, with PPV 25% and 20% respectively. The grey zone and the second run of NIPT in this study showed that the grey zone and second run NIPT approach was able to accurately help categorise cases as negative and positive. Invasive diagnosis is recommended to prevent false negative aneuploidies for samples located in the special z score scope of 2.58-3 for two runs of NIPT. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Grey zone was widely used in NIPT. The performance of grey zone of clinical samples on Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument has been reported, and the performance of grey zone on some mainstream sequencers with simulated samples has also been summarised. Reported treatments for samples located in the grey zone in NIPT usually included being classified into 'unclassified' or 'no call' followed by following up and/or karyotyping analysis. What do the results of this study add? This study investigated the performance of the grey zone on Ion Proton DA8600 with clinical samples; and it present an alternative treatment for samples in grey zone that reclassified them as negative or positive by the second run of sequencing. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our own data for the performance of the grey zone in the cfDNA assay on the semiconductor sequencing platform might provide raw materials for other researchers' meta-analysis, cohort study, or other studies. Details of Z score distributions of chromosomes in grey zone, results of the second run of NIPT for samples in the grey zone, and false negative samples in the grey zone would help lab technicians better analyse the NIPT results and help doctors to improve genetic counselling.

Background: Cell-free DNA noninvasive prenatal screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 has been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. However, previous studies are limited by a lack of follow-up genetic testing to confirm the outcomes and accurately assess test performance, particularly in women at a low risk for aneuploidy., Objective: To measure and compare the performance of cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 between women at a low and high risk for aneuploidy in a large, prospective cohort with genetic confirmation of results STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter prospective observational study at 21 centers in 6 countries. Women who had single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was obtained from prenatal or newborn DNA samples. The test performance and test failure (no-call) rates were assessed for the cohort, and women with low and high previous risks for aneuploidy were compared. An updated cell-free DNA algorithm blinded to the pregnancy outcome was also assessed., Results: A total of 20,194 women were enrolled at a median gestational age of 12.6 weeks (interquartile range, 11.6-13.9). The genetic outcomes were confirmed in 17,851 cases (88.4%): 13,043 (73.1%) low-risk and 4808 (26.9%) high-risk cases for aneuploidy. Overall, 133 trisomies were diagnosed (100 trisomy 21; 18 trisomy 18; 15 trisomy 13). The cell-free DNA screen positive rate was lower in the low-risk vs the high-risk group (0.27% vs 2.2%; P<.0001). The sensitivity and specificity were similar between the groups. The positive predictive value for the low- and high-risk groups was 85.7% vs 97.5%; P=.058 for trisomy 21; 50.0% vs 81.3%; P=.283 for trisomy 18; and 62.5% vs 83.3; P=.58 for trisomy 13, respectively. Overall, 602 (3.4%) patients had no-call result after the first draw and 287 (1.61%) after including cases with a second draw. The trisomy rate was higher in the 287 cases with no-call results than patients with a result on a first draw (2.8% vs 0.7%; P=.001). The updated algorithm showed similar sensitivity and specificity to the study algorithm with a lower no-call rate., Conclusion: In women at a low risk for aneuploidy, single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based cell-free DNA has high sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value of 85.7% for trisomy 21 and 74.3% for the 3 common trisomies. Patients who receive a no-call result are at an increased risk of aneuploidy and require additional investigation., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA has been assimilated into prenatal care. Prior studies examined clinical validity and technical performance in high-risk populations. This systematic evidence review evaluates NIPS performance in a general-risk population., Methods: Medline (PubMed) and Embase were used to identify studies examining detection of Down syndrome (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosome aneuploidies, rare autosomal trisomies, copy number variants, and maternal conditions, as well as studies assessing the psychological impact of NIPS and the rate of subsequent diagnostic testing. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled estimates of NIPS performance (P < .05). Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was assessed., Results: A total of 87 studies met inclusion criteria. Diagnostic odds ratios were significant (P < .0001) for T21, T18, and T13 for singleton and twin pregnancies. NIPS was accurate (≥99.78%) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies. Performance for rare autosomal trisomies and copy number variants was variable. Use of NIPS reduced diagnostic tests by 31% to 79%. Conclusions regarding psychosocial outcomes could not be drawn owing to lack of data. Identification of maternal conditions was rare., Conclusion: NIPS is a highly accurate screening method for T21, T18, and T13 in both singleton and twin pregnancies., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest N.C.R. is a consultant for The Jackson Laboratories and the ObG Project. E.S.B. and M.L.L. serve as directors in, and D.L. is employed by, clinical laboratories that perform a breadth of genetic and genomic analyses on a fee-for-service basis. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Women's autonomy and an inclusive society for all individuals are highly valued in Norway. The Norwegian Biotechnology Act changed in 2020 allowing first-trimester screening and cell-free DNA for common trisomies to all pregnant women. However, implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a public antenatal care program is difficult, because many patients, politicians, and medical professionals do not consider trisomy 21 a severe medical disease. Screening for trisomies at an early gestation might inevitably lead to an increase in pregnancy terminations and making cost-benefit calculations is ethically challenging. Moreover, offering NIPT to all pregnant women is debatable because of the lower prevalence of fetal trisomies in younger women. Therefore, appropriate genetic pre-test counseling is essential. Furthermore, organizing the service between private institutions and public hospitals poses another debate and challenges both quality and equal access to health services for women across the country., (© 2022 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).)

Objectives: To explore the feasibility of clinical application of non-invasive prenatal screening to detect aneuploidy diseases., Material and Methods: A total of 14,574 singleton pregnant women who underwent Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Southern Hospital from 2015 to June 2017 were selected, and 6471 pregnant women with twin pregnancy who underwent NIPT in the laboratory of Bei Rui He Kang Southern Hospital from June 2016 to October 2017 were included in this study. We analyzed NIPT screening efficiency (sensitivity, specificity) in twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies, compared the positive detection rate of NIPT in patients with or without clinical symptoms. All NIPT high-risk results were validated by karyotyping, which were further verified by the follow-up physical examination of the neonatal., Results: A total of 68 cases of twin pregnancy abnormalities were detected by NIPT, including 18 cases of trisomy 21, 6 cases of trisomy 18, 1 case of trisomy 13, 39 cases of Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), and 4 cases of other chromosomal abnormalities. The sensitivity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosome abnormality was 100%; the specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosome abnormality was 99.97%, 99.95%, 99.97%, and 99.91% respectively. The screening efficiency was similar to that of singleton pregnancy, indicating that the NIPT technology in our laboratory for screening for aneuploidy diseases in twin pregnancy has reached the accuracy level of singleton pregnancy screening. There was a statistical difference between the risk group and the non-risk group in pregnant women with singleton pregnancy. The screening efficiency of NIPT was higher in pregnant women in the risk group, which implies that the clinical application of NIPT is inclined to detect high-risk group., Conclusions: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a rapid and safe screening method with high efficiency. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is used for the screening of aneuploidy in twin pregnancy. The efficiency is similar to that of singleton pregnancy, indicating the feasibility of clinical application. However, the efficiency of NIPT screening tends to favor the detection in high-risk groups.

Objectives: Universal screening for trisomy using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has proven to be more effective than combined test, but it is not cost efficient currently. Contingent cfDNA screening on the results of the first-trimester combined test can improve the detection rate of the combined test and reduce the number of invasive tests at a lower cost than universal screening. In 2018, a contingent screening program was implemented in the community of Castilla y Leon (Spain). This study aims to compare the results achieved in Salamanca University Hospital during the first 3 years of contingent screening (2018-2020) with those of the previous 3 years (2015-2017) to assess the changes in the trisomy detection rate and the number of invasive tests., Methods: A total of 9,903 singleton pregnancies without malformations nor nuchal translucency >p99 were included. 5,165 patients underwent combined screening and 4,738 had contingent screening based on the combined test risk. In the combined test group, women were offered an invasive test if the risk was ≥1:270, while risks under 1:270 were considered low risks, and no further testing was offered. In the contingent screening group, invasive testing was offered if the risk was ≥1:100 (≥1:50 from 2020 onwards), while cfDNA was offered if the combined test risk was between 1:100 and 1:1,000 (1:50-1:1,000 from 2020 onwards). When risk was <1:1,000, no further testing was offered. Aneuploidies detected by cfDNA were confirmed by invasive diagnostic testing., Results: There were 33 cases of trisomy 21 (T21) throughout the 6 years of study. Four cases had low/intermediate risks and were spotted by cfDNA. Risk >1:1,000 threshold for contingent test detected 100% T21. There was a false-positive result for trisomy 13. There were no false-negative results. "No-call" cfDNA results were minimized by repeating blood collection 2 weeks later, as fetal fraction (FF) was doubled. Invasive testing had a drop rate of 84% after contingent screening implementation., Discussion: The implementation of population-based contingent screening significantly reduces the number of invasive tests without lowering diagnostic accuracy. To achieve the maximum efficiency of the program, it is important to know the best cut-offs according to the population where the program is to be implemented. The number of uninformative results due to low FF can be reduced by repeating the test 2 weeks after the initial extraction: this increases the FF to twice the initial one, achieving informative results and avoiding unnecessary invasive tests., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Rolling-circle replication (RCR) is a novel technology that has not been applied to cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing until recently. Given the cost and simplicity advantages of this technology compared to other platforms currently used in cfDNA analysis, an assessment of RCR in clinical laboratories was performed. Here, we present the first validation study from clinical laboratories utilizing RCR technology. Methods : 831 samples from spontaneously pregnant women carrying a singleton fetus, and 25 synthetic samples, were analyzed for the fetal risk of trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13), by three laboratories on three continents. All the screen-positive pregnancies were provided post-test genetic counseling and confirmatory diagnostic invasive testing (e.g., amniocentesis). The screen-negative pregnancies were routinely evaluated at birth for fetal aneuploidies, using newborn examinations, and any suspected aneuploidies would have been offered diagnostic testing or confirmed with karyotyping. Results : The study found rolling-circle replication to be a highly viable technology for the clinical assessment of fetal aneuploidies, with 100% sensitivity for T21 (95% CI: 82.35-100.00%); 100.00% sensitivity for T18 (71.51-100.00%); and 100.00% sensitivity for T13 analyses (66.37-100.00%). The specificities were >99% for each trisomy (99.7% (99.01-99.97%) for T21; 99.5% (98.62-99.85%) for T18; 99.7% (99.03-99.97%) for T13), along with a first-pass no-call rate of 0.93%. Conclusions : The study showed that using a rolling-circle replication-based cfDNA system for the evaluation of the common aneuploidies would provide greater accuracy and clinical utility compared to conventional biochemical screening, and it would provide comparable results to other reported cfDNA methodologies.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and diagnostic value of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal aneuploidies in multiple gestations, with a focus on dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a twin or higher-order gestation who underwent genome-wide NIPT at one of the eight Belgian genetic centers between November 1, 2013, and March 1, 2020. Chorionicity and amnionicity were determined by ultrasonography. Follow-up invasive testing was carried out in the event of positive NIPT results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the detection of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 in the dichorionic-diamniotic twin cohort., Results: Unique NIPT analyses were performed for 4,150 pregnant women with a multiple gestation and an additional 767 with vanishing gestations. The failure rate in multiple gestations excluding vanishing gestations ranged from 0% to 11.7% among the different genetic centers. Overall, the failure rate was 4.8%, which could be reduced to 1.2% after single resampling. There were no common fetal trisomies detected among the 86 monochorionic-monoamniotic and 25 triplet cases. Two monochorionic-diamniotic twins had an NIPT result indicative of a trisomy 21, which was confirmed in both fetuses. Among 2,716 dichorionic-diamniotic twin gestations, a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 74.12-100%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.86-100%) was reached for trisomy 21 (n=12). For trisomy 18 (n=3), the respective values were 75% (95% CI 30.06-95.44%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI 99.86-100%) specificity, and for trisomy 13 (n=2), 100% (95% CI 20.65-100%) sensitivity and 99.96% (95% CI 99.79-99.99%) specificity. In the vanishing gestation group, 28 NIPT results were positive for trisomy 21, 18, or 13, with only five confirmed trisomies., Conclusion: Genome-wide NIPT performed accurately for detection of aneuploidy in dichorionic-diamniotic twin gestations., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a highly sensitive and specific method for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies from maternal plasma. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of a new paired-end sequencing-based NIPT assay in 13,607 pregnancies from a single center in Germany., Methods: Samples from 13,607 pregnant women who previously underwent NIPT were analyzed using VeriSeq NIPT Solution v2 assay for presence of common fetal trisomies and monosomy X. Follow-up to determine clinical truth was carried out., Results: Of the 13,607 cases, 13,509 received a NIPT call resulting in a low study failure rate of 0.72%. There were 188 (1.4%) high-risk calls: 117 trisomy 21, 34 trisomy 18, 23 trisomy 13, one trisomy 21 + 13, and 13 monosomy X. High sensitivities and specificities of ≥ 98.89% were reported for all four aneuploidy conditions. Of the high-risk cases, clinical follow-up data were available for 77.1% (145/188). Clinical follow-up of high-risk calls revealed an overall positive predictive value of 84.8% (potential range 65.4-88.3%). NIPT results were provided for samples across a range of fetal fractions, down to 2% fetal fraction., Conclusion: The VeriSeq NIPT Solution v2 assay detected fetal chromosomal aneuploidies across a range of fetal fractions with high sensitivities and specificities observed based on known clinical outcomes, a high overall PPV, and a low failure rate.

Objective: To assess the correlation between Z-scores of positive noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results and the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT., Methods: Pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre between July 2017 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal NIPT results for confirmatory testing. Logistic regression analyses was applied to study the relationship between the Z scores and the PPV performance. The optimal cutoff values for indicating fetal common trisomies were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and then the PPV were calculated in pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Z-score greater than or equal to cutoff value and in patients with a Z-score between 3 and cutoff value respectively., Results: A total of 214 pregnancies with positive NIPT results for fetal common trisomies were validated by invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow up in this study. Of these, NIPT indicated trisomy 13 in 25 cases, trisomy 18 in 54 cases and trisomy 21 in 135 patients. Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association (p < 0.05) between the Z-scores and true positive results for T21 and T18. For T13, the significant association was not observed (p > 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff Z-score for indicating fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 were 6.889, 7.574 and 6.612 respectively, and the corresponding area under curve were 0.706, 0.916, and 0.954. In this cohort with abnormal NIPT results, the cutoff values revealed a sensitivity of 96.8% and a specificity of 90% for indicating trisomies 21, and a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 92.6% for trisomies 18. However, probably due to the sample size, the sensitivity and specificity for indicating trisomy 13 were lower (85.7% and 61.1%) than that for trisomies 21 and 18. The PPVs in pregnancies with positive NIPT results at Z-score greater than or equal to cutoff value were 99.18% (121/122) for trisomy 21, 92.31% (24/26) for trisomy 18 and 46.15% (6/13) for trisomy 13. In patients with a Z-score between 3 and cutoff Z-score, the PPV of NIPT for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were 30.77% (4/13), 10.71% (3/28), and 8.33% (1/12) respectively. Moreover, by classifying Z scores as 3 ≤ Z < 5, 5 ≤ Z < 10, and Z ≥ 10, the majority of Z scores were above 10 with a PPV of 99% for T21 and just 5.2% were between 3 and 5 with a PPV of 14.3%. In contrast for T18, over a third of tests had Z scores between 3 and 5. The PPV in this group is just over 5%., Conclusions: The present results show that the PPV performance of NIPT for fetal trisomies 13, 18, and 21 are closely associated with Z-score. The higher the Z-score, the greater the likelihood that the aneuploidy result is correct. Our experience in evaluating the Z-score accuracy of NIPT in this study could be of use in similar work., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A total of 551 pregnancies with positive results for noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using traditional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis were analyzed. Confirmatory results, positive predictive values, etiology exploration of false-positive results, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The study demonstrated that NIPT performed better in predicting trisomy 21 and trisomy 18 for pregnancies with advanced maternal age than for pregnancies with young maternal age; as for trisomy 13 and sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) prediction, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The positive predictive values for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and SCA showed no significant upward trend when compared based on specific age categories (an interval of 5 years), which suggested that NIPT-positive result deserves equal attention from both providers and patients regardless of maternal age. In addition, the termination rates of 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX, and 47,XYY were 100% (2/2), 92.9% (26/28), 33.3% (5/15), and 9.5% (2/21), respectively, which demonstrated that the decision-making regarding pregnancies varied greatly according to the types of SCAs, and further reinforce the importance of confirmatory prenatal diagnosis. The current study also supported the viewpoint that confined placental mosaicism and maternal mosaicism were the important etiology of false-positive results., (Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clinical performance of the Momguard non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) was evaluated in a cohort of Korean pregnant women. The foetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 (T21, T18 and T13) were screened by low-coverage massive parallel sequencing in the maternal blood. Among the 1011 confirmed samples, 32 cases (3.2%) had positive NIPT results. Of these positive cases, 20 cases of T21, all cases of T18 and two cases of T13 had concordant karyotype findings. Only one case out of the remaining 979 negative NIPT samples showed a false negative result. The overall sensitivity and specificity of Momguard to detect the three chromosomal aneuploidies were 96.8% and 99.8%, respectively. Momguard is a clinically useful tool for the detection of T21, T18 and T13 in singleton pregnancy. However, as other NIPT tests, it carries the risk of false positive and false negative results. Hence, the genetic counsellors should provide these limitations to the examinees.Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? The NIPT approach using massive parallel sequencing (MPS) showed high sensitivity and specificity in various clinical studies. These results are based on analysis systems using their own bioinformatics algorithms. What the results of this study add? When this NIPT technology was introduced in Korea, the first biological specimens collected in Korea were transported overseas for processing in overseas laboratories and analysed by other country's analysis methods. We needed our own NIPT algorithm and developed Momguard NIPT for the first time in Korea. This study attempted to evaluate this Momguard NIPT protocol prospectively in a large number of samples obtained from three Korean hospitals. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The overall sensitivity and specificity to identify T13, T18 and T21 were 96.8% and 99.8%, respectively. These accuracy values were comparable to that of other studies. From this study, we found that Momguard is a clinically useful tool for the detection of three chromosomal aneuploidies. However, as other NIPT tests, it carries the risk of false positive and false negative results. Hence, the genetic counsellors should provide these limitations to the examinees.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare no support from any organisation for the submitted work and no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years. PP is chair of the Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme Advisory Group at the National Screening Committee.

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has revolutionized the prenatal screening landscape with its high accuracy and low false positive rate for detecting Trisomy 21, 18 and 13. Good understanding of its benefits and limitations is crucial for obstetricians to provide effective counselling and make informed decisions about its use. This study aimed to evaluate obstetrician knowledge and attitudes regarding NIPT for screening for the common trisomies, explore how obstetricians integrated NIPT into first-line and contingent screening, and determine whether expanded use of NIPT to screen for sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (CNVs) was widespread., Methods: A questionnaire was designed and administered with reference to the CHERRIES criteria for online surveys. Doctors on the Obstetrics & Gynaecology trainee and specialist registers were invited to participate. Medians and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for confidence and knowledge scores., Results: 94/306 (30.7%) doctors responded to the survey. First trimester screening (FTS) remained the main method offered to screen for the common trisomies. 45.7% (43/94) offered NIPT as an alternative first-line screen for singletons and 30.9% (29/94) for monochorionic diamniotic twins. A significant proportion offered concurrent NT and NIPT (25/94, 26.6%), or FTS and NIPT (33/94, 35.1%) in singletons. Varying follow up strategies were offered at intermediate, high and very-high FTS risk cut-offs for Trisomy 21. Respondents were likely to offer screening for SCAs and CNVs to give patients autonomy of choice (53/94, 56.4% SCAs, 47/94, 50% CNVs) at no additional cost (52/94, 55.3% SCAs, 39/94, 41.5% CNVs). Median clinical knowledge scores were high (10/12) and did not differ significantly between specialists (95% CI 10-11) and non-specialists (95% CI 9.89-11). Lower scores were observed for scenarios in which NIPT would be more likely to fail., Conclusions: Our findings show the diversity of clinical practice with regard to the incorporation of NIPT into prenatal screening algorithms, and suggest that the use of NIPT both as a first-line screening tool in the general obstetric population, and to screen for SCAs and CNVs, is becoming increasingly prevalent. Clear guidance and continuing educational support are essential for providers in this rapidly evolving field.

Objective: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is increasingly being adopted as a screening test in the UK and is currently accessed through certain National Health Service healthcare systems or by private provision. This audit aims to describe reasons for and results of cytogenomic investigations carried out within UK genetic laboratories following an NIPT result indicating increased chance of cytogenomic abnormality ('high-chance NIPT result')., Method: A questionnaire was sent out to 24 genetics laboratories in the UK and completed by 18/24 (75%)., Results: Data were returned representing 1831 singleton pregnancies. A total of 1329 (73%) invasive samples were taken following NIPT results showing a high chance of trisomy 21; this was confirmed in 1305 (98%) of these by invasive sampling. Trisomy 21 was confirmed in >99% of patients who also had high-screen risk results or abnormal scan findings. Amongst invasive samples taken due to NIPT results indicating a high chance of trisomy 18, 84% yielded a compatible result, and this number dropped to 49% for trisomy 13 and 51% for sex chromosomes., Conclusion: In the UK, the majority of patients having invasive sampling for high-chance NIPT results are doing so following an NIPT result indicating an increased chance of common trisomies (92%). In this population, NIPT performs particularly well for trisomy 21, but less well for other indications.

Introduction: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free foetal DNA has been widely accepted in recent years for detecting common foetal chromosome aneuploidies, such as trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and sex chromosome aneuploidies. In this study, the practical clinical performance of our foetal DNA testing was evaluated for analysing all chromosome aberrations among 7113 pregnancies in Italy., Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of collected NIPT data from the Ion S5 next-generation sequencing platform obtained from Altamedica Medical Centre in Rome, Italy., Results: In this study, NIPT showed 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity for trisomies 13, 18 and 21. Out of the 7113 samples analysed, 74 cases (1%) were positive by NIPT testing; foetal karyotyping and follow-up results validated 2 trisomy 13 cases, 5 trisomy 18 cases, 58 trisomy 21 cases and 10 sex chromosome aneuploidy cases. There were no false-negative results., Conclusion: In our hands, NIPT had high sensitivity and specificity for common chromosomal aneuploidies such as trisomies 13, 18 and 21.

Background: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) has opened up new approaches for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and it is often used as the second-tier test for high-risk pregnant women in detecting trisomy (T) 21, T18, and T13 after serum biochemistry screening. This study aims to discuss the clinical performance of NIPT as an alternative first-tier screening test for pregnant women in detecting T21, T18, T13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in China., Methods: A total of 42,924 samples were recruited. The cell-free plasma DNA was directly sequenced. Each of the chromosome aneuploidies of PPV was analyzed. A total of 22 placental samples were acquired, including 14 FP and 8 TP samples. The placental verification of FP NIPT results was performed., Results: Among 42,924 samples, 281 (0.65%) positive cases, including 87 of T21, 31 of T18, 22 of T13, and 141 of SCAs were detected. For the detection of T21, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 78.46%, for trisomy 18, 62.96%, for trisomy 13, 10.00%, for SCAs, 47.22% in the total samples. For trisomy 21, the PPV was 86.67%, for trisomy 18, 80.00%, for trisomy 13, 20.00%, for SCAs, 56.52% in advanced maternal age (AMA) women. The PPV of T21 increased with age. For T18, the PPV showed an overall upward trend. For T13 and SCAs, PPV was raised first and then lowered. Placental verification of false positive (FP) NIPT results confirmed confined placental mosaicism(CPM) was the reason for false positives., Conclusions: This study represents the first time that NIPT has been used as a first-tier screening test for fetal aneuploidies in a pilot city with large clinical samples in China. We propose that NIPT could replace serum biochemistry screening as a first-tier test.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to report on the clinical performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in twin pregnancies and to define the performance of NIPT by combining our cohort study results with published studies in a systematic meta-analysis., Material and Methods: A cohort study was carried out in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Kanghua Hospital. Meanwhile, searches of PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science for all relevant peer-reviewed articles were performed with a restriction to English language publication before 15 June 2019. Quality assessments were conducted with the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 checklist. Data analysis, heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and publication bias were carried out using META-DISC 1.4 and STATA 12.0., Results: In all, 141 twin pregnancies included in our cohort study; confirmation revealed one true-positive case for trisomy 21 and 140 true-negative cases. The sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 by NIPT were both 100%. Twenty-two eligible studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis together with our study. There were 199 cases of trisomy 21, 58 cases of trisomy 18, 14 cases of trisomy 13 and 6347 cases of euploids in total. For trisomy 21, NIPT showed the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.99, 1.00, 145.81, 0.06 and 1714.09, respectively. For trisomy 18, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.88, 1.00, 200.98, 0.19 and 483.68, respectively., Conclusions: The performance of NIPT for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy was excellent and it was similar to that reported in singleton pregnancy. However, due to publication bias (trisomy 18) and small number of cases (trisomy 13), accurate assessment of the predictive performance of NIPT for trisomies 18 and 13 could not be achieved., (© 2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims Our aim was to determine the number of cases of aneuploidy which were prenatally diagnosed in our tertiary referral unit from 2005-2015 and to analyse the subsequent outcomes of Trisomies 13, 18 and 21(T13, T18 and T21). Methods This was a retrospective observational study. We firstly determined the total number of prenatally diagnosed aneuploidies. We then analysed their subsequent outcomes including average gestation at miscarriage or IUD, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome. Results 402 cases of T13, T18 or T21 were identified of which 40% opted for expectant management. T18 was the most likely diagnosis to result in miscarriage, IUD or intrapartum death. The highest caesarean delivery rate was in T21. Conclusion With regards to T13 and T18, live birth rates show that some parents may achieve the goal of spending time with their baby in the immediate postpartum period. This information will act as a valuable resource in our counselling., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Objective: To evaluate the test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13 using cell-free (cf) DNA analysis in maternal plasma with microarray quantitation., Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Searches in MEDLINE, Pre-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to 09.07.2018., Results: Five studies analyzing 3074 samples, including 187 trisomy 21, 43 trisomy 18, and 19 trisomy 13 cases, were identified. Risk of bias was high in all studies, introduced particularly by exclusions from analysis and by the role of the sponsor. Sensitivity of microarray-based cfDNA testing was 99.5% (95%CI 96.3%-99.9%) for trisomy 21, 97.7% (95%CI 87.9%-99.6%) for trisomy 18, and 100% (95%CI 83.2%-100%) for trisomy 13. Specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.87%-100%) for trisomy 21, 99.97% (95%CI 99.81%-99.99%) for trisomy 18, and 99.97% (95%CI 99.81%-99.99%) for trisomy 13. Pooled test failure rate was 1.1%. A direct comparison of microarray- and sequencing-based cfDNA found equivalent test accuracy., Conclusion: Included studies suggest that NIPT using microarray-based cfDNA testing has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting fetal trisomy 21, 18, and 13. However, the evidence base is small and at high risk of bias., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

The frequent occurrence of congenital heart defects (CHDs) in chromosome abnormality syndromes is well-known, and among aneuploidy syndromes, distinctive patterns have been delineated. We update the type and frequency of CHDs in the aneuploidy syndromes involving trisomy 13, 18, 21, and 22, and in several sex chromosome abnormalities (Turner syndrome, trisomy X, Klinefelter syndrome, 47,XYY, and 48,XXYY). We also discuss the impact of noninvasive prenatal screening (mainly, cell-free DNA analysis), critical CHD screening, and the growth of parental advocacy on their surgical management and natural history. We encourage clinicians to view the cardiac diagnosis as a "phenotype" which supplements the external dysmorphology examination. When detected prenatally, severe CHDs may influence decision-making, and postnatally, they are often the major determinants of survival. This review should be useful to geneticists, cardiologists, neonatologists, perinatal specialists, other pediatric specialists, and general pediatricians. As patients survive (and thrive) into adulthood, internists and related adult specialists will also need to be informed about their natural history and management., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) has emerged as a robust tool for identifying microdeletions and microduplications, termed copy number variants (CNVs). Nevertheless, data regarding its utility in different patient populations with developmental delay (DD), dysmorphic features (DF) and congenital anomalies (CA), is a matter of dense debate. Although regions of homozygosity (ROH) are not diagnostic of a specific condition, they may have pathogenic implications. Certain CNVs and ROH have ethnically specific occurrences and frequencies. We aimed to determine whether CMA testing offers additional diagnostic information over classical cytogenetics for identifying genomic imbalances in a pediatric cohort with idiopathic DD, DF, or CA. One hundred sixty-nine patients were offered cytogenetics and CMA simultaneously for etiological diagnosis of DD (n = 67), DF (n = 52) and CA (n = 50). CMA could identify additional, clinically significant anomalies as compared with cytogenetics. CMA detected 61 CNVs [21 (34.4%) pathogenic CNVs, 37 (60.7%) variants of uncertain clinical significance and 3 (4.9%) benign CNVs] in 44 patients. CMA identified one or more ROH in 116/169 (68.6%) patients. When considering pathogenic CNVs and aneuploidies as positive findings, 9/169 (5.3%) received a genetic diagnosis from cytogenetics, while 25/169 (14.8%) could have a genetic diagnosis from CMA. The identification of ROH was clinically significant in two cases (2/169), thereby, adding 1.2% to the diagnostic yield of CMA (16% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001). CMA uncovers additional genetic diagnoses over cytogenetics, thereby, offering a much higher diagnostic yield. Our findings convincingly demonstrate the additive diagnostic value of clinically significant ROH identified during CMA testing, highlighting the need for careful clinical interpretation of these ROH.

The Netherlands launched a nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test offered to all pregnant women. This started on April 1, 2017 as the TRIDENT-2 study, licensed by the Dutch Ministry of Health. In the first year, NIPT was performed in 73,239 pregnancies (42% of all pregnancies), 7,239 (4%) chose first-trimester combined testing, and 54% did not participate. The number of trisomies 21 (239, 0.33%), 18 (49, 0.07%), and 13 (55, 0.08%) found in this study is comparable to earlier studies, but the Positive Predictive Values (PPV)-96% for trisomy 21, 98% for trisomy 18, and 53% for trisomy 13-were higher than expected. Findings other than trisomy 21, 18, or 13 were reported on request of the pregnant women; 78% of women chose to have these reported. The number of additional findings was 207 (0.36%); these included other trisomies (101, 0.18%, PPV 6%, many of the remaining 94% of cases are likely confined placental mosaics and possibly clinically significant), structural chromosomal aberrations (95, 0.16%, PPV 32%,) and complex abnormal profiles indicative of maternal malignancies (11, 0.02%, PPV 64%). The implementation of genome-wide NIPT is under debate because the benefits of detecting other fetal chromosomal aberrations must be balanced against the risks of discordant positives, parental anxiety, and a potential increase in (invasive) diagnostic procedures. Our first-year data, including clinical data and laboratory follow-up data, will fuel this debate. Furthermore, we describe how NIPT can successfully be embedded into a national screening program with a single chain for prenatal care including counseling, testing, and follow-up., (Copyright © 2019 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomies (13/18/21) and other unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (UBCA), following the introduction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis., Methods: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to estimate prevalence, safety, screening-program costs and healthcare costs of five different prenatal screening strategies, using a virtual cohort of 652 653 pregnant women in France. Data were derived from the French Biomedicine Agency and published articles. Uncertainty was addressed using one-way sensitivity analysis. The five strategies compared were: (i) cfDNA testing for women with a risk following first-trimester screening of ≥ 1/250; (ii) cfDNA testing for women with a risk of ≥ 1/1000 (currently recommended); (iii) cfDNA testing in the general population (regardless of risk); (iv) invasive testing for women with a risk of ≥ 1/250 (historical strategy); and (v) invasive testing for women with a risk of ≥ 1/1000., Results: In our virtual population, at similar risk thresholds, cfDNA testing compared with invasive testing was cheaper but less effective. Compared with the historical strategy, cfDNA testing at the ≥ 1/1000 risk threshold was a more expensive strategy that detected 158 additional trisomies, but also 175 fewer other UBCA. Implementation of cfDNA testing in the general population would give an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €9 166 689 per additional anomaly detected compared with the historical strategy., Conclusion: Extending cfDNA to lower risk thresholds or even to all pregnancies would detect more trisomies, but at greater expense and with lower detection rate of other UBCA, compared with the historical strategy. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Different strategies have been designed for clinical implementation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a contingent strategy based on conventional screening and offering cfDNA to the intermediate-risk group, for the screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Secondary objectives were to assess the uptake of cfDNA in women with intermediate-risk, to evaluate the performance of cfDNA testing, and the preferences of pregnant women with intermediate risk., Methods: Prospective observational pilot study between February 2016 and March 2017. Singleton pregnancies with a known outcome were included in the study. At the conventional screening (first trimester combined test or second trimester quadruple test) women were classified in high (risk ≥1:250) or low risk (< 1:250). For the study, a contingent strategy was applied: following the conventional screening women were classified into three groups: high risk (risk ≥1:10 or nuchal translucency ≥3 mm), intermediate-risk (risk 1:11 to 1:1500) and low risk (< 1:1500), and a cfDNA test was offered to those at the intermediate risk., Results: For the analysis, 2639 women were included, 2422 (91.8%) had a first trimester combined test and 217 (8.2%) a second trimester quadruple test. There were 5 cases of trisomy 21, 4 of trisomy 18 and none of trisomy 13. For the contingent strategy, the detection rate and false positive rates were 88.9% (8/9) and 1.3% (35/2630), respectively. For the conventional strategy, the detection rate and false positive rates were 66.7% (6/9) and 5.3% (140/2630), respectively. The cfDNA test had a detection rate for trisomy 21 of 100% (3 out of 3), and a false positive rate of 0.2% (1/466). In a survey, 81.8% (374/457) of women in the intermediate-risk group would choose cfDNA testing as the second line test, mainly due to the lack of risk for the fetus., Conclusion: A contingent screening strategy for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, based on conventional screening, and offering a cfDNA test to women with a risk between 1:11 to 1:1500, reduced the false positive rate and increased the detection rate for these trisomies. Moreover, this strategy is well accepted by women.

Objective: To compare costs and efficacy of reflex and recall prenatal DNA screening for trisomy 21, 18 and 13 (affected pregnancies). In both methods women have Combined test markers measured. With recall screening, women with a high Combined test risk are recalled for counselling and offered a DNA blood test or invasive diagnostic testing. With reflex screening, a DNA analysis is automatically performed on plasma collected when blood was collected for measurement of the Combined test markers., Methods: Published data were used to estimate, for each method, using various unit costs and risk cut-offs, the cost per woman screened, cost per affected pregnancy diagnosed, and for a given number of women screened, numbers of affected pregnancies diagnosed, unaffected pregnancies with positive results, and women with unaffected pregnancies having invasive diagnostic testing., Results: Cost per woman screened is lower with reflex v recall screening: £37 v £38, and £11,043 v £11,178 per affected pregnancy diagnosed (DNA £250, Combined test markers risk cut-off 1 in 150). Reflex screening results in similar numbers of affected pregnancies diagnosed, with 100-fold fewer false-positives and 20-fold fewer women with unaffected pregnancies having invasive diagnostic testing., Conclusions: Reflex DNA screening is less expensive, more cost-effective, and safer than recall screening., Competing Interests: Nicholas J. Wald is director of Logical Medical Systems, which produces software for the interpretation of prenatal screening tests.This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma for fetal aneuploidy identification is expanding worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of NIPT for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 of high-risk fetus in a large Korean population., Methods: This study was performed retrospectively, using stored maternal plasma from 1,055 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis because of a high-risk indication for chromosomal abnormalities. The NIPT results were confirmed by karyotype analysis., Results: Among 1,055 cases, 108 cases of fetal aneuploidy, including trisomy 21 (n = 57), trisomy 18 (n = 42), and trisomy 13 (n = 9), were identified by NIPT. In this study, NIPT showed 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity for trisomy 21, and 92.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity for trisomy 18, and 100% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity for trisomy 13. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 98.1%. PPVs for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 ranged from 90.0% to 100%., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that our NIPT technology is reliable and accurate when applied to maternal DNA samples collected from pregnant women. Further large prospective studies are needed to adequately assess the performance of NIPT., Competing Interests: Jungsun Park, Taegyun Yun, and Dong Yoon Park are employees of the SK Telecom and other authors have nothing to disclose. Involvement of SK employees did not compromise the scientific integrity of this work., (© 2019 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

Objective: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is highly accurate in the detection of common fetal autosomal trisomies. Aim of this project was to investigate short-term costs and clinical outcomes of the contingent use of cffDNA for prenatal screening of trisomies 21, 18, 13 within a national health service (NHS)., Methods: An economic analysis was developed from the perspective of the Italian NHS to compare two possible scenarios for managing pregnant women: women managed according to the Standard of Care screening (SoC) vs a cffDNA scenario, where Harmony Prenatal Test was introduced as a second line screening choice for women with an "at risk" result from SoC screening., Results: The introduction of cffDNA as a second line screening test, conditional to a risk ≥ 1:1,000 from SoC screening, showed a 3% increase in the detection of trisomies, with a 71% decrease in the number of invasive tests performed. Total short-term costs (pregnancy management until childbirth) decreased by € 19 million (from € 84.5 to 65.5 million)., Conclusion: The adoption of the Harmony Prenatal Test in women resulting at risk from SoC screening, implied a greater number of trisomies detection, together with a reduction of the healthcare costs., Competing Interests: Harmony Prenatal Test is a Roche test. Paolini D, Speranza G, Palmisano M, Dionisi M are employees of Roche Diagnostics. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Prefumo F and Camurri L received consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics.