Search

We sought to study the efficacy of "triple" therapy with digoxin, diuretic and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) compared to other combinations of these drugs in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.Controversy continues concerning the role of combining digoxin with diuretic and ACEI in the initial management of patients with heart failure.The study utilized data from two studies of digoxin efficacy: Prospective Randomized Study of Ventricular Function and Efficacy of Digoxin (PROVED) and Randomized Assessment of Digoxin and Inhibitors of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (RADIANCE). Worsening heart failure defined as augmentation of heart failure therapy or an emergency room visit or hospitalization for increased heart failure was the main outcome measure.A total of 266 patients comprising the four treatment groups of the combined PROVED (diuretic alone or digoxin and diuretic) and RADIANCE (ACEI and diuretic, or digoxin, diuretic and ACEI) trials were analyzed. Worsening heart failure occurred in only 4 of the 85 patients who continued digoxin, diuretic and ACEI therapy (4.7%) compared to 18 of the 42 patients (19%) on digoxin and diuretic therapy (p=0.009), to 23 of the 93 patients (25%) on ACEI and diuretic therapy (p=0.001) and to 18 of the 46 patients (39%) on diuretic alone (p0.001). Life table and multivariate analysis also demonstrated that worsening heart failure was least likely in patients treated with triple therapy (p0.01 vs. all other groups).Pending definitive, prospective clinical trials, our results argue for triple therapy as the initial management of patients with symptomatic heart failure due to systolic dysfunction.

To assess the effects of torsemide on the primary end point of change in body weight from baseline, and the following secondary end points: urinary sodium, potassium, and chloride excretion, and urine volume after the first dose of drug.Randomized, parallel, double-blind, multicenter study in patients treated with torsemide 5 mg (n = 19), 10 mg (n = 18), or 20 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 15) for 7 days.Sixty-six patients with New York Heart Association class II or III congestive heart failure and edema.At the end of the study, patients treated with torsemide 10 and 20 mg demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight compared with those receiving placebo (-1.62 and -1.30 kg, respectively), and those treated with torsemide 5 mg did not (-0.60 kg). The severity of edema decreased with increasing torsemide dose. Torsemide caused no greater frequency of adverse effects with increasing dose.Orally administered torsemide 5, 10, and 20 mg once/day for 7 days were well tolerated. Doses of 10 and 20 mg were effective in producing weight loss.

We describe the results of two placebo-controlled trials (MIL-1077 and MIL-1078) designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of oral milrinone administered together with converting enzyme inhibitors to patients with congestive heart failure. Although these trials were terminated prematurely, they provide the only controlled data regarding the effect of oral milrinone on exercise capacity in patients receiving converting enzyme inhibitors. Of the 254 patients randomized, 140 completed one of the trials or reached an end point and are the basis of this report. In both trials, there was a clear trend for an increase in exercise capacity in the milrinone-treated patients (+26 +/- 8% vs. +5 +/- 7% in MIL-1077 and +11 +/- 5% vs. +2 +/- 4% in MIL-1078). Symptoms of congestive heart failure were decreased in one trial but not the other. Quality of life, as assessed by a questionnaire, was not effected in either trial. There was an increased incidence of adverse events in milrinone-treated patients. Adverse events related primarily to hypotension and vasodilation led to discontinuation of drug in 18 milrinone-treated patients vs. 1 placebo-treated patient. Milrinone had little or no proarrhythmic effect and cardiovascular deaths were distributed equally between the milrinone and placebo groups. These data suggest that when used in combination with a converting enzyme inhibitor, oral milrinone improves exercise capacity but is associated with a high incidence of adverse events that appear to be related to excessive vasodilation.

Although digoxin is effective in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure who are receiving diuretic agents, it is not clear whether the drug has a role when patients are receiving angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, as is often the case in current practice.We studied 178 patients with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure and left ventricular ejection fractions of 35 percent or less in normal sinus rhythm who were clinically stable while receiving digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (captopril or enalapril). The patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion either to continue receiving digoxin (85 patients) or to be switched to placebo (93 patients) for 12 weeks. Otherwise, their medical therapy for heart failure was not changed.Worsening heart failure necessitating withdrawal from the study developed in 23 patients switched to placebo, but in only 4 patients who continued to receive digoxin (P0.001). The relative risk of worsening heart failure in the placebo group as compared with the digoxin group was 5.9 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 17.2). All measures of functional capacity deteriorated in the patients receiving placebo as compared with those continuing to receive digoxin (P = 0.033 for maximal exercise tolerance, P = 0.01 for submaximal exercise endurance, and P = 0.019 for New York Heart Association class). In addition, the patients switched from digoxin to placebo had lower quality-of-life scores (P = 0.04), decreased ejection fractions (P = 0.001), and increases in heart rate (P = 0.001) and body weight (P0.001).These findings indicate that the withdrawal of digoxin carries considerable risks for patients with chronic heart failure and impaired systolic function who have remained clinically stable while receiving digoxin and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

In this study, we assessed the effects of exposure to 4 percent and 6 percent carboxyhemoglobin on ventricular arrhythmias in 41 subjects (nonsmokers) with documented coronary artery disease. We used a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. On day 1, a training session with no exposure, the baseline carboxyhemoglobin level was measured, and a supine bicycle exercise test was done. On days 2 through 4, subjects were exposed to room air, 100 parts per million (ppm)2 carbon monoxide (target, 4 percent blood carboxyhemoglobin), or 200 ppm carbon monoxide (target, 6 percent blood carboxyhemoglobin), and they then did a supine bicycle exercise test. Radionuclide ventriculography was performed at rest and during exercise. Ambulatory electrocardiogram recordings were made during the four consecutive days to determine the frequency of premature ventricular contractions at various intervals. The frequency of single premature ventricular contractions per hour during exercise was significantly greater on the 6 percent carboxyhemoglobin day than on the room air day (167.72 +/- 37.99 for 6 percent carboxyhemoglobin compared with 127.32 +/- 28.22 for room air, p = 0.03). The frequency of multiple premature ventricular contractions per hour was also significantly greater during exercise on the 6 percent carboxyhemoglobin day compared with the room air day (9.59 +/- 3.70 for the 6 percent carboxyhemoglobin day compared with 3.18 +/- 1.67 for the room air day, p = 0.02). Patients who developed increased arrhythmias during exercise on the 6 percent carboxyhemoglobin day were significantly older than those who had no increased arrhythmia, and, in addition, exercised longer and had a higher peak workload during exercise. No effect of carbon monoxide exposure was seen on the 4 percent carboxyhemoglobin day.

The efficacy of guaifenesin in reducing cough frequency in young adults with acute respiratory disease was evaluated by both an objective cough counting system and a questionnaire. A guaifenesin cough preparation and the syrup vehicle were administered in a double-blind manner. Coughs were recorded on tape over a 24-hour baseline evaluation period and a 36-hour treatment period for 42 patients. A pronounced diurnal variation in cough frequency was observed. The evaluation of efficacy was based upon comparisons between equivalent six-hour time periods of successive days. No antitussive effect of guaifenesin was demonstrated. The questionnaire was administered to 65 patients, including the 42 whose coughs were recorded. Of 26 patients with productive cough receiving guaifenesin, 25 (96 percent) reported a decrease in sputum thickness compared to 13 (54 percent) of 24 patients receiving the vehicle (p = 0.01, Fisher exact test). Twenty-three of 26 (88 percent) patients receiving guaifenesin also reported reduction in sputum quantity compared to 15 of 24 (62.5 percent) receiving the vehicle (p = 0.07, Fisher exact test). The diurnal variation in cough frequency measured by the tape recording was not apparent from the subjective cough frequency estimates obtained by the questionnaire.