Search

Objectives: Resting-state brain connectivity has been shown to differ for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) compared to healthy control (CON) groups. This study evaluates the degree these RLS-CON differences are changed by concurrent treatment., Methods: Resting-state functional MRIs were obtained from 32 idiopathic RLS patients during the morning asymptomatic period and 16 age and gender-matched CON subjects. Of the 32 RLS patients, 16 were drug-naïve (DN-RLS), and 16 were regularly drug-treated using a dopamine agonist (DT-RLS). Various assessments of disease characteristics were also performed. The primary purpose was to assess the replicability of prior results and the effects of treatment on these differences between controls and untreated RLS patients. Resting-state connectivity was analyzed by a seed-based method using the bilateral ventral-posterolateral nuclei (VPLN) in the thalamus., Results: In the DN-RLS group, compared to the CON group, three areas (the bilateral lingual gyri and right middle temporal gyrus) were replicated. The three replicated areas did not significantly differ for DT-RLS compared to DN-RLS. DT-RLS compared to DN-RLS had significantly higher thalamic connectivity for the left uvula, right tuber, left anterior insula, and right declive., Conclusions: Thalamic connectivity to the bilateral lingual gyri and right middle temporal gyrus is a replicable finding in DN-RLS that was not affected by dopamine agonist treatments. Other changes in thalamic connectivity were altered by dopamine agonist treatment. These treatment effects may be pertinent to the known treatment benefits of a dopamine agonist on RLS symptoms., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To make evidence-based recommendations regarding restless legs syndrome (RLS) management in adults., Methods: Articles were classified per the 2004 American Academy of Neurology evidence rating scheme. Recommendations were tied to evidence strength., Results and Recommendations: In moderate to severe primary RLS, clinicians should consider prescribing medication to reduce RLS symptoms. Strong evidence supports pramipexole, rotigotine, cabergoline, and gabapentin enacarbil use (Level A); moderate evidence supports ropinirole, pregabalin, and IV ferric carboxymaltose use (Level B). Clinicians may consider prescribing levodopa (Level C). Few head-to-head comparisons exist to suggest agents preferentially. Cabergoline is rarely used (cardiac valvulopathy risks). Augmentation risks with dopaminergic agents should be considered. When treating periodic limb movements of sleep, clinicians should consider prescribing ropinirole (Level A) or pramipexole, rotigotine, cabergoline, or pregabalin (Level B). For subjective sleep measures, clinicians should consider prescribing cabergoline or gabapentin enacarbil (Level A), or ropinirole, pramipexole, rotigotine, or pregabalin (Level B). For patients failing other treatments for RLS symptoms, clinicians may consider prescribing prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone where available (Level C). In patients with RLS with ferritin ≤75 μg/L, clinicians should consider prescribing ferrous sulfate with vitamin C (Level B). When nonpharmacologic approaches are desired, clinicians should consider prescribing pneumatic compression (Level B) and may consider prescribing near-infrared spectroscopy or transcranial magnetic stimulation (Level C). Clinicians may consider prescribing vibrating pads to improve subjective sleep (Level C). In patients on hemodialysis with secondary RLS, clinicians should consider prescribing vitamin C and E supplementation (Level B) and may consider prescribing ropinirole, levodopa, or exercise (Level C)., (© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.)

A Task Force was established by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) in conjunction with the European Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (EURLSSG) and the RLS Foundation (RLS-F) to develop evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of long-term pharmacologic treatment of dopaminergic-induced augmentation in restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED). The Task Force made the following prevention and treatment recommendations: As a means to prevent augmentation, medications such as α2δ ligands may be considered for initial RLS/WED treatment; these drugs are effective and have little risk of augmentation. Alternatively, if dopaminergic drugs are elected as initial treatment, then the daily dose should be as low as possible and not exceed that recommended for RLS/WED treatment. However, the physician should be aware that even low dose dopaminergics can cause augmentation. Patients with low iron stores should be given appropriate iron supplementation. Daily treatment by either medication should start only when symptoms have a significant impact on quality of life in terms of frequency and severity; intermittent treatment might be considered in intermediate cases. Treatment of existing augmentation should be initiated, where possible, with the elimination/correction of extrinsic exacerbating factors (iron levels, antidepressants, antihistamines, etc.). In cases of mild augmentation, dopamine agonist therapy can be continued by dividing or advancing the dose, or increasing the dose if there are breakthrough night-time symptoms. Alternatively, the patient can be switched to an α2δ ligand or rotigotine. For severe augmentation the patient can be switched either to an α2δ ligand or rotigotine, noting that rotigotine may also produce augmentation at higher doses with long-term use. In more severe cases of augmentation an opioid may be considered, bypassing α2δ ligands and rotigotine., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Study Objectives: To compare pregabalin versus placebo and pramipexole for reducing restless legs syndrome (RLS)-related sleep disturbance., Design: Randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial., Setting: Twenty-three US sleep centers., Participants: Eighty-five individuals with moderate to severe idiopathic RLS and associated sleep disturbance., Interventions: Participants were randomized across 6 treatment sequences comprising three 4-week periods on pregabalin 300 mg/day (n = 75), pramipexole 0.5 mg/day (n = 76), or placebo (n = 73)., Measurements and Results: Polysomnography was conducted over 2 nights at the end of each period. Primary (wake after sleep onset [WASO], pregabalin vs placebo) and key secondary endpoints were analyzed for statistical significance, with descriptive statistics for other endpoints. Pregabalin improved sleep maintenance, demonstrated by reductions in WASO (-27.1 min vs placebo [P < 0.0001]; -26.9 vs pramipexole) and number of awakenings after sleep onset (-2.7 vs placebo; -7.9 vs pramipexole [P < 0.0001]) by polysomnography, and an increase in subjective total sleep time (30.8 min vs placebo [P < 0.0001]; 26.8 vs pramipexole). Pregabalin also increased slow wave sleep duration (20.9 min vs placebo; 32.1 vs pramipexole [P < 0.0001]). Reduction in periodic limb movement arousal index (PLMAI) with pregabalin was similar to pramipexole and greater than placebo (-3.7 PLMA/h [P < 0.0001]), although reduction in total PLM in sleep was less than for pramipexole., Conclusions: This study demonstrated improvements in objective and subjective measures of sleep maintenance and sleep architecture with pregabalin compared with placebo and pramipexole. Effects of pregabalin on periodic limb movement arousal index were comparable to pramipexole., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00991276; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00991276.

Background: Dopaminergic medications relieve symptoms of the restless legs syndrome (RLS) but have the potential to cause iatrogenic worsening (augmentation) of RLS with long-term treatment. Pregabalin may be an effective alternative., Methods: In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind trial, we assessed efficacy and augmentation in patients with RLS who were treated with pregabalin as compared with placebo and pramipexole. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 52 weeks of treatment with pregabalin at a dose of 300 mg per day or pramipexole at a dose of 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg per day or 12 weeks of placebo followed by 40 weeks of randomly assigned active treatment. The primary analyses involved a comparison of pregabalin and placebo over a period of 12 weeks with use of the International RLS (IRLS) Study Group Rating Scale (on which the score ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms), the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale (which was used to assess the proportion of patients with symptoms that were "very much improved" or "much improved"), and a comparison of rates of augmentation with pregabalin and pramipexole over a period of 40 or 52 weeks of treatment., Results: A total of 719 participants received daily treatment, 182 with 300 mg of pregabalin, 178 with 0.25 mg of pramipexole, 180 with 0.5 mg of pramipexole, and 179 with placebo. Over a period of 12 weeks, the improvement (reduction) in mean scores on the IRLS scale was greater, by 4.5 points, among participants receiving pregabalin than among those receiving placebo (P<0.001), and the proportion of patients with symptoms that were very much improved or much improved was also greater with pregabalin than with placebo (71.4% vs. 46.8%, P<0.001). The rate of augmentation over a period of 40 or 52 weeks was significantly lower with pregabalin than with pramipexole at a dose of 0.5 mg (2.1% vs. 7.7%, P=0.001) but not at a dose of 0.25 mg (2.1% vs. 5.3%, P=0.08). There were six cases of suicidal ideation in the group receiving pregabalin, three in the group receiving 0.25 mg of pramipexole, and two in the group receiving 0.5 mg of pramipexole., Conclusions: Pregabalin provided significantly improved treatment outcomes as compared with placebo, and augmentation rates were significantly lower with pregabalin than with 0.5 mg of pramipexole. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00806026.).

A Task Force was established by the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) to develop evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the long-term pharmacologic treatment of restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED). The Task Force reviewed the results of all studies of RLS/WED treatments with durations of 6 months or longer presented at meetings over the past 2 years, posted on Web sites of pharmaceutical companies, or published in peer-reviewed journals, asking the questions, "What is the efficacy of this treatment in patients with RLS/WED?" and "What is the safety of this treatment in patients with RLS/WED?" The Task Force developed guidelines based on their review of 61 papers meeting inclusion criteria, and using a modified evidence-grading scheme. Pregabalin has been established as effective for up to 1 year in treating RLS/WED (Level A evidence). Pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine have been established as effective for up to 6 months in treating RLS/WED (Level A). The following drugs have been established as probably effective (Level B) in treating RLS/WED for durations ranging from 1 to 5 years: gabapentin enacarbil, pramipexole, and ropinirole (1 year); levodopa (2 years); and rotigotine (5 years). Because of associated safety concerns, pergolide and cabergoline should not be used in the treatment of RLS/WED unless the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. Other pharmacologic therapies have insufficient evidence to support their long-term use in treating RLS/WED. The IRLSSG Task Force also developed consensus-based strategies for the prevention and treatment of complications (such as augmentation, loss of efficacy, excessive daytime sleepiness, and impulse control disorders) that may develop with the long-term pharmacologic treatment of RLS/WED. The use of either a dopamine-receptor agonist or α2δ calcium-channel ligand is recommended as the first-line treatment of RLS/WED for most patients, with the choice of agent dependent on the patient's severity of RLS/WED symptoms, cognitive status, history, and comorbid conditions., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: There has been recent interest in characterizing potential abnormalities of pain processing in patients with sleep disorders such as Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). The aim of this study was to evaluate psychophysical responses to noxious heat and pressure stimuli in both treated and untreated RLS patients, compared to matched controls., Methods: This study is a cross-sectional group comparison of RLS patients with matched controls. A total of 31 patients (15 treated, 16 untreated) with a confirmed diagnosis of RLS were compared to 18 controls with no history of RLS or related sleep disorders., Results: RLS patients (both treated and untreated) demonstrated reduced pain thresholds and reported greater clinical pain relative to controls. Moreover, RLS patients demonstrated enhanced temporal summation of heat pain (p<.05), which may reflect aberrant central nervous system facilitation of pain transmission. Both treated and untreated RLS patients reported disrupted sleep relative to controls, and mediation analyses suggested that the reduced pain thresholds in RLS were attributable to sleep disturbance. However, the effect of RLS on the magnitude of temporal summation of heat pain was independent of sleep disturbance., Conclusions: These findings suggest that central nervous system pain processing may be amplified in RLS, perhaps partially as a consequence of sleep disruption. RLS patients, even those whose symptoms are managed pharmacologically, may be at elevated long-term risk for the development or maintenance of persistent pain conditions. Further studies in larger samples could help to improve the prospects for pain management in RLS patients., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Assess the rate of augmentation as it occurs during standard long-term dopaminergic treatment of RLS, potential risk factors or predictors of augmentation, the relationship between treatment duration and augmentation, and the clinical impact of augmentation on subjects' health outcomes., Methods: Two hundred sixty-six patients with dopamine-treated RLS completed a one-time online survey. All subjects were recruited by their PCP/neurologist and were 18 or older. Augmentation was assessed using NIH guidelines and an augmentation classification system was developed through this research., Results: Overall, 20% of the patients were classified as having definitive or highly suggestive clinical indications of augmentation. Five factors were considered likely to reflect increased risk of developing augmentation, including more frequent RLS symptoms pre-treatment, greater discomfort with RLS symptoms before treatment, and longer treatment duration. RLS augmentation occurred at a rate of about 8% each year for at least the first 8 years of dopamine treatment. Subjects reporting definite or highly suggestive clinical indicators of augmentation had an average IRLS score of 23.6, indicating generally inadequate treatment with generally poor clinical outcomes. Only 25% of the patients reported no indications of augmentation and they were the only group to show on average a low (<15) IRLS score and good clinical outcomes., Conclusions: As currently used, long term dopaminergic treatment for an average ± SD of 2.7 ± 2.4 years produced significant augmentation problems in at least 20% of the patients and only 25% of the patients were totally free of this problem. It is important for physicians to carefully screen patients for changes in RLS symptoms for as long as they are on dopamine agents, with particular attention paid to those patients who present with the most severe RLS symptoms prior to treatment initiation. Given the marked increase in suffering with augmentation, a method for early detection and intervention would be an important contribution to the effective management and treatment of RLS., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic disease, which is managed with palliative medications that are likely to be required for a patient's lifetime. It is, therefore, important to know the long-term consequences of these treatments. Currently, the most commonly prescribed treatment for RLS is one of the dopamine (DA) agonists. Most of what we understand about efficacy and side effects of the DA agonists are, however, derived from relatively short-term studies. This is particularly a problem since these medications produce in some patients a significant increase or augmentation of RLS symptoms known to occur during the first 2 years of treatment and perhaps even later in treatment. The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy (10-year) for commonly used RLS medication types: dopaminergic agonists and opioids., Methods: Records of all RLS patients treated in one tertiary care center with pramipexole, pergolide or methadone during the years 1997-2007 were reviewed. The duration and reason for any discontinuation of treatment and medication doses were recorded., Results: Annual rates for discontinuing treatment persisted for up to 10 years of treatment and were fairly constant after the first year at 9% for pramipexole, 8% for pergolide, and 0% for methadone. Similarly, annual augmentation rates were fairly constant after the first year and persisted for up to 10 years at 7% for pramipexole, 5% for pergolide, and 0% for methadone. The percentage continuing on the treatment medication for over 5 years was 58% for pramipexole and 35% for pergolide., Conclusions: The DA agonists appear to have a limited period of clinical utility for many patients. Severe augmentation, while not common in any 1 year, can develop even after years on the medication. Methadone, in contrast, shows neither augmentation nor major problems with continued efficacy after the first year of treatment., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00135993) assessed efficacy and safety of the dopamine agonist rotigotine in the treatment of idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) over a 6-month maintenance period. A total of 505 eligible participants with moderate to severe RLS (IRLS sum score >or= 15) were randomly assigned to five groups to receive either placebo or rotigotine (0.5, 1, 2, or 3 mg/24 hr) delivered by once-daily transdermal patch (fixed-dose regimen). The two co-primary efficacy parameters decreased from baseline to end of maintenance in IRLS sum score and in clinical global impressions (CGI-1) score. On both primary measures, 2 and 3 mg/24 hr rotigotine was superior to placebo (P < 0.001). Adjusted treatment differences to placebo for the IRLS sum score were -4.5 (95% CI: -6.9, -2.2) for 2 mg/24 hr rotigotine, -5.2 (95% CI: -7.5, -2.9) for 3 mg/24 hr rotigotine, and for CGI item 1 -0.65 (95% CI: -1.0, -0.3) and -0.9 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.5) for the 2 and 3 mg/24 hr doses, respectively. Skin reactions (27%) and known dopaminergic side effects such as nausea (18.1%) and headache (11.6%) were mostly mild or moderate in rotigotine subjects. Rotigotine transdermal patches releasing 2 to 3 mg/24 hr significantly reduced the severity of RLS symptoms. Treatment efficacy was maintained throughout the 6-month double-blind period.

Objective: To determine whether clinical response to the dopamine agonist, ropinirole, in the treatment of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS), depends upon the age-at-onset of RLS symptoms., Methods: Pooled data from four 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of ropinirole in patients with moderate-to-severe primary RLS were analyzed post hoc. The relationship between age-at-onset and response to treatment, based on change from the baseline International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) rating scale (the International Restless Legs Scale [IRLS]) total score and the proportion of responders (rated 'much'/'very much' improved) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, was explored., Results: The range of age-at-onset of RLS symptoms was 2-75 years. No relationship was observed between the age-at-onset of RLS symptoms and baseline IRLS total score (correlation r=-0.06), and between dose administered at Week 12 last observation carried forward (LOCF) and age-at-onset (r=-0.04). The age-at-onset by treatment interaction was non-significant (P=0.952 for the IRLS and P=0.716 for the CGI-I scale), indicating there was no significant relationship between age-at-onset and the magnitude of ropinirole treatment effect., Conclusions: These data suggest that ropinirole provides effective relief of symptoms, regardless of age at RLS symptom onset.

Treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) has as its goals alleviation of the primary symptoms of the disorder and establishment of normal sleep. Dopamine agonists are considered first-line treatment when daily treatment for primary RLS is indicated. Gabapentin and opioids may be of value for refractory cases. Initial treatment of secondary RLS should address the underlying cause.

Objectives: Augmentation of symptom severity is the main complication of dopaminergic treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS). The current article reports on the considerations of augmentation that were made during a European Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (EURLSSG)-sponsored Consensus Conference in April 2006 at the Max Planck Institute (MPI) in Munich, Germany, the conclusions of which were endorsed by the International RLS Study Group (IRLSSG) and the World Association of Sleep Medicine (WASM). The Consensus Conference sought to develop a better understanding of augmentation and generate a better operational definition for its clinical identification., Design and Methods: Current concepts of the pathophysiology, clinical features, and therapy of RLS augmentation were evaluated by subgroups who presented a summary of their findings for general consideration and discussion. Recent data indicating sensitivity and specificity of augmentation features for identification of augmentation were also evaluated. The diagnostic criteria of augmentation developed at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conference in 2002 were reviewed in light of current data and theoretical understanding of augmentation. The diagnostic value and criteria for each of the accepted features of augmentation were considered by the group. A consensus was then developed for a revised statement of the diagnostic criteria for augmentation., Results: Five major diagnostic features of augmentation were identified: usual time of RLS symptom onset each day, number of body parts with RLS symptoms, latency to symptoms at rest, severity of the symptoms when they occur, and effects of dopaminergic medication on symptoms. The quantitative data available relating the time of RLS onset and the presence of other features indicated optimal augmentation criteria of either a 4-h advance in usual starting time for RLS symptoms or a combination of the occurrence of other features. A paradoxical response to changes in medication dose also indicates augmentation. Clinical significance of augmentation is defined., Conclusion: The Consensus Conference agreed upon new operational criteria for the clinical diagnosis of RLS augmentation: the MPI diagnostic criteria for augmentation. Areas needing further consideration for validating these criteria and for understanding the underlying biology of RLS augmentation are indicated.

This paper reviews evidence from April, 1998 through April 2002 for the dopaminergic treatment of the restless legs syndrome (RLS) and periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD). There has been increased study of dopaminergic agents for the treatment of these conditions since publication of a review paper and practice parameters that covered all types of medical treatment of RLS and PLMD in 1999. For this reason, the Restless Legs Syndrome Task Force and the Standards of Practice Committee decided to update the evidence on dopaminergic treatment of these conditions. This paper reviews the literature on levodopa, dopaminergic agonists (pergolide, pramipexole, ropinirole, talipexole, cabergoline, piribidel, DHEC), and other dopaminergic agents (amantadine, selegiline).

Pregabalin is increasingly being used as a first-line treatment for symptomatic control of restless legs syndrome (RLS). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin as add-on therapy in RLS patients already taking dopamine agonists (DA) but still in need of further management. Patients with idiopathic RLS were enrolled, and all had already been prescribed DA for at least 3 months but still had either persistent symptoms, side effects, or comorbid insomnia. An initial dose of 75 mg pregabalin was begun, adjusted as needed, and maintained at a stable dose for 4 weeks, followed by observation for a total of 8 weeks. RLS symptoms and insomnia scores were evaluated before and after add-on pregabalin treatment. Patients were monitored for side effects that could be attributed to pregabalin. A total of 32 RLS patients were enrolled, and 20 subjects remained until the endpoint. After the pregabalin add-on, the mean IRLS score showed significant improvement compared to the baseline (p < 0.001). The insomnia severity index score also improved (p = 0.036), and no serious adverse effects were observed. Our preliminary data suggests the potential for pregabalin as an add-on therapy to DA with regards to both efficacy and safety in patients who have inadequate RLS improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The first aim was to demonstrate a previously hypothesized increased sensitivity of corticostriatal glutamatergic terminals in the rodent with brain iron deficiency (BID), a pathogenetic model of restless legs syndrome (RLS). The second aim was to determine whether these putative hypersensitive terminals could constitute a significant target for drugs effective in RLS, including dopamine agonists (pramipexole and ropinirole) and α2 δ ligands (gabapentin).Methods: A recently introduced in vivo optogenetic-microdialysis approach was used, which allows the measurement of the extracellular concentration of glutamate upon local light-induced stimulation of corticostriatal glutamatergic terminals. The method also allows analysis of the effect of local perfusion of compounds within the same area being sampled for glutamate.Results: BID rats showed hypersensitivity of corticostriatal glutamatergic terminals (lower frequency of optogenetic stimulation to induce glutamate release). Both hypersensitive and control glutamatergic terminals were significant targets for locally perfused pramipexole, ropinirole, and gabapentin, which significantly counteracted optogenetically induced glutamate release. The use of selective antagonists demonstrated the involvement of dopamine D4 and D2 receptor subtypes in the effects of pramipexole.Interpretation: Hypersensitivity of corticostriatal glutamatergic terminals can constitute a main pathogenetic mechanism of RLS symptoms. Selective D4 receptor agonists, by specifically targeting these terminals, should provide a new efficient treatment with fewer secondary effects. Ann Neurol 2017;82:951-960. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background and purpose: To explore aspects of restless legs syndrome (RLS) associated with detrimental impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients and methods: The RLS epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment (REST) survey included SF-36 data on adults with RLS symptoms in the USA and five European countries. Linear regression models on each SF-36 dimension score explored factors influencing HRQoL in this population. Results: Of 16,202 people surveyed, 7% screened positively for RLS. Severity of RLS symptoms was strongly associated with impaired physical and mental HRQoL in both the cohorts from the USA and Europe. Distress and symptom frequency also had predictive capability. In addition, significantly diminished HRQoL was associated with the use of prescription medication for RLS symptoms. Age, number of comorbidities, and number of physician visits were statistically associated with lower HRQoL in respondents with RLS. Conclusions: Diminished HRQoL was partly accounted for by a number of RLS-related factors, including frequency, severity, and distress from symptoms. The negative impact of prescription medications on HRQoL, in contrast to demonstrated improvements with dopamine agonists, suggests inappropriate or ineffective medications are being used in this population. Our results strongly support the need for better physician education, both to diagnose the condition and importantly provide appropriate treatment with dopamine agonists, the only class of medication, that has been shown to improve the HRQoL of patients with RLS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Pramipexole is an effective treatment for restless legs syndrome (RLS), but no controlled studies have lasted >12weeks. Methods: RLS patients (N =331) with pretreatment serum ferritin >30ng/mL were randomly assigned to take double-blind optimized pramipexole (0.125–0.75mg/d) or placebo for 26weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) score. Other endpoints assessed global change, symptoms, and QoL. Patients maintained symptom diaries. Cases meeting predefined criteria for suspected augmentation were reviewed by a blinded expert panel, which used a predefined algorithm. Results: Among 321 patients providing post-baseline data, of whom 234 completed 26weeks, pramipexole was more effective than placebo by multiple endpoints, including an adjusted mean IRLS score change of −13.7 vs. −11.1 (p =0.0077) and an IRLS responder rate (⩾50% score reduction) of 58.6% vs. 42.8% (p =0.0044). Efficacy showed considerable country-to-country variability. Six-month incidence of confirmed augmentation was 9.2% for pramipexole and 6.0% for placebo. The rate increased with treatment duration for pramipexole but not placebo. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were more likely for pramipexole than for placebo, but discontinuation due to AEs was less likely. Conclusions: During a 6-month period, pramipexole was effective, safe, and generally well tolerated. Because risk of augmentation may have increased over 6months, it should be studied in longer trials. Beginning or mild augmentation is difficult to distinguish from natural RLS fluctuation, at least in a non-iron-deficient population. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]