Search

Translesion DNA synthesis, a process orchestrated by monoubiquitinated PCNA, is critical for DNA damage tolerance. While the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme RAD6 and ubiquitin ligase RAD18 are known to monoubiquitinate PCNA, how they are regulated by DNA damage is not fully understood. We show that NBS1 (mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome) binds to RAD18 after UV irradiation and mediates the recruitment of RAD18 to sites of DNA damage. Disruption of NBS1 abolished RAD18-dependent PCNA ubiquitination and Polη focus formation, leading to elevated UV sensitivity and mutation. Unexpectedly, the RAD18-interacting domain of NBS1, which was mapped to its C terminus, shares structural and functional similarity with the RAD18-interacting domain of RAD6. These domains of NBS1 and RAD6 allow the two proteins to interact with RAD18 homodimers simultaneously and are crucial for Polη-dependent UV tolerance. Thus, in addition to chromosomal break repair, NBS1 plays a key role in translesion DNA synthesis., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

XPA is a zinc finger DNA-binding protein, which is missing or altered in group A xeroderma pigmentosum cells and known to be involved in the damage-recognition step of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) processes. Using the yeast two-hybrid system to search for proteins that interact with XPA, we obtained the 34-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA, also known as HSSB and RFA). RPA is a stable complex of three polypeptides of 70, 34, 11 kDa and has been shown to be essential in the early steps of NER as well as in replication and recombination. We also demonstrate here that the RPA complex associates with XPA. These results suggest that RPA may cooperate with XPA in the early steps of the NER processes.

Simian virus 40 chromosomes can be replicated in vitro with the same set of purified proteins required for the replication of naked DNA containing the viral origin. With these reconstituted systems, the fate of parental histones during replication was examined in vitro. The assembly of nucleosomes on replicating chromosomes was hardly affected by the presence of simultaneously replicating naked DNA competitor, suggesting that replication forks can traverse nucleosomes without the displacement of histones. Moreover, we demonstrate that the nascent nucleosomes were distributed almost equally between the leading and lagging strands. This distributive mode of nucleosome segregation favors the propagation of parental chromatin structures to both daughter cells, which can maintain cellular functions dictated by these structures during cell proliferation.

The effects of topoisomerases I and II on the replication of SV40 DNA were examined using an in vitro replication system of purified proteins that constitutes the monopolymerase system. In the presence of the two topoisomerases, two distinct nascent DNAs were formed. One product arising from the replication of the leading template strand was approximately half the size of the template DNA, whereas the other product derived from the lagging template strand consisted of short DNAs. These products were synthesized from both SV40 naked DNA and SV40 chromosomes. For the replication of SV40 naked DNA, either topoisomerase I or II maintained replication fork movement and supported complete leading strand synthesis. When SV40 chromosomes were replicated with the same proteins, reactions containing only topoisomerase I produced shorter leading strands. However, mature size DNA products accumulated in reactions supplemented with topoisomerase II, as well as in reactions containing only topoisomerase II. In the presence of crude extracts of HeLa cells, VP-16, a specific inhibitor of topoisomerase II, blocked elongation of the nascent DNA during the replication of SV40 chromosomes. These results indicate that topoisomerase II plays a crucial role as a swivelase in the late stage of SV40 chromosome replication in vitro.

SV40 chromosomes prepared from infected CV-1 cells were replicated with the purified proteins of SV40 T antigen, HeLa DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex, single-stranded DNA-binding protein, and topoisomerases I and II, all of which have been shown to be essential for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Replication started near the origin and proceeded bidirectionally. The maximum speed of replication fork movement was 200-300 nucleotides/min, which was similar to the rate of SV40 DNA replication with the same set of proteins. When replication products were digested with micrococcal nuclease, DNA fragments of 160-180 base pairs, which is the typical size of mononucleosomal DNA, were protected. This result indicates that replicated DNA was reconstructed into the nucleosome structure, complexed with parental histones.

A soluble system was developed that could support DNA replication in simian virus 40 (SV40) chromosomes. DNA synthesis in this system required the presence of purified SV40 large tumor antigen, SV40 chromosomes prepared from virus-infected monkey cells, a crude extract from HeLa cells, and several low-molecular-weight components. In comparison to the replication of purified SV40 form I DNA, the rate of DNA synthesis was 15 to 20% in this system. DNA synthesis started near the replication origin of SV40 and proceeded bidirectionally in a semiconservative manner. Micrococcal nuclease digestion experiments revealed that the replicated DNA produced in this system became organized into a regularly spaced array of nucleosome core particles when an appropriate amount of purified HeLa core histones was added to the reaction mixture. SV40 form I DNA replicating under the same conditions was also assembled into nucleosomes, which were arranged in a rather dispersed manner and formed an aberrant chromatin structure.

The nucleotide excision repair (NER) subpathway operating throughout the mammalian genome is a versatile DNA repair system that can remove a wide variety of helix-distorting base lesions. This system contributes to prevention of blockage of DNA replication by the lesions, thereby suppressing mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Therefore, it is of fundamental significance to understand how the huge genome can be surveyed for occurrence of a small number of lesions. Recent studies have revealed that this difficult task seems to be accomplished through sequential actions of multiple DNA damage recognition factors, including UV-DDB, XPC, and TFIIH. Notably, these factors adopt completely different strategies to recognize DNA damage. XPC detects disruption and/or destabilization of the base pairing, which ensures a broad spectrum of substrate specificity for global genome NER. In contrast, UV-DDB directly recognizes particular types of lesions, such as UV-induced photoproducts, thereby vitally recruiting XPC as well as further extending the substrate specificity. After DNA binding by XPC, moreover, the helicase activity associated with TFIIH scans a DNA strand to make a final search for the presence of aberrant chemical modifications of DNA. The combination of these different strategies makes a crucial contribution to simultaneously achieving efficiency, accuracy, and versatility of the entire repair system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]