Search

Oxidative DNA damage is recognized by 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1), which excises 8-oxoG, leaving a substrate for apurinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) and initiating repair. Here, we describe a small molecule (TH10785) that interacts with the phenylalanine-319 and glycine-42 amino acids of OGG1, increases the enzyme activity 10-fold, and generates a previously undescribed β,δ-lyase enzymatic function. TH10785 controls the catalytic activity mediated by a nitrogen base within its molecular structure. In cells, TH10785 increases OGG1 recruitment to and repair of oxidative DNA damage. This alters the repair process, which no longer requires APE1 but instead is dependent on polynucleotide kinase phosphatase (PNKP1) activity. The increased repair of oxidative DNA lesions with a small molecule may have therapeutic applications in various diseases and aging.

The most common oxidative DNA lesion is 8-oxoguanine which is mainly recognized and excised by the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1), initiating the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Telomeres are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress (OS) which disrupts telomere homeostasis triggering genome instability. In the present study, we have investigated the effects of inactivating BER in OS conditions, by using a specific inhibitor of OGG1 (TH5487). We have found that in OS conditions, TH5487 blocks BER initiation at telomeres causing an accumulation of oxidized bases, that is correlated with telomere losses, micronuclei formation and mild proliferation defects. Moreover, the antimetabolite methotrexate synergizes with TH5487 through induction of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, which potentiates TH5487-mediated telomere and genome instability. Our findings demonstrate that OGG1 is required to protect telomeres from OS and present OGG1 inhibitors as a tool to induce oxidative DNA damage at telomeres, with the potential for developing new combination therapies for cancer treatment.

Base excision repair (BER) repairs mutagenic or genotoxic DNA base lesions, thought to be important for both the etiology and treatment of cancer. Cancer phenotypic stress induces oxidative lesions, and deamination products are responsible for one of the most prevalent mutational signatures in cancer. Chemotherapeutic agents induce genotoxic DNA base damage that are substrates for BER, while synthetic lethal approaches targeting BER-related factors are making their way into the clinic. Thus, there are three strategies by which BER is envisioned to be relevant in cancer chemotherapy: (i) to maintain cellular growth in the presence of endogenous DNA damage in stressed cancer cells, (ii) to maintain viability after exogenous DNA damage is introduced by therapeutic intervention, or (iii) to confer synthetic lethality in cancer cells that have lost one or more additional DNA repair pathways. Here, we discuss the potential treatment strategies, and briefly summarize the progress that has been made in developing inhibitors to core BER-proteins and related factors., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, 5-azadC) is used in the treatment of Myelodysplatic syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Its mechanism of action is thought to involve reactivation of genes implicated in differentiation and transformation, as well as induction of DNA damage by trapping DNA methyltranferases (DNMT) to DNA. We demonstrate for the first time that base excision repair (BER) recognizes 5-azadC-induced lesions in DNA and mediates repair. We find that BER (XRCC1) deficient cells are sensitive to 5-azadC and display an increased amount of DNA single- and double-strand breaks. The XRCC1 protein co-localizes with DNMT1 foci after 5-azadC treatment, suggesting a novel and specific role of XRCC1 in the repair of trapped DNMT1. 5-azadC-induced DNMT foci persist in XRCC1 defective cells, demonstrating a role for XRCC1 in repair of 5-azadC-induced DNA lesions. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition prevents XRCC1 relocation to DNA damage sites, disrupts XRCC1-DNMT1 co-localization and thereby efficient BER. In a panel of AML cell lines, combining 5-azadC and Olaparib cause synthetic lethality. These data suggest that PARP inhibitors can be used in combination with 5-azadC to improve treatment of MDS and AML., (© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.)

Cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (FU) and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) due to DNA fragmentation during DNA repair has been proposed as an alternative to effects from thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition or RNA incorporation. The goal of the present study was to investigate the relative contribution of the proposed mechanisms for cytotoxicity of 5-fluoropyrimidines. We demonstrate that in human cancer cells, base excision repair (BER) initiated by the uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG is the major route for FU-DNA repair in vitro and in vivo. SMUG1, TDG and MBD4 contributed modestly in vitro and not detectably in vivo. Contribution from mismatch repair was limited to FU:G contexts at best. Surprisingly, knockdown of individual uracil-DNA glycosylases or MSH2 did not affect sensitivity to FU or FdUrd. Inhibitors of common steps of BER or DNA damage signalling affected sensitivity to FdUrd and HmdUrd, but not to FU. In support of predominantly RNA-mediated cytotoxicity, FU-treated cells accumulated ~3000- to 15 000-fold more FU in RNA than in DNA. Moreover, FU-cytotoxicity was partially reversed by ribonucleosides, but not deoxyribonucleosides and FU displayed modest TS-inhibition compared to FdUrd. In conclusion, UNG-initiated BER is the major route for FU-DNA repair, but cytotoxicity of FU is predominantly RNA-mediated, while DNA-mediated effects are limited to FdUrd.

Uracil in DNA is repaired by base excision repair (BER) initiated by a DNA glycosylase, followed by strand incision, trimming of ends, gap filling and ligation. Uracil in DNA comes in two distinct forms; U:A pairs, typically resulting from replication errors, and mutagenic U:G mismatches, arising from cytosine deamination. To identify proteins critical to the rate of repair of these lesions, we quantified overall repair of U:A pairs, U:G mismatches and repair intermediates (abasic sites and nicked abasic sites) in vitro. For this purpose we used circular DNA substrates and nuclear extracts of eight human cell lines with wide variation in the content of BER proteins. We identified the initiating uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG2 as the major overall rate-limiting factor. UNG2 is apparently the sole glycosylase initiating BER of U:A pairs and generally initiated repair of almost 90% of the U:G mismatches. Surprisingly, TDG contributed at least as much as single-strand selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1) to BER of U:G mismatches. Furthermore, in a cell line that expressed unusually high amounts of TDG, this glycosylase contributed to initiation of as much as approximately 30% of U:G repair. Repair of U:G mismatches was generally faster than that of U:A pairs, which agrees with the known substrate preference of UNG-type glycosylases. Unexpectedly, repair of abasic sites opposite G was also generally faster than when opposite A, and this could not be explained by the properties of the purified APE1 protein. It may rather reflect differences in substrate recognition or repair by different complex(es). Lig III is apparently a minor rate-regulator for U:G repair. APE1, Pol beta, Pol delta, PCNA, XRCC1 and Lig I did not seem to be rate-limiting for overall repair of any of the substrates. These results identify damaged base removal as the major rate-limiting step in BER of uracil in human cells.

Base excision repair (BER) corrects a variety of small base lesions in DNA. The UNG gene encodes both the nuclear (UNG2) and the mitochondrial (UNG1) forms of the human uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG). We prepared mitochondrial extracts free of nuclear BER proteins from human cell lines. Using these extracts we show that UNG is the only detectable UDG in mitochondria, and mitochondrial BER (mtBER) of uracil and AP sites occur by both single-nucleotide insertion and long-patch repair DNA synthesis. Importantly, extracts of mitochondria carry out repair of modified AP sites which in nuclei occurs through long-patch BER. Such lesions may be rather prevalent in mitochondrial DNA because of its proximity to the electron transport chain, the primary site of production of reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, mitochondrial extracts remove 5' protruding flaps from DNA which can be formed during long-patch BER, by a "flap endonuclease like" activity, although flap endonuclease (FEN1) is not present in mitochondria. In conclusion, combined short- and long-patch BER activities enable mitochondria to repair a broader range of lesions in mtDNA than previously known.

The onset of inflammation is associated with reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage to macromolecules like 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) in DNA. Because 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) binds 8-oxoG and because Ogg1-deficient mice are resistant to acute and systemic inflammation, we hypothesized that OGG1 inhibition may represent a strategy for the prevention and treatment of inflammation.We developed TH5487, a selective active-site inhibitor of OGG1, which hampers OGG1 binding to and repair of 8-oxoG and which is well tolerated by mice.TH5487 prevents tumor necrosis factor–a–induced OGG1-DNA interactions at guanine-rich promoters of proinflammatory genes. This, in turn, decreases DNA occupancy of nuclear factor kB and proinflammatory gene expression, resulting in decreased immune cell recruitment to mouse lungs. Thus, we present a proof of concept that targeting oxidative DNA repair can alleviate inflammatory conditions in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic uracil is a DNA lesion but also an essential key intermediate in adaptive immunity. In B cells, activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates cytosine to uracil (U:G mispairs) in Ig genes to initiate antibody maturation. Uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDGs) such as uracil N-glycosylase (UNG), single strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1), and thymine-DNA glycosylase remove uracil from DNA. Gene-targeted mouse models are extensively used to investigate the role of these enzymes in DNA repair and Ig diversification. However, possible species differences in uracil processing in humans and mice are yet not established. To address this, we analyzed UDG activities and quantities in human and mouse cell lines and in splenic B cells from Ung+/+ and Ung-/- backcrossed mice. Interestingly, human cells displayed 15- fold higher total uracil excision capacity due to higher levels of UNG. In contrast, SMUG 1 activity was -8-fold higher in mouse cells, constituting -50% of the total U:G excision activity com- pared with less than 1% in human cells. Inactivated B cells, both UNG and SMUG 1 activities were at levels comparable with those measured for mouse cell lines. Moreover, SMUG 1 activity per cell was not down-regulated after activation. We therefore suggest that SMUG 1 may work as a weak backup activity for UNG2 during class switch recombination in Ung~ mice. Our results reveal significant species differences in genomic uracil processing. These findings should be taken into account when mouse models are used in studies of uracil DNA repair and adaptive immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]