Search

The methyl-CpG-binding domain 2 and 3 proteins (MBD2 and MBD3) provide structural and DNA-binding function for the Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase (NuRD) complex. The two proteins form distinct NuRD complexes and show different binding affinity and selectivity for methylated DNA. Previous studies have shown that MBD2 binds with high affinity and selectivity for a single methylated CpG dinucleotide while MBD3 does not. However, the NuRD complex functions in regions of the genome that contain many CpG dinucleotides (CpG islands). Therefore, in this work, we investigate the binding and diffusion of MBD2 and MBD3 on more biologically relevant DNA templates that contain a large CpG island or limited CpG sites. Using a combination of single-molecule and biophysical analyses, we show that both MBD2 and MBD3 diffuse freely and rapidly across unmethylated CpG-rich DNA. In contrast, we found methylation of large CpG islands traps MBD2 leading to stable and apparently static binding on the CpG island while MBD3 continues to diffuse freely. In addition, we demonstrate both proteins bend DNA, which is augmented by methylation. Together, these studies support a model in which MBD2-NuRD strongly localizes to and compacts methylated CpG islands while MBD3-NuRD can freely mobilize nucleosomes independent of methylation status., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: MeCP2 and MBD2 are members of a family of proteins that possess a domain that selectively binds 5-methylcytosine in a CpG context. Members of the family interact with other proteins to modulate DNA packing. Stretching of DNA-protein complexes in nanofluidic channels with a cross-section of a few persistence lengths allows us to probe the degree of compaction by proteins., Results: We demonstrate DNA compaction by MeCP2 while MBD2 does not affect DNA configuration. By using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we determined that the mechanism for compaction by MeCP2 is the formation of bridges between distant DNA stretches and the formation of loops., Conclusions: Despite sharing a similar specific DNA-binding domain, the impact of full-length 5-methylcytosine-binding proteins can vary drastically between strong compaction of DNA and no discernable large-scale impact of protein binding. We demonstrate that ATTO 565-labeled MBD2 is a good candidate as a staining agent for epigenetic mapping.

We show that DNA carrying 5-methylcytosine modifications or methylated DNA (m-DNA) can be distinguished from DNA with unmodified cytosine by Raman spectroscopy enhanced by both a bowtie nanoantenna and excitation resonance. In particular, m-DNA can be identified by a peak near 1000 cm -1 and changes in the Raman peaks in the 1200-1700 cm -1 band that are enhanced by the ring-absorption resonance. The identification is robust to the use of resonance Raman and nanoantenna excitation used to obtain significant signal improvement. The primary differences are three additional Raman peaks with methylation at 1014, 1239, and 1639 cm -1 and spectral intensity inversion at 1324 (C 5 =C 6 ) and 1473 cm -1 (C 4 =N 3 ) in m-DNA compared to that of DNA with unmodified cytosine. We attribute this to the proximity of the methyl group to the antenna, which brings the (C 5 =C 6 ) mode closer to experiencing a stronger near-field enhancement. We also show distinct Raman spectral features attributed to the transition of DNA from a hydrated state, when dissolved, to a dried/denatured state. We observe a general broadening of the larger lines and a transfer of spectral weight from the ∼1470 cm -1 vibration to the two higher-energy lines of the dried m-DNA solution. We attribute the new spectral characteristics to DNA softening under high salt conditions and find that the m-DNA is still distinguishable via the ∼1000 cm -1 peak and distribution of the signal in the 1200-1700 cm -1 band. The nanoantenna gain exceeds 20,000, whereas the real signal ratio is much less because of a low average enhanced region occupancy even with these relatively high DNA concentrations. It is improved when fixed DNA in a salt crystal lies near the nanoantenna. The Raman resonance gain profile is consistent with A-term expectations, and the resonance is found at ∼259 nm excitation wavelength., (Copyright © 2018 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)