Search

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cancer globally; therefore, early diagnosis and surveillance of this cancer are of paramount importance. Current methods of CRC diagnosis rely heavily on endoscopy or radiological imaging. Noninvasive tests including serum detection of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) are associated with low sensitivity and specificity, especially at early stages. DNA methylation biomarkers have recently been found to have higher accuracy in CRC detection and enhanced prediction of prognosis and chemotherapy response. The most widely studied biomarker in CRC is methylated septin 9 (SEPT9), which is the only FDA-approved methylation-based biomarker for CRC. Apart from SEPT9, other methylated biomarkers including tachykinin-1 (TAC1), somatostatin (SST), and runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) have been shown to effectively detect CRC in a multitude of sample types. This review will discuss the performances of various methylated biomarkers used for CRC diagnosis and monitoring, when used alone or in combination.

In light of the high incidence and mortality rates of cancer, early and accurate diagnosis is an important priority for assigning optimal treatment for each individual with suspected illness. Biomarkers are crucial in the screening of patients with a high risk of developing cancer, diagnosing patients with suspicious tumours at the earliest possible stage, establishing an accurate prognosis, and predicting and monitoring the response to specific therapies. Epigenetic alterations are innovative biomarkers for cancer, due to their stability, frequency, and noninvasive accessibility in bodily fluids. Epigenetic modifications are also reversible and potentially useful as therapeutic targets. Despite this, there is still a lack of accurate biomarkers for the conclusive diagnosis of most cancer types; thus, there is a strong need for continued investigation to expand this area of research. In this review, we summarise current knowledge on methylated DNA and its implications in cancer to explore its potential as an epigenetic biomarker to be translated for clinical application. We propose that the identification of biomarkers with higher accuracy and more effective detection methods will enable improved clinical management of patients and the intervention at early-stage disease.

Introduction: Epigenetic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes is involved in the development of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). ZIC1, a potential tumor suppressor gene involved in regulating cell growth and apoptosis, was investigated in MPM cell lines and tumors., Methods: ZIC1 expression and promoter methylation were evaluated in MPM cell lines and tumor samples by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis, and methylation-specific PCR. ZIC1 was reexpressed in cell lines and functional effects were assessed. miRNA expression was quantified by microarray and reverse transcription quantitative PCR. ZIC1 knockdown and miRNA inhibitors were used to study the relationship between ZIC1 and miRNA expression and confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation PCR., Results: ZIC1 expression was low in MPM cells, and was correlated with ZIC1 promoter methylation and reversed upon decitabine treatment. ZIC1 reexpression inhibited proliferation and invasion in MPM cells whereas knockdown enhanced the growth of MeT-5A. In MPM tumor samples ZIC1 expression was either low or undetectable, with promoter methylation observed in 16 of 24 cases. The overexpression of miR-23a and miR-27a was reduced by ZIC1 reexpression, with inhibitors of miR-23a or miR-27a reducing colony formation. miR-23a overexpression was also associated with shorter survival of MPM patients., Conclusion: ZIC1 is down-regulated in MPM through promoter methylation and acts as a tumor suppressor through down-regulation of its direct targets miR-23a and miR-27a.

Npm1(+/-) heterozygous mice develop a haematological disorder with features resembling human myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Promoter hypermethylation of the NPM1 gene may lead to suppressed gene transcription and hence functional haploinsufficiency, which contributes to the development of MDS. Thirty-one patients with MDS and eight normal individuals were studied for promoter methylation and mRNA expression of NPM1. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP), COBRA and bisulfite sequencing were used to examine the NPM1 methylation status. Quantitative PCR was used to assess the expression of NPM1. NPM1 DNA methylation was rare, occurring in one of 31 cases as determined by MSP. There was no significant difference in NPM1 mRNA expression between MDS and normal blood samples. In conclusion, the finding suggests that NPM1 methylation is rare in MDS and does not play a major role in its pathogenesis.

As an important way to inactivate tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) during cancer development, promoter hypermethylation can be used to define novel TSGs and identify biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. SLC19A3 (solute carrier family 19, member 3) was found to be such a biomarker. SLC19A3 expression was downregulated in gastric cancer cell lines (71%, 5/7) and restored after pharmacological demethylation. Notably, hypermethylation of SLC19A3 promoter was detected in gastric cancer cell lines (57%, 4/7), primary gastric carcinoma tissues (51%, 52/101) and precancerous lesion (intestinal metaplasia) tissues (32%, 8/25). Exogenous SLC19A3 expression caused growth inhibition of gastric cancer cells. In summary, SLC19A3 was epigenetically downregulated in gastric cancer. Methylation of SLC19A3 promoter could be a novel biomarker for early gastric cancer development., ((c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos related disease that is generally considered to be difficult to diagnose, stage and treat. The diagnostic process is continuing to evolve and requires highly skilled pathology input, and generally an extensive list of biomarkers for definitive diagnosis. Diagnosis of MPM requires histological evidence of invasion by malignant mesothelial cells often confirmed by various immunohistochemical biomarkers in order to separate it from pleural metastatic carcinoma. Often when invasion of neoplastic mesothelial cells into adjacent tissue is not apparent, further immunohistochemical testing - namely BAP1 and MTAP, as well as FISH testing for loss of p16 (CDKN2A) are used to separate reactive mesothelial proliferation due to benign processes, from MPM. Various combinations of these markers, such as BAP1 and/or MTAP immunohistochemistry alongside FISH testing for loss of p16, have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MPM. Additionally, over the recent years, research into epigenetic marker use in the diagnosis of MPM has gained momentum. Although still in their research stages, various markers in DNA methylation, long non-coding RNA, micro RNA, circular RNA, and histone modifications have all been found to support diagnosis of MPM with generally good sensitivity and specificity. Many of these studies are however, limited by small sample sizes or other study limitations and further research into the area would be beneficial. Epigenetic markers show promise for use in the future to facilitate the diagnosis of MPM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is associated with asbestos exposure. Asbestos can induce chronic inflammation which in turn can lead to silencing of tumour suppressor genes. Wnt signaling pathway can be affected by chronic inflammation and is aberrantly activated in many cancers including colon and MPM. SFRP genes are antagonists of Wnt pathway, and SFRPs are potential tumour suppressors in colon, gastric, breast, ovarian, and lung cancers and mesothelioma. This study investigated the expression and DNA methylation of SFRP genes in MPM cells lines with and without demethylation treatment. Sixty-six patient FFPE samples were analysed and have showed methylation of SFRP2 (56%) and SFRP5 (70%) in MPM. SFRP2 and SFRP5 tumour-suppressive activity in eleven MPM lines was confirmed, and long-term asbestos exposure led to reduced expression of the SFRP1 and SFRP2 genes in the mesothelium (MeT-5A) via epigenetic alterations. Finally, DNA methylation of SFRPs is detectable in MPM patient plasma samples, with methylated SFRP2 and SFRP5 showing a tendency towards greater abundance in patients. These data suggested that SFRP genes have tumour-suppresive activity in MPM and that methylated DNA from SFRP gene promoters has the potential to serve as a biomarker for MPM patient plasma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: mesothelioma; microRNA; DNA methylation; epigenetic; diagnosis EN mesothelioma microRNA DNA methylation epigenetic diagnosis N.PAG N.PAG 2 02/05/21 20210203 NES 210203 Introduction We are pleased to announce the publication of this Research Topic focusing on epigenetic modifications in mesothelioma. Although DNA methylation is the most discussed epigenetic biomarker in other cancers, microRNA represents the most interesting for mesothelioma researchers. Epigenetic biomarkers such as DNA methylation, microRNA and non-coding RNA have high potential to provide sensitive and specific detection of mesothelioma as well as providing earlier possible detection. [Extracted from the article]