Search

Gene expression biomarkers are now available for application in the identification of genotoxic hazards. The TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker can accurately distinguish DNA damage-inducing (DDI) from non-DDI exposures based on changes in the expression of 64 biomarker genes. The 64 genes were previously derived from whole transcriptome DNA microarray profiles of 28 reference agents (14 DDI and 14 non-DDI) after 4 h treatments of TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells. To broaden the applicability of TGx-DDI, we tested the biomarker using quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR), which is accessible to most molecular biology laboratories. First, we selectively profiled the expression of the 64 biomarker genes using TaqMan qPCR assays in 96-well arrays after exposing TK6 cells to the 28 reference agents for 4 h. To evaluate the classification capability of the qPCR profiles, we used the reference qPCR signature to classify 24 external validation chemicals using two different methods-a combination of three statistical analyses and an alternative, the Running Fisher test. The qPCR results for the reference set were comparable to the original microarray biomarker; 27 of the 28 reference agents (96%) were accurately classified. Moreover, the two classification approaches supported the conservation of TGx-DDI classification capability using qPCR; the combination of the two approaches accurately classified 21 of the 24 external validation chemicals, demonstrating 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 91% balanced accuracy. This study demonstrates that qPCR can be used when applying the TGx-DDI biomarker and will improve the accessibility of TGx-DDI for genotoxicity screening. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60: 122-133, 2019. © 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis., (© 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis.)

The genotoxicity testing battery is highly sensitive for detection of chemical carcinogens. However, it features a low specificity and provides only limited mechanistic information required for risk assessment of positive findings. This is especially important in case of positive findings in the in vitro chromosome damage assays, because chromosome damage may be also induced secondarily to cell death. An increasing body of evidence indicates that toxicogenomic analysis of cellular stress responses provides an insight into mechanisms of action of genotoxicants. To evaluate the utility of such a toxicogenomic analysis we evaluated gene expression profiles of TK6 cells treated with four model genotoxic agents using a targeted high density real-time PCR approach in a multilaboratory project coordinated by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Committee on the Application of Genomics in Mechanism-based Risk Assessment. We show that this gene profiling technology produced reproducible data across laboratories allowing us to conclude that expression analysis of a relevant gene set is capable of distinguishing compounds that cause DNA adducts or double strand breaks from those that interfere with mitotic spindle function or that cause chromosome damage as a consequence of cytotoxicity. Furthermore, our data suggest that the gene expression profiles at early time points are most likely to provide information relevant to mechanisms of genotoxic damage and that larger gene expression arrays will likely provide richer information for differentiating molecular mechanisms of action of genotoxicants. Although more compounds need to be tested to identify a robust molecular signature, this study confirms the potential of toxicogenomic analysis for investigation of genotoxic mechanisms.

Drug synthesis and/or formulation can generate genotoxic impurities. For instance, strong acid/alcohol interactions during the process of drug salt formation produce alkylating agents such as alkyl halides and alkyl esters of alkyl sulfonic acids. The genotoxicity of a few classic alkylating agents such as methyl and ethyl methanesulfonate have been previously well characterized, whereas the majority of compounds from this class have only been tested in the Salmonella reversion assay. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate clastogenicity and DEL recombination profiles of 22 halogenated alkanes and alkylesters of sulfuric and alkane-, aryl-sulfonic acids using a battery of cellular and molecular assays. The in-vitro micronucleus assay in CHO cells was used to measure clastogenicity and the deletion recombination (DEL) assay in S. cerevisiae provided a measure of DNA deletions. We also examined the compounds' reactivity towards 4-(p-nitrobenzyl)pyridine (NBP), a surrogate molecule for biological ring nitrogens. Methylating agents were most potent in all three assays and the alkyl chlorides evaluated in our study were negative in all three assays. Also, a strong correlation was found between the MN, DEL and NBP assays. In summary, this study contributes to a better understanding of the genotoxic properties of common alkyl halides and alkyl esters with alkylating activity and might provide guidance for managing risk of genotoxic process-related impurities of drug substances and products.

Microarrays provide an unprecedented opportunity for comprehensive concurrent analysis of thousands of genes. The global analysis of the response of genes to a toxic insult (toxicogenomics), as opposed to the historical method of examining a few select genes, provides a more complete picture of toxicologically significant events. Here we examine the utility of microarrays for providing mechanistic insights into the response of cells to DNA damage. Our data indicate that the value of the technology is in its potential to provide mechanistic insight into the mode of action of a genotoxic compound. Array-based expression profiling may be useful for differentiating compounds that interact directly with DNA from those compounds that are genotoxic via a secondary mechanism. As such, genomic microarrays may serve as a valuable alternative methodology that helps discriminate between these two classes of compounds. Key words: biomarkers, gene expression profile, genetic toxicology, mechanism of action, toxicogenomics.

Polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons such as polychlorinated biphenyls and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) are extremely stable and widely distributed environmental pollutants. These chemicals are animal carcinogens and probable human carcinogens, and TCDD is possibly one of the most potent toxins ever evaluated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons score negatively in most genotoxicity assays, including the Ames (Salmonella) assay. Although their mechanism of toxicity is not well understood, they induce aryl hydrocarbon (AH) hydroxylases and bind to the AH receptor, which is believed to mediate toxicity. Here, we determine effects of polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons in genotoxicity assays that score for DNA deletions by intrachromosomal recombination in vivo and in vitro. In this study, TCDD, Aroclor 1221, and Aroclor 1260 induced deletions in vivo in the mouse embryo; Aroclor 1221 and Aroclor 1260 induced deletions in yeast. We also show that the induced deletion events did not correlate with induction of AH hydroxylase. None of the tested compounds induced CYP1A-associated ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase activity in mouse embryos or in vitro. These results clearly demonstrate a genotoxic activity of polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons in vitro and in vivo, which is independent of induction of cytochrome P450 activity. Because genetic instability and deletions may be mechanistically involved in carcinogenesis, these results may encourage further research to determine whether such genotoxic mechanisms may be useful for cancer risk assessment of polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons.