Search

Background and Study Aims: Suitable techniques for the prevention of stricture formation after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are still lacking. We investigated the efficacy of polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets with fibrin glue to prevent post-ESD stricture., Patients and Methods: We conducted a pilot study on a total of eight consecutive patients who underwent esophageal ESD that left a mucosal defect of more than three-quarters of the esophageal circumference. PGA sheets were attached to the defect with fibrin glue immediately after the completion of ESD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of post-ESD stricture. The secondary endpoints were the number of sessions of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) required to resolve any stricture and the rate of complications., Results: There were no adverse events related to the use of PGA sheets and fibrin glue. Post-ESD stricture occurred in 37.5 % of the subjects and 0.8 ± 1.2 sessions of EBD were required., Conclusion: The use of PGA sheets and fibrin glue after esophageal ESD is a novel method that radically decreases the incidence of esophageal stricture and the number of EBD sessions subsequently required. University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000011058)., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Certain tumor characteristics may pose challenges when endoscopically determining the horizontal extent of early gastric cancers (EGC). In the present study, clinicopathological features related to inaccurate endoscopic evaluation of horizontal extent of intestinal-type EGC were analyzed., Patients and Methods: We analyzed 431 lesions with intestinal-type EGC treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at our hospital. We focused on whether pretreatment demarcation was accurate by comparing positional relationships between marking dots and tumor edges in resected specimens, and factors related to inaccurate evaluation were analyzed. Gender, age, tumor size, location, circumference, depth, ulceration, macroscopic type, presence of a flat (0-IIb) component, predominant histological type, mixture of diffuse-type adenocarcinoma, mixed histology, and use of magnification endoscopy with narrow band imaging were analyzed. Reasons for inaccurate evaluation were also investigated by re-examining endoscopic images and prepared histological slides., Results: Rate of inaccurate evaluation of horizontal extent was 7.4% (32/431 lesions). Multivariate analysis revealed the following significant independent variables contributing to inaccurate endoscopic evaluation: presence of a flat component, large size, and predominant histological findings of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Re-examination of prepared histological slides of inaccurately evaluated cases revealed a marginal flat spreading area in 28 of the 32 lesions (87.5%). In 14 of the 32 lesions (43.8%), tumor margins were composed of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma., Conclusions: For lesions with a flat component, large lesions, and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, determination of the horizontal extent can be challenging in EGC indicated for ESD, even with the best available endoscopic tools., (© 2013 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2013 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)

Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has several advantages over conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, including a higher en bloc resection rate and more accurate pathological estimation. However, ESD is a complex procedure that requires advanced endoscopic skills. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device (EMR-L) compared to ESD for rectal carcinoid tumors., Methods: Between September 2003 and April 2011, 24 rectal carcinoid tumors in 24 patients treated by ESD or EMR-L were retrospectively analyzed. The indications for endoscopic treatment were node-negative rectal carcinoid tumors. We compared the therapeutic outcomes of the ESD group (n = 13) and the EMR-L group (n = 11)., Results: Both groups had similar mean tumor sizes (ESD: 5.5 ± 2.1 mm; EMR-L: 4.4 ± 2.2 mm). The rates of en bloc and complete resection were, respectively, 100% and 92.3% for ESD, and 100% and 100% for EMR-L. Perforations did not occur in either group. Postoperative bleeding occurred in one EMR-L case, and it was endoscopically managed. However, there were no differences in therapeutic outcomes between the two groups. The mean procedure time was longer in the ESD group (28.8 ± 16.2 min) than in the EMR-L group (17.4 ± 4.4 min), without a significant difference. The mean hospitalization period was significantly shorter in the EMR-L group (1.8 ± 3.1 day) than in the ESD group (6.2 ± 2.1 day), and eight EMR-L cases were treated in an outpatient setting., Conclusions: EMR-L is a simple and effective procedure that compares favorably to ESD for small rectal carcinoid tumors., (© 2012 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2012 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.)