Search

It is customary to simplify the analysis of contact between two elastically deformable bodies by treating an equivalent problem where only one body is deformable and the other is rigid. This is possible provided that the gap geometry and the effective elastic modulus of the bodies in the simplified problem are the same as in the original problem. However, the question arises on whether – and to which extent – the simplification is still valid even when (size-dependent) plasticity occurs. Studies using discrete dislocation plasticity have also, so far, addressed simple contact problems where only one body can deform plastically. Here, we extend the analysis to two bodies in contact that can both deform by dislocation plasticity and investigate under which conditions the response agrees with that of an equivalent simplified problem. The bodies in contact are metal single crystals with sinusoidal and flat surface. It is found that the response of two plastically deformable bodies in contact can be simplified to an equivalent problem where one body is rigid and the other can deform plastically. Also, a plasticity size effect is observed, but the effect fades when the platen becomes more plastically deformable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate the plastic shear response during static friction of an asperity protruding from a large FCC single crystal. The asperity is in perfectly adhesive contact with a rigid platen and is sheared by tangentially moving the platen. Using discrete dislocation plasticity simulations, we elucidate the plastic shear behaviour of single asperities of various size and shape, in search for the length scale that controls the plastic behaviour. Since plasticity can occur also in the crystal, identification of the length scale that controls a possible size-dependent plastic behaviour is far from being trivial. It is found that scaling down the dimensions of an asperity results in a higher contact shear strength. The contact area is dominant in controlling the plastic shear response, because it determines the size of the zone, in and below the asperity, where dislocation nucleation can occur. For a specific contact area, there is still a dependence on asperity volume and shape, but this is weaker than the dependence on contact area alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discrete dislocation plasticity simulations are performed to investigate the role of interaction between neighboring asperities on the contact pressure induced by a rigid platen on a rough surface. The rough surface is modeled as an array of equispaced asperities with a sinusoidal profile. The spacing between asperities is varied and the contact pressure necessary to flatten the surface to a given strain is computed. Plasticity in the asperities and in the crystal below is described by the collective glide of dislocations of edge character. Results show that the mean contact pressure necessary to flatten closely spaced asperities is larger than that required to flatten widely separated asperities. A small dependence on asperity density is already observed for a purely elastic material, but it is enhanced for small asperities, in the presence of dislocation plasticity. Plastic strain gradients, dislocation limited plasticity and interaction between neighboring plastic zones all contribute to what we will call the asperity density effect. Since dislocation limited plasticity plays a dominant role, the asperity density effect will mainly be relevant for surfaces having small asperity roughness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]