Search

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve the prognosis of many cancers but cause immune‐related adverse events (IrAEs). Limited data are available on upper gastrointestinal (UGI) IrAEs. We describe the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and efficacy of medical therapy in patients with UGI IrAEs. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with UGI symptoms and moderate to severe endoscopic UGI lesions, occurring after ICI. Efficacy of induction medical therapy and at the most recent follow‐up was assessed. Results: Forty patients were included; of these, 34 (85%) received anti‐PD(L)1, either alone (n = 24) or combined with anti CTLA‐4 (n = 10). Eighteen patients (45%) had concomitant enterocolitis. All patients had severe endoscopic lesions (erosions, ulcerations, hemorrhage, or necrotic lesions). Three patients who received an inefficient initial medical treatment had a complicated course: One patient died of enterocolitis, one had a pneumomediastinum, and one developed an ulcerated stricture of the pylorus. Thirty‐five patients (88%) were treated with corticosteroids; 28 patients (80%) responded, and 20 (57%) reached clinical remission. Eight patients were treated with infliximab, and six responded (75%). After a median follow‐up of 11 months, 36 patients (90%) were in corticosteroid‐free clinical remission for their UGI symptoms. Endoscopic lesions persisted in 68% of patients. Conclusions: ICI cause severe UGI IrAEs, which are associated with enterocolitis in approximately half of the patients. Most patients with UGI IrAEs respond to corticosteroids or infliximab. These data support the recommendation to treat these patients without delay and in the same way as those with enterocolitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are currently no comparative data on the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) after anti-TNF therapy fails. We retrieved the full datasets of two observational, multicentre, retrospective studies of patients with UC for whom anti-TNF therapy failed and the patients were then treated with either vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission, clinical remission, treatment persistence, colectomy, hospitalization, and serious and infectious adverse events. Propensity scores weighted comparison was applied. In total, 121 patients were included in the vedolizumab group and 97 were included in the ustekinumab group. At week 14 and week 52, in the weighted cohort, no difference was found between vedolizumab and ustekinumab for steroid-free clinical remission (OR = 0.55 [0.21–1.41], p =.21 and 0.94 [0.40–2.22], p =.89, respectively). There was no difference between vedolizumab and ustekinumab for secondary outcomes such as clinical remission, hospitalization, UC-related surgery, treatment persistence and serious and infectious adverse events. In patients with UC for whom anti-TNF therapy failed, no difference was found between vedolizumab and ustekinumab after propensity scores weighted comparison. Further studies are required to determine predictive factors of the efficacy of both biological agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease remains challenging. Fibrin glue injection has previously shown short‐term efficacy in a randomized controlled trial. No long‐term data are available to assess the benefit of this treatment. Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included all patients with drained fistulas treated by at least one fibrin glue injection between January 2004 and June 2015 in three tertiary French centres. The primary end‐point was the rate of complete clinical remission at 1 year after injection defined by the closure of all fistula tracts with no need for iterative anal surgery or for optimization of immunosuppressants and/or biologics. Results: In all, 119 patients (median age 33 years, complex fistulas 65%, median previous anal surgery two, median Harvey Bradshaw score 3, immunosuppressants exposure 50%, anti‐tumor necrosis factor exposure 60% with median time of administration of 1.1 year) were analysed with a median follow‐up of 18.3 months. The complete clinical remission rate at 1 year was 45.4%. The primary end‐point was achieved in 63% of the cases in the combination therapy group and 37% in other patients. The only predictor of complete clinical remission at 1 year was combination therapy at the time of injection (P = 0.01). The rate of early reintervention after glue injection was 2.5%. The cumulative incidence of iterative anal surgery and ostomy in the whole population was 54% and 5.6% respectively at 5 years. Conclusion: An adjunct of fibrin glue to conventional medical therapy may be an effective and safe treatment for perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: There is no head‐to‐head trial comparing ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) refractory to anti‐tumour necrosis factor (anti‐TNF). Aim: To compare the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD refractory to anti‐TNF in a multicentre retrospective observational cohort. Methods: All consecutive patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti‐TNF who initiated either vedolizumab or ustekinumab were included between May 2014 and August 2018. Clinical remission, steroid‐free clinical remission (SFCR) and treatment persistence were assessed at week 48 with intention‐to‐treat analysis and propensity scores weighted comparison. Results: A total of 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 received vedolizumab. At week 48, ustekinumab was associated with a higher clinical remission rate (54.4% vs 38.3%; odds ratios, OR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.09‐3.39]) and treatment persistence (71.5% vs 49.7%; OR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.40‐4.62]) than vedolizumab. The rate of SFCR did not differ significantly between ustekinumab and vedolizumab (44.7% vs 34.0%; OR = 1.57, 95% CI [0.88‐2.79]). Subgroup analyses showed that ustekinumab was associated with a higher clinical remission rates at week 48 in patients with ileal location (OR = 3.49, 95% CI [1.33‐9.17) and penetrating behaviour (OR = 6.58, 95% CI [1.91‐22.68]). Regardless of the treatment group, combination therapy at initiation was associated with a higher clinical remission rate at week 48 (OR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.09‐3.43]). Conclusion: This study suggests that ustekinumab is associated with a higher rate of clinical remission and treatment persistence than vedolizumab after 48 weeks of follow‐up, in patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti‐TNF. The rate of SFCR was not significantly different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Case reports and series suggest hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may benefit some patients with Crohn disease.Objective: To evaluate the effect of autologous HSCT on refractory Crohn disease.Design, Setting, and Participants: Parallel-group randomized clinical trial conducted in 11 European transplant units from July 2007 to September 2011, with follow-up through March 2013. Patients were aged 18 to 50 years with impaired quality of life from refractory Crohn disease not amenable to surgery despite treatment with 3 or more immunosuppressive or biologic agents and corticosteroids.Interventions: All patients underwent stem cell mobilization before 1:1 randomization to immunoablation and HSCT (n = 23) or control treatment (HSCT deferred for 1 year [n = 22]). All were given standard Crohn disease treatment as needed.Main Outcomes and Measures: Sustained disease remission at 1 year, a composite primary end point comprising clinical remission (Crohn Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <150 [range, 0-600]), no use of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive or biologic drugs for at least the last 3 months, and no endoscopic or radiological evidence of active (erosive) disease anywhere in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary composite outcome and other measures of disease activity, laboratory results, quality of life and functional status, and GI tract imaging.Results: Twenty-three patients underwent HSCT and 22 received standard Crohn disease treatment (controls). Sustained disease remission was achieved in 2 patients undergoing HSCT (8.7%) vs 1 control patient (4.5%) (absolute difference, 4.2% [95% CI, -14.2% to 22.6%]; P = .60). Fourteen patients undergoing HSCT (61%) vs 5 control patients (23%) had discontinued immunosuppressive or biologic agents or corticosteroids for at least 3 months (difference, 38.1% [95% CI, 9.3% to 59.3%]; P = .01). Ten vs 2 patients had a CDAI less than 150 (remission) at the final evaluation, 8 (34.8%) vs 2 (9.1%) for 3 or more months (difference, 25.7% [95% CI, 1.1% to 47.1%]; P = .052). Eight (34.8%) vs 2 (9.1%) patients were adjudicated free of active disease on endoscopy and radiology at final assessment (difference, 25.7% [95% CI, 1.1% to 47.1%]; P = .054). There were 76 serious adverse events in patients undergoing HSCT vs 38 in controls. One patient undergoing HSCT died.Conclusions and Relevance: Among adult patients with refractory Crohn disease not amenable to surgery who had impaired quality of life, HSCT, compared with conventional therapy, did not result in a statistically significant improvement in sustained disease remission at 1 year and was associated with significant toxicity. These findings do not support the widespread use of HSCT for patients with refractory Crohn disease.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00297193. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) reintroduction in Crohn's disease (CD) after stopping for loss of response or intolerance. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study including adult patients with clinically (CD Activity Index >150) and objectively active luminal CD in whom IFX was reintroduced after at least 6 months of discontinuation. The reasons for the initial discontinuation could be a secondary loss of response or IFX intolerance. The reintroduction schedule included 3 IFX infusions at weeks 0, 4, and 8, after a systematic premedication. The primary end point was the efficacy of IFX retreatment at week 26 defined by a CD Activity Index of <150 in the absence of IFX discontinuation or use of corticosteroids, surgery, or other biologic. RESULTS: At week 26, 24 patients (35%) among the 69 analyzed reached the primary end point. No significant difference was observed between rates of clinical remission at week 26 in patients with prior LOR (n = 48) and those with IFX intolerance (n = 21) (35% and 33%, P = 0.87, respectively). Thirty-two acute infusion reactions were recorded in 27 patients, leading to withdrawal of IFX in 20 patients. No pharmacokinetic characteristic at baseline but detection of positive anti-drug antibodies at week 4 was predictive of IFX failure or infusion reaction at week 26. DISCUSSION: In this first prospective cohort study, IFX retreatment was safe and effective in one-third of the patients with CD, regardless the reason of prior discontinuation. Early detection of anti-drug antibodies can predict subsequent IFX reintroduction failure and infusion reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Active-comparator trials are important to inform patient and physician choice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with either ustekinumab or adalimumab in biologic-naive patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease.Methods: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, active-comparator, phase 3b trial (SEAVUE) at 121 hospitals or private practices in 18 countries. We included biologic-naive patients aged 18 years or older with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score of 220-450, who had not responded to or were intolerant to conventional therapy (or were corticosteroid dependent) and had at least one ulcer of any size at baseline endoscopic evaluation. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; via an interactive web response system) to receive ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg intravenously on day 0, then 90 mg subcutaneously once every 8 weeks) or adalimumab (160 mg on day 0, 80 mg at 2 weeks, then 40 mg once every 2 weeks, subcutaneously) through week 56. Study treatments were administered as monotherapy and without dose modifications. Patients, investigators, and study site personnel were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were in clinical remission (CDAI score <150) at week 52 in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03464136, and EudraCT, 2017-004209-41.Findings: Between June 28, 2018, and Dec 12, 2019, 633 patients were assessed for eligibility and 386 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab (n=191) or adalimumab (n=195). 29 (15%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group and 46 (24%) of 195 in the adalimumab group discontinued study treatment before week 52. There was no significant difference between the ustekinumab and adalimumab groups in the occurrence of the primary endpoint; at week 52, 124 (65%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group versus 119 (61%) of 195 in the adalimumab group were in clinical remission (between-group difference 4%, 95% CI -6 to 14; p=0·42). Safety for both groups was consistent with previous reports. Serious infections were reported in four (2%) of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group and five (3%) of 195 in the adalimumab group. No deaths occurred through week 52 of the study.Interpretation: Both ustekinumab and adalimumab monotherapies were highly effective in this population of biologic-naive patients, with no difference in the primary outcome between the drugs.Funding: Janssen Scientific Affairs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]