Search

Objective: To identify prognostic factors for the effectiveness of needle aspiration of calcific deposits (NACD) for rotator cuff calcific tendinitis (RCCT) METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients with symptomatic RCCT were included in a prospective cohort study. Pain (VAS), shoulder function (SST and DASH), and quality of life (EQ-5D) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-NACD. Univariate analyses (independent t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests depending on the distribution of data) were performed to build a multivariable linear regression model. Stepwise regression analysis through backward elimination was performed to evaluate the effect of predefined prognostic factors on the outcome.Results: Patients who underwent multiple NACD procedures had less reduction of pain (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a larger reduction in VAS pain scores at 3 months post-NACD was associated with a larger reduction in VAS pain scores at 12 months (p < 0.01). More improvement of SST and DASH scores at 3 months was associated with better SST, DASH, and EQ-5D scores at 12 months (p < 0.01). Smaller-size calcific deposits were associated with less improvement of DASH (p = 0.03) and EQ-5D scores (p = 0.01). A longer duration of symptoms prior to NACD was associated with less improvement of EQ-5D scores (p = 0.01).Conclusions: A good initial response after NACD is associated with better outcomes at 12 months. Patients with a longer duration of symptoms prior to NACD and patients who require multiple procedures showed inferior outcomes in terms of pain reduction and improvement of quality of life. Smaller-size calcific deposits are associated with a less favorable outcome of shoulder function and quality of life scores and might therefore be less susceptible for NACD.Key Points: • A good initial response to NACD is associated with a better outcome in the longer term. • A longer duration of symptoms and the need for multiple NACD procedures are associated with inferior outcomes. • Smaller-size calcific deposits seem less susceptible for NACD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although needle aspiration of calcific deposits (NACD) has proven to be an effective treatment for calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff (CTRC) in patients who are resistant to conservative treatment, little is known about the effectiveness of NACD in terms of complete relief of symptoms and the effectiveness of repeated NACD procedures. Furthermore, analyses of complications of the procedure in large series are scarce.Methods: 431 consecutive patients with symptomatic CTRC treated by NACD were included in this retrospective cohort study. Short-term effects were assessed at two weeks post-treatment by using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The six months outcome was determined on a dichotomous symptom scale (symptom free or persistence of symptoms). NACD procedures performed within six months of a previous NACD procedure were considered repeated procedures. All complications that occurred within six months of the NACD procedure were registered.Results: At two weeks post-treatment, a significant improvement of pain scores was noted (mean reduction of NRS: 4.4 points; p<0.001). 74% of patients had complete relief of symptoms at six months post-treatment. 143 (33.2%) patients required multiple treatments. These repeated procedures were equally effective as the primary procedure. Complications of the NACD procedure were seen in 31 (7.2%) patients: 21 patients (4.9%) developed a subacromial bursitis, seven patients (1.6%) a frozen shoulder and three patients (0.7%) developed a septic bursitis.Conclusion: Needle aspiration of calcific deposits (NACD) is an effective treatment for calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff in the majority of patients. Approximately one third of the patients will require multiple treatments, which were equally effective as the primary procedure. Based on this, patients should not be withheld a second or even a third treatment in case of persistent symptoms. Furthermore, NACD has a low complication rate, the risk of infection should, however, always be accounted for.Level Of Evidence: Retrospective study, level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]