Search

Background: Evidence suggests that people with disabilities are more likely to suffer from depression. Previous studies have focused on depressive disorders in specific disability types or age groups using small-scale cross-sectional samples. We investigated longitudinal trends in the prevalence and incidence of depressive disorders according to disability types and severity levels in the entire Korean adult population. Methods: The age-standardised prevalence and incidence of depressive disorders were investigated using National Health Insurance claims data from 2006 to 2017. The odds of depressive disorders by type and severity were examined using logistic regression after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities based on merged 2006 to 2017 data. Results: Both the incidence and prevalence of depressive disorders were higher among the disabled than the non-disabled, with the prevalence gap being larger than the incidence gap. In regression analyses, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities considerably reduced the odds ratios, particularly for incidence. The severity of disabilities was inversely associated with the incidence of depressive disorders. Brain injury and disabilities in major internal organs were associated with lower odds of developing depressive disorders than in non-disabled individuals. Conclusions: A significant proportion of depressive disorders in disabled individuals are caused by financial hardships or comorbidities rather than disabilities themselves. We must pay special attention to those who cannot access healthcare services due to severe disabilities and those whose depressive disorders are misdiagnosed as intellectual disabilities. More research is required to elucidate the causal mechanisms underlying depressive disorders in people with various types and severities of disabilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few studies have examined the association between disability and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We compared the trends in the annual COPD prevalence between people with and without disabilities, and examined the association between disability and COPD. We linked the National Health Information Database (2008–2017) with the National Disability Registration Database, which includes more than 2 million people with disabilities every year. In the 2017 dataset, people with disabilities had a higher prevalence of COPD than those without disabilities (30.6% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.001). The age-standardized prevalence rate of COPD among people without disabilities increased from 4.2 in 2008 to 10.9% in 2017 (change of 6.7%), whereas that among those with disabilities increased from 7.0 to 17.1% (change of 10.1%). In multivariate analysis, compared to people without disabilities, those with disabilities had a higher probability of having COPD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval 1.42–1.43). The results of subgroup analysis by disability characteristics suggested that disabilities due to failure of an organ, such as the kidney, lung, heart, or liver, and severe disabilities were particularly vulnerable to COPD. In conclusion, people with disabilities are more likely to have COPD compared to people without disabilities. Further longitudinal studies that examine cause-and-effect relationship between disability and COPD are needed to clarify this relationship and to further investigate any potential negative effects associated with the coexistence of these conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the 10‐year trends in the prevalence of osteoporosis according to disability grade and type compared with those without disabilities in South Korea. We linked national disability registration data with the National Health Insurance claims data. Age‐ and sex‐standardized prevalence of osteoporosis were analyzed from 2008 to 2017 according to sex, disability type, and disability grade. Adjusted odds ratios for osteoporosis according to disability characteristics in the most recent years' data were also confirmed by multivariate analysis. Over the past decade, the prevalence of osteoporosis has increased in people with disabilities compared with people without disabilities, and the gap has gradually widened from 7% to 15%. By analysis of the most recent year data, both male and female individuals with disabilities had a higher risk of osteoporosis than those without disability (odds ratios [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70–1.73 in males; OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.27–1.28 in females); the multivariate‐adjusted OR was especially prominent in disability related to respiratory disease (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.93–2.21 in males; OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.60–1.90 in females), epilepsy (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.78–2.61 in males; OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.53–1.91 in females), and physical disability types (OR 2.09, 95% CI 2.06–2.21 in males; OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.69–1.71 in females). In conclusion, the prevalence and risk of osteoporosis have increased in people with disabilities in Korea. In particular, the risk of osteoporosis increases significantly in people with respiratory diseases, epilepsy, and physical disability types. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyzed the patterns of diagnosis, treatment, and prognoses of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with and without disabilities. The data were collected from the National Disability Database, the Korean Central Cancer Registry, and the Korean National Health Insurance claim database. We built a cohort of 2 776 450 people with disabilities and a nondisabled cohort of 8 329 350 people who were selected at a ratio of 1:3 by matching age and sex. From this population, adult patients who were diagnosed with AML were analyzed. The number of patients with AML were 26.74 per 100 000 in people without disabilities and 20.39 per 100 000 in those with disabilities (P <.0001). The proportion of AML patients receiving chemotherapy and those of patients receiving transplants were significantly lower in the disabled population than that of nondisabled populations (71.2% vs 77.1%, P =.0031, and 17.5% vs 26.9%, P =.002). This trend was more pronounced in subgroups of communication disability and major internal organ disorder. The median survival was 10.8 months for patients with disabilities, which was significantly shorter than 17.1 months for those without a disability (P =.002). Individuals with disabilities have a low diagnosis rate of AML and undergo less active treatment, which results in inferior prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health disparities among individuals with disabilities remain underrecognized. The objective of the current study was to investigate: 1) whether disparities exist in breast cancer screening rates among women with disabilities compared with women without disabilities; 2) whether breast cancer screening rates vary according to the type and severity of disabilities; and 3) trends in breast cancer screening disparities according to disability status over time.Methods: Using national administrative databases concerning disability status and national cancer screening programs in Korea, age-standardized participation rates were calculated according to the type and severity of disabilities.Results: The age-standardized rate for breast cancer screening in individuals with disabilities increased from 30.2% in 2006 to 53.7% in 2015 (change of +23.5%), whereas that among those without a disability increased from 29.3% to 60.1% (change of +30.8%). In general, disability was associated with slightly lower breast cancer screening rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.824; 95% CI, 0.820-0.828). However, screening rates were especially low in women with severe disabilities (aOR, 0.465; 95% CI, 0.461-0.469) and among women with autism (aOR, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.143-0.388), renal failure (aOR, 0.342; 95% CI, 0.337-0.348), brain injury (aOR, 0.349; 95% CI, 0.346-0.352), intellectual disabilities (aOR, 0.403; 95% CI, 0.397-0.410), mental disorders (aOR, 0.494; 95% CI, 0.488-0.501), or ostomies (aOR, 0.529; 95% CI, 0.512-0.546).Conclusions: Even without a cost barrier, significant disparities were found in breast cancer screening participation, especially in women with severe disabilities and brain-related and/or mental disabilities. Policy efforts, such as ensuring the accessibility of information and equipment, transportation support, and access to a usual source of care, should be made to decrease this disparity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]