Search

During the 1990-1998 diphtheria epidemic in the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union, more than 150,000 infections and 5,000 deaths occurred. During this period, more than 10 million trips were made from Finland to Russia or vice versa. This resulted in only 10 cases of diphtheria in Finland. There was no secondary spread to healthcare workers or other close contacts. Three patients had severe respiratory tract diphtheria. All three were middle-aged men who had made a short visit to Russia, during which time they had intimate contact with local women. These findings suggest diphtheria was transmitted mainly by direct saliva contact. All patients with severe diphtheria had a non-protective level of antitoxin antibodies during the first days of the disease. Only the patient whose antibody titre rose rapidly to a protective level (>1 IU/ml) had an uncomplicated recovery. The other two, one of whom died, had myocarditis and severe polyneuropathy.

A major diphtheria epidemic affecting the whole population of St. Petersburg started in 1990. During the period of 1991 to 1995, 4600 patients with clinical respiratory tract diphtheria were treated in Botkin's Hospital. From 112 (2.4%) of these patients only a nontoxigenic strain of Corynebacterium diphtheriae was isolated. Three patients with this strain who were suffering from clinical disease consistent with classical toxic diphtheria died. All had myocarditis, two had asphyxia due to membrane formation in the lower respiratory tract, and one had severe polyneuritis. In two patients the causative agent was of the biotype mitis and in the third intermedius, whereas the prevailing epidemic strain was of the biotype gravis. As the clinical presentation of the disease in the three patients who died was typical of toxic diphtheria, it is considered likely that the immunodiffusion test for toxin production in vitro may fail to detect strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae producing toxin in vivo.

An epidemic of respiratory tract diphtheria began in Russia in 1989. In 1994 more than 2,500 cases occurred in St. Petersburg alone. We describe clinical findings in the 1,860 adult patients treated in Botkin's Hospital. The study is based on a retrospective review of patient records. In 98% of the patients the diagnosis was confirmed by a positive throat culture growing a toxin producing strain of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. A catarrhal disease without membranes was present in 1,256 (67.5%) patients, 150 patients had membranes on tonsils only, 268 patients on tonsils, the uvula, soft palate and posterior pharynx and 35 patients on larynx or in the lower respiratory tract. 42 patients (2.3%) died. Among the deceased patients 26 were alcoholics, whereby the death rate for non-alcoholics was probably around 1%. 151 patients (8.1%) had a toxic form of the disease with swelling of the neck. This form of the disease carried a high mortality, 25.7%. In a subgroup of 1,045 patients the protective efficacy of vaccination could be evaluated. A 2.2-fold protection was found, but the study may underestimate the efficacy. We conclude, that if a wide diphtheria epidemic affects an industrialized country, it would probably not any more be the big killer that it was in Europe and in the United States in the 1950's and 1960's.

We report the first case of diphtheric myocarditis documented by serial electrocardiography and echocardiography. The electrocardiographic changes preceded the contraction abnormalities by 3 weeks. During a prolonged neurologic disease with extensive polyneuropathy, the patient had only subtle clinical signs of myocarditis. In patients with diphtheria, electrocardiographic changes may warrant repetitive echocardiographic examinations.