Search

Aims: To compare preconception use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2i) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4i) inhibitors to sulfonylurea agents, and associated peri-conceptional A1c concentration, and risk of pregnancy loss and congenital anomalies., Methods: This population-based cohort study used administrative datasets for all of Ontario, Canada, and included women eligible for free medication coverage and who achieved a recognized pregnancy from April 2007-November 2021. Exposure was a SGLT2i, DPP4i or sulfonylurea (referent) dispensed at least 90 days preconception. Study outcomes included differences in periconceptional A1c; miscarriage, induced abortion, or stillbirth; and any congenital anomaly - the latter two outcomes assessed using propensity score overlap weighting., Results: The mean (SD) periconceptional A1c was 8.1 % (2.0) among those prescribed any sulfonylurea, compared with 8.3 % (2.0) with a DPP4i and 7.8 % (1.6) with any SGLT2i. The risk of pregnancy loss was lowest among those exclusively prescribed a SGLT2i (relative risk [RR] 0.51, 95 % CI 0.22 to 0.91). Risk of a congenital anomaly at birth did not differ significantly comparing DPP4i or SGLT2i to sulfonylurea agents., Conclusions: Neither SGLT2i nor DPP4i use before pregnancy was associated with a difference in A1c, or a higher risk of selective adverse outcomes, compared to sulfonylureas. Future larger studies are required, including assessment of medication use after conception, during the critical period of embryogenesis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: REG reports receiving research grants to his institution, membership of advisory boards and receiving honoraria for CME talks from Astra Zeneca within the past 3 years. REG is the Chief Scientific Officer and a shareholder of Fibrocor Therapeutics, and owns shares in Certa and OccuRx. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) and Canadian Institute for Health Information. The analyses, conclusions, opinions, and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred. This document used data adapted from the Statistics Canada Postal Code(OM)Conversion File, which is based on data licensed from Canada Post Corporation, and/or data adapted from the Ontario MOH Postal Code Conversion File, which contains data copied under license from ©Canada Post Corporation and Statistics Canada.This Study is also based in part on data provided by Better Outcomes Registry and Network (“BORN”), part of the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not necessarily represent those of BORN Ontario. We thank IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc. for use of their Drug Information File., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Evidence from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) for newer antidiabetic drugs is increasingly influencing revised recommendations for second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This systematic review aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of newer antidiabetic drugs specified as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) for T2D in a second-line setting., Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, and all relevant published studies were searched comprehensively in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and International Health Technology Assessment database published from April 2023. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 reporting checklists., Results: We included 28 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Overall reporting of the identified studies largely met CHEERS 2022 recommendations. The CORE and Cardiff models were the most frequently utilized for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in T2D. Four studies consistently discovered that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than GLP-1RA in T2D who were not adequately controlled by metformin monotherapy. Four studies compared GLP-1RA with DPP-4i, sufonylurea (SU), or insulin. Except for one that demonstrated SU was cost-effective, all were GLP-1RA. Five studies revealed that SGLT2i was more cost-effective than DPP-4i or SU. Eleven studies indicated that DPP-4i was more cost-effective than traditional antidiabetic drugs. Four additional studies explored the cost-effectiveness of various antidiabetic drugs as second-line options, indicating that SU, SGLT2i, or meglitinides were more economically advantageous. The most common driven factors were the cost of new antidiabetic drugs., Conclusion: Newer antidiabetic drugs as second line are the cost-effective option for T2D from the cost-effectiveness perspective, especially SGLT2i., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Aims: Sodium load increases endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels in humans. Therefore, patients with an increased amount of dietary sodium intake are supposed to have higher endogenous GLP-1 levels compared to those with less dietary sodium intake. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with more dietary sodium intake show better dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) effect on glycemic control because of the expected higher GLP-1 level. Thus, we performed a single-center cohort study to explore this idea., Methods: Medical records of patients with T2DM prescribed DPP-4i in the last 11 years were investigated. Dietary sodium intake was measured before the DPP-4i prescription with Tanaka's formula using casual spot urine samples. The effect of DPP-4i on glycemic control was estimated by the subtraction of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) before DPP-4i initiation from HbA1c 1 year after DPP-4i administration. We analyzed 50 patients., Results: DPP-4i improved HbA1c by -0.41% ± 0.66%. The effect of DPP-4i on glycemic control was significantly negatively correlated with the dietary sodium intake (r = -0.400). Thus, the more dietary sodium intake, the better the glycemic control by DPP-4i., Conclusions: Thus, patients can expect better plasma glucose control by DPP-4is if patients are taking increased dietary sodium intake., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Research Trust of DiabetesIndia (DiabetesIndia) and National Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (N-DOC). Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies have suggested that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors increase the risk of development of bullous pemphigoid (BP), which is the most common autoimmune blistering skin disease; however, the associated mechanisms remain unclear, and thus far, no therapeutic targets responsible for drug-induced BP have been identified. Therefore, we used clinical data mining to identify candidate drugs that can suppress DPP4 inhibitor-associated BP, and we experimentally examined the underlying molecular mechanisms using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs). A search of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and the IBM ® MarketScan ® Research databases indicated that DPP4 inhibitors increased the risk of BP, and that the concomitant use of lisinopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, significantly decreased the incidence of BP in patients receiving DPP4 inhibitors. Additionally, in vitro experiments with hPBMCs showed that DPP4 inhibitors upregulated mRNA expression of MMP9 and ACE2 , which are responsible for the pathophysiology of BP in monocytes/macrophages. Furthermore, lisinopril and Mas receptor (MasR) inhibitors suppressed DPP4 inhibitor-induced upregulation of MMP9. These findings suggest that the modulation of the renin-angiotensin system, especially the angiotensin1-7/MasR axis, is a therapeutic target in DPP4 inhibitor-associated BP., Competing Interests: KNo is employed by Japan Tobacco Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Nozawa, Suzuki, Kayanuma, Yamamoto, Nagayasu, Shirakawa and Kaneko.)

Background: Preclinical data have shown the immunomodulatory effects of metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors in patients with diabetes. However, its clinical impact remains unclear in lung cancer., Methods: Between 2017 and 2021, 466 patients received ICI monotherapy. Patients were categorized into concurrent (MET; metformin or combination of metformin and DPP4 inhibitor) and without concomitant (NMET; nonmetformin/DPP4 inhibitors) administration of metformin and DPP4 inhibitors groups at least 8 weeks before and during ICI therapy. The primary objectives were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The second objective was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)., Results: Among 466 patients, 89 (19.0%) and 377 (81%) were categorized into the MET and NMET groups, respectively. MET group had a significantly higher ORR (MET group: 24.7% vs. NMET group: 14.8%, p = 0.025) and longer PFS than those in the NMET group (MET group 5.1 month vs. NMET group 2.8 months, p = 0.018). After patients were stratified based on the prior line of therapy and PD L1 expression status, the PFS of the second-line therapy and PD L1 ≥50 was significantly higher in the MET than in the NMET group. The proportion of patients experiencing all-grade irAEs was numerically higher in the MET group (19.1%) than in the NMET group (14.3%), without statistical significance (p = 0.382)., Conclusions: Concurrent use of metformin and DPP4 inhibitors with ICIs significantly improved the clinical outcomes without increasing the incidence of irAEs in NSCLC., (© 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the association between dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) and the incidence of neoplasm in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: Pubmed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrial.gov website were searched from May 2002 to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials with reports of neoplasm events which compared DPP-4i versus non-DPP-4i users., Results: Generally, DPP-4i was associated with a decreased incidence of overall neoplasm events in patients with T2D when compared with non-DPP-4i agents (OR = 0.91, 95%CI, 0.8 to 0.97). Moreover, the incidence of rectal neoplasm, especially rectal malignant neoplasm, and the incidence of skin neoplasm were significantly decreased in DPP-4i users. The overall neoplasm events were less frequent in DPP-4i users who were elderly, or male, or obese, or Caucasian, or with over 10 years of diabetes, or with follow-up duration over 52 weeks., Conclusions: DPP-4i was associated with decreased risks of overall neoplasm, rectal neoplasm, rectal malignant neoplasm and skin neoplasm in patients with T2D. The overall neoplasm events were less frequent in patient with DPP-4i treatment who were elderly, male, obese, Caucasian, with long diabetes durations and with long follow-up durations. Further investigations are still required., Meta-Analysis Registration: CRD42021273627.

Background/aims: We aimed to define an optimal target population and drug-specific biomarkers that may predict dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor responses in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)., Methods: An exploration study (study I) was performed using three different NAFLD models (basket study design; high-fat diet [HFD], methionine choline-deficient diet [MCD], and high-cholesterol Western diet [WD] models). RNA transcriptome analysis was performed on pre-studied liver tissues to identify biomarkers that could predict the response to DPP-4 inhibitors. In the validation study (study II), the HFD-induced NAFLD model was divided into high and low hepatic insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (Igfbp-1) groups based on the pre-study liver biopsy., Results: DPP-4 inhibitor attenuated the NAFLD activity score and fibrosis stage in the HFD model but not in the WD and MCD models. The overall response rate was 19% across the modified basket NAFLD trial and 42%, 25%, and 0% in the HFD, WD, and MCD models. Hepatic Igfbp-1 expression was higher in the responder group than in the non-responder group in pre-study biopsy samples. In contrast, hepatic Igfbp-1 expression was lower in the responder group than in the non-responder group in the end-study biopsy samples. DPP-4 inhibitor response rates were 83% and 17% in the baseline hepatic high Igfbp-1 and low Igfbp-1 groups, respectively. Hepatic messenger RNA Igfbp-1 expression was positively correlated with serum IGFBP-1 levels., Conclusion: The DPP-4 inhibitor response was higher in the HFD phenotype and pre-treatment levels of hepatic or serum IGFBP-1 were high.

Aims: To date, no clinical studies have compared once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors in terms of glucose variability (GV) and oxidative stress (OS)., Methods: Thirty-six patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors for at least 12 weeks were randomized to either continue once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors or receive omarigliptin, a once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitor, for 24 weeks. The primary end points were changes in the diacron-reactive oxygen metabolite (d-ROMs) test, a marker of OS, and GV using flash glucose monitoring. The secondary end point was changes in the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) scores., Results: There were no significant group differences in d-ROMs and DTSQ scores after 24 weeks of treatments. However, omarigliptin was superior to once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors in controlling fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and time in range (TIR). Although FPG and TIR were unchanged at 24 weeks after switching to omarigliptin, these parameters increased in the group receiving maintenance therapy with once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors. No statistically significant changes in hemoglobin A1c were observed between the two groups., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that switching from once-daily DPP-4 inhibitors to omarigliptin may be efficacious for maintaining FPG and TIR in T2DM patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aims: Higher bullous pemphigoid (BP) risk has been reported to be associated with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i). The aim of this study is to examine the association between BP risk and DPP4i treatment., Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database between 2000 and 2015. 124,619 diabetic patients who were receiving DPP4i therapy were matched 1: 1 with diabetic patients who had never received DPP4i by age, sex, duration of diabetes, insulin usage, and propensity score-matching of comorbidities., Results: The 6-year cumulative incidence of BP in the DPP4i-treated cohort was significantly higher than that in the non-DPP4i group (0.74 per 1000 vs 0.38 per 1000, P = 0.001). Modified Cox regression analysis revealed that DPP4i treatment (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.18-3.91, P = 0.01), age (HR: 1.06, P < 0.001), renal disease (HR: 2.32, P < 0.001), and metformin user (HR: 1.93, P = 0.006) were associated with increased BP risk., Conclusions: DPP4i users had a 2.2-fold increase in the risk of BP, and the risk was the highest in those with concomitant use of DPP4i and insulin., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To investigate the effect of anagliptin (Ana), a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, on acute ischemia-induced bladder dysfunction in rats., Methods: Eight-week-old female Wistar-ST rats were randomly assigned into four groups: (a) sham; (b) ligation (Lig); (c) Lig + Ana; and (d) Lig + Liraglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonist; Lira). Rats in the Lig, Lig + Ana, and Lig + Lira groups underwent ligature of the bilateral internal iliac arteries. Ana was orally administered mixed with the CE-2 diet. Lira was subcutaneously administered once a day. Blood glucose levels, plasma dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) activity, GLP-1 levels, and bladder function were measured in all groups. Bladder blood flow was measured in the sham, Lig, and Lig + Ana groups, 4 weeks postsurgery., Results: No differences in blood glucose levels among the groups were observed. DPP-4 activity decreased in the Lig + Ana group (P < .01). GLP-1 levels in the Lig + Ana and Lig + Lira groups were higher than those in the sham and Lig groups (P < .01). Intercontraction intervals (ICIs) were longer in the Lig and Lig + Lira groups than in the sham group (P < .05), but similar to those observed in the Lig + Ana and sham groups. The Lig group exhibited reduced bladder blood flow relative to the sham group (P < .01); however, this measure improved in the Lig + Ana group (P < .01)., Conclusions: Ana administration improved ICIs and bladder blood flow after acute bladder ischemia through a GLP-1 receptor-independent signaling pathway, without altering the blood glucose levels. Therefore, Ana dosing might be useful to prevent ischemia-induced bladder dysfunctions., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background and Aims: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a well-recognized independent risk factor for ASCVD, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, on prevention of progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) in T2DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-center, open-label, blinded end point, controlled 18-month study in patients with CAD and T2DM. A total of 149 patients, who had at least 1 atherosclerotic plaque with 20%-80% luminal narrowing in a coronary artery, and had not undergone intervention during a clinically indicated coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, were randomized to sitagliptin group (n = 74) or control group (n = 75). Atherosclerosis progression was measured by repeat 3D-QCA examination in 88 patients at study completion. The primary outcome was changes in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from baseline to study completion measured by 3D-QCA. Secondary outcomes included change in 3D-QCA-derived total atheroma volume (TAV) and late lumen loss (LLL)., Results: The primary outcome of PAV increased of 1.69% (95%CL, -0.8%-4.2%) with sitagliptin and 5.12% (95%CL, 3.49%-6.74%) with the conventional treatment (p = 0.023). The secondary outcome of change in TAV in patients treated with sitagliptin increased of 6.45 mm 3 (95%CL,-2.46 to 6.36 mm 3 ) and 9.45 mm 3 (95%CL,-4.52 to 10.14 mm 3 ) with conventional treatment (p = 0.023), however, no significant difference between groups was observed (p = 0.175). Patients treated with sitagliptin had similar LLL as compared with conventional antidiabetics (-0.06, 95%CL, -0.22 to 0.03 vs. -0.08, -0.23 to -0.03 mm, p = 0.689)., Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, treatment with sitagliptin resulted in a significantly lower rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared with conventional treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declared they do not have anything to disclose regarding conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Teneligliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Japan in 2012. However, clinical trials of teneligliptin involved limited numbers of elderly patients. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of teneligliptin in elderly patients with T2DM., Methods: This 3-year follow-up RUBY surveillance registered patients with T2DM who started treatment with teneligliptin between May 2013 and February 2015 in Japan. Collected data included demographics, treatments, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and laboratory variables. Data were analysed for patients in three age subgroups (< 65, ≥ 65 to < 75, or ≥ 75 years old). Safety was assessed as the incidence of ADRs and efficacy was assessed in terms of glycaemic control, for up to 3 years., Results: The ADRs and serious ADRs occurred in 3.35% and 0.65% of 4596 patients aged < 65 years, in 4.42% and 1.22% of 3371 patients aged ≥ 65 to < 75 years, and in 3.99% and 1.69% of 2729 patients aged ≥ 75 years. The most common ADRs in patients aged ≥ 65 to < 75 years and ≥ 75 years were gastrointestinal disorders, but the incidence of these ADRs did not show an age-dependent increase. Hypoglycaemia occurred in 0.24%, 0.56%, and 0.29% of patients in each age subgroup, respectively. The least-squares mean changes in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) adjusted for baseline were - 0.66 ± 0.02% (n = 2177), - 0.72 ± 0.02% (n = 1689), and - 0.77 ± 0.03% (n = 1161) at 3 years., Conclusion: There was no clear difference in the number of ADRs among the three age subgroups, although the incidence of serious ADRs was higher in elderly patients than in patients aged < 65 years. We found no additional safety or efficacy concerns among elderly patients beyond those already described in the package insert. The present results support the use of teneligliptin in elderly patients with T2DM in real-world clinical practice., Trial Registration: Japic Clinical Trials Information identifier, Japic CTI-153047.

Introduction: Teneligliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor that was approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Japan in 2012. We performed a long-term post-marketing surveillance (RUBY) to obtain real-world evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of teneligliptin in Japan., Methods: This 3-year follow-up RUBY surveillance registered patients with T2DM who started treatment with teneligliptin between May 2013 and February 2015 in Japan. Collected data included demographics, treatments, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and laboratory variables. Data were evaluated in all patients and in patients divided according to baseline renal function across categories of estimated glomerular filtration rate (G1-G5) and dialysis. Safety was assessed as the incidence of ADRs and efficacy was assessed in terms of glycaemic control, for up to 3 years., Results: Of 11,677 patients registered, 10,696 and 10,249 were evaluable for safety and efficacy analyses, respectively. The median duration of exposure was 1096 days. ADRs occurred in 412 patients (3.85%) and were serious in 117 patients (1.09%). The most frequent ADR class was gastrointestinal disorders (0.68%), which included constipation. There were no new ADRs warranting attention beyond those already described in teneligliptin's package insert. ADRs and serious ADRs in renal function subgroups occurred in 3.24-7.14% and 0.65-5.36% in G1-G5, and 4.49% and 1.92% in patients on dialysis, respectively. Reduction in HbA1c was sustained for 3 years after starting teneligliptin (- 0.70% ± 1.36%, p < 0.001 at 3 years). The least-squares mean changes in HbA1c adjusted for baseline were - 0.76% to - 0.66% in G1-G5 at 3 years. Glycated albumin levels decreased in patients on dialysis (- 2.92% ± 4.78% at 3 years)., Conclusion: There were no new safety or efficacy concerns about teneligliptin used in long-term, real-world, clinical settings in patients with T2DM with any stages of renal impairment., Trial Registration: Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center clinical trials database identifier: Japic CTI-153047. Plain language summary available for this article.

Aim: To examine the effect of oral diabetes medication on the risk of dementia in an elderly cohort with type 2 diabetes., Methods: This was a population-based cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance claims data from 2002 to 2013. Elderly subjects (60 years of age or older) with and without type 2 diabetes were included; patients with new-onset type 2 diabetes were further divided into the oral diabetes medication group and no-medication group., Results: Among 278,290 patients with type 2 diabetes, 56,587 developed dementia (20.3%) over 11 years of follow-up. Type 2 diabetes was associated with a 1.69-fold increased risk of dementia (95% CI 1.66-1.72). Among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, the risk of dementia was lower in the oral diabetes medication group than in the no-medication group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79; 95% CI 0.77-0.81). Lower risk of dementia was particularly noticeable in all of the combination therapy groups and especially lower in the combination therapy group treated with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.45-0.51)., Conclusion: Overall, the use of oral diabetes medication in type 2 diabetes patients significantly decreased the risk of dementia., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are controversial. There is no information on the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with DM. We evaluated the effects of alogliptin on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Methods: Blood pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were measured before and after 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment with alogliptin in 22 hypertensive patients with T2DM., Results: After 3, 6, and 12 months, alogliptin treatment decreased hemoglobin A1c from 7.0 ± 0.97% to 6.4 ± 0.61%, 6.3 ± 0.58%, and 6.3 ± 0.75% (P < 0.01, respectively), glucose from 8.6 ± 4.39 mmol/l to 7.05 ± 2.16, 7.05 ± 2.28, and 6.44 ± 1.50 mmol/l (P < 0.01, respectively), systolic blood pressure from 137 ± 18 mm Hg to 127 ± 13, 125 ± 15, and 120 ± 17 mm Hg (P < 0.01, respectively), diastolic blood pressure from 79 ± 13 mm Hg to 74 ± 8, 74 ± 10, and 70 ± 8 mm Hg (P < 0.01, respectively) and baPWV from 1,947 ± 349 cm/second to 1,774 ± 259, 1,856 ± 361, and 1,756 ± 286 cm/second (P < 0.01, respectively). A baseline baPWV value of 1,643 cm/second was the optimal cut-off value for patients who had reduced blood pressure after treatment with alogliptin (sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 75.0%)., Conclusions: Alogliptin was associated with improvements not only in glucose metabolism but also in blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients with T2DM. The cut-off value of baPWV may enable identification of responders of decrease in blood pressure by alogliptin in hypertensive patients with T2DM., Clinical Trials Registration: Registration Number for Clinical Trial: UMIN000007722., (© American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2019. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims/introduction: Recent data showed that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors exert a lipid-lowering effect in diabetes patients. However, the mechanism of action is not yet clearly understood. We investigated the effect of anagliptin on cholesterol metabolism and transport in the small intestine using non-diabetic hyperlipidemic animals, to clarify the mechanisms underlying the cholesterol-lowering action., Materials and Methods: Male apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-deficient mice were orally administered anagliptin in the normal chow. Serum cholesterol levels and lipoprotein profiles were measured, and cholesterol transport was assessed by measuring the radioactivity in the tissues after oral loading of 14 C-labeled cholesterol ( 14 C-Chol). In additional experiments, effects of exendin-4 in mice and of anagliptin in DPP-4-deficient rats were assessed. Effects on target gene expressions in the intestine were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in normal mice., Results: The serum total and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations decreased after anagliptin treatment in the ApoE-deficient mice. The cholesterol-lowering effect was predominantly observed in the chylomicron fraction. The plasma 14 C-Chol radioactivity was significantly decreased by 26% at 2 h after cholesterol loading, and the fecal 14 C-Chol excretion was significantly increased by 38% at 72 h. The aforementioned effects on cholesterol transport were abrogated in rats lacking DPP-4 activity, and exendin-4 had no effect on the 14 C-Chol transport in ApoE-deficient mice. Furthermore, significant decreases of the intestinal cholesterol transport-related microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase 2, ApoA2 and ApoC2 messenger ribonucleic acid expressions were observed in the mice treated with repeated doses of anagliptin., Conclusions: These findings suggest that anagliptin might exert a cholesterol-lowering action through DPP-4-dependent and glucagon-like peptide 1-independent suppression of intestinal cholesterol transport., (© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is a novel group of medicine employed in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM),which improves meal stimulated insulin secretion by protecting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) from enzymatic degradation. Cardiovascular diseases are serious complications and leading causes of mortality among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Glycemic control per se seems to fail in preventing the progression of diabetic cardiovascular complications. DPP-4 has the capability to inactivate not only incretins, but also a series of cytokines, chemokines, and neuropeptides involved in inflammation, immunity, and vascular function. Pre-clinical studies suggested that DPP-4 inhibitors may have potential cardiovascular protective effects in addition to their antidiabetic actions. In recent years, a number of clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the effect of different DPP-4 inhibitors on the cardiovascular system. We herein review the available clinical studies in cardiovascular effects played by each DPP-4 inhibitor and discuss the prospective application of DPP-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular diseases., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To review the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on the wound healing and its mechanisms in chronic diabetic foot ulcers., Methods: The latest literature concerning DPP-4 inhibitors for chronic diabetic foot ulcers was extensively reviewed, as well as the potential benefit and mechanism of DPP-4 inhibitors on wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers was analyzed thoroughly., Results: DPP-4 inhibitors can accelerated the ulcer healing. The mechanisms probably include inhibiting the expression of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and restoring the balance of the wound MMP and the tissue inhibitors of MMP; promoting recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells and augmenting angiogenesis; optimizing extracellular matrix construction and the immune response to persistent hypoxia in chronic diabetes wounds, and so on. At present, clinical researches show that DPP-4 inhibitors may be considered as an adjuvant treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers., Conclusion: DPP-4 inhibitors show promise in the local wound healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. However, more strictly designed, adequately powered, long-term follow-up, and high-quality randomized control trials are needed to further verify their efficacy and safety for chronic diabetic foot ulcers.

Background: No conclusive evidence has been obtained yet on the significance of the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4 inhibitor) treatment on the arterial stiffness in clinical settings. In addition, the effects of good glycemic control on the arterial stiffness have also not been clarified yet. As a sub-analysis of the PROLOGUE study, we examined the effect of a DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin) on the 2-year progression of the arterial stiffness and also to determine the effect of good glycemic control on the rate of progression of the arterial stiffness., Methods: In the PROLOGUE study, the study participants were either allocated to add-on sitagliptin treatment or to continued treatment with conventional anti-diabetic agents. Among the 463 participants of the PROLOGUE study, we succeeded in measuring the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) at least two times during the 2-year study period in 96 subjects., Results: The changes in the baPWV during the study period were similar between the both groups (i.e., with/without staglipitin), overall. On the other hand, when the study subjects were divided into two groups according to the glycemic control status during the study period {good glycemic control group (GC) = hemoglobin (Hb)A1c <7.0 at both 12 and 24 months after the treatment randomization; poor glycemic control group (PC) = HbA1c ≥7.0 at either 12 months, 24 months, or both}, the 2-year increase of the baPWV was marginally significantly larger in the PC group (144 ± 235 cm/s) as compared to that the GC group (-10 ± 282 cm/s) (p = 0.036)., Conclusion: While the present study could not confirm the beneficial effect of sitagliptin per se on the arterial stiffness, the results suggested that good glycemic control appears to be beneficial for delaying the annual progression of the arterial stiffness. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000004490.

Background: As a sub-analysis of the PROLOGUE study, we evaluated the long-term effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, on endothelial function in the conduit brachial artery in patients with type 2 diabetes., Methods: In the PROLOGUE study, patients were randomly assigned to either add-on sitagliptin treatment (sitagliptin group) or continued conventional antihyperglycemic treatment (conventional group). Among the 463 participants in the PROLOGUE study, FMD was measured in 17 patients in the sitagliptin group and 18 patients in the conventional group at the beginning and after 12 and 24 months of treatment., Results: HbA1c levels were significantly decreased after 12 and 24 months of treatment compared to baseline values in both groups (7.0 ± 0.4 vs. 6.6 ± 0.3 and 6.6 ± 0.4 % in the sitagliptin group; 7.0 ± 0.6 vs. 6.6 ± 0.7 and 6.6 ± 0.7 % in the conventional group; P < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference between FMD values at baseline and after 12 and 24 months in the sitagliptin group (4.3 ± 2.6 vs. 4.4 ± 2.1 and 4.4 ± 2.3 %, P = 1.0, respectively). Although FMD had a tendency to increase from 4.3 ± 2.4 % at baseline to 5.2 ± 1.9 % after 12 months and 5.1 ± 2.2 % after 24 months in the conventional group, there was no significant difference between FMD values at baseline and after 12 and 24 months (P = 0.36 and 0.33, respectively)., Conclusions: Add-on sitagliptin to conventional antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes did not alter endothelial function in the conduit brachial artery measured by FMD during a 2-year study period. Sitagliptin may be used without concern for an adverse effect on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes., Trial Registration: University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center: ID UMIN000004490.

Over the past two decades, therapeutics for diabetes have evolved from drugs with known heart failure risk to classes with potential benefit for patients with heart failure. As many as 25 to 35 % of patients with heart failure carry a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, newer drug classes including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GIP-1) agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are being examined for cardiovascular safety as well as their effects on left ventricular function, quality of life, and other measures of disease progression. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing evidence on these classes of anti-diabetic agents in patients with heart failure.

Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, was the first in its class to receive approval from the US FDA in 2006 for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. It has been evaluated in numerous clinical trials and has several attractive features as an antidiabetic agent, including a low risk for hypoglycemia, a neutral effect on weight, and an ability to be used in chronic kidney disease and more. This article provides an up-to-date discussion of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of sitagliptin.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors suppress the metabolism of the potent antihyperglycemic hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). DPP4 was recently shown to provide cardioprotection through a reduction of infarct size, but the mechanism for this remains elusive. Known interactions between DPP4 and adenosine deaminase (ADA) suggest an involvement of adenosine signaling in DPP4 inhibitor-mediated cardioprotection. We tested whether the protective mechanism of the DPP4 inhibitor alogliptin against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury involves GLP-1- and/or adenosine-dependent signaling in canine hearts. In anesthetized dogs, the coronary artery was occluded for 90 min followed by reperfusion for 6 h. A 4-day pretreatment with alogliptin reduced the infarct size from 43.1 ± 2.5% to 17.1 ± 5.0% without affecting collateral flow and hemodynamic parameters, indicating a potent antinecrotic effect. Alogliptin also suppressed apoptosis as demonstrated by the following analysis: 1) reduction in the Bax-to-Bcl2 ratio; 2) cytochrome c release, 3) an increase in Bad phosphorylation in the cytosolic fraction; and 4) terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling assay. This DPP4 inhibitor did not affect blood ADA activity or adenosine concentrations. In contrast, the nonselective adenosine receptor blocker 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8SPT) completely blunted the effect of alogliptin. Alogliptin did not affect Erk1/2 phosphorylation, but it did stimulate phosphorylation of Akt, glycogen synthase kinase-3β, and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB). Only 8SPT prevented alogliptin-induced CREB phosphorylation. In conclusion, the DPP4 inhibitor alogliptin suppresses ischemia-reperfusion injury via adenosine receptor- and CREB-dependent signaling pathways., (Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.)