Search

Abstract Oysters are frequently associated with norovirus outbreaks, but the presence of norovirus RNA in oysters does not necessarily imply a health risk to humans. There is a close link between human illness and consumption of oysters with high levels of norovirus RNA, but oysters with low levels of norovirus RNA are more unlikely to be associated with illness. Reliable and precise quantification methods are therefore important for outbreak investigations and risk assessments. This study optimised and validated RT droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) assays for quantification of norovirus genogroups I and II in artificially contaminated oysters, and compared them with the standard method, RT real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The two methods had comparable 95% limits of detection, but RT-ddPCR generally showed greater precision in quantification. Differences between fluorometric measurements and quantification with RT-ddPCR were determined on in vitro transcribed RNA with targets for norovirus genogroups I and II. Quantification by RT-ddPCR was on average 100 times lower than the fluorometric value for norovirus GI and 15.8 times lower than the fluorometric value for norovirus GII. The large inter-assay difference observed highlights the need for monitoring the RT efficiency in RT-ddPCR, especially when results from different assays are compared. Overall, this study suggests that RT-ddPCR can be a suitable method for precise quantification of norovirus genogroups I and II in oysters. Highlights • RT droplet digital PCR and RT real-time PCR for quantification of norovirus GI and GII in oysters were validated • The two methods had comparable 95% limits of detection • RT droplet digital PCR had greater precision in quantification than RT real-time PCR [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A new assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis A virus was designed. • The new assay displayed better inclusivity than the assay recommended by ISO 15216−1. • The assay was validated for RT droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) and RT real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). • RT-ddPCR had greater precision than RT-qPCR, especially between runs. • Due to the high precision, RT-ddPCR should be considered as an alternative to RT-qPCR. Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is mainly transmitted via contaminated food or water or through person-to-person contact. Here, we describe development and evaluation of a reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) and reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay for detection of HAV in food and clinical specimens. The assay was evaluated by assessing limit of detection, precision, matrix effects, sensitivity and quantitative agreement. The 95 % limit of detection (LOD95 %) was 10 % higher for RT-ddPCR than for RT-qPCR. A Bayesian model was used to estimate precision on different target concentrations. From this, we found that RT-ddPCR had somewhat greater precision than RT-qPCR within runs and markedly greater precision between runs. By analysing serum from naturally infected persons and a naturally contaminated food sample, we found that the two methods agreed well in quantification and had comparable sensitivities. Tests with artificially contaminated food samples revealed that neither RT-ddPCR nor RT-qPCR was severely inhibited by presence of oysters, raspberries, blueberries or leafy-green vegetables. For this assay, we conclude that RT-qPCR should be considered if rapid, qualitative detection is the main interest and that RT-ddPCR should be considered if precise quantification is the main interest. The high precision of RT-ddPCR allows for detection of small changes in viral concentration over time, which has direct implications for both food control and clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]