1. Comparable Postprandial Amino Acid and Gastrointestinal Hormone Responses to Beef Steak Cooked Using Different Methods: A Randomised Crossover Trial.
- Author
-
Prodhan UK, Pundir S, Chiang VS, Milan AM, Barnett MPG, Smith GC, Markworth JF, Knowles SO, and Cameron-Smith D
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Eating, Fasting blood, Healthy Volunteers, Humans, Male, Postprandial Period, Young Adult, Amino Acids blood, Cooking methods, Dietary Proteins blood, Gastrointestinal Hormones blood, Red Meat
- Abstract
Cooking changes the texture and tenderness of red meat, which may influence its digestibility, circulatory amino acids (AA) and gastrointestinal (GI) hormonal responses in consumers. In a randomised crossover intervention, healthy males ( n = 12) consumed a beef steak sandwich, in which the beef was cooked by either a pan-fried (PF) or sous-vide (SV) method. Plasma AA were measured by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), while plasma GI hormones were measured using a flow cytometric multiplex array. Following meat ingestion, the circulatory concentrations of some of the essential AA (all the branched-chain AA: leucine, isoleucine and valine; and threonine), some of the nonessential AA (glycine, alanine, tyrosine and proline) and some of the nonproteogenic AA (taurine, citrulline and ornithine) were increased from fasting levels by 120 or 180 min ( p < 0.05). There were no differences in circulating AA concentrations between cooking methods. Likewise, of the measured GI hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations increased from fasting levels after consumption of the steak sandwich ( p < 0.05), with no differences between the cooking methods. In the healthy male adults, protein digestion and circulating GI hormone responses to a beef-steak breakfast were unaltered by the different cooking methods., Competing Interests: A.M.M, M.P.G.B. and S.O.K. are employees of AgResearch Limited. The other authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF