Search

This study tests the hypothesis that a high-fat postnatal diet increases fat mass and reduces improved insulin sensitivity (IS) found in the low-protein model of maternal undernutrition. Offspring from Wistar dams fed either a 20% (control (CON)) or 8% (low protein (LP)) protein diet during gestation and lactation were randomly assigned to a control (con) or cafeteria (caf) diet at weaning (21 days) until 3 months of age at which point IS was measured (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp). Fat mass, growth, energy intake (EI) and expenditure (EE), fuel utilization, insulin secretion, and leptin and adiponectin levels were measured to identify a possible role in any changes in IS. IS was increased in LP-con in comparison to CON-con animals. Cafeteria feeding prevented this increase in LP animals but had no effect in CON animals (insulin-stimulated glucose infusion rates (GIRs; mg/min/kg); CON-con: 13.9 +/- 1.0, CON caf: 12.1 +/- 2.1, LP-con: 25.4 +/- 2.0, LP-caf: 13.7 +/- 3.7, P < 0.05). CON-caf animals had similar percent epididymal white adipose tissue (%EWAT; CON-con: 1.71 +/- 0.09 vs. CON-caf: 1.66 +/- 0.08) and adiponectin (microg/ml: CON-con: 4.61 +/- 0.34 vs. CON-caf: 3.67 +/- 0.18) except hyperinsulinemia and relative hyperleptinemia in comparison to CON-con. Differently, LP-caf animals had increased %EWAT (LP-con: 1.11 +/- 0.06 vs. LP-caf: 1.44 +/- 0.08, P < 0.05) and adiponectin (microg/ml: LP-con: 5.38 +/- 0.39 vs. LP-caf: 3.75 +/- 0.35, P < 0.05) but did not show cafeteria-induced hyperinsulinemia or relative hyperleptinemia. An increased propensity to store visceral fat in LP animals may prevent the elevated IS in LP offspring.

Aim: The aim was to assess two macronutrient interventions in a 2 × 2 factorial dietary design to determine their effects on oral health. Materials and Methods: Participants (65–75 years old) with a body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2 of a larger randomized control trial who consented to an oral health assessment were recruited. They had ad libitum access to one of four experimental diets (omnivorous higher fat or higher carbohydrate, semi‐vegetarian higher fat or higher carbohydrate) for 4 weeks. The periodontal examination included periodontal probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing. Oral plaque and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were collected before and after the intervention. Results: Between baseline and follow up, the number of sites with a CAL <5 mm (mean difference [MD] −5.11 ± 9.68, p =.039) increased and the GCF amount (MD −23.42 ± 39.42 Periotron Units [PU], p =.050) decreased for the semi‐vegetarian high‐fat diet. For the mean proportion of sites with PPD reduction of >1 mm and CAL gain of >1 mm, significant differences were calculated between the diets investigated. The clinical parameters were not associated with changes in the oral microbiota. Conclusions: The results of this study provided evidence that a semi‐vegetarian high‐fat diet provides benefits to clinical parameters of periodontal health. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ACTRN12616001606471). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, populations are ageing with significant impact on health patterns. Studies have shown that low protein, high carbohydrate diets are associated with more favourable outcomes. Plant-based diets have also been shown to have a positive impact on cardiometabolic health, weight loss and prevention of all causes of mortality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study is to assess the main and interactive effects of two macronutrient interventions in a 2×2 factorial dietary design to determine their effects on appetite and health outcomes in older individuals. METHODS: Individuals aged 65 to 75 with a BMI between 20 and 35 kg/m2 were recruited. Participants were provided with ad libitum access to one of four diets for four weeks, designed as a 2×2 factorial. Each dietary treatment provided 14% of energy as protein, which was either omnivorous or semi-vegetarian in origin. The remaining complement of macronutrient energy (80–82%) was either relatively high in fat (37–41% of energy) and low in carbohydrates (41–43%), or vice versa (28–29% fat with 53% carbohydrate). Study diets were provided via a meal delivery company. Self-completed questionnaires, biospecimen and clinical assessments were collected before and after intervention to assess cardio-metabolic, oral and gut health, body composition and physical performance. RESULTS: Trial status is currently ongoing (sample and data analyses). CONCLUSIONS: This study will help determine whether protein-source (plant vs animal) and fat to carbohydrate ratio have an impact on predictors of healthy ageing. These findings will also create a sound foundation on which to base nutritional interventions in older individuals to support healthy ageing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]