Search

Background: Excessive alcohol (ethanol) consumption, such as binge drinking, is extremely commonplace and represents a major health concern. Through modeling excessive drinking in rodents, we are beginning to uncover the neurobiological and neurobehavioral causes and consequences of this pattern of ethanol intake. One important factor for modeling binge drinking in mice is that they reliably drink to blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) of 80 mg/dl or higher. Drinking‐in‐the‐dark (DID) is a commonly used mouse model of binge drinking, and we have shown that this method reliably results in robust ethanol front‐loading and binge‐level BECs in C57BL/6J (B6) mice and other ethanol‐preferring mouse strains/lines. However, establishing the DID model in a new vivarium space forced us to consider the use of rodent diet formulations that we had not previously used. Methods: The current set of experiments were designed to investigate the role of two standard rodent diet formulations on binge drinking and the development of ethanol front‐loading using DID. Results: We found that BECs in animals maintained on LabDiet 5001 (LD01) were double those found in mice maintained on Teklad 2920x (TL20). Interestingly, this effect was paralleled by differences in the degree of front‐loading, such that LD01‐fed mice consumed approximately twice as much ethanol in the first 15 min of the 2‐h DID sessions as the TL20‐fed mice. Surprisingly, however, mice that developed front‐loading during maintenance on the LD01 diet continued to display front‐loading behavior after being switched to the TL20 diet. Conclusions: These data emphasize the importance of choosing and reporting diet formulations when conducting voluntary drinking studies and support the need for further investigation into the mechanisms behind diet‐induced differences in binge drinking, particularly front‐loading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]